September 30, 2014, - 9:57 am

Told Ya So: Chick Secret Service Agent Overpowered by WH Intruder; Did She Break a Nail?

By Debbie Schlussel

We now know that knife-wielding White House intruder Omar Gonzalez got as far as the East Room. And we know that he got there in part because he easily overpowered a FEMALE Secret Service Agent. Shocker.




Obama w/ his Incompetent Secret Service Chieftess Julia Pierson

Last week, I told you that the ongoing problems–failures!–at the U.S. Secret Service at the White House can be directly attributed to Obama’s affirmative action police: he hired a woman to run the agency based on her sole qualifications of past ability to ovulate (though only her gynecologist knows for sure if that once existed) and Billie Jean King’s haircut from 1982. Now we know that women in the Secret Service are part of the reason for its failure, not just at the top, but in its midst.

The man, 42-year-old Omar J. Gonzalez, ran unobstructed for 70 yards across the front lawn of the White House before entering through the North Portico. On the way, he brushed by a Secret Service officer with a drawn gun, sources tell CBS News’ Bill Plante. Gonzalez then proceeded to run through the entrance hall to the cross hall of the White House, past the staircase that leads up to the first family’s residence. He was confronted by a female Secret Service agent, who he overpowered, and made it all the way to the East Room, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CBS News, citing whistleblowers.


Are we really surprised that women are physically weaker than men and in most cases can be overpowered? Is this some new Einsteinesque, rocket science info? Really? This is a predictable result, not shocking in the least. Not even to feminists who pretend that a woman can do whatever a man can. And we will see the same thing in the Marine infantry and Army Rangers programs where women are being pushed into positions for which they aren’t qualified. The standards for women in federal law enforcement are lower than those for men. Successful female Secret Service applicants who become agents don’t have to run as fast, do as many push-ups, or shoot as well as the men. And that only breeds the situation that Omar Gonzalez encountered.

When you make vagina-based affirmative action, rather than ability and uniformly strict standards, the mission in your employee recruitment, hiring, and retention, this is what you get. A bunch of incompetent minorities and, frankly, a bumbling group of agents in the majority whose morale and own standards have been lessened as a result. As I told you a few months ago, this is the policy of the Obama Administration for all law enforcement, as Obama’s “Justice” Department is suing the Pennsylvania State Troopers for having uniform physical standards that weed out only a tiny portion of female applicants (70% of the females still make it into the PA Troopers).

What’s also predictable–and notable–is that much of the media coverage of the Secret Service agent being overpowered at the White House, left her genderless. Yes, many of the media stories, including one in the print version of today’s Wall Street Journal, fail to mention that this was a chick agent who was overpowered. They don’t want you to know the truth. They want you to think that all Secret Service agents are equally competent . . . or incompetent, when her inferior strength as a female is the key fact to the story.

Most private sector bodyguards are male . . . for a reason. As I noted last week, for all the negative press Blackwater (later named, “Xe,” and now called, “Akademi”) got, the organization NEVER lost a dignitary it protected in war-torn Iraq or Afghanistan. And if you look at the company’s rolls during that time, it was almost entirely male. In fact, I’m surprised we didn’t see any Obama EEOC gender-based lawsuits against the company. The fact is that in jobs focused on security and protection, men are physically more suited than women. Not everyone applying is a brutal lesbian WNBA lookalike. Most aren’t. And even those “women” are generally weaker than the average man. It’s just a fact of nature.

And it won’t change, no matter how politically correct and affirmative-action-driven the U.S. Secret Service becomes. When security and protection become secondary to affirmative action, armed or weapon-girded intruders will get to the East Room of the White House. And further. And Presidents and their families will eventually be harmed. The slippery slope is greased. And the agency slid to the bottom.

New Motto: The U.S. Secret Service . . . Did someone break a nail?


As I noted last week, one reason the Secret Service has become so gyno-centric, instead of security-focused, is that both Democrat AND Republican feminist politicians whined that the prostitution scandal in Colombia was the result of an alleged “male culture” of the agency and demanded a woman run the show and more women be moved up the Secret Service food chain. Um, here’s a tip: male culture is how you protect people from violent male intruders. Omar Gonzalez overpowering female agents is what you get with a female culture at the agency. Which is preferable–a few male Secret Service agents getting into hot water after they haggled with a foreign prostitute over price . . . or a President possibly being taken hostage at the White House? Or even a terrorist blowing up the White House from the East Room, which could have happened if Gonzalez was wearing a suicide bomb?


Remember when Brian Nichols, a convicted criminal (for crimes including murder), overpowered a chick sheriff’s deputy in an Atlanta courthouse and seized her gun? He shot and killed a judge and shot a court reporter, a cop, and a federal agent as a result. Those deaths came directly as a result of gender-based affirmative action. And that was in 2005, but nothing has changed. Nobody has woken up to this stark truth:

When you make having a vagina the key factor in law enforcement hiring, people die.

That’s just a fact. A fact the Secret Service had better wake up to, no matter what Barack Obama, the ACLU, and NO-FUC (the National Organization of Fat Ugly Chicks) says.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

33 Responses

I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating…

Affirmative action is a direct—and intended—consequence of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. One of the worst laws ever passed in our history.

Whatever small gains were made by minorities have long been overshadowed by a permanent culture of victimhood and entitlement. If there is a way to put that genie back into the bottle, I surely don’t know it.

Prometheus on September 30, 2014 at 10:13 am

    If anyone here needs to contact me, here is my info:

    My name is Michael Shaw and I’m executive vice president and director of marketing for Interscan Corporation.

    We sell Gas Detection Products.

    You can google us for more info.

    Prometheus on October 3, 2014 at 4:38 am

If they are going to hire a woman, she needs to look like Janet Reno (and not only because her looks will scare them off).

I_AM_ME on September 30, 2014 at 10:25 am

Maybe they should hire people in wheelchairs for the Secret Service so as to not discriminate against the handicapped. How about a few blind SS agents?

David on September 30, 2014 at 11:26 am

If Odirtbag wants to increase the risks of danger against himself, by putting chicks between himself and the bad guys, I say, let him!

Trigeek on September 30, 2014 at 11:33 am

The intruder could’ve very easily taken two weapons away from agents, especially the female agent’s, that he overpowered.

I don’t know if it’s a case of 100% affirmative action at this point in our society, or more a case of combining political correctness and affirmative action with incompetence across the board.

Case in point, the SAC Chicago had a female, black, agent in charge. Now one would think that it would be a mecca for minorities, but it was exactly the opposite: She loved white boys, even married one. A brother, or other male minority could not catch a break at that office. The POS SAC also loved females, promoting the most ridiculous, incompetant, stupidest female agents to supervisor. She even promoted a skank ASAC, former secretary, that many knew was in way over her skanky head. Male ASACs and G/S’s were basically emasculated, if they had a pair to begin with, and just cowered in silence as the POS SAC and Skank ran the office into the laughing stock of federal law enforcement in Chicago. Detroit SAC abu Mouskevitz was one of her favorite white boys, and we all know what a clown he was.
Of course DHS/ICE/HSI policy had a lot to do with the way that agency floundered and was destroyed. But above all was the circus that the POS SAC created unabashedly at that office.

QTD on September 30, 2014 at 12:19 pm

To paraphrase the late Rabbi Meir Kahane about this issue: I’m shocked that everybody else is shocked over this. And to those who would take issue with what is brought up here, need I remind everyone: R.I.F.

ConcernedPatriot on September 30, 2014 at 12:21 pm

I gotta make this count because my posts don’t always go thru’.

Of course DS is correct. I see the media haven’t said the agent overpowered was a broad, LOLOL. I’m a FORMER feminist and think having chicks in that position (and as head of agency) is stupid and foolish. Facts don’t lie.

But you know the same dopes upset by the Hannah Graham column will wanna hold on to their feminist ideology with a kung-fu grip. It’s pathetic! I was as strong a believer as one could get and I believe NONE of it now. That’s why I laugh when I see female cops now. Why not hire a goose then?

I can’t wait to read the column on the Black Moooooooslim. Duped into Islam and he has no clue how the adherents inherently are racist towards Blacks universally. That’s even more dumb and pathetic than the Black apologists who want to see raaaaaacism everywhere when it’s not. The one who can’t figure out in 2014 that White Libtards use Blacks for their own power edification. Not everyone can have an average IQ I reckon…

Skunky on September 30, 2014 at 12:52 pm

    I’m stupefied every time I see a SINGLE, unaccompanied female cop driving around here in metro Atlanta. It’s bad enough that male cops have to drive single. But a female????? In the interest of “equal rights” across the sexes, and political correctness, this society is actually showing that they don’t really give a damn about women. They would rather sacrifice a female cop’s life on the alter of political correctness. It’s sickening.

    Trigeek on September 30, 2014 at 4:25 pm

    (Skunky, I recommend making an electronic copy [I use Evernote] of your replies until Debbie gets things fixed.)

    skzion on September 30, 2014 at 4:48 pm

Political Correctness Kills like the bumper sticker says.
After the Iranian DC Terror plot in 2011 this kind of thing is really bad.
It’s just sad to see that for so many people in the western world their institutionalized illusions have become their primary source of security.

japple on September 30, 2014 at 1:58 pm

    Lezbe clear with the facts here. The creature heading up the Secret Service will remain in her position. After all, she was hand picked by Obambi. No changes here……likme the IRS, CIA, NSA, VA, etc.

    Victoryman on October 1, 2014 at 10:59 am

If the present administration buys into equality, that the President is willing to sacrifice his personal safety promoting an agenda…then so be it.

I spent 4-decades in INS & DHS. I have often thought the policies were deliberate. We don’t really do the job as we once did with INS and what better way to promote equality than to hire chicks and pretend they are law enforcement within an agency where we don’t enforce laws. Even at the academy it was routinely stated (by the instructors) that the safest place at the Range is behind the target of any female trainee.

#1 Vato on September 30, 2014 at 2:19 pm

Gaddafi had female body guards so the next crew better watch out when the next Billybob Clinton inhabits the oval office.
The important thing about policies like this is they’re easy to implement but almost impossible to get rid of.
Inefficiency through regulation is what makes government great.
This is a problem that will need more tax payer money eventually.

japple on September 30, 2014 at 2:45 pm

We are bound to see this happen again. It is a miracle that some sort of mayhem did not occur in the White House as a result of this intrusion.

Worry on September 30, 2014 at 2:55 pm

Yeah, Debbie called it! Thank you Ma’am!

PDMac60 on September 30, 2014 at 4:01 pm

This incident is a parody of irony…
No offense; Hispanic dude (with Arabic name((s))jumps fence, runs past guard shacks, traverses the open terrain, past an overwatch nest, opens the front door-which is unlocked-runs into our home, past stairs that lead to our bedrooms, over powers a feeble irony of a officer, thinks he’s “home free” for the kitchen, and is finally subdued by a male member of a security society….
…and we’re surprised why??
Femininity-regardless of sex-is why there is NOT more pluralistic and universal peace in the world, and why there is less universal security everywhere. Diminutive feminine leadership from El Presidente on down. Regardless of what I/you think of El Prez., he IS the President of the United States period. Heads should roll period. (and less Vagina Monologues.)

Sick_Boy on September 30, 2014 at 4:18 pm

We should make IFC experience mandatory for all female candidates for the Secret Service. I wouldn’t object if Gina Carano took me down. It’s almost worth getting arrested for.

Trigeek on September 30, 2014 at 4:31 pm

Yep, unfortunately once again you were right. Plus, the White House had its first “drive-by”. Time to fire that ugly hag.

Lars on September 30, 2014 at 6:49 pm

There is clearly something odd going on here.

Look for several of the agents – especially the reportedly off-duty agent who ultimately did overpower Gonzalez – to die in mysterious accidents within the next few months.

Guardian Angel on September 30, 2014 at 7:42 pm

A gun doesn’t equalize everything.

When a woman is matched against a man, she will lose every time.

What you see in movies and TV shows with women overpowering men is fiction. Its possible because you can suspend the laws of reality. And its fun.

But in real life, having a woman do the kind of dangerous work a man does leads to disaster – for both women and men alike. There are some jobs too important to be assigned to women.

Equality is nothing to celebrate if you wind up dead. Feminism has NOT come a long way, baby.

NormanF on September 30, 2014 at 8:04 pm

Guardian Angel thinks like I do. I thought there was something that smelled from the moment this story broke. I don’t think this was for real, but I can’t figure out why this would have been set up. This doesn’t seem to set up the Martial Law predictions that have been made in years past, which I agree with.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on September 30, 2014 at 11:00 pm

You’re right, Debbie; no women at Blackwater (except in the office). At least not in 2004.
Thinking back to the infantry and some of the other places I’ve been, I have to say I’m glad I was there before mandatory sexual political correctness was enforced. If you grow up in a modern, PC school learning a bunch of stuff about how everyone is the same (not “equal”; “the same”), and then go into some job where they force people to pretend that everyone is the same, you can fail to realize the huge difference it makes to a group like infantrymen or Secret Service agents. I’m not just talking about physical capabilities either. Everyone knows that a woman is not going to be able to carry some wounded member of her unit, all his gear, all HER gear, and their weapons up a hill while being shot at, as we all trained to do. No, even more important is the impact she has on the unit.
Take a random group of men. Put them in a room together. Doesn’t matter if they are watching football or practicing room-entry and CQB drills. The men will bond in a certain way. They will reach a social equilibrium, establish a pecking order, become a group. Now, drop any given female into that room. Again, doesn’t matter who, what, where, when or how. The entire social dynamic INSTANTLY changes. Now the men who were so tight knit instantly start to fracture. Rivalries develop. Competitiveness gets out of hand. Guys start to become enemies with other guys. Not just friendly rivals; enemies. How does this happen? It’s how human brains are wired. Survival; fight, flight, reproduce. These are powerful drives and the second you have a female in a tight-knit group like that, the instinct to compete over her overrides the instinct to bond as a team. Guess what, if your team doesn’t gel, guys die. It is that simple. Watch sports and think about teamwork. Multiply that by 100 and you have some idea of how important it is in the kinds of jobs where people’s lives are on the line all the time. To me, it isn’t just about physical strength, it’s about human psychology, behaviors under stress, in survival situations, in combat. This has never worked, and it has been tried again and again and again throughout the history of warfare.
All I can say is Obama is getting the Secret Service he deserves.

Jubal Biggs on October 1, 2014 at 9:04 am

Mr. Biggs, on the one hand, that is a brilliant analysis, seriously. Your point by point breakdown of the dynamics that exist in teams of men hit like bullets at the center of a target. It should be required reading for every American, especially those in positions of political power.

And on the other hand, it is also common sense. Men and women? Different? You DON’T say!!! LOL!!!

And THAT, is the sad part, and why I believe there is a deliberate mentality to the machinations dismantling the political structure, military services, and civil society here in America.

NOBODY, does such nonsensical things as are being done in this country, . . .

unless they are looking to kill themselves, or in the case of America, all of us.

Thanks for chiming in, Mr. Biggs, great stuff. Having broken bread and shared joints with geeks, gangsters and everyone in between, I thoroughly understand and agree with your points about dynamics in groups of men.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on October 1, 2014 at 10:47 am

Now I know how to get a free tour of the Whitehouse. Seriously why is no one getting fired? The lack of accountability is destroying our government. I am held accountable if I think of breaking one of their regulations, but nothing happens to them. Where is this going to end up?

Army_Vet on October 1, 2014 at 11:12 am

Remember when the Obama Administration announced that women would be allowed into combat roles but that the physical standards expected of combat soldiers would not be lowered for women? Well, they have been.

This question should be asked of lefties, feminists, etc. concerning police, firefighters, soldiers, marines, etc., and even football players – which would be the better group, force, etc. – all male or all female? A leftie/feminist etc. will never answer the question directly and/or honestly.

Concerned Citizen on October 1, 2014 at 1:28 pm

Gonzalez should not plead not guilty. Rather, he should plead “OJ”. Don’t Mexican-Americans have an Al Sharpton? Affirmative action says Gonzalez is not guilty. Rather, he is a victim of historical discrimination.

Prometheus, I don’t agree with your comment. The problem isn’t the civil rights act of 1964. Do the math! That was 50 years ago. (Oops! I did the math for you.) The problem is that here in America, we take every good idea to the nth degree of absurdity. If you disagree, I would suggest you place your starting point with the ratification of the 13th Amendment. Don’t forget the 19th Amendment too.

If the President wants little girls to guard his life, who am I to argue? It’s HIS life!

Our Harvard-educated President is reputed (by his supporters) to be a brilliant man. Does anyone think he learned anything from all this?


There is NO Santa Claus (aka TINSC)

There is NO Santa Claus on October 1, 2014 at 11:38 pm

I completely agree with this article. Women, on average, are not physically capable of competing against the average man in a fight. To put it simply: woman should not be allowed in LE, the military, or as secret service agents.

Valeri S. on October 3, 2014 at 12:10 am

I would be surprised if you actually allowed any of your readers to read negative comments but you need to know that you are not right on this.

Cindy Przybilla on January 22, 2015 at 8:25 pm

    No, she isn’t wrong at all.

    Eben on September 5, 2015 at 11:32 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field