March 22, 2010, - 5:19 pm

Muslim UN Peacekeepers Committed Rape, Dodge Discipline

By Debbie Schlussel

If American or Israeli soldiers did this, there would be outrage around the world.  And there would be courts-martial galore.

unpeacekeepers

But when United Nations “Peacekeepers” rape women and father children, well, it’s not only no big deal, but they escape any and all discipline.  Yup, for all of the Blacks who convert to Islam, it’s bad enough that Muslims first traded them into slavery (and in many places still have them as slaves today).  But if that doesn’t make the case for them, this example of 14 Muslim U.N. soldiers engaging in “wide-spread sexual exploitation and abuse” against Blacks in the Ivory Coast should at least make a dent. And it’s yet another reason the U.S. should do what it doesn’t have the guts to: get out of the U.N.  There’s a reason they call the U.N. “peacekeepers,” the “beasts in blue berets.”  Or as my friend, Dean, says, “Muslim peacekeepers, the official definition of oxymoron.”

As the United Nations worked to restore peace and protect women and children in Africa’s troubled Cote d’Ivoire three years ago, it announced it was investigating “serious allegations of wide-spread sexual exploitation and abuse.”

Shockingly, the alleged perpetrators were with the U.N.—Moroccan troops serving as peacekeepers.

A confidential probe by U.N. and Moroccan investigators turned up evidence that 14 soldiers were involved, according to a person familiar with the matter; DNA analysis showed some of them had fathered children with the victims. But the U.N. has never disclosed the results of the investigation or whether any of the soldiers were punished.

The Moroccan government has stated that no conclusive evidence of abuse was found and that it dropped all charges.

Shocker. That’s “justice” in the Muslim Mid-East.

More than six years after the United Nations implemented a zero-tolerance policy for sexual misconduct by its peacekeepers, the organization is still struggling to persuade member states to investigate and discipline accused soldiers.

“It’s my biggest headache and heartache, this whole issue,” says Alain Le Roy, who has served as the U.N.’s under-secretary-general for peacekeeping operations since 2008.

The U.N. has long been plagued by allegations that some of its peacekeepers around the world—who are supposed to protect local populations—committed rape, exploited children or trafficked in arms or minerals. . . .

But interviews and U.N. documents show the problem continues. Sexually related allegations against U.N. military forces last year rose 12% to 55; some of the allegations involved minors. . . .

Indeed, the investigative and disciplinary process for accused peacekeepers remains shrouded in secrecy, despite vows by U.N. officials to make it more open.

Wait a sec. Isn’t this the same UN that repeatedly tells the U.S. it must be open about how it treats Islamic terrorists? Talk about hypocrisy. Rape of innocent indigenous peoples–cover that up. But waterboarding terrorists–we want the details for international outrage.

Although the U.N. recently began publishing statistics on a Web site, it still doesn’t detail allegations, specify the number of alleged perpetrators or announce the results of investigations. . . . Nor does the U.N. publicly criticize countries that don’t cooperate in investigations or respond to requests for information.

And here’s the money quote from a UN official:

“The ambition, of course, is to be zero tolerant,” says Inga-Britt Ahlenius, under-secretary-general for Internal Oversight Services. “But you have to be realistic.

So they can be 1% tolerant of rape at the U.N.?  15% tolerant of rape?  I’m curious as to what “realistic” is.

Do you think Israeli or American officials could get away with saying something like that with a straight face? Think again. United Nations? More like United Rapists.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

34 Responses

Spot on. It’s been a joke for years. I shudder to think about the money we inject into that crooked world mafia.

Joe on March 22, 2010 at 5:38 pm

Debbie, no – Obama won’t say a word about Muslim rape of women through his beloved UN. But every one knows, its all those Jews building settlements in Jerusalem that is the Number One issue that has every one on the planet outraged.

There’s just no sense of proportion. Jews get lynched for doing nothing wrong while Muslims escape justice for real crimes against indigenous peoples.

The way of the world.

NormanF on March 22, 2010 at 5:43 pm

Out of the hundreds maybe thousands of UN peacekeepers, we have 14 soldiers accused of abuse and 55 allegations of abuse against UN peacekeepers in one year.

“Do you think Israeli or American officials could get away with saying something like that with a straight face? Think again. United Nations? More like United Rapists.”

American officials and soldiers get away with it all the time.

Gee I guess with all the sexual abuse committed by American male soldiers against their female counterparts, this country should be called the United Rapists of America or how about the United States of Rapists?

Kippler on March 22, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    Poor Kippler is actually defending the “Blue Helmets.” Dude, I have forgotten how many times these clowns, if Muslims, have been guilty of rape, etc. Not that Euro Blue Helmets are any good, mind you. They just rape and pillage less.

    There is a law enforcement process for intra-military rape. There is nothing comparable for the Blue Helmets, who, in addition, have an enormous “power differential” (using the language of the left–which you should be familiar with).

    I do not know what the US gains from the UN. The UN was put in place with the help of Hiss, a Soviet spy. Its purpose was always to constrain the US. It has never advanced Western values or US interests.

    skzion on March 22, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    kippler-
    THANK YOU. all of these idiots don’t seem to realize that these 14 peacekeepers didn’t rape because the were muslim: they did it because they were individually bad people. considering the people on this blog are spewing hate against the UN for not being able to stop 14 rapists, why aren’t they looking at the US military or better yet, homeland? I don’t see any mention of the repeated incidents in Japan by US troops. OR of the 90,000 reported rapes per year in the US: don’t tell me they’re all muslim’s too. considering how angry all these commentators are, it wouldn’t surprise me if at least one happened to be guilty of rape themselves.

    annoyed on March 24, 2010 at 8:07 pm

      No, annoyed. Rape is much more likely from Muslims with power because Islam encourages rape of the unbeliever. Indeed, there is a hadith that instructs the rapist to try to get the female pregnant (as opposed to pulling out before ejaculation).

      skzion on March 25, 2010 at 12:50 pm

The UN, what a joke. We should kick them out of the U.S. and see what other country would accept them. I bet Iran would be compatible with all of the ridiculous BS that the UN espouses.

Jarhead on March 22, 2010 at 6:07 pm

NormanF writes, “Jews get lynched for doing nothing wrong while Muslims escape justice for real crimes against indigenous peoples.”

Indeed. There was a near lynching only last Friday as a few Jews were driving through Abu Joz, an Arab neighborhood (that was a Jewish neighborhood years ago) near the Old City. Read and consider what life will be life in Jerusalem if the PA takes over these neighborhoods: From INN:

“Suddenly, about 100 Arab rioters attacked us with a barrage of hundreds of rocks,” he recalled. “The car was warped by the blows, and then a boulder hit the front windshield and smashed it.”

Levi’s 18-month-old daughter was sitting in the back seat of the car, asleep in her carseat. The noise woke her. Fortunately, Levi said, she was only lightly injured, and suffered “just a few scratches.”

“We were afraid they were going to lynch us,” Levi said. “They approached until they were right next to us, which meant the rocks were not thrown so hard, but even so, they smashed all the windows.”

“I felt like they were going to slaughter us,” he added.

Levi managed to escape by screaming for help, which distracted the attackers for several seconds – long enough to allow him to slam on the gas and speed away.

Raymond in DC on March 22, 2010 at 6:09 pm

    Raymond, it wasn’t a “few Jews.” Why’d you write it that way, not that that would change anything by much but as you accurately quoted INN, it was a young man and his BABY daughter, 18 mos. old. There were about 100 Arabs that surrounded the car, They smashed the windscreen and severely damaged the body of the car. It was only because the driver rammed the gas pedal,not worrying about the political incorrectness of running over some of the lynchers, they were able to escape.
    They had gone to pray at the rededicated “Hurva” Synagogue in the Old City and because of traffic took a short cut thru what had been until this THRID INTIFADA a safe neighborhood.

    mk750 on March 23, 2010 at 12:09 am

They won’t be punished, because they are, but the World’s “standards” NOT racists. That’s right, if a soldier doesn’t rape it’s conquered population, he is a racist. Here’s the evidence, a report by an Idiot Israeli Leftist.

How many of you still believe that Leftists have ANYTHING positive to contribute to civilization?

yonason on March 22, 2010 at 7:03 pm

“How many of you still believe that Leftists have ANYTHING positive to contribute to civilization?”

You’ve asked the wrong crowd. Maybe Blitzer will vote aye.

skzion on March 22, 2010 at 7:10 pm

@skzion on March 22, 2010 at 7:10 pm

Calm down, skzion. It was aimed at the likes of “kippler” and any other Lefty idiots who read it, not the Conservative regulars.

yonason on March 22, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    p.s. – still, it might have been clearer had I listened to the little voice that whispered to me that I should have written something like, “How many still believe…”

    yonason on March 22, 2010 at 7:35 pm

It would be nice if the Republicans could develop some kind of overall world view; not just criticizing and whining about the passage of health care, but uniformly opposing illegal immigration (which maybe 1 or 2 percent of the politicians now oppose) and among other things urging withdrawal from the United Nations. Exposing the UN would be a cutting edge across the bow of the liberals of both parties. Like the League of Nations before it, the UN has done nothing of significance which was constructive. It is worse than the League; at least the League didn’t defend the Nazis’ it was just paralyzed, and the Nazis and their allies withdrew; the UN actually supports the wrong side, and its representatives are criminals; much worse than the League.

SKZion’s comment made me think of how Joe McCarthy always had ‘slips; of the tongue, when referring to Adlai Stevenson, he always said “Alger Stevenson, oops I mean Adlai”.

Little Al on March 22, 2010 at 9:15 pm

One wonders when the UN blue helmets will be seen in the USA? I suspect that with the way the congress is pushing the pedal to the medal on our bankruptcy with their spending, it will not be long…we’ll all be part of the NWA, in zone Ameriki.

BB on March 22, 2010 at 9:28 pm

When things get too hot for Obama here in America, he can always go stay with his supportive Muslim “friends.”

yonason on March 22, 2010 at 11:06 pm

he “blue helmets” give off an aura of menace and evil. I know that sounds weird but where I used to live in Jerusalem there were tons of them and even here in the Northern city to where I moved, there is a nearby base. I see those Land Rovers and look into the dead eyes of the occupants and know I have seen the enemy.

mk750 on March 23, 2010 at 12:12 am

*The* blue helmets

mk750 on March 23, 2010 at 12:13 am

Debbie you are right about American Blacks who convert to Islam. It is sad that most only believe slavery was perpetrated my Whites colonists and american is the main guilty party. If you have ever wondered why the Middle east does not have very many dark skinned people from Africa with African features living there, it is because when the Arabs/Islamists conquered their lands they brutally castrated the males so they could not reproduce and to weaken them so they would ultimately bleed to death while being slaves in the Middle East. The Women and Children were killed usually on the spot after being raped.

ConservativeWhoServived6ToursInBoulderColorado on March 23, 2010 at 1:02 am

The UN shouldve been relocated to Geneva long ago, they are a blight on our society that we as Americans cant tolerate.

ARISHEM on March 23, 2010 at 6:14 am

Alas, UN perfidy has become commonplace to the level of the acceptable. Unfortunately we are not merely silent bystanders here but key enablers.

Paul D. on March 23, 2010 at 7:03 am

Too bad we these UN supported abuse centers here in the Untied states for domestic abuse. The UN supports them. THe fact that many of them are run by very disturbed women and they have no one to answer to is sad. But any organization that claims to protect women we should take at face value. Many people think the UN cares about women as they care about domestic abuse but it is another scam sadly and they just want to have control of women.

adam on March 23, 2010 at 9:35 am

More proof Muslim fascists get away with everything and the UN covers their asses.

Rocky Lore on March 23, 2010 at 9:56 am

Islam permits the rape and enslavement of infidels. This is the mass appeal of Islam; it is a warrior’s religion. Codes of conduct and decorum only apply to the Muslim body, the ummah. For infidels and pagans, anything goes, they become the spoils of jihad. Don’t listen to these Muslim front groups. Read an authentic copy of the Koran, their hadiths, and their history; therein lies truth.

Rick on March 23, 2010 at 11:03 am

Have been saying this for years: Get the f*** out of the UN. And if you’re gonna let them still operate in NYC, spook the place like there’s no tomorrow- I’d have my own intel gathering squads cleaning the toilets and sweeping the floors. If not, then have the occupants pack up and leave.

Not Ovenready on March 23, 2010 at 11:12 am

(Might also add, that another topic which has been covered up by those wishing to whitewash the history of Islam — is that during the time of the Barbary pirates, when “slavery” was discussed, it was not about Arab enslavement of Blacks, but Arab enslavement of Christians. And the Christians were white.)

J.S. on March 23, 2010 at 11:31 am

UN peacekeepers, what a joke. They should wear pink berets, flip flops and carry a BB gun to show their actual effectiveness.

Jarhead on March 23, 2010 at 6:17 pm

Moroccan soldiers fighting in the French Army in Italy in World War II were notorious for their mass rapes of Italian women during the Monte Cassino campaign.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marocchinate

Gramercy Infidel on March 26, 2010 at 11:52 am

You know guys it has absolutely nothing got to do with being Muslim, Jewish or any other religion. Rape and sexual abuse is going on across all UN missions simply because perpetrators are not punished by the states sending their troops as it looks bad for them and the UN is in effect powerless to force states to take action and also because it is terrified it will affect troop contributions. What needs to happen is to given the UN power to force states to prosecute and punish soldiers sexually abusing children. States have obligations under human rights treaties they are party to, in particular the CRC to ensure rights are being protected. Many soldiers are deployed who may have previously been implicated in gender based violence and/or human rights abuses. Also states are not required to screen their soldiers for HIV, resulting in the spread of aids. In fact AIDS might be one of the primary reasons that young girls are targeted as they are perceived as being less likely to carry the virus. Many of the victims are located in areas where the infrastructure may be extremely poor, reducing the incidents actually being reported. Also in many of the societies where this is occurring, females or in some incidents even young boys, that have been abused will be reluctant to report such abuse to fear of being ostracised from their communities.

rosy on June 12, 2010 at 10:25 pm

Most countries providing Blue Helmet peace keepers are no better than the war criminal countries they are supposed to help!

SemperFiVet on January 7, 2011 at 4:43 pm

And it’s some Nordic idiot defending them.

Occam's Tool on November 10, 2011 at 8:13 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field