By
Recently, I broke the news to you that for misconduct. I learned on Friday that he was indicted, as many loyal Dearborn Police officers (tired of their ethically-challenged Islamo-pandering chief and officers like Saab). Now it is official. The man held up to the world after 9/11 as the model Muslim police officer is no model of anything . . . except criminality and corruption.

Hezbollah’s Anti-Serpico: Dearbornistan Officer Daniel Saab
Saab was fired for misconduct, but it was well past time. The man’s behavior over the course of his career is criminal. Think Denzel Washington’s character in “Training Day” or Richard Gere’s in “Internal Affairs.” Saab is the anti-Serpico. He is deceptively innocent-looking and pure evil.
Daniel Saab, a Shi’ite and open Hezbollah supporter, displayed a Hezbollah poster at his community policing office at the Dearborn Public Library. In most police offices, that would be grounds for dismissal, as would Saab’s conviction for stalking a Michigan state legislator, and his admission in testimony placing him at the time and location of a late-night fire-bombing of a non-Muslim Dearborn City Councilman’s car.
But the Dearbornistan Police Department is not “most police departments.” It’s like the corrupt third-world police departments you see in the movies, where there are so many good cops who want to enforce the law and so many bad cops who run the asylum along with their Mayoral and Police Chief allies in the back pockets of terrorism supporters.
Saab spent years shaking down, harassing, and attacking various Dearbornistan citizens on behalf of then Dearbornistan Mayor Michael “The Godfather” Guido, now deceased. Although Guido was not a Muslim, he was in the back pocket of the most extreme Muslims in town, including fugitive federal indictee and , who reportedly gave him a $9,000 ring, thousands in cash, and ongoing tabs at Detroit’s three casinos.
Saab was Guido’s henchmen. And he didn’t just terrorize infidels. He terrorized fellow Muslims. One, a jewelry store owner who was suing Dearborn over the controversial death of his epileptic brother in a Dearborn jail, had his business repeatedly vandalized, reportedly at the direction of the Mayor, who protected Saab at every turn of malfeasance. In turn, Saab did Guido’s bidding and that of Guido’s Hezbollah financier patrons.
Now, Saab is finally getting his due. But in many ways it is too little too late. The feds–specifically the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office–repeatedly ignored Dearborn citizens’ complaints against Saab, and even tipped Mayor Guido and Saab off about their communications with complainants. Now Saab will defend against his federal indictment for witness and evidence tampering and producing a false police report, with the help of Islamist attorney and Hezbollah supporter , with whom the FBI and are close.
Reportedly, Ayad’s fees are being paid for by a pro-Hezbollah Dearborn businessman who owns a lot of property in the city. One of his properties, a home occupied by drug dealers, was reportedly visited by Mohammed Attah well before the 9/11 attacks.
There is so much more on Daniel Saab, to which I’ve alluded on this site previously, and I will get to it.
Stay tuned. And until then, remember, Dearbornistan is ground zero and a scary omen for America’s future.
Dan Saab’s story is what happens to a city when Islamists take over. Dearborn’s new Mayor, Jack O’Reilly, is not much different from his predecessor and was in on many of his “deals.” His hands were forced on Saab’s situation.
And those hands are almost as dirty.

By Debbie Schlussel
I’ve over the years. And while I know quite a few of my readers have them (I guess they are the exceptions to my generalizations), you still gotta wonder about why anyone would put permanent marks on themselves. I’m glad my religion forbids me from getting one.
In my view, they’re more forgivable on men. But, , a woman who doesn’t take long to agree to repeatedly put a needle in her body, generally doesn’t take long before she acquiesces to putting other things into her body. In other words, she’s easy.
Now, there are more serious implications for those women with the “tramp stamp” marking their lower backs. Once they get pregnant, there is serious harm potential to themselves and their unborn child.

Easy and Now At Risk to Her Baby
Wall Street Journal health columnist Rachel Zimmerman reports:

Pregnant women already have plenty to worry about. But now some doctors are pointing to another potential problem: tattoos.
The issue is whether it’s safe to stick a needle through a tattoo in the lower back for an epidural — an injection of painkilling medicine that can ease the discomfort of labor.
There has been an explosion in recent years in women’s lower-back tattoos — often ornate designs that take up a lot of surface area near the vertebrae where epidural needles are typically inserted.
In 2002, a pair of Canadian anesthesiologists published a report that questioned whether administering an epidural through such a tattoo could be risky. The doctors speculated that complications like inflammation or nerve damage may arise if the needle pulled a bit of dyed skin along with it, and then deposited it into the nerve-rich region outside the spinal column. . . .
A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology found that nearly one-quarter of Americans ages 18 to 50 are tattooed. [DS Translation: Dermatologists and plastic surgeons practicing laser removal will have an even more booming biz in a few years.] Among them, nearly 20% of the women have tattoos on their lower back, researchers reported. [DS Translation: At least 20% of American women are saying, “We’ll be seeing each other come bar time.”]
The national epidural rate is nearly 65% of the four million births a year in the U.S. . . .
The Food and Drug Administration says tattoo inks and pigments fall into categories that the agency regulates, but due to other health priorities, the agency hasn’t specifically approved any inks. Two FDA-backed studies are under way to evaluate possible adverse reactions to the ink, and ways to test it for toxicity.
Krzysztof Kuczkowski, chief of obstetric anesthesia at the University of California San Diego Medical Center, published an account in 2004 of a 34-year-old patient with tattoos covering her mid-lumbar area who received an epidural. Afterward she experienced unusual burning, tenderness and swelling where the epidural catheter had been placed. Dr. Kuczkowski believes the tattoo was the culprit. “It’s possible there’s a release of small particles that could contain metals or toxic compounds,” he says.
Anesthesiologist Mark Kostash, clinical professor at the University of Calgary in Alberta, says, “Nerves are so delicate and can be injured so easily, we want to minimize the risk that anything we do might cause damage.” He adds: “If it was me, and I had a tattoo, I’d say, ‘Go around it.’ ”
Anesthesiologists should try to avoid the tattoo. Or they can create a nick in the skin before the needle is stuck in, minimizing the chance of some skin getting pulled down with the injection. Finally, Dr. Douglas says, women should be told that while there is no proof complications will arise, there remains a potential risk.

Or better than going around the tattoo, here’s another suggestion for women who want to have a baby:
Don’t get a tattoo.

By
So, a guy says on his website he supports Cosa Nostra (the Mafia). He has photos of various Gambino family members on his obscure website and messages trying to recruit others for division of Gambino organized crime operations. He is observed preparing to carry out a mafia hit and training for it in a local park with an AK-47. And he’s a third-year medical student on the side.
Do local newspapers say, “Armed Student’s Motives Unclear,” or do they say, “Med Student Doubled as Mafioso in Training”? Well, that depends. If the man were Italian and had photos of John Gotti on his site, he’s definitely mobbed up.

Whatever: Pan-Islamist Dearbornistan Mayor Jack O’Reilly
Claims Hezbollah Terrorist Houssein Zorkot “Not Terrorist-Related”
BUT . . . If the man was a Muslim and the Gambino and mob connections were actually Muslim and Hezbollah ones, then we can be sure no-one in the Detroitistan or Dearbornistan media and law enforcement will know what he was up to. They will go with the first headline and claim. They couldn’t actually believe that a Lebanese Shi’ite man armed with an AK-47, declaring allegiance to Hezbollah and its leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah would actually mean what he said. He was just playing Muslim cowboys and Indians, right? His motives were unclear.
That’s the case with , the 3rd year med student and Hezbollah member I wrote about last week. The Detroit Free Press headline (on an article written by resident Islamist Niraj Warikoo):

Armed Student’s Motives Unclear

Hmmm . . . He says he supports Hezbollah and is on a “personal jihad” on his website. He then trains with an AK-47 in a Dearbornistan Park. I’d say the motives are quite clear.
And there’s more:
The FBI and police are investigating Zorkot. . . . But for now, they’ve found no direct links between him and any terrorist organization.
Uh-huh.
And a card-carrying member of the ACLU has no direct links between him/herself and the ACLU. Riiiight.
Dearbornistan Mayor Jack O’Reilly (who is alleged to have taken pay-offs from and who voted for a controversial overpayment of several million for a Chahine building Dearborn didn’t need):

Was he really dangerous or was he acting out some fantasy? We don’t know. . . .His parents . . . have said he’s a young man who’s just confused right now.

Yeah. Was the Shoe Bomber, Richard Reid, really dangerous or was he acting out some fantasy with kinky fuses in his libidinous Nikes? Maybe Mohammed Atta and his 18 buds were just young men who were just confused. Uh-huh. That’s the ticket.
It’s pretty clear he was dangerous (he was carrying an AK-47, which he turned on police) and we DO know. . . unless you’re a mayor in the back pocket of Hezbollah’s most radical supporters in Dearborn, as hizzoner is.
Welcome to the future of America. As I’ve been saying for many years, Dearbornistan (the name I coined) is just ground zero. Just the beginning of a long-spreading cancer.

By
This week, the jury in the ongoing trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development begins deliberations. Will they let these HAMAS money launderers go free?
That depends on whether they believe the feds did a good job laying out their case. And given that the feds did not even want to indict Holy Land Foundation until principled courageously forced their hands (in an appearance on an ABC News interview with Brian Ross) in their ongoing mamby pamby reticence to go after terrorists charities, the Justice Department didn’t really have its heart in getting these terrorist financiers from the get-go.

Holy Land Foundation:
Will HAMAS’ U.S. Money-Laundering Machine Get Away With It?
I hope the jury makes the right decision. If not, we can expect the charity to reconstitute and $12 million more to freely go to financing homicide bombings and the families of “martyrs” in the Middle East.
Sadly, as a former U.S. State Department diplomat in Israel (P.L.O. lobbyist Edward Abington) and an equally evil former U.S. Congressman (John Bryant) testified on behalf of the Holy Land Foundation, claiming it’s not HAMAS, when we know that it is (and DoJ did little to counter them). It was financed in part by Musa Abu Marzook, the political director of HAMAS, and run by his family. If John Gotti financed something, I think we’d be safe in saying it was a Gambino family operation.
But jurors aren’t always safe. They’re often stupid and clones of those who served under Judge Ito for O.J. And Justice Dept. prosecutors are often inept bores who glaze juries’ eyes over, as reports say happened in this case. Let’s hope the glaze doesn’t cloud good judgment.
If the prosecutors lose this case, it’s no biggie for them. They work for the government, and they’re here to help you. Merely on to the next case for them.
But for America, the decision in this case is monumental. Our safety and security depends on it. If the United States of American loses in this case, Muslim terrorists will be laughing all the way to the bank . . . via charities on our soil.

By
Even though she’s, sadly, won over gullible U.S. Senators on the Homeland Security Committee, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Chieftess put together a phony civil rights program to win over liberal Democrats . . . just in case.

The ICE Princess Announces Her
Coincidentally-Timed New Affirmative Action Program
Timing is everything. And that’s why it’s no coincidence that The ICE Princess signed a permanent agreement with three Black colleges to reserve a significant number of internships at ICE for Blacks. That’s important because it’s hard enough already for anyone–regardless of race–to attain the relatively few ICE internship slots available for those college students interested in pursuing a career in federal immigration enforcement. Now, under Myers’ new plan it’s: Whites need not apply. I thought Republicans were against quotas. But I was wrong. If you are a White college student looking for a job in law enforcement, look to another agency . . . for this and a host of other reasons I’ve noted on my site in the last two-plus years.
And the program is sheer phoniness designed to impress clueless liberal (redundant) Senators. I’m completely against affirmative action for minorities, but , there are ZERO Black agents in any of the stop spots at ICE. Check out this leadership page: White as rice. The only Black person in top leadership is a non-agent in–it figures–an equal employment job. I personally know that there are plenty of Black (and White and Hispanic and Asian and male) agents who are far more qualified than the vast lot of losers and incompetents The ICE Princess has chosen for her coterie of court jesters.
Like I said, I’m not for affirmative action or minority preferences in hiring and promotions, but she’s pretending she is. And the Black colleges are falling for it.
And then there’s the fact : The ICE Princess worked on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, a federal holiday. And she made Michigan-based ICE agents work, too, chauffeuring her around like Miss Daisy. And stock her fridge with Diet Coke that they bought. I’m told that after I posted about it, the agents suddenly were reimbursed. Shocker.
Yep, as I said, The ICE Princess doesn’t give a damn about Black (or White–or any) ICE agents. Everything is done by design. And the design this week is getting her absurd, laughable nomination approved.
Looks like she’s well on her way. Illegal aliens are laughing all the way to the bank.
I do have one suggestion, though. If Myers were truly interested in promoting Blacks, she’d have picked one for the top spot at ICE . . . instead of selfishly picking herself.
Mirror, mirror on the wall. This chick is the phoniest of them all.

“Julie Myers’ Diet Coke” artwork by David Lunde

By
This weekend features a couple of good picks, among them an unlikely Donkey Kong documentary, and a few stinkers:

* “The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters“: This is my favorite movie among this weeks movie releases. A hilarious, clever, entertaining, light, and enjoyable flick, it’s about the quest to be the world record holder in the classic video game, “Donkey Kong.” Unlike most movies, I had fun watching this one. And after “In the Shadow of the Moon,” it’s the second best documentary of the year and in my top ten movies of the year.
If you grew up in the ’70s or ’80s, you’ll especially like this film. But even if you did not, you’ll like it anyway. It’s not so much about video game competitors, as it is about good guys finishing on top and the battle of wills in competition where the odds are sometimes unfairly stacked.
Steve Wiebe is a laid-off sensitive guy and former baseball sensation. But he’s discovered a new talent. He’s great at Donkey Kong and set the world record, via videotape, from the Donkey Kong machine in his basement. Or did he? Billy Mitchell, the movie’s bete noir–the reigning Kong record-holder–is not about to allow his record to be conquered.
Mitchell, who resembles a young Chuck Norris, looks like he just walked out of the ’70s, with his long mane of feathered black hair, tight black jeans and cowboy boots and leather jacket. The only thing missing is the comb in his back pocket. This restaurant owner and hot sauce salesman set the unbeaten world record as a teen in decades past. And he has his minions of fellow Donkey Kong nerds travelling the country to protect his record. He’s not only the reigning King of Kong, he’s the Pacman champ, too. And he’s the antagonist in this movie, which blatantly takes Wiebe’s side.
The movie shows us the contest between the sensitive, nice guy Steve (now a science teacher) and the villainous Billy in the battle to keep the Donkey King crown. This is not rocket science. It’s far more important to the men of “King of Kong.” They’re also fighting for Guinness Book of World Records accolades. And we watch how Wiebe’s supportive wife and family try to help him reach his Donkey Kong dreams.
The characters we meet are entertaining and multi-dimensional. There is Walter Day, the aging hippie and Charles Manson look-alike, who runs Twin Galaxies, the website that keeps score of world records in all of the ’80s Video Games (now called “classic video games”). He maintains order and rules in video gaming competition. It’s serious business.
There are referees who watch video of people playing the video games and setting records. Gamers and referees come out to people’s homes to take apart and inspect the games on which the high scores were achieved. If you thought examining chads on ballots in the 2000 Presidential election was rough, you ain’t seen nothing when it comes to verifying classic video games scores.
We meet the Donkey Kong champs of the ’80s and see what they are up to now, which is protecting the old Donkey Kong King from his new rival. We meet Donkey Kong geeks and stooges like Brian Kuh, who retired at 30 (unfortunately, the movie didn’t say from what; would love to know–Google? AOL?) and is a stooge of Kong King Billy Mitchell. And we see Donkey Kong gadflies who want to help newcomer Wiebe break the record, including one who talks about chumps who “chumpetize” themselves. It’s such a serious business there are restraining order involved.
And sometimes there are outsiders who bring them back to reality. Wiebe’s perspicacious young daughter tells him:

The Guinness Book. Some people sort of ruin their lives to be in there.

Aside from the entirely entertaining aspect of this movie, I learned needless but interesting trivia about Donkey Kong. There’s a kill screen in every classic video game, beyond which you can’t go. In Donkey Kong, it’s the 22nd screen. Even though you are winning, Mario just suddenly dies.
I cannot say enough about this entertaining, witty, and fun movie. You can take your whole family to this pure, likable film. It’s what the movie experience is about–escapist and light. A plus: The movie is under 1.5 hours. On the silver screen, shorter is almost always better.
* “The Brave One“: This latest remake of “Death Wish” is far superior to the recent “.” While “Death Wish” still reigns supreme, this one is good enough–actually, pretty good–for 2007, though I could have done without the overwrought angst and Lifestyle Network-esque emotional drama and upheaval we see in “The Brave One.”
Jodie Foster plays a left-wing national public radio hostess in New York City (a case of art imitates life for far-left Foster, whose next movie glorifies Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl). Then, one evening, she and her fiancee are brutally attacked by thugs in Central Park. She survives. He does not. And what once was a liberal talk show hostess spouting meaningless verbiage about trees and leaves and other sounds of the city is now a vigilante with an illegal gun.
Fed up with a broken “justice” system and police who are overwhelmed with cases, she tries to buy a gun the legal way. But who wants to wait 30 days for a permit when your fiancee’s just been murdered and you’ve been in a coma for three weeks?
And Foster’s character, Erica Bain, doesn’t choose to kill criminals. They choose to attack her . . . at least at first. That’s the part that strains credulity. What are the odds of three violent attacks on you in a month? Is New York really still that bad?
Still, it’s a great movie. You cheer when Foster shoots the thuggish criminals that dominate the city scene, just as you cheered when liberal-turned-vigilante Paul Kersey did the same in Charles Bronson’s “Death Wish.” They deserve the crude but swift justice they get.
The real star of the movie, though, is not Foster. It’s Terence Howard, who has really developed as a great actor now that he’s left pimp and race-baiting films for more mainstream releases. He sparkles as the police detective who is charged with finding the vigilante killer and unwittingly (at first) befriends Foster’s vigilante character in the process.
As I said, this one’s not nearly as good as “Death Wish” and doesn’t even come close, but it’s good enough to be okay.

* “Mr. Woodcock“: When a movie promoters give out promotional favors consisting of a ruler measuring the second syllable in the title and car deoderizers depicting and smelling like used jock straps, you know the movie’s a stinker. Clearly, Susan Sarandon needed the paycheck and Billy Bob Thornton sold out, too, in doing this tasteless, stupid movie I thought would never end. His talent is squandered immensely here.
“Woodcock” starts out with an intriguing premise: A successful self-help guru/author (Seann William Scott, “Stifler” of “American Pie” fame) returns to his hometown in Nebraska to accept an award. He soon discovers that his most hated, eternal nemesis–his cruel gym teacher (Thornton)–is seriously dating his mother (Sarandon).
But the movie spirals downward from there. We watch as the author ruins his career and embarrasses himself throughout town in trying to expose the gym teacher and break them up. Yes, there are some funny lines and scenes. I did laugh several times. But most of the jokes are just groanworthy and juvenile. And what began as a great premise degrades into a non-stop Saturday Night Live skit that went on too long.
That said, there is one funny character who is underused–a hilariously aggressive book agent, played by Amy Poehler. She garnered most of the deserved laughs.
The only good thing here is that the movies is under 1.5 hours. Still, it’s a waste of that much of your life you’ll never get back. Skipworthy.
* “In the Valley of Elah“: This one is out in some parts of the country today, the rest of the country in the next two weeks. It’s sad that such an interesting murder mystery relies so heavily on defaming our troops. But, unfortunately, that’s the tone of “Elah”. With a cast consisting of uber-lefties Tommy Lee Jones, Susan Sarandon, and Charlize Theron, that shouldn’t be a surprise. But I was hoping for better.
Jones plays a retired career Army military police officer whose son is AWOL after returning from a tour of duty in Iraq. His son’s body is soon discovered dismembered and burned beyond recognition, with no sign of what happened to him. Despite evasive military police who are uninterested in his son’s fate and a local police detective (Theron), who derisively dismisses Jones’ theories, we learn what actually happened, intermixed with video repeatedly defaming our troops in Iraq.
We’re treated to phony video of American soldiers repeatedly “playing doctor” with wounded Iraqi civilians–asking them where it hurts, then sticking their fingers inside the injuries to torture them for sport. We see Iraqis writhing and screaming in agony. That’s only bested by video of American soldiers who put funny stickers on the burned, mangled faces of dead Iraqi civilians. Oh, and we’re also told that the soldiers also buy and use illegal drugs and pay prostitutes to perform oral sex on all of them as their “night out on the town.”
Yes, this is based on a true story of an American soldier who was murdered by his fellow homicidal/suicidal soldier after returning from Iraq. But is serving in Iraq what made a mentally ill soldier murder a fellow troop? There’s no evidence of that. And if true, we’d have a lot of homicides on our hands at the hands of returning troops. And the stickers on dead Iraqis and the deliberate torture of wounded ones has no basis in fact. Sorry, but this isn’t Lynndie England stuff. It’s far worse and never happened.
It’s sad, too, because the Jones character in the movie is sympathetic and good. He’s a sympathetic, working-class man who loves his country. He served and lost two sons serving in Iraq. He loves his family, and wants to get to the bottom of the mystery.
If only that weren’t used as the basis to falsely defame those who actually serve as I wrote this and who are risking life and limb so Tommy Lee Jones, Charlize Theron, Susan Sarandon, and writer/director Paul Haggis can continue to make tripe like this.

* “Across the Universe“: This one is also out in some parts of the country today, rest of the country by the end of the month. Been there, seen this. It’s called “Hair.”
As if we need yet another anti-war movie, like “Hair” this is a musical using Beatles songs. It takes place during the Vietnam war, and the message is that America’s wars are bad, America sends its boys to die and get maimed, and we need spoiled, rich left-wing activists to show us the way. Hmmm . . . sound familiar. It’s called Hollywood.
Marilyn Manson’s girlfriend, Evan Rachel Wood plays Lucy, a young girl from a rich family who loses her boyfriend, killed serving in Vietnam. She drops out of school, moves to New York, and becomes an anti-war activist. She also falls for an illegal alien from Britain, Jude. He’s the illegitimate son of an American World War II vet who is now a janitor at Princeton. We follow Jude, Lucy (surprise!–the convenient namesakes of Beatles songs), and her brother, who drops out of Princeton and tries to dodge the Vietnam draft–all through a musical journey, which celebrates the ’60s counterculture. Because we all know the ’60s brought us such great stuff like AIDS, rampant polygamous relationships, drugs, and failed everything. Also features two characters apparently modeled on Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix, and equally as brain-addled.
Aside from the plot, equally annoying is the cameo by Bono, who really belonged in that decade and out of ours.
Although the singing and sets in this movie are well done (and I’m no musical devotee), the anti-war message grows tinny and tired. What was a 2.25-hour movie seemed like more than four hours.
* “The Hunting Party“: Yet another limited release this weekend, this one will be rolled out to the rest of the country next week and beyond. Starring Richard Gere and Terence Howard, this film is a dark comedy from the maker of “The Matador“. It’s about how a washed up former network TV reporter (Gere) and his high-flying former network cameraman (Howard) go in search of the #1 Serbian Christian war criminal, risking their safety, having apparently already lost their sanity. They are on a quest to capture the man, when they are mistaken for CIA operatives and everything goes haywire. Are they risking their lives for the $5 million bounty, regained journalistic respect, or justice?
Although I found this movie to be well-acted, funny, and entertaining, I also found it to be heavy on anti-Christian Serb propaganda, while almost completely sympathizing with Muslims in Bosnia. There is much about Christian rape, torture, and murder of Muslims, but very little (almost nothing) about what was actually perpetrated by the other side–ie., where Muslims committed plenty of bloody atrocities against Christians.
Recently, I met with and interviewed Writer/Director Richard Shepard (“The Matador”) and he admitted that his movie was one-sided against Bosnian Serbs and in favor of the plight of Muslims in what has now become an Al-Qaeda breeding ground. But, he says, it was based on a true story, an article that appeared in a men’s magazine.
Still, he concedes that much of the movie is fictionalized and changed from the original. The Richard Gere character never had a Muslim, female love interest murdered in cold blood by Serbs. And other scenes are urban legend. And he admists that one of the journalists involved in the magazine article story is now married to a Muslim woman he met there. Yes, there is bias in the movie business, and sometimes, pillow talk is the most effective form of free speech.

By
For months,I’ve been at the forefront of writing about , both . At first, many doubted me when I warned about Muslim doctors . They doubted that despite the . Then, there was the foiled British Islamic doctor terrorist plots. And people took note, especially since those doctors .
And, as I’ve noted, a number of the Muslim doctors who are aiding and abetting terrorists are right in my backyard in Dearbornistan, Michigan.

Houssein Zorkot:
Dearbornistan Hezbollah Terror Suspect/Muslim Medical Student
The latest is Houssein Zorkot, a third-year medical student at Wayne State University (my father’s alma mater). He was caught, Sunday, in Dearbornistan’s Hemlock park, armed with an AK-47 assault rifle and dressed in black clothing with camouflage paint covering his face. He was apparently training for some sort of terrorist attack on behalf of Hezbollah and its various Shi’ite splinter groups in Lebanon, all of whose “martyrs” he honors on his website.
Zorkot is a Lebanse Shi’ite Muslim, as are the majority of Muslims in Dearbornistan. And like almost all of them–surprise!–he’s a supporter of Hezbollah. (New story here. Video here.)
Check out Doc-to-be Zorkot’s website, particularly this page and this one, and enjoy the jihadist “music” in the background. As you will note, it is a pro-Hezbollah, pan-jihadist recruitment site for Jabal Amel and Zrarieh (apparently two Hezbollah offshoots), based right here on our soil and in my backyard.
His website features calls for unity among various Shi’ite terrorist groups in Lebanon, various pictures of Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, notations honoring May 25th–the day in 2000 that Israel boneheadedly pulled out of Southern Lebanon and allowed Hezbollah to take over, and various pics of a hand bearing the Hezbollah insignia taking over and covering up Lebanon’s flag (which is exactly what has happened to the country).
I’m not surprised by this. Are you?
Here are some screenshots from the Zorkot site – thanks to my screenshot/JPEG master David Lunde:

By
18-year-old is on her way to Jericho in the so-called “West Bank” of Israel. And she has a one way ticket.
The small-town Michigan teen is , wear a hijab, and marry a Palestinian Muslim who went by the name “Abdullah Psycho” on MySpace. No longer will anyone see her long, flowing blonde hair. And no longer will anyone in America see her, period. She is lost to her family forever. (Video here.) She left Wednesday for Islamic terrorist-dominated Jericho.

Katherine Lester:

From Cute Small-Town Teen Girl to Islamic Palestinian Wife
Unlike the same scenario last year, this time neither her family nor the FBI can stop her.
If you don’t want this to happen to your daughter, don’t follow the “parenting” example of Ms. Lester’s father and stepmom, Terry and Krista.
Just over a year ago, Katherine Lester was a 16-year-old Michigan teen in small town Michigan going behind her mother’s back on MySpace. She furtively corresponded back-and-forth with “Abdullah Psycho” a/k/a Abdullah Jimzawi a/k/a Abdullah Jinzawi, a 25-year-old Palestinian Muslim (who–surprise!–lied about his age online) in the terrorist-dominated, extremist town of Jericho. Yes, what was once the same Biblical Jericho.
But this story isn’t Biblical. It’s tragic.
Lester lied and said she was going to visit Canada, tricked her mother into getting her a passport, and instead flew to New York to stay with Jimzawi’s relatives in Brooklyn, who helped facilitate this sleazy scheme. (So glad they’re U.S. citizens, aren’t you?) Abdullah Psycho wired them the money for Lester’s one-way ticket to Israel, where she planned to convert to Islam and become Mrs. Psycho . . . perhaps one of four Mrs. Psychos. Lester got all the way to Jordan, where she was finally stopped by the FBI and returned home.
Abdullah Psycho’s mother–let’s call her Umm Psycho [partial Arabic for “Mother of Psycho”] . After all, teen Katherine planned to convert to Islam and “wear the head covering” (the Islamic headscarf, or hijab). Per Umm Psycho’s instructions, Ms. Lester had packed two important garments: a pink dress for the engagement and a white dress for the wedding. Oh, and a lot of scarves for her head.
The biggest tragedy to the Psycho a/k/a Jimzawi/Jinzawi family: Now Mr. Psycho would have to scrap his plans for a visa and green card to America, which many of his fellow Jericho-ite Palestinians sought and obtained after they lured lonely and desperate Americans like Katherine Lester via MySpace and other online mechanisms.
When the FBI returned the Lester daughter back to Michigan, a court hearing was held. Her father and stepmother sought custody from Lester’s mother. After all, it was Lester’s mother who unwittingly allowed this fiasco to happen. Unfortunately, father and stepmommy won. It was the beginning of the end.
Not long after the hearing, Lester’s father and stepmom, the media-awestruck Terry and Krista, began pimping their teen daughter out to the biggest media bidders. They saw stars . . . and cameras. And they couldn’t get enough. So much for protecting their daughter.
First, there was an all-expense paid trip to New York for a live with all three. Then, there was the Parents, let that be a lesson to you: “Seventeen” is not your daughter’s friend. Or yours. It’s trash.

During the GMA interview, Terry and Krista Lester informed ABC News that they would allow their daughter to continue her online and telephone relationship with Abdullah Pyscho. They would even allow her to explore Islam and converting to this glorious religion. I wrote a critical column about it, and soon after, I received a sewer-mouthed, insult-filled rant from stepmommy Krista in response, telling me I was an unworthy writer (so unworthy, she spent at least an hour of time better spent pimping her stepdaughter to the media and the “Religion of Peace,” to write her screed to me).
The end of Krista Lester’s e-mail is worthy of your attention because it is the hallmark utterance of lazy parenting. The Second Mrs. Lester’s parenting advice is the epitome of what NOT to do if you don’t want this to happen to your daughter:

Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:15:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: From Katherine Lester’s “evil stepmother” Krista Lester
From: Krista Lester
To: dschlussel@yahoo.com
Hi,
[DS: I edited out the three long paragraphs of run-on sentence insults directed at me.]
. . . .Of course if this was your child, you would lock her up. Heck, just throw away the key. You’re right! Why didn’t we think of that? We can forbid her from finishing school, or leaving the house at all. Did you ever read the book, “Flowers in the Attic,” because that would maybe work . . . lock her in the attic with no contact whatsoever with the outside world. Do you think that is realistic? That she won’t go to school and borrow someone’s phone, or get on a computer at work and use a computer to shoot him an e-mail? Oh, that’s right, she will be locked up, so she should never get to have a job or go to school. We are not encouraging her to develop a relationship with this man, but she is going to do it whether we approve or not, so we would rather have it here under our control, rather than convince her the best thing to do is return to a country where we, nor she will have any type of control. She is young, and doesn’t understand their culture. Forgive us for trying to keep her here in America where she is safe. Do you remember being a teen-ager, as long ago as that probably was for you? When our parents told us we could not date someone, did we just say “oh, ok, you’re right…I won’t like him anymore…”
No, we were even more determined to see that person, and they probably lived nearby. So our parents’ biggest fear was that we might sneak out of the house to go down the street to see him. Well, OUR biggest fear here is that our daughter might sneak out of the country again, and this time NEVER come back. We must be some horrible, evil parents to want to try to avoid that from happening.
You make me sick.
Sincerely,
Krista Lester

In “Flowers in the Attic,” a crazy single mother locked her children in an attic for years, and they had incestuous sex with each other. No-one advocated that here. I only advocated a little parenting and constructive supervision, instead of pimping out their daughter to the media and encouraging her to stay in touch with a Palestinian Muslim who lied about his age, called himself “Abdullah Psycho,” and wanted an American Muslim-convert bride for a green card.
I mean, the nerve of me. Who would ever consider educating their daughter on the real perils of Islam, especially for a young American girl with her whole life ahead of her? Not her stepparents, apparently.
Actually, on these kinds of things I listened to my parents. Silly me. Instead, I could be on my way to greater Islamic Arabia right now, like their daughter is, about to embark on a great new opportunity of being one of four Islamic baby-making machines and the singular greencard opportunity in the family. Damn my parents for watching over my every move. I missed out on “Katherine’s Excellent Adventure.”
Clearly, the Lester father’s and stepmother’s “parenting” idea didn’t work. (I’ve also heard rumors they allowed their daughter to hang out and live temporarily in Dearborn to “explore” Islam.)
And now the Lester parents’ “biggest fear” is coming true. They had a year before their daughter turned eighteen to prevent it and change her behavior, educate her about Islam. Instead, they did worse than nothing. They encouraged this relationship in the name of lax parenting and enticing media opportunities.
I may have made her parents “sick”. But their behavior made them heartsick. Or did it?
Now, Katherine Lester is lost to Islam and the barbaric Palestinian jungle of a “society,” forever. Or at least until “Abdullah Psycho” Jimzawi wants his green card.

Katherine Lester’s New Future
***
Read my previous work on the Abdullah Psycho/Katherine Lester story , , , , , and .

By
Let’s say Al-Qaeda or Hezbollah or some other Islamic terrorist group sends a rocket into an American Army base. Let’s say 57 out of 69 U.S. soldiers at an Army base are wounded as they sleep, and five are killed.
Would the U.S. just sit back and take it? Or would we start attacking the mountains of Pakistan and maybe–if we did the right thing–the palaces of Riyadh?
Or would America “show restraint”?

Father of Israeli Soldier
Tries to Get Info on Fate of His Son After Palestinian Attack
HELL NO. Nor should it. So why are we asking Israel to do the same in the face of such an attack by Palestinians, yesterday? And why are we asking Israel to act in the embarrassing way we once acted when our troops were attacked in Beirut while they slept?
It’s absurd.
Just before the Jewish New Year, Palestinians sent a rocket into an Israeli army base near Ashkelon, north of the Gaza Border, early Tuesday morning. With at least 57 soldiers wounded and five dead, it was also the highest casualty toll of any single Palestinian rocket attack.
So what does America do? U.S. officials urged Israel to “show restraint,” fearing it could jeopardize “new peace efforts with the Palestinians”.
HUH?! What “peace efforts”? This is a never ending war. Restraint is for idiots. And dead people. Who makes peace with these barbarians as they are committing mass murder?
America would never again take a bombing like the one in Beirut in the early ’80s, without a response. Why should Israel?

By
Most of the mainstream media is up in arms about a First Amendment Center poll showing that the majority of Americans (55%) believe that the Founding Fathers intended America to be a Christian nation.
USA Today “reporter” Andrea Stone, for instance, must think she doubles as an editorialist. Her report in today’s edition features loaded, biased opinions with words like “erroneous” (regarding most Americans’ belief) and “scariest” regarding other numbers in the poll.

Frankly, as a Jew, I’m glad most Americans believe America was intended to be a Christian nation. And unlike Ms. Stone, I’m not so sure this is an erroneous belief. While our Founding Fathers believed in freedom of religion, there’s no proof they did not see this as, ultimately, a Christian nation (and plenty of evidence that they did, indeed, envision a Christian nation). And while some, like Thomas Jefferson, are believed to have been close to atheism, most were devout Christian men who believed in the Judeo-Christian laws of the Bible and based our system of government and laws on them.
As one who sees the growing threat of Islam within our borders, I’m glad most Americans see us as a Christian nation. That means that, likely, most still believe strongly in Christianity. And that’s why our country is not yet in the position of Europe a/k/a Eurabia (a term coined by Bat Ye’or). Our strong Christian heritage is what has kept our country from heading down the Islamist path (so far). European nations have a strong atheist ethos, and that emptiness and nothingness is fast being replaced by an extremist belief in Allah.
Once we lose our Christian identity, we will lose our country. And I will lose my right to practice my Judaism freely.
So, I applaud the view shown by this poll. And, yes, I do believe the founders intended a Christian nation, where I can freely practice my non-Christian religion. I don’t believe they intended a European-style vacuum to be easily dominated and replaced by an extremist religion (Islam), which will not allow anything else to live, let alone flourish.
Moreoever, there is a backlash against those who continue to persecute Christianity in America, while they continue to push Islam on our public institutions:

More people, 43%, say public schools should be allowed to put on Nativity re-enactments with Christian music than in 2005, when 36% did.

Notice the word “Nativity.” We don’t want Mohammed displays and pretenses at Islam in our public schools. But those things are what’s happening, not the vilified, “nasty” N-word (Nativity), which, frankly, has far more basis in our country’s founding.
Freedom of religion doesn’t mean freedom from religion. And it doesn’t mean freedom to push a barbaric religion shared by 19 hijackers on our public institutions, either.