November 19, 2008, - 2:26 pm

It’s a Liberal Celebrity Thing, You Wouldn’t Understand: Pitt-Jolie Daughter Wants Male Name Change

By Debbie Schlussel
You’re a bizarro half-assed movie star, who admitted to a cutting addiction and other weird things. Your body is covered in tattoos, and you cheered on Palestinian kids as they sang of murder and terrorism and “revenge” to “take back Jerusalem.” Oh, and you stole your movie star hubby from another movie star wife.
So, you adopt a gazillion United Nations of Bennetton kids as accessories, and have a few of your own out of wedlock–giving them all pretentious names and having them raised by nannies.
And guess what? At age 2 1/2, your daughter wants to become a man:

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s two-and-half-year old daughter . . . Shiloh will only respond to the name ‘John.’


The New Addams Family:

Parents of Shiloh/”John”, Funders of Failed Anti-Prop 8 Campaign


Brad Pitt made this hilarious admission to Oprah Winfrey on her program scheduled to air Nov. 19.

Um, it’s not that hilarious. Just stupid.

“She only wants to be called John. John or Peter. So it’s a Peter Pan thing,” Pitt says. “So we’ve got to call her John. ‘Shi, do you want …’ – ‘John. I’m John.’ And then I’ll say, ‘John, would you like some orange juice?’ And she goes, ‘No!’ So, you know, it’s just that kind of stuff that’s cute to parents, and it’s probably really obnoxious to other people.”

And, of course, her uber-liberal, anything-goes parents put up with and encourage this absurdity.
Today, it’s the name. Tomorrow, it’s the reassignment surgery for “John.” So sad, too bad. No love lost for leftists like Angie Voight who cheer on the murder of innocent civilians by terrorists.
Reader Duane disagrees and thinks this is all a made up story designed for Pitt’s anti-Proposition 8 agenda for gay marriage:

Yeah, I am sure that it was the two year old’s agenda and not the guy that gave $100,000 to fight Proposition 8? Liberals using children for their agendas borders on child abuse.

Duane, I think you’re right.
I don’t know about you, but I’m Jolie-Pitted to death. If only America would write these two hypocrites a “Dear John” letter, and not to their daughter . . . but to them.

7 Responses

My little girl is three, and she has some interesting foibles herself. What’s stupid is that Brad is making a huge deal out of something that many kids her age do. If you make an issue out of something, it will continue.
I can tolerate most things, as long as they don’t interfere (too much) with our day to day activities. I insist on good manners (both table and social), putting our toys away, etc. Some things are negotiable. Most are not.

cirrus1701 on November 19, 2008 at 3:04 pm

Hmmmm, sounds like a couple of Neil Diamond songs:
1. Cracklin Rosie:
Crackhead Jolie, you’re a store bought woman.
You like a song bout takin back Jerusalem. Get another tatoo and let that song keep runnin on … Play it now, play it now, play it now …
2. Shiloh:
Shiloh, when you were young. We used to call you John. Though no one else would care. Shiloh we called you son …
Jimmy Lewis
SCS, Michigan

Jimmy Lewis on November 19, 2008 at 3:21 pm

And we are supposed to accept the political guidance of these strange people.

c f on November 19, 2008 at 3:25 pm

Brad Pitt is just a trophy husband for Jolie. That is the dating scene in California or liberal cities. Look good for the women and keep your mouth shut. Men emasculate themselves to be in the good graces of women. Nothing better to see than a tattooed buffed guy taking a tongue lashing from a prissy little bitch while making him hold her purse. Can you say whipped?
Brad Pitt needs to take some notes from The No Nosense Man and get some of his dignity.

californiascreaming on November 19, 2008 at 3:35 pm

Plausible that the public comments were timed for the No on Prop 8 campaign. Deb’s quip about reassignment surgery is more that just that: the current Atlantic Monthly has a full-length article about making it available (first through drugs and hormones, only later surgery) to kids.

Jeremiah on November 19, 2008 at 8:01 pm


Shy Guy on November 20, 2008 at 2:09 am

Just me, but I don’t get the huge hype over this very overrated broad, Jolie.
She’s nice looking but there are far hotter. I would have stayed with Aniston who I think is far hotter and can’t be nuttier.
Of course Oprah is the messenger for this nonsense. The only useful purpose for Oprah to me is to weed out the bims. If I know a bim is an Oprah watcher I stay far away.

Jeff_W on November 20, 2008 at 9:44 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field