February 3, 2011, - 1:13 pm

Study: US Men Now Officially Chicks; Women Now America’s Men

By Debbie Schlussel

For years, on this site and elsewhere, I’ve been an unfortunate observer of how America’s men are becoming chickified and and America’s women are becoming masculinized.  And now a new study shows this disturbing trend now dominates America.  Researchers studying over 5,000 men and women found that men–more than at any time before in America–are more interested in love, marriage and children;  and that women want more “independence” in their relationships and feel that “hooking up” and one-night stands aren’t just meaningless sexual encounters.  (Yeah, you keep telling yourself that, sluts.)

Girlie-Man Nation: The Transformation Is Complete

So, basically, it’s official.  We’ve become a nation in which men are women with a sperm supply.  And women are the new men with the inconvenience of a womb and periods.  It’s so sad.  And, as I’ve noted before, nations like this–matriarchies never last.  The dustbin of history is filled with all of them, all failures.  It’s not the kind of society that will beat the Islamic threat, but the kind of society that will sadly embrace it, as the void of masculinity for men continues and they yearn and find it elsewhere.

Findings show men are more interested in love, marriage and children than their peers in earlier times; women want more independence in their relationships than their mothers did; and hooking up and one-night stands aren’t necessarily meaningless sexual encounters.

The researchers say the nationally representative survey of more than 5,000 men and women is the largest and most comprehensive study of single adults to date. And it reveals a sea change in gender expectations.

“Men are now expressing some traditionally female attitudes, while women are adopting some of those long attributed to men,” says biological anthropologist Helen Fisher, who helped develop the survey with social historian Stephanie Coontz and Justin Garcia, a doctoral fellow with the Institute for Evolutionary Studies at Binghamton (N.Y.) University.

Not sure how this is “evolution.” More like DE-volution and regression.

“For me, as a historian, it’s just amazing confirmation about what has changed in the last 40 years,” says Coontz, professor of history and family studies at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash.

Yes, an “amazing confirmation” of how far America has fallen in the last 40 years. If you don’t think there’s a correlation between the rise in ignorance and failure in math and science, the breakdown of the American family and society mores, and just overall decline in America since 1970 AND the feminist revolution, you’re simply a moron. Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan may have been derided and mocked. And the Equal Rights Amendment might have lost. But they won. They won. The fact that women are the new men, and men are the new women in America is the ultimate victory for the NOW hags. Again, they won.

The online survey of singles ages 21 and older was conducted by market research firm MarketTools for the Dallas-based dating website Match.com. Fisher, a research professor at Rutgers University, is a scientific adviser for a division of Match.com.

Data show men are quicker to fall in love and more likely than women to want children: 54% of men say they have experienced love at first sight, compared with 44% of women; among singles without children under 18, more men (24%) than women (15%) say they want children.

And, across every age group, women want more independence than men in their relationships: 77% of women say having their personal space is “very important,” vs. 58% for men; 78% of women say the same about having their own interests and hobbies (vs. 64% for men). And 35% of women (vs. 23% of men) say regular nights out with the guys/girls are important.

Kathleen Gerson, a sociology professor at New York University who did not participate in the survey, says the attitudes echo her findings on 18- to 32-year-olds born in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, which reflect “a blurring of gender boundaries.”

“Men do feel more empowered to acknowledge their desires for commitment and their desires for connection,” says Gerson, author of The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family, out in March.

That’s a sugar-coated, euphemism-filled, diplomatic way of telling the truth, which is that men are feeling more empowered to be girlie. Admit it. That’s what she’s saying. Whip out the lipstick, guyliner, man-blouses, and frilly lace for men. Sounds like there’s now a huge market.

The title of her book makes it clear that feminists are celebrating because this is a huge victory for them. There’s a reason her book title is “Unfinished Revolution.” The ultimate goal of the feminist revolution is that men are relegated to female roles and women become the men. That’s happened. The only thing left to “finish” the revolution is to gloat . . . and find a way to have kids without sperm.

Sherri Langburt of New York, founder of SingleEdition.com, a lifestyle website for singles, says she has noticed the changes in what men and women ask the site’s panel of experts.

“Men are writing us more about the emotional relationships than women. Women are writing us about the one-night stands,” Langburt says. “Women are (asking) if it’s OK — ‘Can I have a one-night stand?’ Men are writing, ‘I’m single and I’m lonely and want to find love and can’t admit it to anyone.’ ” . . .

The 5,199 singles surveyed include the never married (56%), divorced (31%), widowed (10%) and separated (3%) who were not in a serious relationship at the time. Of the total, 5% were gay or lesbian; 4% were bisexual; and 0.1% identified as transgender.

Among other findings . . . .

•Hookups and one-night stands can turn into partnerships. Thirty-five percent have had a one-night stand that turned into a long-term relationship.

Like I said, you keep telling yourself that, sluts. Sorry, but that number sounds very high. It’s basically a bunch of lying women not wanting to admit the truth–to themselves or those conducting the study. The world doesn’t operate like the predictable, unrealistic movie, “No Strings Attached” (read my review).

The survey did not define a “hookup” for participants, but Garcia’s research calls it “a sexual encounter between people who are not dating or in a relationship, and where a more traditional romantic relationship is not an explicit condition of the encounter.”

Regardless, it’s pretty clear that there’s no coincidence that a declining masculinity in men and an increasing masculinity in women is happening at the same time as America is declining in every aspect more than ever.

Chickified men = chickified–and failed–America.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

54 Responses

So when men have one night stands with women they’re pigs that use women but when women do it, it’s because they’re empowed to “blur the gender boundaries”? Wow.

My prediction for the next chickification move is a motto. I’m betting that some TV show – probably Glee or something similar – will come out with “Gay is the new straight!”

Sean on February 3, 2011 at 1:28 pm

Pretty much Sean. A 40-something woman is allowed to fawn over young males, such as the ones in Twilight who were underage, or have one night “empowering” stands with men and it is ok because it satisfies their urges but if a male dares to look at a woman the wrong way it is sexual harassment.

Ken Blazek on February 3, 2011 at 1:41 pm

This is totally ridiculous. Get over yourself and your rigid view of the way society needs to be. Nobody is going to take your femininity away from you! Shut up, grow up and worry about real problems, like the economy, unemployment rate, crime, war, child abuse, and poverty.

Meg on February 3, 2011 at 2:07 pm


    You obviously are not a regular reader and don’t know the background of the arguments. Debbie continually deals with social issues because of their ramifications on society. Social values affect almost all of the issues you mentioned.

    Economy- (I’ll include health care.) One in 5 Americans has herpes. The statistics are about the same for HPV. The number one killer of middle aged women in this country is cervical cancer. 70% of cervical cancer comes from HPV. The economic and social costs of rampant disease and death are staggering.
    All of this, because the liberals say that you can have “Safe sex.” They lie. A condom does not stop herpes or HPV. There is no safe sex other than lifelong faithful marital sex.

    Crime: The crime statistics of broken or single parent homes are exponentially higher than in traditional two parent homes.

    War: War is an abstract that we cannot control on an individual level. Violence is a controllable factor. Violence is statistically much higher in broken homes.

    Child abuse: Once again-much higher in single or broken homes.

    Poverty: The poverty rates of single parent homes are much higher than traditional two parent families. The parasitic economic effects of welfare increase taxes on employers and employees thereby raising the cost of doing business. This then hurts the economy and raises unemployment.

    You say the topic is totally ridiculous. Moral decisions have real world consequences.

    You say that she needs to shut up, grow up, and worry about real issues. I would suggest instead that you would study economics, history, sociology, and religion.

    westward wanderer on February 3, 2011 at 2:52 pm

      Westward, if you really believe that the problems in our society are are simple and one-dimensional as that…you’re gravely mistaken. And you’re the one telling me to study? Please.

      Sean, I won’t impress rigid gender roles upon my kid(s). I don’t care if my future daughters want to do traditionally “masculine” things or vice versa. I just want them to be healthy, happy, self-sufficient, productive members of society. I couldn’t care less if they don’t fit your stereotypical gender roles.

      Meg on February 3, 2011 at 4:52 pm


        I hope you enjoy your social security and medicare that you won’t get because there won’t be enough kids born to become future workers and pay for them.

        Marriage exists to provide a stable environment to raise kids. It can be used for other relationship types, but THAT’S the purpose.

        And there is not one major Western power breeding above replacement, and except the US, all are breeding below. Gerontocracies don’t last, either.

        Occam's Tool on February 3, 2011 at 6:02 pm

        I apologize for assuming that you were uneducated on the topics. I assumed by your use of the terms, “shut up”, “grow up”, and “get over yourself” in your argumentation, that you had little of value to contribute to the discussion and were thereby resorting to ad hominem attacks. I may have misinterpreted poor manners for a poor education.

        Your response to all of my statistically verifiable points was pretty insightful as well. I hope you can see that writing off my points by saying my interpretation of the data is “simple and one-dimensional” is not the strongest rebuttal.

        westward wanderer on February 3, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    By the way, Meg, that’s what we’re worrying about. Have you checked the data on the disintegration of the American family in Middle Class America lately? Recommend the University of Virginia’s The State of Our Unions.

    Incidentally, I’m a board certified psychiatrist. Cleaning up the debris of the society you advocate is what I do for a living. I’ve forgotten more about disintegration of families than you will ever know.

    Occam's Tool on February 3, 2011 at 6:09 pm

Does this mean that it’s open season for those of us men who aren’t “chickified” and don’t want love,marriage or children?

Can we have our cake and eat it too?
I may consider relocating to a city where this is most prevalent and it has a high female to male ratio.
Love ’em and leave ’em baby!
Hit and run!

This basically how I remember the women from the 60’s to be.
Bra burning,self empowering feminists.
I knew a few who were quite open about their sexuality.
Except back then men were masculine and macho.

ebayer on February 3, 2011 at 2:12 pm

Coontz has a long history as an anti-American rabble-rouser, going back to the 60s. She was a leader of the movement against the war in Vietnam, and saw this movement as an instrument of weakening our country, in that instance, benefiting the Communists; now the benefit goes to the Muslims. To my knowledge she has never renounced the anti-American views she has held.

It is a symbol of the intellectual and moral degeneration of our society that a person like this can be considered a respected commentator.

I wonder if she says anywhere that the women themselves should pay for the babies and diseases they get from these encounters.

Little Al on February 3, 2011 at 2:14 pm

I see the trend toward more effeminate men in the form of shaving body hair and so forth. I noticed one of my favorite UFC fighters, Shane Carwin, had even taken the hair off his knuckles due to the close up of an article. I realized that a lot of the young fighters are doing that whole shaved everything look. But there’s probably 2 men on the entire planet that could give Carwin a competetive fight before being knocked totally out. He’s married and well educated but still he went for the hairless look.
One thing won’t change. The better trained, armed a guy is, the more manly. Period. On the side of the road with a flat tire at 12am. I am pretty safe, because might still equals safe.
To accentuate this fact, my female boss, 8 yrs ago or so, had a flat in the parking lot at work. She’s got all this authority but it’s freezing out with a few inches of snow and a tow truck is at least 1-2 hrs away. Nobody out of 10 guys could break the nut on that wheel to change it. I get out a little late and after another guy stood on the tire iron, I got it loose and changed the tire. It was a better night for her that a GUY could muscle a rusted piece of metal. Her authority could not free that flat. Lot’s of people out there with their degrees will write about anybody can pay for an ape to do that stuff but if it happens on the side of a road around 12am and the woman or effeminate male has nothing but an ice scraper, I’d rather be the manly guy.

samurai on February 3, 2011 at 2:28 pm

Excellent article.

Meg and many,many other women cannot see what is happening in America today. American women today have become absolute pigs in retail establishments and in public.
When I hear women talking about their periods or performed fellatio on some fellow in a retail establishment, I am ready to throw up.

Manners from women,forget it.

I have really had to defend myself after a traffic accident because the police were ready to come down on me and let the woman off the hook. I have had to fight the woman and her insurance company to get payment from them for what she did.

At any job that I have had in the last 20 years, if women customers do not get their way in retail, they will gladly report a man in heartbeat and tell a few lies to go with it.

Compete against a woman for a job…a man may as well forget it.

Yes Debbie, the Feminization of America is in full gear and America is going to pay a terrible price.

Pat on February 3, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    Ha, it’s almost funny how inaccurate that is. I have a degree in this so at least I can say I have studies this extensively and know the stats. Do you?

    T. on February 17, 2011 at 3:43 am

Maybe this is why I have fantasies about Janet Reno in a string bikini? My values are all twisted around, like a dog chasing his own tail?

Truth on February 3, 2011 at 3:16 pm

You won’t find this man feminized. If my future girlfriend wanted me to wear her panties all day to express my unconditional love to her, she can forget it. I will not revoke my mancard for her anytime in my life.

Bobby on February 3, 2011 at 3:27 pm

Meg, I want to ask you a question, do you want your son to act like you and his sister(s)? Do you want your boyfriend or husband behave like you, his daughter(s) or his sister(s) or mother? I hope you don’t say yes to any of those questions I asked you. Debbie has a point on this issue, and I completely agree with her on this decision. I’ve heard some guys say that if your “clean cut, you don’t act too manly”, I completely disagree with that argument, I happen to be clean cut (less hair on my face, & body parts) and I act very manly and macho. Hell, I haven’t cried in nearly 15 years, it’s extremely hard for me to cry these days.

Now to women, I prefer women who are clean cut around their genitalia area (some men like women with hair down there, not me, I think it’s kinda gross), to me that’s a little more feminie, IMO, I think women should be clear cut on their body areas (expect for their scalp). It’s ok if some to most of you disagree with me on this little issue.

“A nation is identified by it’s borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on February 3, 2011 at 3:35 pm

Bobby, I agree with you, I to will NOT be feminized when I get a girlfriend and get married. That’s why I prefer conservative women over liberal women, conservative women like their men masculine, macho, etc., while liberal women on the other hand tend to want to act macho, feel a little superior to their male partners, and try to intimindate their male partners!

That’s why I when I go onto dating sites, I strictly go for conservative females between their early 20s-early 30s! And I also try to talk to some females, but NOT flirt with them (some women like it when men flirt with them) and clearly NOT to touch them inappropriately.

“A nation is identified by it’s borders, langauge & culture!”

Sean R. on February 3, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    Liberal women are pigs. They use men for one night stands until men rape them and beat the shit out of them to regain control and put their asses back in their place.

    Jake on September 23, 2012 at 2:23 pm

Debbie, I disagree with your conclusion. I think it is terrific that men are moving towards family values, such as marriage and children, since these are the true values that buttress a strong society.

The problem of course is that women are moving away from these values. Here lies the real issue. If only 15% of women are interested in having children, America will be left with an aging, less-productive society in just a generation or two.

L: It is, indeed, a good thing that men are moving toward family values, but not at the expense of women becoming like men. The former is useless with the latter. So, we don’t disagree. DS

Leah on February 3, 2011 at 3:44 pm

Love this thread!

I like to read the UK Daily Mail and they had an article that cracked me up…that woman see vegetarian men as “wimps”…even the veggie broads!

As an ex-vegetarian (I do hope to work my way back into being a veggie again!) I hafta agree with that. There is NOTHING more off-putting than a wimpy (beta) male. I just hate it! If you’re gay, you can be as girlie as hell and I don’t care, but just DON’T be a girlie-hetero…I hate it! (Men liking animals is endearing thou’. Just don’t cry about it.)

I wish more peeps thought like DS does. I regret Feminism and I see it now as a bunch of horrible broads whom became the horrible men they disdained.

It may NOT be fair, but yes, men can get away with more than women can. We call out the nasty men when we hafta. It’s no big deal that men and women are different.

(However I HATE when men think women who sleep with kids is not as bad as a man sleeping with kids. Both are disgusting and should be prosecuted EQUALLY.)

Skunky on February 3, 2011 at 4:06 pm

I miss the old days when men were Men and women and were men. And men would put women where they belong – the kitchen. The man was the head of the family with absolute power and the woman was at his service all the time. Boy do I miss those days! Now, go iron my t-shirt!

bbc on February 3, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    lmao @bbc

    I grew up during those days and let me tell you,my mom could hold her own against my dad.

    Not sure how this idea of an overbearing,woman hating family head developed,but I guarantee you it wasn’t the norm.

    Yes my mom cooked,but she loved seein my dad come home from work.
    And the six of us kids had chores,so we all took turns cleanin up the dinner dishes and such.

    ebayer on February 3, 2011 at 4:40 pm

American men are becoming emasculated by the power(s) that be whether it is the media or some public figure. Here is an example…at my former place of employment this poor shmuck was fired for telling a girl that she looked “great today” and nothing more. He wasn’t saying it in a d-bag way…just an honest comment. Ironically, this girl’s same circle of friends at work grab and touch the men all the time and NOTHING happens to them. If a guy were to tell HR that a female touched him wrong there is a good chance they would laugh at hime.

Imagine if a guy grabbed a woman’s backside at work…..he’d be placed in jail and all over the news….when a woman does it…she gets a medal.

Howard Segal on February 3, 2011 at 6:23 pm


I apologize for assuming that you were uneducated on the topics. I assumed by your use of the terms, “shut up”, “grow up”, and “get over yourself” in your argumentation, that you had little of value to contribute to the discussion and were thereby resorting to ad hominem attacks. I may have misinterpreted poor manners for a poor education.

Your response to all of my statistically verifiable points was pretty insightful as well. I hope you can see that writing off my points by saying my interpretation of the data is “simple and one-dimensional” is not the strongest rebuttal.

westward wanderer on February 3, 2011 at 6:46 pm

westward wanderer on February 3, 2011 at 6:49 pm

I doubt if that so called survey was an accurate picture of American men–I’d like to see the poll’s internals. It seems a group with a feminist agenda positions questions in such a way as to get answers favorable to their ideology. Quite often I’ve gone to upper class malls on a Saturday and noticed feminized males who can’t wait to go into our neutered public restrooms and change their kids diapers. Yet, when I’m in working class neighborhoods–white or black–I still see men who are proud and masculine. And I believe they’re still the majority. However, the liberal media along with the advertising world distorts this reality for their own purposes.

Jerry on February 3, 2011 at 9:25 pm

Debbie if it makes you feel better I think the survey is BS. I believe women are sluttier year by year but not that men have changed. They’ve always wanted to bang lots of women and afterwards have them turn into pizza and a six-pack. I am family oriented though. In fact if I were to date a hypothetical pretty blonde Jewish blogger who secretly likes me and neglects sports coverage I would be more than happy to knock her up as soon as possible since the child of Jewish parents is legitimate in the eyes of Israel. And my six-pack would be those smaller 12 oz bottles of Coke Zero.

A1 on February 3, 2011 at 10:09 pm

That did it!

I am going to go out and write my name in the snow without touching the snow!

Let’s see if you gals can do that.

Tanstaafl on February 4, 2011 at 9:21 am

Men conquered. Now zip your pants in the back.

CaliforniaScreaming on February 4, 2011 at 9:29 am

Debbie–no offense, but shouldn’t you be married and have children by now? You certainly have strong opinions about what others should be doing with their lives.

Bob on February 4, 2011 at 12:05 pm

I think I mentioned this once before on Debbies website regarding a similar story on this topic.

There exists a book entitled Warrior, King, Magician, Lover penned by noted Jungian Psychotherapist Dr. Robert Moore. which deals with masculine archetypes ovet time and thru present day applicability.

There also exists a Mens Action Network (MAN) called the Mankind Project which among other things has a national actually international program called The New Warrior Training Adventure.

The program has “solved” the problems Debbie frequently points out that besieges men in our society today for thousands of men who have been been courageous enough to step into it, and continues to do so…

Having reminded all of that little snippett of hope…

…ya know why cave men upon bashing their women on the head with their club, drag them off to their cave by their hair?…because if they drag them by the leg they would fill up with dirt…

hill billy on February 4, 2011 at 12:28 pm

Look at US Secretary of Homeland Security, and you know why Homeland is so Insecure: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Napolitano
As Americans now know, Janet, who should secure our borders, urged the congress and senate to vote against America’s immigration laws (DREAM Act): http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/12/02/napolitano-dream-act-helps-border-security
If America wanted a woman to head Homeland Security, why not a real American woman like Sue Myrick or our own Debbie?

Alert on February 5, 2011 at 1:19 pm

Pantyhose for men???
It’s all Joe Namath’s fault!!!
(for those old enough to remember:)

theShadow on February 5, 2011 at 8:44 pm

Look at any Law School Grad poster. Mostly women. But the fair sex seems to prefer Administrative Law. Standards-of-review nauseum. Yech!

Vlad the Muslim Impaler on February 6, 2011 at 5:07 am

Any connection between U.S. women and men, for the past ten years, has sadly fallen in to a pile of numb. How so? Well, there is a HUGE difference between sexually harassing someone and flirting, yet the lines are blurred. It is horrible. If I want to tell a man that he looks wonderful, I don’t want to watch him freak out thinking that my compliment means we have to get together. I know the difference between when a man is deliciously flirting with me versus being a predator. Viva la difference. Ah, that we all still remembered how to flirt and the rewards of that joy in the U.S.

Sophie Tucker on February 8, 2011 at 8:30 am

Sex is biological. Gender is a human construction. (As I thought most people are taught at some point in their education. I was). Just because you don’t want to follow the hyper genderized rules of our society, does not mean that the country is going to hell like this Debbie rhetoric wants everyone to believe. In fact, many liberated societies would believe the opposite. What happened to America’s love of freedom and expression? Does that only apply as long as you follow Debbie’s strict beliefs? If Debbie is such a fan of classic gender roles, why is she even on the computer typing her opinion? Shouldn’t she be in the kitchen somewhere? Shouldn’t she tirelessly be raising four kids? A woman with a political voice is not adhering to typical gender binaries by any means. Lastly, Debbie seems to love judging women and calling them “sluts” if they deviate from the nice, wholesome girl image. Well, ok, let’s use this stereotype for a second. The picture of Debbie at the top of this website shows a clear image of a woman with long, bleach blonde hair and TONS of makeup. (Lip liner much?) Now, according to popular standards, that image produces a certain connotation. Many people would assume that because she looks like that, she is nothing more than a slut. (Or at least a stripper). So, if Debbie is such a fan of judgment and rejecting sexualized female behavior, maybe she shouldn’t mirror her image off popular pornographic stars. Just a suggestion.

Kyle on February 17, 2011 at 3:57 am

If women are America’s men, I wouldn’t be in the Selective Service System. THIS AUTHOR had better to hell consider the fact that things are very very very far from equal from person to person, and that some things are FORCED in this sick country. I have a penis, so off to war I could go. Most likely I’d be fighting for the liberation of weak women… go figure. So from a U.S. man’s perspective, he’s made to be weak, he can get sent in whatever condition he’s in and do some damage in war, but then hopefully die so he is no longer a burden. It really is great strategy from the feminist and rich elite point-of-view… simply keep throwing logs to the fire…. because it can’t miss. I don’t remember any FEMALE ever requesting to register for the SSS. THUS, this whole deal here by this author is extremely, extremely insensitive and shallow.

With artificial sperm on the horizon, ALL of “manhood/fatherhood” could be gone.

We could outlaw in vitro-fertilization, but the ladies could still go to their drunk neighbor’s, refuse contraceptives, have him arrested for rape, take his money and half his life…. and still nothing changes from how life is exactly right now.

Women have the major upper hand in pursuit of the greatest life prospect (which is life) no matter what, until we can birth human beings start to finish purely from machines. After that, stuff gets pretty trivial in comparison. It should have been war in the country with men backlashing against all these eminence fronts (just because), but quite frankly, most of the women in the U.S. aren’t even close to being the most desirable in the world, probably next to last. The only reason men do as they do now here is because they cannot believe how backwards, fat, uncaring, childlike, irresponsible and delusional many females have become, but they are curious to see first-hand just how pathetic everyone really gets. That’s the truth. Once that’s satiated (which will be sooner than later) you’re talking about major trends of men going foreign for parenthood. I mean, our sluts aren’t even very desirable–those cat houses find the weirdest-looking transvestite-emulating wenches ever.

Jason on April 16, 2011 at 12:58 am

Coontz is well-known as one of the more extremist feminist/neo-communists out there. Hence, it’s no surprise that her “online” survey discovered exactly what she wanted it to or her positive reaction to it. What’s really surprising, and perhaps more disturbing than the survey results, is the poor state of the academic institutions that would allow the authors of such pathetic research to continue in their positions.

Scott on May 1, 2011 at 12:57 am

“The man was not made for the woman, but the woman for the man”-God

Ethan on September 30, 2011 at 10:49 pm

Forget everything you ever read on Freud. Eating female-hormones-shot-chicken-meat, the same you buy at your favorite supermarket on a weekly basis to feed your kids with, is doing the trick…, turning America’s male population into the gay ranks at a doubled pace, for they´re working on the upcoming of the chicken-consumer-rainbow generation. It´s all part of the wicked Gay Power Agenda in association with the Illuminati, the shapeshifting-carnivorous-lizard-like humanoids from the Eagle Constelation, and, of course, the chicken farmers, which, as everyone knows, are 99% gays, them being so close to the air-borned female-hormones-contaminated particles of chicken xit and feathers floating around in their working enviroment. It´s all explained, just Google The Homo Sapiens’ Fertility Rate Reduction EBE´s Manifesto, JFYI, in case you haven´t heard or read about all these iniquities before. God Save America (or what´s goona be left of it).

Charles on March 17, 2012 at 2:27 pm


    Carlos on January 24, 2013 at 1:01 pm

At first, I was interested in what you have to say. I am not a feminist or an MRA.

But the minute you called ‘those women’ sluts, you completely dropped the ball.

I stopped reading and do not care about anything else you have to say.

Naomi (@NaomiJChambers) on December 12, 2012 at 10:59 pm

Excellent. This is good news that men are becoming human beings instead of remaining unevolved. You called the women sluts, but it is MEN who ARE the true SLUTS. You forget that when MEN were MEN, this world was never safe or at peace. Now we can ex[pect some sanity, hopefully…

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 4:16 am

It is just sad to see board certified psychiatrists and such people defending idiotic nonsense. One would expect that they understand things for what they truly are rather than project patriarchal BS on gullible masses who are always ready believe anything that comes out the mouth of such board certified psychiatrists!!!

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 4:24 am

“All of this, because the liberals say that you can have “Safe sex.” They lie. A condom does not stop herpes or HPV. There is no safe sex other than lifelong faithful marital sex.”
Why is no one suggesting cutting down or abstaining from sex itself? Only those who are trying for kids should indulge in this disease ridden disease spreading activity called sex and once this purpose is achieved, they too can practice abstinence and focus on bringing up their kid like a human being. Most sexual indulgences and perversions lead to herpes and cervical cancers. To stay healthy, exchange of bodily fluids must be prevented, so all sexual activities including vaginal, oral, anal, etc. sex should stop. Why are people not being told to abstain from things that cause disease, while the world is obsessed with preventing smoking and use of narcotics? Anything that causes harm to others, like sex, should be the first to be banned. It causes diseases to all who indulge in it and it also causes diseases to the kids conceived from these so called unions. Cures to reduce the libido of men should be found, instead of finding ways to increase their virility. Over indulgence of anything is evil, so why is overindulgence in sex not treated as evil, and why is no action being taken to prevent it? Only people who spread this message can be treated as social worker, not those who spread myths and blame women for all their problems. Lets not forget that most problems on this planet are the result of men’s greed and lust.

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 4:46 am

“Crime: The crime statistics of broken or single parent homes are exponentially higher than in traditional two parent homes.”
Prevention of crime can be achieved if all men become feminized. All crimes are due to men’s greed and lust. If men were dedicated to family, there would be no broken homes. Expanding on previous point, prevention of sex will prevent the root cause of single parent families, by preventing production of kids. There is no guarantee that 2 parent homes will remain 2 parent homes forever. Any fine day, one or the other parent will walk out. So to prevent crime, one only has to prevent production of kids.

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 4:51 am

“Child abuse: Once again-much higher in single or broken homes.”
Again, prevention of child abuse can be achieved by the prevention of the production of kids. If there is no child, there obviously can’t be abuse of a child. The parents should be decent human beings and there is no guarantee that either is a decent person. So why would anyone want to allow such people to have kids is something the govt. should think about. They might come up with a process of evaluating prospective parents, and only allow those who are fit to become parents to have kids.

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 4:59 am

“Poverty: The poverty rates of single parent homes are much higher than traditional two parent families. The parasitic economic effects of welfare increase taxes on employers and employees thereby raising the cost of doing business. This then hurts the economy and raises unemployment.”
Even when there is NO money, people continue to reproduce. They cant take care of themselves, and they create more mouths to feed. This is why reproduction should require a permit. If there is poverty already present, how long will the 2 people stay together? Instead of blaming everything else, first blame the perpetrators. Anyone who cannot afford family should not have kids. And if the govt. is concerned, the govt. will make arrangements for people to reproduce. But people who can’t shoulder responsibility for themselves should never be allowed to reproduce.

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 5:03 am

Jake is a sick and violent man, should be locked up in a mental asylum asap…

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 5:12 am

bbc is even more nutty… high time he was shrinked…

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 5:15 am

btw, if men want kids they might as well take care of all the needs of their bloody kids themselves…

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 5:18 am

“The man was not made for the woman, but the woman for the man”
what a load of BULL!!! Only a blithering idiot can write such an airheaded statement. it certainly wasn’t written by god, cause god doesn’t exist, god was created by delusional men.

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 5:28 am

it is also true, ms. debbie does look HOT 🙂

Buffy on October 21, 2013 at 5:31 am

If law and order ever breaks down,women will be put back in their place.The rediculous laws in the west are preventing men from doing their duty:enforcing rules in own household.As soon as these stupid laws are done away with men will reassert the right to disapline their wives and children.

Darek on July 31, 2015 at 9:51 am

Feminists have also given us 56 million dead babies, about 99% of which have been butchered on the altar of their lifestyle’s convenience rather than for something like saving the life of the mother which is extremely rare.

Can someone please explain to me how am I supposed to view this situation without being paralyzed by cognitive dissonance? We have a situation in which the women of this country are considered both
1. so immature and irresponsible of pieces of shit that they just HAVE to be allowed to have their unborn children killed off so they don’t have to be bothered with facing the adult responsibilities their adult actions have brought about; yet
2. women are also supposed to be seen as being so mature and responsible of adults that they should be allowed to vote like a grown man?

How can someone be both? The answer: they obviously cannot. Adult responsibilities are not a coat that you can put on and take off as it suits your particular situation. Either women are so mature and responsible like a man that they should be allowed to vote like a man does or women are conversely so immature and irresponsible that they should be allowed an escape hatch from their adult responsibilities (even though that escape hatch comes at the cost of a dead human being) but should have no more right to vote in an election than an infant.

You can’t have it both ways feminists. Since 1973 you’ve tried mightily to have it both ways but I promise it will catch up with you. History will not see feminists as some kind of noble liberators of women. History will see feminists as being responsible for the most horrific abomination this country has ever suffered and as wretches who tried to get women to shirk the one claim to fame women have, childbirth/child rearing in exchange for… what? Getting to act like dudes with tits? Let me clue you in on something ladies, you’re not exactly killing it out there as dudes with tits…

Billy on April 25, 2017 at 6:14 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field