March 25, 2010, - 12:39 pm

Humorous Video: Finally, PETA a/k/a PUTAh Has a Point

By Debbie Schlussel

They’ve donated to eco-terrorists and pro-animal terrorists.  They’ve murdered dogs en masse.  And they’re just flat-out nuts.  But finally the minions of PETA–or as we call it here, PUTAh, People for the Unethical Treatment of Animals and humans–have a point.

petaoctomom

Yes, I believe one should be able to have as many kids as she wants, provided it’s in a marriage and the taxpayers aren’t footing the bill.  But, by no means, do I support the OctoMom, Palestinian Nadya Suleman.  Not only did she soak taxpayers for millions of dollars in Medicaid and other entitlements, but she’s about to be kicked out of her home, unless . . . . Unless she accepts PETA’s offer to pay for her and the multi-kiddies to stay, so long as she posts this sign on her front lawn.  Well, to be accurate, PETA is actually only offering $5,000 (and a month’s supply of veggie burgers and veggie hot dogs for her and the kids).  But can this mother of a gazillion kids really afford to turn it down?  Still, you gotta ask:  is that all they can offer her after Bob Barker gave them millions?

Cue the funny video:

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , ,

13 Responses

…Illinois Tool Works donated nearly 6 million dollars to PETA in the early 2000s, it was posted as a community service brag point on their website back then….my surprised thought at that time was that it was a ‘clean’ way for anti-US entities to fund chaos…

I noticed recently that all trace of this seems to have been scrubbed from the internet…not really a surprise I suppose…

Nick Fury on March 25, 2010 at 12:47 pm

You mean it has another meaning other than People Eating Tasty Animals… I’m shocked, shocked I say……

Ed on March 25, 2010 at 12:51 pm

Have you seen Joe Cartoon’s Octomom In A Blender? Enjoy!!

http://joecartoon.atom.com/cartoons/968-octomom_in_a_blender

Jarhead on March 25, 2010 at 12:53 pm

I can’t even stand to think of that dopey, skank-bogan. She is just a hideous piece of crap. Those poor babies ought to be put up for adoption in loving, two parent (male and female) homes.

I can’t stand PETA even though I love animals. I knew they were frauds when in the early 90′s they got all the Supermodels to pose as anti-fur when they knew full well most of them weren’t (that nutter hag Naomi Campbell). I was a Liberal then and it bothered me how they just didn’t care about values and the cause. More peeps ought to know how they kill animals themselves. I’d not give them even a Canadian penny!

Skunky on March 25, 2010 at 12:59 pm

Giving birth to lots of little sheet-heads, Fakestinians give new meaning to “population bomb.”

yonason on March 25, 2010 at 1:19 pm

And dare I remind you all, even though Debbie says PETA has a point in their ad campaign…

PETA KILLS ANIMALS!

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/

Bob Porrazzo on March 25, 2010 at 1:52 pm

Veggie hot dogs and burgers are great for babies!

John Hamer on March 25, 2010 at 2:29 pm

If PETA can’t afford to offer a free spay service to Nadya, I will gladly foot the bill rather than pay the tax burden of her next litter.

Bob on March 25, 2010 at 5:15 pm

That woman is a disgrace!!

She is a shank and she just go ahead and do the porn film. She has no moral character or self-respect anyway. The way she pops out all those babies and expects OTHER people to support them.

Poor little babies deserve MUCH better that her.

Sewsalot on March 25, 2010 at 5:41 pm

At the risk of being flamed, I vehemently disagree with PETA’s “spay or neuter” mantra. If it’s so damned desirable, why is it politically incorrect to suggest the same “solution” for prolific humans like Octomom? I’ll tell you why! Removing the reproductive organs of _any_ animal is barbarously inhumane and seriously alters its behavior, personality, and physiology. Just ask yourself how _you_ would like to have your testicles or uterus removed “for your own good”. People should have to be certified as worthy and responsible before obtaining a pet.

Graty Slapchop on March 26, 2010 at 5:44 pm

@Graty Slapchop on March 26, 2010 at 5:44 pm

Without going into what’s right or wrong with your rational, your conclusion would seem to be correct, mostly. When I asked a friend of mine, a Cohen who’s been to Yeshiva, why his two cats weren’t “fixed,” he told me the Torah prohibits it. I was embarrassed, because I though I knew a lot of practical information, but this I wasn’t aware of. Good thing I don’t have a pet, and, since they are a lot more pleasant to live with once “fixed,” I am now no longer likely to acquire one.

yonason on March 26, 2010 at 6:11 pm

@yonason – Thanks for your even-handed reply. Our family had 3 male dogs over a span of about 28 years. Now, this was before the PC police mandated canine eunuchs, so we never put in the “fix”. All 3 dogs (a collie/shepherd mix, a Weimaraner, and a Boston Terrier) were vibrant, active, delightful pets and were never less than “pleasant” to any concerned. Sure, there were some typical puppyhood moments, but disciplined love transformed them all into well behaved adults.

Graty Slapchop on March 26, 2010 at 10:15 pm

There are people who should not reproduce.

The Unmedicated American Voter on March 28, 2010 at 7:37 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field