June 1, 2012, - 4:51 pm

Weekend Box Office: Snow White and the Huntsman (& the Muslims), High School

By Debbie Schlussel

My reviews of this weekend’s new movies:

* “Snow White and the Huntsman“: Nope, it’s not about that Utah liberal pretending to be a Republican in the primaries. But it’s pretty liberal and has pan-Muslim sympathies, too. As in this year’s previous Snow White flick (“Mirror Mirror”–read my review), it’s a dark, feminist revisionist version of Snow White that ends up being a catfight between the evil witch queen (Charlize “I have orgasms for Cuba’s Castro” Theron) and Xena Snow White Warrior Princess (Kristen Stewart). None of this comes as a surprise, since the movie is by the same people who made the pan-feminist “Alice in Wonderland” (read my review), in which Alice is now a warrior princess kick-butt action figure.

And the men in the movie? Well, they are accessories like a purse or a bag. And one of them cries (while Snow White, far more masculine than he, never sheds a single tear). Snow White wears chain mail and a knight’s outfit, leading the legion of knights into battle. Puh-leeze. Yes, I know it’s a fairy tale, but since when was Snow White a she-man warrior? Uh, sorry, but reality check: men are the strong ones and the ones in physical fighting who win and best women, in almost all cases, despite the fantasies of the ghost of Betty Friedan and the aging human crypt of skin known as Gloria Steinem.

I also wanna know when Snow White became a vehicle for pro-Muslim propaganda. The only people who are kind to Snow White and a male ally are a group of people whose women wear niqabs (full-ninja Muslim face-veils) and whose men wear kufis (Muslim hats). And they become victims for helping her. Of course, my surprise at this stopped when I noted that one of three screenplay authors is named Hossein Amini.

Beyond that, the movie’s story is creepy, scary, thrilling, entertaining, and well-told. The costumes, visuals, and special effects are stunning. If you can look beyond the feminist and pan-Islamic baloney (and Theron’s disgusting pan-Communist BS on Castro and Cuba), you’ll enjoy it, as I did. And yes, there are the seven dwarves.

In this story, there is no “prince charming” to rescue Snow White. Instead, there is a “huntsman” (Chris Hemsworth), who is originally paid to hunt for her in the dark forest at the behest of the queen. But he, very predictably, falls for Snow White, instead, and there is a duke’s son, who is also a rival for her love. The movie is set up to be just like her Twilight movies with a love triangle of two men who are more the women, while she assumes the male role.

It’s violent and bloody, so it’s NOT for kids.


Watch the trailer. . .

* “High School“: Hey, yet another piece of utter garbage that is so bad it never would have been made, but for the Michigan Film Tax Credits that subsidized it. It’s a liberal movie in which the kids are brilliant, the authority figures–the principals and teachers–are sleazebags and morons, and there are no parents to speak of (if there were, they’d be idiots, too, of course). The movie is filthy, vile, and just plain stupid. It’s a stoner comedy, but it’s just not funny. Makes “Dude, Where’s My Car?” look downright Shakespearean.

Adrien Brody sure fell a long way down the slippery slope from when he won an Oscar for his portrayal of a Jew in Holocaust Europe. Here he’s a Black-wannabe, crazy drug dealer with cornrows and tattoos.

His customers are two kids from the local high school. One of them is a complete burnout loser, and in the anti-Semitic tradition of crappy Hollywood movies lately (most of them made by self-hating Jews), the filmmakers want you to know that this bad person and cause of major disasters is a Jew. He has a giant Jewish Star tattoo on his back shown on screen at some length, in case you might miss his religion and ethnicity. (This was the case in “Project X” (read my review) and “Act of Valor” (read my review) and several others I’ve reviewed on this site.

The other kid is brilliant and on his way to becoming class valedictorian. But, at the behest of the stoner Jewish kid, he tries marijuana on the day before the principal (Michael Chiklis) decides to drug-test everyone in the school. If the smart kid tests positive, he’ll be kicked out of school and won’t be valedictorian. So he and the Jewish kid conspire to rob a drug dealer (Brody) and get the whole school high with pot brownies they bake and put at the school bake sale (replacing the legit brownies). Disaster ensues.

I wanted to walk out of this for the entire two hours I sat there, but if I did, I woudn’t be allowed to review it. You were warned. It’s an IQ test. If you waste your time and money to go see this, anyway, you failed. This is one of the worst movies I’ve seen in a long time, and I’ve seen a lot of stinkers. Doubles for both high-quality Gitmo torture material and Al-Qaeda recruitment propaganda about how bad America is.


Watch the trailer . . .

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

37 Responses

“I also wanna know when Snow White became a vehicle for pro-Muslim propaganda. The only people who are kind to Snow White and a male ally are a group of people whose women wear niqabs (full-ninja Muslim face-veils) and whose men wear kufis (Muslim hats). And they become victims for helping her. Of course, my surprise at this stopped when I noted that one of three screenplay authors is named Hossein Amini.”

Yes, I do not think that the Brothers Grimm in rendering this old German tale envisioned Muslims as being part of the scenery. The setting was obviously late Medieval, and the only Muslims that the Germans would have encountered were Turks trying to conquer Southeastern Europe. Muslims were utterly loathed for their religion(deemed heretical), attempts at conquest, raids for looting and obtaining slaves, etc. No, Islam was even money with The Black Plague in terms of popularity in the fourteenth century.

Also, women did not normally ride into battle in the Middle Ages. They had the candlepower to realize that they would be no match for a male with an upper body strength, greater weight, as well other factors that would have been overwhelming. Medieval woman had no illusions that their breastfeeding qualified them to defend the realm with buckler and shield. It was not gender discrimination that caused this, but the very sane desire to survive and protect their children from harm. Let the gender with the best chance of holding off an enemy in battle fight. That is of course misogynist heresy now.

You can see why people have such a garbled view of history when such wholly innacurate portrayals of places and times are the norm. Projecting the present into the past does a disservice to the past and renders a false picture of it.

Worry01 on June 1, 2012 at 5:17 pm

    I find that adaptations of fictional fairy tales have infinite room for artistic license that stretches as far as it wants from reality and history … for learning history I do not look to the Brothers Grimm and/or Hollywood …

    stuart on June 4, 2012 at 6:29 pm

One and a half Reagans? Don’t you really mean Marxes?

CR: Well, it was slightly good. DS

Charles Rector on June 1, 2012 at 5:18 pm

Debbie watches all this crap so we don’t have to.
Thank you Debbie!

Michelle on June 1, 2012 at 6:53 pm

Debbie, thank you for this advice. I was thinking about going to see this movie but now will save my money.

Kristy on June 1, 2012 at 7:27 pm

Debbie, this is why I do not like watching remakes. This I think began in the comic books and now has spilled over into the movies. I saw the commercials for this and they want to portray this as another Lord of the Rings type movie but I suspected that it was not. Now you confirmed what I believed and not going to watch it unless it hits cable. I just ignore any movies that show remakes because the modern screen writers think it cool and hip to be “on the edge” and reinterpret old movies and stories for today’s progressive society.

Mario on June 1, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    Mario, it is curious that you bring up comic books. Many characters, despite their past histories in pulp, into gays and lesbians. Green Lantern and Batwoman are now in that ever expanding camp. It makes no difference that the fans of these characters in the past developed a liking for characters that were clearly heterosexual. Even though the audience for such fare is quite small, someone will subsidize the stacks of unread magazines ready to be recycled or archiving those story boards that got maybe fifty hits online in two years. There will always be people who will pay for that, while ignoring the old or new audiences that do not happen to be gay, but are infinitely larger.

    Worry01 on June 1, 2012 at 9:32 pm

I blame straight men for these ass-kicking wimmin heroes. I have heard far too often that such females are hetero male fantasy material.

When Motorola tried to sell its Bionic with this kind of angle, I made sure to pass, even though my BlackBerry was driving me crazy.

skzion on June 1, 2012 at 10:01 pm

First time I’ve seen Reagans accompany Osamas in any of your movie reviews. But hey, if the Mohammedan supporters of Snow White (where is this set anyway) get killed, maybe it ain’t so bad.

From the still shot of the promo, looks like Snow White is too old here. All these Fairy Tale beauties – Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Rapunzel et al – weren’t they in their late teens or early twenties when they discovered their princes & got married? Also, Snow White was supposed to be exactly that – snow whitish in complexion, but this one looks like someone w/ a normal tan. Speaking of which, given that we’ve had female Santas, and Black Santas, maybe they could have brought in a Black Snow White.

Exit question: had the witch been a Muslim decked head to toe in a burqha, would she have gotten the opportunity to ask her mirror who’s the fairest of them all?

Infidel on June 1, 2012 at 11:36 pm

I can’t see Snow White because there is no way I can suspend disbelief for that long. Charlize Theron is supposed to feel threatened by the beauty of Kristen “Dead Fish Eyes” Stewart? I can accept a lot of crazy things in order to enjoy a movie, but that one is just too much for my poor brain to handle.

DavidJ on June 2, 2012 at 1:29 am

Uh, they made another annoying teenage character Jewish? Lame. He is played by Sean Marquette, who is definitely not Jewish.

Oh well. If you love Jewish villains Debbie, you should look forward to the Adam Sandler movie That’s My Boy, where Sandler’s creepy loser (who imprignates his teacher) is very explicitly Jewish.

dee on June 2, 2012 at 2:28 am


dee on June 2, 2012 at 2:29 am

I loved “Snow White and the Huntsman.” It was a beautifully told fantasy, one of the best I’ve ever viewed in my lifetime. As Debbie describes the film, it is “creepy [in a good way, I felt], scary, thrilling, entertaining, and well-told. The costumes, visuals, and special effects are stunning”–an accurate catalog of the film’s many merits. This was certainly far superior to “Lord of the Rings” which suffered from a gratingly pot-friendly, industrial-hating, hippie-loving liberal subtext.

Debbie’s main complaint was that there is a strong feminist subtext which peaks when Snow White puts on armor and fights her step-mother. On the surface, this appears to be a feminist idea, and I have no wish to defend feminism since I consider it part of the corruption of modern culture. I do have a few personal observations, though:

1) The film makes very clear that the evil step-mother is motivated by a general hatred of men (“Men are users!”) which in my mind epitomizes the very worst aspect of feminism: its man-hating politics based on resentment and grudge. It’s the step-mother, the clear villain, who is the real feminist in this story rather than Snow White.

2) Snow White has in the film a very appealing way of dealing with forest animals, trolls, strangers, dwarfs and other men, which is through her grace, charm, love and purity. There was a lot of evidence in the film that the screenwriters had great admiration for feminine virtues which aren’t based on male confrontation and power.

3) It’s an English literary tradition that, when evil so corrupts a culture that there are no other choices left, a woman leader by necessity will be forced to don armor and fight the good fight. This tradition began with the armor-wearing Belphoebe in Spenser’s “Fairy Queen” (Camille Paglia takes a long time in “Sexual Personae” talking about the importance of this armored symbol). This is why Queen Elizabeth surprisingly put on armor and rode to battle at the end of the film “Elizabeth II” and why Cate Blanchett unexpectedly put on armor and fought at the end of the recent “Robin Hood” film. This armored female symbol is iconic to the English who have a place in their historical tradition for certain women to join the general fight when political circumstances become dire. This, I think, is what allowed Margaret Thatcher to be elected and why she has been so much admired by conservatives.

Frankly, I think when evil becomes as powerful as it has in our own world, I want women (like Debbie, for example) fighting on the front lines if they can make a difference.

Burke on June 2, 2012 at 7:48 am

    Wow, good points!

    Mominminnesota on June 2, 2012 at 9:29 am

    “This was certainly far superior to “Lord of the Rings” which suffered from a gratingly pot-friendly, industrial-hating, hippie-loving liberal subtext.”

    Pot friendly. Whatever. I suspect the Middle Earth crowd handled their refer with less madness than 21st century humans do. (Drug culture is self-stereotyping and obnoxious.)

    Industrial-hating part is true. Common fantasy theme. A tired one, too.

    As for liberal subtext? You mean the forces of the west uniting to fight murderous fanatical followers of a hateful creature intent on world domination? Civilians (Hobbits) rising to the responsibility given to them to defend freedom at possible cost of their own lives? Oh, yeah, that’s “liberal”.

    Ride Out to Meet Them on June 4, 2012 at 10:42 pm

      Ride Out to Meet Them, you’re the best.

      ClericRoguers on December 29, 2012 at 4:04 pm

Thanks Debbie!

chuck on June 2, 2012 at 10:37 am

Right back @ dee:

Oh well. If you love Jewish villains Debbie, you should look forward to the Adam Sandler movie That’s My Boy, where Sandler’s creepy loser (who imprignates his teacher) is very explicitly Jewish.

If you’ve seen the red-band trailer for the flick, you’ve seen the tax write-off whole movie.

While I do appreciate DS’s willingness to see examples of a rapidly deteriorating civilization through the cinema, subjecting her to such torture would be unpardonable. If you value your mortal soul, do not go see “That’s My Boy”.

It’s a shame when Kapos start running the synagogues. Shabbat Shalom.

The Reverend Jacques on June 2, 2012 at 10:55 am

Er – can someone put a strike-though on “tax write-off”, please? I think my HTML has got a bit rusty, eh?

The Reverend Jacques on June 2, 2012 at 10:58 am

Another “stoner comedy”. There’s the saying about such “comedies”: more stoner than comedy.

And my liking of Charlize Theron is done.Another model-turned-slightly-better-than-average-actress, who has fallen victim to the PC brainwashing/fashion of adopting a black baby, like the other AA-winner and single,Sandra Bullock. I’m starting to believe that all the time she dated Stuart Townsend, that HE was the “beard” in that relationship.

Phineas on June 2, 2012 at 11:42 am

Burke, then there’s the real life Joan of Arc.

If Debbie really wants a good work out, she should start learning Krav Maga. She might wish for manly men but from the looks of things, she’s going to be waiting a long time for one to rescue her if G-d forbid, anyone decides to assault her. And I’m being very serious. The time has past for us to flutter our eyelashes and have a case of the “vapors” if bad guys come after us because the good guys will probably stand there and cry when we get hurt.

Very sad but it’s not the first time in History, especially Jewish history. We had Deborah who had to go to battle to get Barak to move against the enemy and then it took Yael to actually kill their general, which she did in a spectacularly violent and bloody way, after seducing him.

History as well as fiction is littered with strong women who stepped in when there were no men available or those who were around wimped out.

Italkit on June 2, 2012 at 3:59 pm

Italkit, I really liked your second paragraph. Can’t argue with that and it indeed will be a pity.

Other than disliking the sour and dour Kristen Stwewart, DS’ description of the “Snow White” film sounds like the film I would have died for and craved when I was a feminist. Luckily, that foolishness has passed and I would hate (some parts) of it as much as she did. Really, once you have your feet firmly planted in reality-ville, it’s hard to get all gaga about foolish crap. Feminism, like Liberalism generates the exact opposite of it’s stated intent so the hypocrisy of it all makes me too sick to embrace it as a fantasy. The lies and the fake road I traveled is too palpable to not see the reality.

Burke (as always) made some good and compelling points that must be pondered. I’m gonna look up DS’ review on “The Road” because I saw that movie on a fluke and boy did I like it (I think! It was extremely heavy and dark…right up my dark alley!) and I love her writing style and am curious of her opinion on it.

Skunky on June 2, 2012 at 5:15 pm

How about a Debbie review of “5 Broken Cameras”? This sounds right up her alley. LOL. It’s getting a 91 rating at RT, so it must be great!

An extraordinary work of both cinematic and political activism, 5 Broken Cameras is a deeply personal, first-hand account of non-violent resistance in Bil’in, a West Bank village threatened by encroaching Israeli settlements. Shot almost entirely by Palestinian farmer Emad Burnat, who bought his first camera in 2005 to record the birth of his youngest son, the footage was later given to Israeli co-director Guy Davidi to edit. Structured around the violent destruction of each one of Burnat’s cameras, the filmmakers’ collaboration follows one family’s evolution over five years of village turmoil.

“A truly powerful statement on the horrors of occupation and the heart of the resistance to it.”

“A remarkable documentary which charts the impact on a Palestinian village, and one of its children, of Israeli oppression during the past five years.”

JGlanton on June 2, 2012 at 9:48 pm

@ DavidJ – “Charlize Theron is supposed to feel threatened by the beauty of Kristen “Dead Fish Eyes” Stewart?”

Kristen projects smoldering sexuality with her eyes. The only thing dead about her is that she’s drop-dead gorgeous.

DS_ROCKS! on June 3, 2012 at 1:41 pm

Thanks for the review.

When I heard you give your movie reviews on Friday on Mike’s radio show, I missed the part about the Muslim reference.

Good investigative reporting.

It is interesting to see you giving Reagan’s and a Bin Laden on the same movie review.

Keep it up. I love the movie reviews. You can be trusted to tell us the truth in your posts and articles as well as your movie reviews.

Panhandle on June 3, 2012 at 8:32 pm

Mirror, Mirror on the wall, the angel of light(Satan) is soon to fall! Praise be to Jesus who lives and rules forever more!

Partysover on June 4, 2012 at 11:14 am

this is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen on the internet. It proves that any old moron has a voice online. Anyone who would donate to this filthy, nanny-state mongering whore is in fact worse than a drug enabler. Christ is dead. God is fake. Heaven is a lie, and you’ve all been duped into being mind controlled just like this cross-molesting soothsayer. Religion is a disease, and people like Debbie are rabid and ready to spread in more ways than one.

Mike on June 4, 2012 at 3:01 pm

Thanks for the laughs! You guys (commenters included) made my day.

Spavitary on June 4, 2012 at 3:28 pm

Fuck yeah feminism/strong female roles and fuck yeah positive and nuanced portrayals of people who aren’t white. I wasn’t actually planning on seeing Snow White, but upon reading this bigoted, misogynist dribble I think I will. If what you complain about is true I’ll probably really enjoy it.

Quinn on June 4, 2012 at 3:36 pm

If you’re so vehemently anti-feminism you ought probably to shut the fuck up and get to baking something, huh?

Brendan on June 4, 2012 at 3:53 pm

Is this site supposed to be satire? Honest question.

Question on June 4, 2012 at 4:36 pm

Why are you writing this blog? Shouldn’t you be in the kitchen making dinner? And women are only supposed to speak when spoken to. The only thing a woman’s mouth is good for is pleasuring a man after a long day of work.

Gene Oneal on June 4, 2012 at 5:48 pm

Thank you for this review and some of the comments, especially the one regarding historical accuracy in a fairytale. Every time I feel a little bit stupid, I’ll come here and remember that I’m a genius compared to some knuckle-dragging loons.

Helen on June 4, 2012 at 9:57 pm


Unlike in most European countries occupied by Nazi Germany — where the Germans sought and found true collaborators among the locals — in occupied Poland there was no official collaboration either at the political or at the economic level.[43][44] Poland also never officially surrendered to the Germans.[45] Under German occupation, the Polish army continued to fight underground, as Armia Krajowa and forest partisans – Le?ni. The Polish resistance movement in World War II in German-occupied Poland was the largest resistance movement in all of occupied Europe.[46] As a result, Polish citizens were unlikely to be given positions of any significant authority.[43][44] The vast majority of the pre-war citizenry collaborating with the Nazis was the German minority in Poland which was offered one of several possible grades of the German citizenship.[47] In 1939, before the German invasion of Poland, 800,000 people declared themselves as members of the German minority in Poland mostly in Pomerania and Western Silesia. During the war there were about 3 million former Polish citizens of German origin who signed the official list of Volksdeutsche.[44] People who became Volksdeutsche were treated by Poles with special contempt, and the fact of them having signed the Volksliste constituted high treason according to the Polish underground law.

There is a general consensus among historians that there was very little collaboration with the Nazis among the Polish nation as a whole, compared to other German-occupied countries.[43][44][48] Depending on a definition of collaboration (and of a Polish citizen, based on ethnicity and minority status), scholars estimate number of “Polish collaborators” at around several thousand in a population of about 35 million (that number is supported by the Israeli War Crimes Commission).[49] The estimate is based primarily on the number of death sentences for treason by the Special Courts of the Polish Underground State. Some estimates are higher, counting in all members of the German minority in Poland and any former Polish citizens declaring their German ethnicity (Volksdeutsche), as well as conscripted members of the Blue Police, low-ranking Polish bureaucrats employed in German occupational administration, and even workers in forced labor camps (ex. Zivilarbeiter and Baudienst). Most of the Blue Police were forcibly drafted into service; nevertheless, a significant number acted as spies for Polish resistance movement Armia Krajowa.[48] John Connelly quoted a Polish historian (Leszek Gondek) calling the phenomenon of Polish collaboration “marginal” and wrote that “only relatively small percentage of Polish population engaged in activities that may be described as collaboration when seen against the backdrop of European and world history”.[48]

The anti-Jewish actions of szmalcownicy were very harmful to the Polish Jews as well as the gentile Poles aiding them. Anti-Jewish collaboration of Poles was particularly widespread and effective in the rural areas.[citation needed] It is estimated that some 200 thousand hiding Jews died in 1942-1945 in direct result of this collaboration.[citation needed] The collaboration by some Polish Jews, who belonged to ?agiew, was also harmful to both Jewish and ethnic Polish Underground.

The Polish Secret State considered szmalcownictwo an act of collaboration with the German occupiers. The Armia Krajowa (Home Army) punished it with the death sentence as a criminal act of treason.[3] Blackmailers had been sentenced to death by the Special Courts of the Polish Underground for crimes against Polish citizens. The Polski Komitet Wyzwolenia Narodowego (Polish Committee of National Liberation) by its decree of August 31, 1944 also condemned this act as collaboration with Nazi Germany. This decree is still a valid law in Poland, and any person who committed an act of szmalcownictwo during the war faces life imprisonment. After the war, there were very few trials as most witnesses had already died or left the country.

Zibi on June 6, 2012 at 1:53 pm

This was actually painful to read.

Why should a woman not assume the position of a strong, “masculine” lead? There are, if you haven’t noticed, woman that exist that have more “masculine” tendencies. Even kindergartners get that. They call them “tomboys”. Why should the cinema ignore an existing quality like that in women, and have every single female lead be weak? Because, if again you haven’t noticed, there exist women in this world that are stronger than men.

Alice in Alice in Wonderland was meant to be shown as a woman who went against the expectations for women for her time period. Just because she was wearing beautiful dresses didn’t mean that she couldn’t kick the Jabberwocky’s ass!

You’re just fueling the stereotype that women can’t be stronger than men. Women won’t get anywhere in this world thinking as you do! The fact you ARE a woman still floors me. I’m a 17-year-old woman! If women like you keep feeding this stereotype, what will life be like for me as I grow older, and for my children?

Calling it “Muslim propaganda” is also incredibly bigoted. The people that help Snow White had a culture inspired by that of Muslim culture. So. What. It may have been set there for a reason — for the film to be known for having Muslim-inspired people in it — but why is that a problem? The fact that a film had a nod to Muslim culture is a good thing. It’s what people call “diverse”, if you didn’t know. If it had been a Catholic-inspired culture that helped Snow White, would you have complained? The list can go on and on. It’s a test, you see: if you input a religion or culture into that scenario, and one of them disgusts or stands out to you, you have a natural prejudice against them. That might need to be fixed, methinks.

You seem like the ultra-conservative, where you want society to go back to when only Protestants weren’t looked down upon, when women were owned by their spouses like the family house. Looking at your bio, you really just look to me like a modern-day McCarthy. You may be a crusader against Islamic radical groups, but do make sure to not get the average, honest people mixed up with the radical ones. Which you seem to do. A lot.

“She has gone undercover, infiltrating many Muslim organizations in the Detroit area (the heart of Islamic America), exposing their radical nature and support for terrorism.” How DARE you. It’s one thing to work for nipping terrorism in the bud, but this is ridiculous. I can’t… no matter how much I want to argue and beat you senseless for this, you’re too backwards to even understand why I’d be angry, aren’t you?

Sidney on December 31, 2012 at 12:18 pm

You just out did yourself in stupidity, craziness and rabid, frothing islamophopbia.

Well done!

Yeah, medieval, non muslim women didn’t go out and fight battles. but muslim women did, in the 6th century, like umm amarrah, and Aisha, who were even Generals and led the muslim armies. while women like you in the west were at home at that time. Hows that for women power?

I’m actually surprised I’m even bothering to comment on this. you are far too brainwashed to understand. should i even bother saying like the above commuter that do not confuse the extremist minority from the peaceful majority?

And as for all your ‘muslims are anti semitists and israel is completely in the right and the zionists of today are not racist’ bla bla; lol.

Go onto Wikileaks and read Israels records (assuming you may understand them, but we never know with your cognitive miserliness and small mental capacity) and leaked files and see the truth of israel, and th middle east, and everything your beloved american government has done. your lies have been infiltrated and rendered false already by solid evidence, evidence that has caused those who revealed it, Assange, Manning etc, to run for their lives from the corrupt superpowers.

Its HILARIOUS that people like you are still living in the dark like this, and then accuse others of living in the dark ages. Which is funnier, since while the west was in the dark ages and burning women by accusing them of being witches, the muslim world was in a golden age, with scientists and philosophers, men and women both, especially from arab spain, flourishing, like Avicenna, Averoes etc.

And people like Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden? Unlike you, miss Schlussel, are True Americans, because it is them who are upholding the law since they are revealing that its your own governments that are breaking the laws, and unveiling their excesses, crimes and so Snowden and Manning are thus the most patriotic Americans while you and all those who support the biggest terrorists of the world (the us government) and their crimes by standing behind the facade of democracy (which, as you can see in the files, even those who propagate it are in fact not following it or carrying it out except in rhetoric) are a stain on the west and a disgrace to Democracy itself

Its people like YOU who are ruining the country, and there are many ‘foreigners’ that are worth twenty of you and are actually contributing to the country instead of sitting on their asses and coming out with such factually incorrect, bigoted, fascist swindle that imbibes prejudice pure, raw, hatred and which has laughingly already been proved false by potent evidence (wikileaks etc)

This is the most bigoted piece of writing and website overall that i have ever read and very contradictory in itself as well. And the most fascist, reminds me of hitlers preaching, except we just have to change those dirty ‘jews’ to those dirty ‘muslims’.

How the hell did you actually come to the conclusion that this is anything to do with muslims, or turks or arabs?
And even if it is, well, why don’t you watch kingdom of heaven. HAHAHA maybe not you might have a rabid hissy fit/stroke/heart attack.

Get out of this country, us hardworking, tax paying people don’t want you ruining the west and blaming it on your favourite scapegoats; Immigrants, Muslims etc.

In five years time; Haifa.

James Young on July 17, 2013 at 3:39 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field