March 23, 2010, - 1:42 pm
Did Hillary Clinton Endorse Removing Muslims From Israel?; AIPAC: Obama’s Partner in Amputating Israel
Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke to the annual convention of AIPAC–the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. And, as you may have heard, she attacked Israel and told it that it must give up more land and further amputate itself into oblivion–that Israel’s refusal to do this (after it’s already done so several times with no positive results) is the “obstacle” to peace.
Since Hillary Supports Demographically Jewish Israel,
Time to Expel the Muslims Like They Expel the Jews
But, in her speech, she unwittingly gave Israel approval for something else that her logic must dictate: removing Muslims from Israel’s land within the green zone. After all, that is the only way, demographically, that Israel can survive as both a democracy and a Jewish State–both of which she admitted Israel should remain. And that is the turnabout that’s fair play, since Clinton implicitly advocated no Jews in the so-called “territory” of the “Israeli occupation,” a term she used in her speech and the lingua franca of Al-Jazeera and the Muslim world. More on that below. But first a little bit about the forum in which Mrs. Clinton spoke, yesterday.
AIPAC is billed as “the pro-Israel lobby,” but here’s what it really is: the American-Liberals-Shove-it-Down-Israel’s-Throat Committee. Yes, AIPAC really stands for the Appeasement forced on Israel (by liberal American naifs) Public Affairs Committee. Decades ago, when the organization was headed by the great Morris J. Amitay, it was actually a pro-Israel organization. I was an activist in AIPAC in high school. But I saw how it quickly became a wing of the Democrats and an organization obsessed with telling off Israeli Prime Ministers and pushing them to give up land . . . the same concept Hillary pimped yesterday.
AIPAC is single-handedly responsible for shoving the disastrous Oslo Accords down Israel’s throat, for getting the U.S. to remove the P.L.O./Fatah from any U.S. terrorist designations, and for pimping America on the false notion that Fatah is the “moderate” terrorist group and a “partner for peace.” AIPAC even held joint lobbying sessions for the Palestinians all over Capitol Hill, loaning its lobbyists to anti-Israel, anti-Semitic Edward Abington, the PLO’s lobbyist. AIPAC’s friend, Abington, is now working for HAMAS. And AIPAC will probably help Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton force-feed the wholesale further amputation of Israel down the country’s throat.
When my former boss, then-Congressman Phil Crane, got his bill–defunding the State Department until they moved the Israeli embassy to Jerusalem–to the floor of the House for a vote, AIPAC worked the phones to get the bill defeated, just as fake “anti-Iran” AIPAC worked to defeat tough legislation offered in several states to prohibit sales to Iran.
As an attorney for pro-Israel students on the University of Michigan campus, we were forced to fight intimidation and open threats from the AIPAC group on campus, as we prepared an alternate programming session against the Divestment (from Israel) Conference and filed a lawsuit to attempt to prevent Islamic terrorist Sami Al-Arian from speaking on campus (he’d been banned as a safety threat from his own campus, on which he was the faculty). The AIPAC students on campus authored a petition against our efforts and asked the Muslims to co-sign it with them. But the Muslims refused because they wouldn’t sign a document along with Jews. I’ve written more about the fraud known as AIPAC and how they’ve intimidated truly pro-Israel students on campus in a way even the Muslims don’t have the gall to do. And I urge you to read it.
Now back to Hillary’s comments, yesterday. Here’s what she said:
The conflict with the Palestinians . . . threatens Israel’s long-term future as a secure and democratic Jewish state.
The status quo is unsustainable for all sides. . . . The dynamics of demography, ideology, and technology make this impossible.
First, we cannot ignore the long-term population trends that result from the Israeli occupation. As Defense Minister Barak and others have observed, the inexorable mathematics of democracy – of demography are hastening the hour at which Israelis may have to choose between preserving their democracy and staying true to the dream of a Jewish homeland. Given this reality, a two-state solution is the only viable path for Israel to remain both a democracy and a Jewish state.
Well, that’s only the case if each so-called democracy in the two-state non-solution can get rid of the ethnicities that cause demographic problems. Is Hillary saying she’ll allow all Arabs and Muslims inside Israel’s green line to be expelled, the way that will certainly happen to the Jews in any Palestinian state in the so-called West Bank, the same way it happened in Gaza?
Surely, Hillary must believe that Israel must also be allowed to remove the Muslims from its entire remaining country. After all, even if Israel gives up the entire so-called “West Bank” to Palestinians, there is still a ticking demographic time bomb among the Arabs remaining inside Israel. And with their birthrate, they will take over democratically, even if Israel gives up the so-called territories. So, going along with Hillary’s reasoning, the country must be allowed to do with their Muslims what all Muslim countries did with their Jews to zero international outrage: expel them.
The late Israeli tourism minister Rechavam Ze’evi–who was nicknamed “Ghandi Transfer”–advocated that. He was soon assassinated by the PFLP (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine), because the group knew he was right, and that, if done, the Palestinians would be forced to be repatriated into their real countries: places like Jordan (where Palestinians are the majority by far), Egypt, Lebanon, and Syria. Just as Israel was forced to absorb the Jews kicked out of all Arab and Muslim nations. As I’ve repeatedly noted on this site, the late Rabbi Meir Kahane also advocated this, saying the Jews couldn’t live with the Muslims in peace. He was dismissed as an extremist, but today, the entire Israeli left now admits it through their actions, like the wall, leaving Gaza, etc.
If only Israel had listened to Ze’evi then, we wouldn’t be hearing these silly speeches about demographics and two-state solutions now. The Palestinians would already be in their state, which for them is, like I said, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, and Syria. That’s where they belong.
And Hillary couldn’t care less about demographics or she’d call for the expulsion of all Arabs and Muslims from Israel. When pigs fly.
Tags: AIPAC, American Israel Public Affairs Committee, demographically Jewish, demographics, Hillary Clinton, Islam, Israel, Jewish state, Muslims, Palestinian State, Palestinians, Rechavam Ze'evi, Rehavam Zeevi, speech