September 19, 2011, - 9:15 pm

Sad: TV Tonight is Choice Between Tranny “Chaz” & Glamorizing Playboy Club Hos

By Debbie Schlussel

Is it just me, or did you notice that the choices on TV tonight are worse than usual in terms of Hollywood pushing its warped, garbage values on America?  The major networks are serving up a choice between a transsexual and the glamorizing of the Playboy clubs that helped push forth America’s “sexual revolution” of AIDS, STDs, broken homes, and out-of-wedlock births comprising over 40% of all live births today. This stuff used to be limited to cable, but now it’s everywhere. You just can’t get away from the pimping of this crap.

On broadcast TV, right now, you can watch the bizarro transsexual “former” woman Chastity Bono dancing around with another woman and pretending it’s like a normal man/woman dancing couple.  “Dancing With the Stars” calls all of those who protested this wacked out pretense, “crazies.”  But the only crazy person is the fat blob who thinks she’s a man merely because she took hormones and now has facial hair.  The fact is that “Chaz” Bono had, has, and will always have female chromosomes, and she will never have sperm.  You can make all the Hollywood cosmetic changes in the world, but those things will never change.  Biologically, this Bono he/she/it will always be a female, no matter how butch he/she/it now looks.  Anyone who pretends this is normal is the real crazy, not those of us who call out this weirdo baloney.

Then, at 10:00 p.m. Eastern, you can watch “The Playboy Club,” where we see how far the definition of “nostalgia” has sunk.  NBC pretends that these slutty women of the early ’60s–the ones considered the “hos” of their day with those silly pom-pom tails on their butts–are now the “glamorous” superwomen living an exciting life.   That’s just not the way it was, then.  Women were not proud to tell the outside world they worked there.  And for good reason.  The bunnies at the Playboy Clubs were essentially high-class hookers, nothing more.

The bunnies weren’t considered classy, no matter how this show tries to pretend otherwise.  They were considered trollops, harlots, easy.  And in many cases, that wasn’t without fact to back it up.  Despite both Gloria Steinem and Barbara Walters taking their turns in the tawdry Bunny role–or perhaps in keeping with their turns at it, the cheap women who became bunnies were uneducated, low-class women who had no better future.  It was something to aspire to as much as “crack whore” is something to aspire to, today.  Hey, maybe in fifty years, if there is still TV (and that’s doubtful), they will glorify crack whores as the beautiful people.  “Idiocracy” isn’t just a movie about the year 2500.  It’s the here and now in real life.

Sadly, everyone is getting in on the act of this revisionist history.  A week or so ago, the Detroit Free Press Sunday Edition ran three pages on former Playboy bunnies from the clubs.  These women were cheap-looking then, and they’re still cheap now.  Many of them were divorced or single mothers, haggard, uneducated  airheads, now in their ’60s.  It’s one of those cases where snobbery–ours–is a good thing and vastly underrated.

And let’s not forget what the Playboy Clubs were about, back then.  They were revolutionary in the sense that married men could go there to easily cheat on their wives behind closed doors, and single men could go there to meet multiple, easy, no-strings sex partners in a day when that wasn’t accepted out in the open the way it sadly is today.  But the clubs, hand-in-hand with Steinem and Walters feminism helped make empty sex the common, wanton behavior that it is today.  The men who went to the Playboy Clubs, back then, were embarrassed to admit it, unlike the casual bragging about going to strip joints today.

That’s the crappy state of TV today.  You can watch “Antiques Roadshow” on PBS and be considered old and boring.  Or you can join the American celebration of messed up sexuality  and the slut clubs of yesteryear that led to the open acceptance of that messed up sexuality, today.

This is the stuff that the Bin Ladens and Zawahiris of the world were all too happy to use as public relations tools about how warped America and the West have become.

I predict “The Playboy Clubs” will get huge ratings, tonight, but then it will fade, and I’ll bet it isn’t around, next fall.  I’m taking bets at which will die more quickly–the show or 80-something Hugh Hefner, the father of the clubs.  The gimmick of Playboy is as dead as the magazine.  And if we want to see a show that looks like “Mad Men,” we’ll watch . . . “Mad Men” (which also pretends to be classy while glamorizing cheap, soap opera behavior that simply wasn’t as available back then as the show pretends).  And as for “Dancing with the Tranny Stars,” the stunt with Chaz/Chastity Bono, well, sadly, this homely, talentless daughter of a plastic surgery victim who won’t face that she’s almost 70 (Cher) has built a whole career on a whole new “talent”:  I used to be a chick.

And only in 2011’s fading America and waning culture is that a talent.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly, PDF & Email






58 Responses

“Reality” TV programming sucks.

They’re full of people you don’t want to meet in life. Buy or rent last season’s mainstream shows. You won’t miss a thing tonight and I’ve learned to live without cable.

NormanF on September 19, 2011 at 9:27 pm

Debbie, I have always been a supporter of you. But I gotta say that being transgender is undoubtedly an abnormal condition and I feel that these people need sympathy. I have read about being transgender and people don’t have to accept it, but Transgender people shouldn’t be hated or attacked. It’s upsetting how many of them are victims of violence. I’m not saying it should be embraced. People don’t have to like it or agree with it so the best solution is not to watch Dancing With the Stars.

Matthew on September 19, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    How do you figure “Chaz” needs our sympathy for “being” transgendered? Let’s not forget, “Chaz” is not a hermaphrodite that was born with ambiguous genitals – the only thing that makes her transgendered is the fact she decided to go out and amputate her own bewbage.

    If she is owed any sympathy, it is the same that is owed to anyone that is depressed or has some other kind of mental illness. But even “Chaz” will disagree with you on this because according to her and anyone playing along with her warped reality she has no mental issues and is perfectly normal – she’s not the problem, the world is.

    Hopewell on September 19, 2011 at 10:26 pm

    Matthew:”But I gotta say that being transgender is undoubtedly an abnormal condition and I feel that these people need sympathy.”

    Trouble is Matthew is this statement from you would resolutely rejected by the BLTG ‘community’ which would label you a bigot for saying transgender is abnormal and would throw your sympathy back in your face, with interest. You are correct of course but this denial of reality top do with the most basic aspects of human life and society is exactly the same disease which lets others deny the reality of what large scale immigration into western countries from islamic ones is doing to these societies.

    Bronson on September 20, 2011 at 5:47 am

      Bronson, your post was right on the money. Especially when you note how they would call someone like him (and me) a bigot.

      I always tell those idiots you better hope all “bigots” are like me because even if (you) don’t think I am on your side (to a point) I am. But (your) own entitlement and double-speak get in (your) way.

      I used to be way more supportive to the so-called LGBT “community” but they are off-putting now because they don’t want to relish how far they have come and they, like Mooooooslims, want special treatment and NOT equal treatment.

      They don’t deserve it thou’. They need to clean up their own back yard because they support a lot of horrible things.

      Skunky on September 20, 2011 at 10:11 am

    I rather doubt that. Also, thank you for trolling.

    Worry01 on September 20, 2011 at 7:15 am

debbie

why aren’t you talking about
hosanna obama the magnificent’s
full fontal assault on
the middle class
with his lying
buffett rule ??!!

any implementation of this policy
guarantees
that the middle class will be taxed
at the exact same rate as
millionares and
billionares

and we’re supposed to buy into this
because everbody hates the rich

hating the rich in this case is also
hating and destroying the middle class

but of course this is obama’s
communist inspired mission

never believe what obama says
think what his policies mean

prestigio on September 19, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    You should try reading back issues. She has discussed Obama many times. If you want your daily fix of that sort of thing, there are other sites aside from this one.

    Worry01 on September 20, 2011 at 6:57 am

“Actress” Heard told TV Guide that women on the show are “empowered” and “strong”.

Lev on September 19, 2011 at 10:03 pm

Hi Debbie,

Did you ever see the Bumper Sticker that said, “Kill your television?”

I have a TV – but I only use it for watching DVDs.

And regarding “what” Sonny & Chers little girl has grown up to be, is gross and totally pathetic.

Apparently, gross and totally pathetic is the image Hollywood wants to project.

For them, Darkness has become the “new” Light.

Azixoye on September 19, 2011 at 10:08 pm

And these networks wonder why people are turning to the internet, netflix, and other such ways to get entertainment while canceling cable and satilite.

TV sucks, hollywood is out of ideas, nothing is fresh or truly orignal, different, outside the box, and they go right back to “Reality” shows for ratings. Political correctness and psychonutism is the norm on TV.

Why the hell should I pay $70 for a service that I use only to watch maybe 2-3 channels out of like….250? I’m waiting for a set top box to come out that let’s me watch only the channels I want to watch and see only what I want to see.

Hollywood needs to go back to the drawing board, loosen their psychonut grip on mainstream television, and start thinking outside the box and be original again.

Squirrel3D on September 19, 2011 at 10:13 pm

Debbie-lah first of all u should know I have 100% grade A Yiddishe sperm, none of whom care what’s on tv tonite or who Chaz Bono is dancing with. I do want to extend to you a hearty yishar koach (like mazal tov but better) on your football Lions tremendous win in week 2. I know I spoke lashon hara (slander) against them not long ago but they sucked for so long it was an honest mistake. I will make amends for my preseason aveirah (booboo) on Rosh Hashana (Jewish New Year). I can only hope the Jews of Detroit rededicate themselves to toirah (torah like the Chabad guys say it) and mitvas (good deeds) so that the Lions should go undefeated and truly represent for DS.

A1 on September 19, 2011 at 10:37 pm

    A1, since you’re throwing around Hebrew, I’ll add the term “tzniut,” a term you should ponder seriously.

    skzion on September 20, 2011 at 12:24 pm

I don’t know about her not being totally male. She has the type of gut that, on a guy, is often referred to as a “dickdoo”. It’s called that because it sticks out further that her dick do.

CornCoLeo on September 19, 2011 at 11:16 pm

Debbie, you should have watched MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show” — the funniest show on television. Maddow’s very special guest was Michael Moore. Asked about Obama’s new class warfare tax bill, Moore loved it. Rather than say that Obama was throwing “red meat to the base,” Moore said that Obama was “feeding him Reese’s Pieces.” Funny stuff! About a minute later, Moore mentioned “a bag of Doritos.”

Of course, there was always the NY Giants playing the St. Louis Rams on Monday night football.

For those with internet but no tv, there was the opening free lecture in Hillsdale College’s series on the Constitution.

Barry Popik on September 20, 2011 at 2:14 am

    Barry, “Rick” Maddow alone is a great example of why people should have sympathy for most transexuals because she is a full-blown Lesbian (and let’s all just admit that Lesbians are annoying…even gays are annoyed by them) and in his “everyday” life he looks like a snarky and nerdy boy but on her dopey TV show, she sells out and makes himself look almost like a female.

    The biggest hypocrit on the planet. And the dumbest. I couldn’t care less if she is a Rhodes Scholar…what she believes would not even be believed by someone who lived in the woods for 99 years.

    Rick Maddow thinks she is a man, but does not want to really be one. Most female to males transexuals want to be men and think they are. That is a peek into the mental illness.

    Skunky on September 20, 2011 at 10:22 am

Last week I was surfing and I came across a show called, “The Waltons”. Some of you may remember it. It was popular in the 70’s. As I was watching it, I couldn’t help thinking that in today’s America, you would be called a religious nut for watching it. Oh well, “Time They Are A Changing,” for the worst.

Rick on September 20, 2011 at 8:55 am

chastity bono is a disgusting excuse for a human being. I noticed that yahoo news posted a story about her needing security to protect her from crazies. They couldn’t be too much crazier than her.
Look at jersy shore if you want to see a real exhibit of our downward spiral. Pathetic.

samurai on September 20, 2011 at 9:49 am

Here’s the Chaz the litmus test on if she’s a man – can she pee standing up? No = not man.

Hopewell on September 20, 2011 at 10:20 am

Hey! Antiques Roadshow is awesome!

Mominminnesota on September 20, 2011 at 10:28 am

Debbie
Get off my tip….er lip, well wherever it is down there today!!

Signed,
Chas Boner

CaliforniaScreaming on September 20, 2011 at 12:28 pm

Another “tranny blog” so soon? This time, the pretext is that there are only two things to watch on network TV. I’ve heard, though, of something called “kay bull” that might mitigate the problem.

Is public morality worse than it was 50 years ago? Well, anti-Semitism was a fact of life then (how else do you explain the name changes of Jewish last names in Hollywood?). As for discrimination against blacks, well, it’s obvious. And yes, discrimination against homosexuals was intense and life-destroying. Of course, women were properly in the home with their husbands and kids, not putting the fear of G-d in Muslims via blogs.

I think any fair review of the direction of public morality over time would yield a mixed verdict.

But really, what is served by this “Eeew, it’s Chaz” business? For me what is important is personal responsibility and minimal government intrusion in personal life. That means, among other things, no government subsidies for bastardy or willful poverty, or for illegal aliens, and no “affirmative action” at all, as governments should not practice discrimination. The pathologies of the black and hispanic ghettos derive from clear policy errors, and this is where correction is needed. No amount of bemoaning the culture will have an effect, as the cause of the problem has not been addressed.

skzion on September 20, 2011 at 12:56 pm

About that photo — I’ll take the one on the left.

Seek on September 20, 2011 at 1:17 pm

    I’ll take the bunnies.

    Rabbit Habit or "Bunnies over Bono" on September 20, 2011 at 1:51 pm

Barry, as far as the STD’s in the adult industry, I don’t think it’s nowhere near 70% as you claimed, I was reading the “AIDs in the pornographic film industry”, from what I read the STD rate amongst adult film performers is around 2-4%, which they state is considerably lower than the average for sexually active young people with similar demographics. As for “AIM”, dude, to be honest with you, I didn’t do my homework on them, I read that the AIDS Healthcare Foundation filed a lawsuit against AIM earlier this year and won their lawsuit against AIM and they were forced to closed.

Now there’s this new organization called “The Adult Production Health and Safety Services” in which it was announced in early May after AIM shut down in a lawsuit that they lost. They (APHSS) were lobbied by the “Free Speech Coalition, it’s designed to fill the gap left by Adult Industry Medical (AIM) Healthcare Foundation. The AHF has been after AIM because AIM provided an alternative to condom use regular STD testing of performers, that it claims doesn’t fully protect them from the likes of HIV. And you’re right about Alfred Kinsey, Barry, he’s responsible for the “sexual revoltion” in this country back during the post World War II era, in which til a degree has wrecked the nuclear family. Lookit, I happen to be a sexual-libertarian myself, whatever you and you’re partner do in the privacy of your bedroom is NONE of my business or anybody elses business, but DO NOT exploit underage kids into the act.

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on September 20, 2011 at 3:02 pm

I really feel sorry for Chastity Bono. The poor woman obviously has serious mental issues yet some messed up doctor took her money and mutilated her.

I understand gay folks—either through genes, hormones, or circumstance, they prefer the same gender. Transexuals however have a mental issue where they want to mutilate themselves. They should be getting treatment, not sex-change surgery.

jimmyPx on September 20, 2011 at 3:23 pm

Why doesn’t she shave her neck?

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com

ali on September 20, 2011 at 5:13 pm

@skzion

Sadly, I am educated on Alfred Kinsey.

Since you appear to be a staunch supporter of his, are you a fervent fan of his ‘research’ in table32 where little babies were molested “in the name of research”?

Oh, and a disproportionate number of the people used to determine all of Kinsey’s ‘research’ were convicted sex offenders as most real men were away at war during the ’40s.

skzion =pro Kinsey cheerleader

P.S. How could Kinsey determine the levels of homosexuality in a given population when his field sample of people were made up of sexual perverts and not people of a normal sexual disposition i.e. not rapists. Oh, and I’m sure, since you’re clearly in love with Mr Kinsey, that you know of the Nazi peadophile Dr. Fritz Von Balluseck who molested and raped kids and recorded the details — details which Kinsey authorised and facilitated and used in his research.

Get a clue mate.It’s truly sad that out of my FACTUAL post, your take um-bridge with me espousing facts.

Barry on September 20, 2011 at 5:26 pm

    Barry, you might impress others with your frenzied, enraged persona, but not me. I have already pointed out a specific and very serious error in your claims about Kinsey, et al. You do not deny making this error. This means, quite simply, that you are not diligent in your preparation. I could thus immediately determine that your post was NOT factual.

    As for your claims about me being a cheerleader for Kinsey et al., do not put words in my mouth.

    skzion on September 20, 2011 at 6:39 pm

@Sean R.

Sean, I didn’t claim anything of my own. I reiterated data from the people in the know — that is, the head of A.I.M called Sharon Mitchell who said that 66% of porn performers had the incurable disease of herpes.

Regarding Kinsey, what people don’t always get is how much of his FRAUDULENT findings has actually become institutionalised in government policies regarding sex education.We always hear about how “10% of the population is gay” to justify gay-rights. One problem though — it’s untrue and the real number is FAR lower. But lefties love to band that little gem around.

Barry on September 20, 2011 at 5:44 pm

Gross. Thanks, TV , for trying to lecture me on what’s normal and ok. Never been a fan of DWS but now I really don’t like it. Talk about pimping a subject for a ratings bump. Who is next? Ahkmidenijad is in town for the occupation of N.Y. at the UN.

samurai on September 20, 2011 at 8:40 pm

Wow, what an ugly woman (on the right)!
What? That’s a “man”?
Wow, what an ugly man (not the woman on the left; she’s kinda cute, in a slutty kinda way)!

jc15 on September 20, 2011 at 10:54 pm

@skzion

You pointed out no error. Kinsey clearly states in his 1948 book that between 10-37% of the male population is homosexual.

Further, you are indeed a Kinsey cheerleader — it’s an objective fact that children were molested as part f Kinsey’s research. You had nothing to say on that. It’s an objective fact that Kinsey facilitated and used the research of a Nazi paedophile. You had nothing to say on that.It’s an objective fact Kinsey used sex convicts to base on ‘research’ on. You had nothing to say on that.

Your gripe is that the beloved Kinsey ‘only meant’ men experimented with homosexuality.You’re wrong. And you’re a liar.Kinsey had a ‘grading’ system for measuring sexuality and he explicitly refused to term people as heterosexual or gay. In fact, Kinsey used the sex offenders in his ‘research sample’ to conclude about the 37% of them had a homosexual experience. This was buffered by his claim that over 10% of a population is “exclusively homosexual” for the MAJORITY of their life. Not only are these findings misleading, they are used to form governmental legislation today regarding sex education teachings.

My words are not attempts to impress anyone and certainly not a pro Kinsey cheerleader such as yourself. They are mere reiterations of facts. Anyone can go pick up a copy of Kinsey’s 1948 book and read it for themselves and see what disgusting research and findings it presents. I suggest you do that.

For more info, please go read the research of Judith Reisman who exposes Kinsey for the sick b*stard he was.

Barry on September 21, 2011 at 10:41 am

Transgendered people (and those who wish to have sex-change surgery) need serious counseling.

They are no different than people suffering from apotemnophilia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apotemnophilia

guitarguy on September 21, 2011 at 12:51 pm

@skzion

It says a lot about you that out of my posts, which list several FACTS regarding Kinsey, that you take issue with my presentation of the statistics regrading homosexuality.

You have nothing to say regarding Kinsey’s use of rapists and perverts in his research from which he extrapolated his data.You’re silent on Kinsey’s correspondence and advice to a Nazi paedo.You’re silent on table32 and are now justifying it. Weirdo.

Newsflash — what Kinsey did was sick then and is sick now. It’s lefties such as yourself who are trying to justify his perverted research.Fiddling with kids as Kinsey’s researchers did to make them ‘orgasm’ is disgusting and perverse. Nothing can ever justify it. Especially not you.

Kinsey’s table32 required molestation of kids to obtain data. Fact. And you justify that. Sick.

Reisman is not a fraud but I understand that anyone espousing facts and exposing your beloved Kinsey will be considered a fraud in your eyes. But good thing, your opinion is of no relevance.And you FAILED to rebute my points because YOU SIMPLY CANNOT.

Regards.

Barry on September 21, 2011 at 5:42 pm

Peepz, @skzion is trying to LIE regarding Alfred Kinsey and his peado research.Just ignore idiots like him — they think their lefty politics equate with being enlightened. But all it really equates to is a justification for perverse moral relativism.

Kinsey’s research required the use of rapists and peados. Over 1,400 of these ‘normal’ men were interviewed. Over a third of all human samples Kinsey used to form his data were sexual perverts.Thus, sexual pests and their ‘orientations’ have been used as part o the data Kinsey’s team parade as normal. It isn’t.

In Kinsey’s table32, adults molested kids, some only a few months old, in order to make them orgasm.Fact. An orgasm, according to Kinsey was when a baby screamed, cried and pulled away. Yep, disgusting.There is NO justification for that. skzion, if you think that’s normal, please seek a doctor because you need one.

Kinsey used paedos in his research. Kinsey also partook with his researchers in orgies which were filmed.

Kinsey’s research has formed the basis of American sex education for over half a century.

It’s time to stand up to this perverse research.

Barry on September 21, 2011 at 5:52 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field