January 30, 2009, - 2:20 am

Weekend Box Office: Thrilling “Taken,” Guilty Pleasure “Uninvited” vs. Anti-American “New in Town”

By Debbie Schlussel
Usually January is pet cemetery #2 for bad movies (#1 is August)–where Hollywood puts its lackluster movies to die a quick death and get cremated. But I’ve been surprised at some of the movies out in January 2009. This weekend includes one of the good ones, “Taken.”
* “Taken“: Is Liam Neeson–in his late fifties–the new Dirty Harry/Paul Kersey (Charles Bronson in “Death Wish”) of the 2000s? Could be, if this movie is the success I predict it will be at the box office, this weekend. I liked Neeson as an action hero better than I like Daniel Craig as the new James Bond. I loved this movie.


This is the kind of action thriller we loved a lot, but haven’t seen since the ’80s. And I’m glad it’s made a comeback. It’s the latest of only a few movies that dare try to melt the post-9/11 official Hollywood rule that you can’t make Arabs and Muslims look bad or portray them as terrorists or thugs. More than one of them get their violent comeuppance from the action hero of this movie, and I wanted to cheer out loud (but it’s unseemly at a critics’ screening, so I didn’t; well, actually, I did it as quietly as possible).
Neeson (who was great in this, but could use better hair coloring than the obvious Grecian formula stuff here) plays a CIA agent who retires from the Company, so that he can be closer to his 17-year-old daughter whose childhood he mostly missed while on assignments. But it’s tough to compete with her multi-millionaire stepfather. He is initially resistant when his daughter wants to go to France with a girlfriend. (The movie errs here in having the two teens shadow the U2 European concert tour–what 17-year-old teens are U2 groupies in 2009? That’s for 40-something middle-aged women.) But eventually, he must go to France to rescue his daughter or lose her forever.
Neeson’s daughter is kidnapped in Paris by an Albanian Muslim-run sex slavery operation. And that’s where Hollywood’s “Thou Must Whitewash Islam” rule starts to melt. While they never outright tell us that the Albanian sex slavery mobsters are Muslims, there are several quick, but deliberate shots of the crescent and star tattoos on their hands–yup, the “Religion of Peace.” And then, there are the Arabs who are prominent among the sex slave purchasers. One of them is purchasing the women as concubines for his boss, a big, fat, ugly Arab Muslim Sheikh on a yacht. (I’m sure Mr. Neeson’s agent will be getting a call from CAIR, ADC, and the other Mid-East whine merchants, real soon.)
There is a great scene where all of these evil Arabic-speaking scumbags get sent to a permanent conference call with the 72 virgins. That is the kind of stuff people went to movies to see, and they don’t get to see it much at all anymore. Bring it back and bring it on. Just bring it. And this movie does.
“Taken” was funny, exciting, suspenseful, and it flew by. Though parts of it–like the endless dodging of bullets that surely would hit their target–are not believable, most of it is. And it’s clever, even if some of it is predictable. Some of the things Neeson does to find the men who have his daughter are ingenious. And if you like guns, action, and the bad guys meeting a nice, evil death in your movies, this is your flick.
Despite his choice in mother-in-laws (he’s married to the daughter of pan-terrorist hacktress Vanessa Redgrave), I’ve always like Liam Neeson. He was great in “Darkman.” And he’s great in this.
I’m sure the mainstream liberal movie critics will pan “Taken,” but don’t believe the tripe. It may not be highbrow and deep enough for them. But it’s what it is–a fun action adventure. This is the movie I recommend for this weekend.
One other note: This movie is not for kids. It’s violent and bloody–though the right people are subject to the violence and bloodletting. And there’s, of course, the theme of sex slavery. Don’t take your ten- or even 12-year-old to see it. It’s for, minimum, age 14 and up in my mind.
* “New in Town“: I saw this movie on TV in 1996, and it was called “Christmas in My Hometown.” This movie has the exact same plot, only it’s not half as good as that schlocky Tim Matheson-Melissa Gilbert production. And it has a gazillion times more snoot.
“New in Town” seethes with the smug, unfunny comedy writing of anti-American Hollywood liberals who can’t stand small town Middle Americans. It’s almost two hours of snobbery and mocking of small town Midwesterners as dumb, backward, ugly, uncultured, and so on and so on and so on.
Renee Zellweger–looking particularly manly in this movie–plays a high-powered executive in corporate America, who lives the good life in Miami. Soon, she’s sent to New Ulm, Minnesota to downsize a company plant and lay off workers. It’s complete culture shock.
In the movie–and as Hollywood sees it–the small town people are disgusting, annoying, boorish, intrusive and nosy, and just plain out of touch with reality. It’s like a repeat of “Northern Exposure” for two onscreen hours. And it mostly just wasn’t funny. I barely laughed. The jokes were more mean than they were laugh inducing. And they were at the expense of most of America–the parts of America that didn’t vote in droves for Barack Obama, the parts of America that still have some semblance of values.
Zellweger’s character can’t stand it in small town Minnesota, and the factory workers aren’t exactly taken with her snobbery and big city manner. She develops a love-hate relationship with the plant’s union rep, Harry Connick, Jr. And you can predict what happens if you saw “Christmas in My Hometown,” “Baby Boom,” or any of a gazillion other movies this one rips off and dumbs down.
Dumb, dopey, sappy, predictable, and too much snobbery to fill a La Jolla country club. Skipworthy. Send New in Town back where it came from.

* “The Uninvited“: Don’t let the crappy movie poster for this flick fool you. The movie isn’t dark, but it is a nailbiter. It’s one of those low-budget thrillers that was much better than I expected. While the movie is aimed at teens, I found it engrossing, entertaining, and unpredictable. It’s a guilty pleasure movie you’ll enjoy. I felt kind of ripped off with it’s M. Night Shyamalan type of trickery. But it’s fair trickery, and you’d definitely never predict the ending. The movie is well done.
A young girl returns home (to her wealthy author father’s beachside mansion)from a mental hospital, where she’s being treated for attempting to commit suicide after accidentally killing her ill mother. Or, at least, she’s been led to believe she did it. She constantly has nightmares of what happened and sees ghosts, hinting to her that things aren’t as they soom. Soon, she and her sister suspect their mother’s sexy former nurse (Elizabeth Banks), who is now their father’s girlfriend is behind everything. They must convince their father (David Strathairn) that she’s the real killer before she kills them.
This movie rips off plot points from many other movies just like it, but it’s still good and very clever with it’s ending.
It’s rated PG-13 and deserves it for it’s bloody and violent images.

12 Responses

Liam Neeson seems different here, according to your description, than his character “Alfred Kinsey,” the sexpert.
Taking about sex, you mentioned “there is a great scene where all of these evil Arabic-speaking scumbags get sent to a permanent conference call with the 72 virgins.”
“A great scene?”
“Permanent conference call with 72 virgins?”
Those lucky bastards!!
I wish you would’ve expanded a little bit with some details.
Did they show any virgins?
Anyway, I think I’ll go see that movie, maybe I’ll get lucky and finally see the 72 virgins.
I just hope they don’t look like Hanan Ashrawi.

Independent Conservative on January 30, 2009 at 3:48 am

Got a preview copy, as soon as I saw it I knew you’d like it;), as did I

mindy1 on January 30, 2009 at 6:35 am

Got a preview copy, as soon as I saw it I knew you’d like it;), as did I-I meant of taken

mindy1 on January 30, 2009 at 6:36 am

I love your movie rating system! Somewhat ironic that Minnesota went blue this past election season & is still attacked by Hollywood. Perhaps “New in Town” was green lighted when Pawlenty looked like the GOP’s VP choice.

adagioforstrings on January 30, 2009 at 6:13 pm

I despise your rating system, it is as stupid, knee jerk and one dimensional as they come. From what I see, you project your knee jerk right wing faux populism on movies that don’t meet your boorish, tacky standards. So if someone mocks the average american, which that movie did as well as other types, that means they are not only anti-American, but Marxists too? Wait a minute, one dimensional is too good for you, that implies say 2 mm to the left or 3 mm to the right. You are zero dimensional, binary on/off; either it is wholesome all american or it is some sort of communist plot.

MorrisMinor on January 30, 2009 at 7:45 pm

Wow adagioforstrings,
You sound real smart, like you done gone to that there college type school. I bet ya talk smart too. I bet its like music when ya flap ya lips. I bet people tell you that you use your mouth prettier that a $2 whore. To my thinkin’ you just too smart to be readin’ this here, what’ya call it…oh yea “knee jerk right wing faux populism”.
Gosh Darn, I wish i could talk the way you write.

CopterDocter on January 30, 2009 at 11:41 pm

Glad to hear about Taken. Some of these comments are so bizarre they are more funny than offensive. I think you may have offended some particularly slimy and grotesque excuses for human beings. Good work.

justsayno2islam on January 31, 2009 at 12:27 pm

Just saw Taken today. La Deb, your review is right on!
It was a terrific action movie. No moral equivalency, no seeking to “understannnnnnd”, just find the bad guys and take care of business.
Liam Neeson was great.
I could easily see it again.

Jeff_W on January 31, 2009 at 9:13 pm

I just returned from Taken and it is a very disturbing movie. Action, yes. Suspense, yes. PC, absolutely not. I was shocked that Besson would write/produce a movie that holds no punches. He attacks the decadence and corruption of his native Fwance as well as providing a sickly, accurate portrayal of the Muzzies. Great job Mr. Besson, though it is still a disturbing movie.

Bubbaman on January 31, 2009 at 10:14 pm

I just saw taken and loved it! It is definitely four Reagans. If someone thought this movie was disturbing, good! It is much worse in real life than shown in this movie, except in real life there aren’t rich or Rambo type fathers to go find their daughters and much of the time the father is complicit -selling the daughter to begin with.

JT on February 1, 2009 at 11:17 am

Actually, The Uninvited is a remake of Tale of Two Sisters, a very original and creepy Asian film. The American remake strips it of any really scary parts or suspense.

Jasmyn on August 22, 2010 at 12:42 pm

I saw taken a while back and I enjoyed it too,not bc I read about it here but bc other critic whose reviews I like said it was a good movie,so I watched it,good good movie.

Juan on January 26, 2012 at 11:18 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field