September 14, 2011, - 3:29 pm

Judenrein: PLO Ambassador Says Jews NOT Allowed in Palestinian State

By Debbie Schlussel

You know that “peaceful” Palestinian state that all the liberals and Obama–and before him, President Bush–have been pimping on us for years?  Well, the Palestinian Ambassador says it will be like most other Muslim countries:  NO JOOOOOS Allowed!  That’s right.  Israel isn’t allowed to expel its Arabs (who identify as Palestinians and who don’t want to be under Palestinian rule and prefer Israel, anyway).  But the Palestinians can ban Jews.  That’s how it’s gonna be.  Reminds me of the signs that used to hover over Keego Harbor, Michigan when my cousin, Sylvia Rose Waldman, had to get her gentile handyman to buy her house for her:   “No dogs or Jews allowed.”  Don’t be surprised if you see the same thing at the border of HAMASPalestine.  We always knew these people were Nazis.  Now, they are even more brazen about it.

The Palestine Liberation Organization’s ambassador to the United States said Tuesday that any future Palestinian state it seeks with help from the United Nations and the United States should be free of Jews.

“After the experience of the last 44 years of military occupation and all the conflict and friction, I think it would be in the best interest of the two people to be separated,” Maen Areikat, the PLO ambassador, said during a meeting with reporters sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor. He was responding to a question about the rights of minorities in a Palestine of the future.

Such a state would be the first to officially prohibit Jews or any other faith since Nazi Germany, which sought a country that was judenrein, or cleansed of Jews, said Elliott Abrams, a former U.S. National Security Council official. [As an official in the Bush Administration, Abrams openly endorsed the Palestinian State BS, so he is part of this problem. Did he expect anything better or different from the Palestinians?]

Israel has 1.3 million Muslims who are Israeli citizens. Jews have lived in “Judea and Samaria,” the biblical name for the West Bank, for thousands of years. Areikat said the PLO seeks a secular state, but that Palestinians need separation to work on their own national identity.

The Palestinian demand is unacceptable and “a despicable form of anti-Semitism,” Abrams said. A small Jewish presence in a future Palestine, up to 1% of the population, would not hurt the Palestinian identity, he said.

“No civilized country would act this way,” Abrams said.

Who said that Muslim countries are civilized?

But, hey, why have the Jews in their stinky new country, if and when it’s allowed to officially open for biz?  After all, we wouldn’t want Muslims to get ideas on how to do anything besides invent new ways to blow people up.

That Was Then . . .

swastika.jpgyellowstar.jpg

This Is Now . . .

islamiccrescent.jpgyellowstar.jpg

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly




17 Responses

A state of Palestine– i.e., The Devil’s masterpiece.

lee on September 14, 2011 at 3:57 pm

Funny, Israel is the one always accused of apartheid. How will the lefties answer this one? Oh, that’s right, they’ll ignore it.

Jonathan E. Grant on September 14, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    1930s

    national SOCIALIST WORKERS PEOPLES party of germany

    how much more left can one call their own party

    nazis were left wing fascists NOT right wing

    another lie of our leftist educators and media

    Bill C. on September 15, 2011 at 1:06 am

    If only both of my ancestors were Aryan, I could live in Palestine. I have Jewish blood, which disqualifies me. When it comes to ethnic cleansing and apartheid, the Arabs are no longer bothering to hid their true goal: to get rid of all the Jews! We always suspected this was what a Palestinian state was going to be. Now the PLO has set the record straight!

    NormanF on September 15, 2011 at 11:45 am

Unbelievable. All those pseudo-intellectual liberals and infidel students who wear the terrorist scarfs and march in “protest” with muslims make me puke. This is an abomination.

DS_ROCKS! on September 14, 2011 at 4:18 pm

Looking critically at Ereikat’s insistence that “Palestinians need separation to work on their own national identity” one notes two curiosities.

The first is that he wants separation only within “Palestine”, driving out the Jews (and note the “international community” has no problem with that). But Ereikat would go ballistic if anyone suggested “separating” the Arabs from within Israel. No exchange of populations for him, only simple ethnic cleansing.

The second is that after decades of claiming that Palestinians are a distinct people with a long history, they still need to “work on their own national identity”. It would appear it takes more than insisting “the Jews are thwarting our national aspirations” to create an identity from a motley bunch whose origins range from Libya to Saudi Arabia to Iraq.

Following up on the “No Jews or Dogs Allowed” theme, Daniel Greenfield (aka Sultan Knish) has a piece on the historic hatred of dogs in Islamic culture, as distinct from the affection shown our canine friends elsewhere.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2011/09/our-canine-heroes-and-islamic.html?m=1

excerpt:
In Iran, visitors tell of dogs who could distinguish between Zoroastrians and Muslims; “In Sharifabad the dogs distinguished clearly between Moslem and Zoroastrian, and were prepared to go…full of hope, into a crowded Zoroastrian assembly, or to fall asleep trustfully in a Zoroastrian lane, but would flee as before Satan from a group of Moslem boys.”

In Iraq and Afghanistan many dogs find refuge from their cruel surroundings only among western soldiers.

Raymond in DC on September 14, 2011 at 4:25 pm

I guess that Rabbi Kahane might have been on to something after all. He must have foreseen what the Arabs would want. Let them all go to the existing Palestinian state – Jordan.

Susuu on September 14, 2011 at 5:40 pm

You’re a smart attorney. Spend a little time pondering if there is a Constitutional issue with a free country, founded on the greatest documents defining INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, spending tax dollars to support a country or people that don’t believe in the First Amendment. I’m so very tired of sending tax dollars to Gaza, Egypt, and military expertise to Saudi Arabia only to have them fund more sites for groups to damn these same freedoms in our own borders. If they DON’T support the First Amendment loudly then let them live on their own.

SenatorMark4 on September 14, 2011 at 6:32 pm

As I have often mentioned, I have always intrinsically supported the Jews. I have always felt they were the good guys even before I learned more about the conflict.

SO…as DS stated, with the Jooooooooos being not allowed in many ME hellholes and now this POS stating what we know they all feel, HOW THE HELL CAN THE DOPES THAT SUPPORT A PALESTINIAN STATE FEEL THEY ARE ON THE GOOD SIDE?

If you support the Mooooslim Jew haters you’re evil. If you support the so-called “Palestinians” you’re evil and very, very retarded.

You Palestinian supporters are NOT fooling us.

Skunky on September 14, 2011 at 7:06 pm

Excellent post Debbie and excellent comments here so far.

Re:

From the USA Today article quoted and linked by Debbie:

“Such a state would be the first to officially prohibit Jews or any other faith since Nazi Germany, which sought a country that was judenrein, or cleansed of Jews, said Elliott Abrams, a former U.S. National Security Council official.”

A reader pointed the following out on the USA Today website and and I was also thinking the same thing:

Um, Mr. Abrams, you mean that Jordan doesn’t count? Jordan made the so-called “West Bank”–Jordanian Orwellian reference to Judea and Samaria–as well as Jordan proper Judenrein, expelling its Jews and not allowing Jews to live there or become citizens. (Judea and Samaria from 1948-1967; Jordan proper from 1948 through the present.)

JeffE on September 14, 2011 at 9:37 pm

I don’t know about you Debbie, but I’m a Palestinian.

Jews are Palestinians too! For all too long, Jews have bought into this idea that Palestinians are exclusively Arabs, but that’s not true. That is why I ALWAYS (just in case you never noticed) refer to “Palestinian Arabs”. The “No Jews allowed” policy of the PLO/HAMAS/PA/etc. is completely consistent with the policy of the Arab League. The statement from the PLO “ambassador” shouldn’t surprise anyone.

I think Golda Meir was the last Israeli leader to make a point of distinction between Palestinians and Arabs who live in the region historically known as Palestine.

For too long, people have bought into the “No Jews Allowed” policy of the Arab League when using the noun or adjective “Palestinian”. It’s a lie.

I’m a Palestinian. Those other guys are Arabs.

There is NO Santa Claus on September 14, 2011 at 10:51 pm

Imagine if Israel just said “ok, then you can have all our muslims”. Kick them out and lock the door behind them. Then what would they do for work or even medical treatment? Just give them what they wish for, they will regret it.

Ender on September 15, 2011 at 12:15 am

Didn’t I say, just yesterday, that when people call Israel an apartheid country, it’s projection?

Do all those left-liberals, holding weep-ins over the now-so-called “Palestinians” and demanding that Israel retreat to the pre-6 Day War borders to give the “Palestinians” a SECOND autonomous homeland, besides Jordan, know or care that every Arab in “Palestine,” who ever so much as sold a cup of coffee to a Jew, will be regarded as an Uncle Tom at best, a Quisling at worst-and shot?

Miranda Rose Smith on September 15, 2011 at 4:12 am

    Miranda:

    When people call Israel an “apartheid country” it’s anti-Semitic demonization. I don’t know what Palestinian Arabs will do with those who “collaborated” with Jews. I can’t project the future like you did.

    What I can do is take note that intra-Arab violence has been VERY well documented over the past 10 months. When I look at the turmoil occurring throughout the Arab League States, I can’t help but wonder what the sense is in fostering yet another Arab League State.

    The only people who really care about Palestinian Arabs are Palestinian Jews. Everybody else is pretty much using Palestinian Arabs as proxies to wage war against the Jews. The tragedy is that the Palestinian Arabs are so caught up in their own anti-Semitism that they don’t understand that.

    There is NO Santa Claus on September 15, 2011 at 8:35 am

      The only people who really care about Palestinian Arabs are Palestinian Jews. Everybody else is pretty much using Palestinian Arabs as proxies to wage war against the Jews.

      That’s what I said in my posting the other day. Left liberals only care about the now-so-called “Palestinians” as cat’s-paws to finish off Israel for them. I’ve been saying for years that the now-so-called “Palestinians” are in GRAVE danger of genocide, FROM THEIR OWN GENUS, their fellow Arabs.

      Miranda Rose Smith on September 16, 2011 at 1:55 am

Hmm……..the rag heads want the right of return but Jews cannot enter a Palestinian state. I believe apartheid is the word for that. What a bunch of hypocrites!

Catmann on September 15, 2011 at 8:30 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field