By Debbie Schlussel

I would never think of storing a cell phone in my bra. It seems like a weird place, and it would get more sweat (and maybe some deoderant) on it than usual. And it seems like a low-class practice to me (like a cocktail waitress at a truck stop keeping cash in her bra). But many young women apparently do this, and some of them are suddenly getting breast cancer. Although no scientific studies have been done, the instructions with many phones say not to keep your phone stored next to or on your skin, and it appears that there is a link. If you know any women–friends, wives, girlfriends, mothers, sisters, daughters, etc.–please watch these videos and tell them NOT to do this. It appears this is based on phone-to-skin contact only. But, regardless of gender, I would not keep the phone in my pants or skirt pocket because who wants to risk the possibility that you might get cancer on your genital region? That’s happened to police who had radar guns (to detect speeders) sitting in their laps. Check out the news report videos, below.

Watch these frightening videos . . . Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Longtime readers of this site know that I’ve been on the case of Arcapita, formerly known as First Islamic Investment Bank, for over a decade. Last year, when the company–owned by Jew-hating Gulf State sheiks (including the family that owns Al-Jazeera, the Qatari royal family)–filed for bankruptcy, I cheered. But my jaw dropped when I learned that the company had the gall to submit a sharia-compliant bankruptcy plan. That’ll never fly, I thought, because it’s unconstitutional. But I was wrong. As I’ve noted many times before, there truly is no Establishment Clause for Muslims in America or separation between mosque and state. These things apparently only apply to Christians and Jews. Yesterday, federal Judge Sean Lane of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan, gushing how “fascinating” he found sharia, approved the sharia bankruptcy. Disgusting. It’s just the latest instance in which a U.S. Court recognizes Islamic law. Look for more and more of that. When an American bankruptcy court recognizes Islamic law, it opens the door for other American courts and institutions to recognize Islamic law.

In 2002, Arcapita, the former owner of Caribou Coffee, appointed Muslim Brotherhood cleric and America-hating, Jew-hating scumbag Yusuf Al-Qaradawi as one of its top executives, to make sure that all of its products and services–at Caribou and its other businesses–were sharia-complaint. When I exposed this in a 2002 New York Post column (a longer version of which appears here) and appearances on FOX News’ “O’Reilly Factor” and MSNBC’s “Hardball with Chris Matthews,” the bank claimed to fire Qaradawi, but it didn’t matter. Caribou (which is now owned by a German company, which is closing or renaming most Caribou stores) had its worst sales quarter ever, and the bank fired its then-CEO, replacing him with a far-left Jewish yes-man who flashed his Jewish credentials to try to get people to patronize Caribou. A few years ago, a friend of mine repeated my work in a newsletter he sent out to the Jewish community and found himself on the receiving end of lawsuit threats from Arcapita. I represented my friend and told Arcapita’s retained Jewish lawyer that we would be looking forward to deposing the sheik shareholders who own Arcapita and looking over their finances, including donations to Islamic terrorists. That shut them up.

You should note that, per usual, the extremist Arcapita–whose board members and shareholders included a cleric with ties to Al-Qaeda and a sheikh who apparently donated money to a Palestinian terrorist telethon–had a Jewish lawyer in the bankruptcy. Yup, they hate the Jews, but they always hire them as legal counsel. Clearly, lawyer Michael Rosenthal of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm wasn’t bothered by the fact that Arcapita’s hand-picked exec, Qaradawi, urged Muslims to give up their dowries and instead spend the money to fund Palestinian homicide bombers and spill “Zionist blood” or that he urged Muslims to blow up U.S. soldiers in Iraq as a religious duty.

More:

Bahrain investment firm Arcapita Bank received approval from a U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Tuesday for its plan to repay creditors, thought to be the first that is compliant with sharia, Islamic law. “I’m happy to confirm the plan,” said Judge Sean Lane of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan. “This has been a fascinating case for me.” Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

I get that this chapel removed Christian pews because, after all, we must show our “tolerance” of Muslims–which means America and its Judeo-Christian heritage bending over for Islam with more flexibility and repetition than a gymnast nymphomaniac. But I just don’t get why this is exhibit is called “13th Ballad,” instead of the more appropriate, “12th Imam.” Oh, and by the way, despite Christian pews being defiled in a modern art exhibit, American Christians didn’t start a frenzy-filled, murderous rampage, engaging in mass killing of Muslims. Imagine that. We are actually civilized, as we roll over and allow the country to continue to be invaded and the cancer to continue to metastasize within.

Upon entering the Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago’s Kovler Atrium, audiences will find rows of pews from University of Chicago’s Bond Chapel. The pews were removed in order to provide Muslim students a place to pray. Above the pews hangs a large-scale double-cross sculpture filled with household items such as umbrellas, dented cans for non-perishables, and wine glasses. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Edward Snowden, the private contractor, who violated his top secret security clearance and gave away secrets of government data mining to detect terrorists, should be prosecuted. Make no mistake. He is NOT a hero. He’s merely an arrogant, misguided egomaniac. And he’s no different than Bradley Manning, the soldier who gave away secrets to Julian Assange, for them to be publicized to the world. Many conservatives rightly called for Manning’s prosecution. Why do they hypocritically now make excuses for Snowden?

On Friday, I heard a caller tell Rush Limbaugh that “we all–including you–supported this” under Bush. Limbaugh disagreed, claiming that right after 9/11, he said on the air that he hoped the terrorist attacks wouldn’t be used by the government to take away our rights. He then claimed he was always against this. But Limbaugh’s memory is selective. In fact, when a group of Arab Muslims (including HAMAS CAIR), left-wingers (including Greenpeace and the late Christopher Hitchens), the ACLU, and libertarian-“conservatives” on the right filed a federal lawsuit in Detroit in January 2006 to stop Bush NSA telephone wiretapping, Limbaugh supported the Bush wiretaps and supportively read my article on the plaintiffs and participants on the air. Those wiretaps were far more invasive than the the Snowden-revealed program of mining phone numbers and e-mails for patterns. And Limbaugh and most on the right supported the wiretaps without warrants. Now, they are upset over a program that is far more constitutional. There is nothing that violates any right to privacy here because conversations and e-mails are not being recorded, unless and until there is probable cause.

It was laughable, yesterday, when Limbaugh read, with approval, a British newspaper’s differentiation of Snowden from Manning because Snowden is “smart” and “has a girlfriend” and “a life.” Huh? He’s an arrogant 29-year-old with a girlfriend who is an “acrobatic dancer” (one step above stripper, but still complete with pole). These are silly “distinctions” without a difference to what he did: jeopardize national security and break the law. But let’s say she was a ballroom dancer and they lived in a mansion. So what? We’re now judging a guy’s violation of national security based on class and snobbery? Really? A soldier–Manning–is “not credible,” but a pencil-necked, egomaniacal Millennial who hides in Hong Kong is? A soldier who disclosed national security secrets is to be condemned because he disclosed secrets because he is gay (at that time, Don’t Ask Don’t Tell was still in place), but a contractor–who took over $100,000 in annual pay (and–newsflash!–cashed the checks, because he’s such a “principled guy”) is not to be condemned for breaking the law and informing Islamic terrorists what we are doing? Thanks, Rush. Good to know you’re a snob. But both of these cretins should be prosecuted, just like you and other conservatives (such as FOX News’ Michelle Fraudkin) were calling for the leaker of information regarding the far more invasive Bush NSA wiretaps in 2005 to the New York Times to be prosecuted. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Over the weekend, when the name of the Santa Monica murderer of five was released, I received plenty of e-mails from readers and friends asking me about John Zawahri. He murdered five people, including his brother Chris and his father, Samir “Sam” Zawahri, and injured several others. Yes, they were Arabs. No, they were not Muslim. They were Christians, and his parents, Samir Zawahri and Randa Abdou, were immigrants from Lebanon. What struck me is that this is the second such rampage by the kid of an Arab immigrant family in California, this year. In March, I wrote about Muslim Ali Syed of Orange County, who went on a jihadist rampage, shooting and murdering three innocent people not related to him and wounding several others. Like Zawahri, he also was a 20-something ex-student who was excused as “mentally disturbed.” Um, yeah, “mentally disturbed while Arab,” or as I call it, “the halal twinkie defense.”

Whether they are Christian or Muslim, this is the culture of the Arab Middle East. They are violent and don’t settle things peacefully and civilly. It’s “in the blood.” As I’ve frequently noted on this site, Egyptian Copts (also Christians) are extremely violent and bloody and led Muslims in pogroms against Jews in Egypt. The Copts and the Greek and Syrian Orthodox were helping HAMAS and Hezbollah. That’s their “brethren.” Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

For years, I’ve noted on this site and elsewhere that one of the most popular fashion accessories for elite White chick stars is a Black baby, worn for the cameras like the latest trendy purse. And TMZ–months ago–did a funny video piece on this, which was deemed “too controversial” to air on its syndicated daily TV show. Well, now, TMZ owner and producer Harvey Levin finally decided to cast aside the PC censors and post it online. It’s below. (The second video, below, shows how politically correct they were previously, refusing to air it, despite the request of even TMZ’s Black employees–they know more than anyone how political and PR-engineered these Black baby adoptions by the rich and famous celebs are).

By Debbie Schlussel

It’s no secret that the British are extremely anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. It’s no secret that the British repeatedly sided with the Arab Muslims when the British controlled what was then “Palestine” until Israel became an official state. (They seemed to relish in sending Jews back to Hitler-controlled Europe, to be murdered in the Holocaust. While in Palestine, the British soldiers often made anti-Semitic trinkets and dolls to mock the Jews.) And it’s no secret that there are now something like 12 times as many Muslims as Jews in the United Kingdom (and fast growing beyond that), and so the British continue to display their anti-Semitism, while the Muslims destroy their country and they do nothing about it. And so it’s no surprise that yet another British Member of Parliament displays his Jew-hatred in a BBC undercover interview. In this case, it’s Conservative Party MP Patrick Mercer, a former BBC correspondent himself (as I’ve noted before, the “Conservatives” of Britain would be liberals in America–their “conservatism” is only relative to the far left of Britain’s Labor Party and other such wacko parties there).

Patrick Mercer described a young Israeli soldier as looking like a “bloody Jew” in a conversation secretly recorded during the course of an undercover investigation. In small talk with an undercover reporter posing as a lobbyist, the Conservative MP described meeting a young female soldier during a recent trip he had taken to Israel. Mr Mercer said that when the young woman told him she was a soldier, he thought: “You don’t look like a soldier to me. You look like a bloody Jew.” Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Another mediocre weekend of new movies at theaters this weekend–well-suited for an ever more mediocre nation. *** SPOILER ALERT *** – If you don’t want certain things given away for the very predictable, “The Purge,” only read the first two sentences of my review:

* “The Purge“: I absolutely hated this very obvious, predictable far-left “social commentary” denouncing rich White people (especially those who are still in married, nuclear families) and mocking American patriotism as something akin to supporting murder. Samantha Power–Obama’s America-hating UN Ambassador nominee–would LOVE this. The only good guy in this movie is a Black homeless veteran, who saves everyone, including the family that tortured him and was going to help him get murdered. And while the movie is entertaining, it’s mostly a racist (anti-White) exercise in torture porn, killing porn, and other brutal savagery. That’s how it gets its “thrills.” I saw almost every “twist” and plot point in this movie a million miles away–that the Black guy was gonna save the day, that the rich people are evil, self-absorbed Whites (they threw on one Black chick with the evil Whites at the end to make it seem balanced, but it wasn’t), that the daughter’s boyfriend was gonna try to kill the dad, etc. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

HAMAS CAIR and all the other Muslim alphabet soup terrorist-supporting organizations always make a big deal about the hijab–the Islamic women’s headscarf–to the point of absurdity. And, as I often point out, it’s frequently hypocritical and fraudulent. These so-called “modest” women in the hijabs aren’t so modest after all. In fact, they are frequently frauds and hypocrites and as slutty as Kim Kardashian and the teen moms, all while they look at us Americans as the sluts and with disdain. And so it goes with two women in hijabs, yesterday in Detroit, when they thought they were molesting actor Ryan Gosling, who is in the area filming a movie because Michigan legislators (Democrats AND Republicans) give stars like him Michigan tax dollars to film junk and suck money away from hard-working stiffs. Check out the video below at approximately 2:25 in. (The video is also a great demonstration in American groupthink idiocy.)

Islamic women–especially the ones in hijabs–believe that they are not supposed to touch men or kiss them, even on the cheek. They look at non-Muslim women who do this as slutty. And the whole “modesty” thing they purport to observe is not just manifested in the headscarf, which is actually more minor under Islamic law than touching men to whom they are not married and who are not relatives. But the two women in the video, below, threw all of that to the wind when they thought they were touching and kissing Ryan Gosling. And, so, they might as well throw away their headscarves. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Hey, it’s more of that precious Muslim “tolerance” on display at the Miss World Beauty Pageant. Because some Muslims might get angry and murder a whole lotta people in a rampage, the attitude is always, “Hey, what other restriction can we put in place so that Muslims don’t get all jihadist on us?” Yup, Muslims ask for us for “tolerance” of them and their backwards, “party-like-it’s-1499” ways (squat toilets at your local mall!). But when it comes to tolerance from them, you ain’t never gonna get it. Never ever. Denial is a river in Egypt, and tolerance is a one-way street in Islam. And it only goes their way.

The irony here is that the event is being held in Bali. Yes, that’s in Indonesia, where the largest population of Muslims in the world lives, but it’s also the place where tourists–which make Indonesia gazillions of dollars–parade around in the skimpiest of bikinis. But Muslims are hypocrites, and they’d rather get the dollars from the tourists than shut down the bikinis on the beaches there. Halal Cha-ching! And this is more the action of the dhimmi organizers of “Miss World” than the Indonesians, though they are quite intolerant themselves.

Contestants at this year’s Miss World beauty pageant will not wear bikinis in the parade in a bid to avoid causing offence in Muslim-majority Indonesia, organisers confirmed Wednesday. The 137 women taking part in the September contest will swap bikinis for more conservative attire, such as traditional sarongs, for the beach fashion section. Read the rest of this entry »