September 16, 2011, - 2:32 pm

The Morons of the “Arab Spring”

By Debbie Schlussel

Anyone who has read a newspaper or paid attention to world events–even only occasionally–in the last ten years knows that the Muslim world is a savage place that will never be civilized and whose only version of “democracy” is to elect fellow savages.  Anyone who needed the Muslim invasion of the Israeli Embassy in Cairo, last week as a wake up call should go back to sleep.  You simply haven’t been paying attention . . . attention to “Gaza Democracy” a/k/a HAMASastan . . . attention to “Iraqi Democracy” a/k/a Iran-backed, koran-based Shia-ocracy . . . Libyocracy a/k/a mass torture and revenge and then koran-ocracy.  Oh, and then there’s the gang-rape of Lara Logan by the “liberators” she cheered until they “liberated” her  . . . and the virginity tests of their fellow Egyptian “democrats.”  This is Islam.  This has always been Islam.  It will not change.  They need brutal dictators to keep some appearance of stability among the animals.

And, like I said, you don’t need to be Einstein to know this.  You just need to be paying attention.  But the most brainiac of self-proclaimed brainiacs on world affairs know better than us and our common sense.  And that goes for uber-morons like Josef Joffe, a “fellow” of the Hoover Institution, a so-called conservative think tank.  Joffe’s colleagues at Hoover include Fouad Ajami, the Arab Spring’s biggest cheerleader and a Shi’ite Muslim fantasist parading as a moderate, and Daniel Pipes, a giant phony who won’t condemn Islam and believes it can be moderate and peaceful and, instead, hides behind the non-existent “Islamism” to make his several hundred thousand dollars a year in salary without recognizing the Islamic threat while using the euphemism of cowards for it, instead.

In today’s Wall Street Journal, Joffe has an op-ed piece, entitled “Optimists Were Wrong About the Arab Spring.”  Uh, really?  No s–t, Sherlock.  The problem is, this guy admits that he thought, until last week’s Muslim riots at the Cairo Israeli Embassy, that Muslims were peaceful and could have a Western-style democracy.  Whatta moron!  Did he not notice the anti-Semitic, swastika-laden, anti-Israel signs in Cairo during all the protests of February and March?  Or the Lara Logan rape?  Or the virginity tests?  Or how “democracy” turned out in Gaza and the so-called West Bank?  This guy is an idiot.  And, hey, he’s also the editor of Die Zeit and a senior fellow of the Freeman-Spogli Institute.  Check out part of what amounts to his admission, “I am a moron,” in today’s Journal (and note that for the rest of his column, he blames Hosni Mubarak for this–the man who isn’t in power and whose unseating is the reason this is all going on, that and that fact that these are Muslims we’re dealing with):

I wasn’t alone, but the mea culpa is all mine. Like many, I thought that dawn was finally breaking over the Arab world when those nice, middle-class crowds thronged Cairo’s Tahrir Square chanting “freedom” and “democracy” without burning American and Israeli flags. What a miracle, I mused: The dogs of hate are not barking. And what a wondrous moment of transcendence! Free the people, and they will free themselves from the obsession of anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism their overlords had implanted to distract them from misery and oppression.

It was a false dawn—and not only because of the sacking of the Israeli embassy in Cairo last week. On my desk sits a Reuters photo dated May 13; the caption reads: “People burn an Israeli flag during a demonstration on Tahrir Square.” There were no such symbols of “Arab rage” when the protests erupted in late January.

Uh, yes, there were, you dumbass. There were plenty of prominently displayed anti-Israel and anti-Semitic signs in Tahrir Square. Dude, you need to get a new prescription for your eyeglasses. Or a brain transplant.

The demons of yore are back and presumably they have never left. The Friday demonstration on Tahrir Square was at first standard fare—yet another protest against the military regime. But at the end, several thousands armed with Palestinian flags, crowbars and hammers marched off to the Israeli embassy for a bit of deconstructionist work.

Hey, Josef, glad you finally woke up.  But it’s too little, too late.  The rancid halal milk is spilt.  Your crying now won’t fix it.  But, thanks.

The morons of the Arab Spring, Joffe and his colleague Ajami and others, cost the world a lot, including and especially a more stable Middle East. Thanks a gazillions, guys. And, no worries, the Hoover paycheck is still coming in, despite your cheerleading and enabling of the enemy.

Alhamdillullah [praise allah].

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

89 Responses

Skunky & Eyes, mom (Maoists of Minnesota? Muslims of Michigan?) is either an ignoramus or, more likely, a liar. For example, mom (who may well be a man) either did not know the approximate proportion of Muslims in the world, or knew it and lied about it. As between ignorance and lying, I think the latter is more likely. If so, we are seeing a typical pattern of Muslim lying.

We can’t be sure if mom is a knave or a fool, but surely this entity doesn’t deserve your time. I mean what’s the point of arguing with someone who either knows almost nothing about the subject or deluges you in lies about it?

“Imagine a world without Islam!”

skzion on September 19, 2011 at 12:11 am

    Right on, Skzion!

    I love your tag at the end of your post. Hope you keep it!

    Skunky on September 19, 2011 at 9:22 am

There are bad scenes to the Arab Spring, but we are still in the middle of the movie. I’m not sure which way the plot will twist next.

Solomon2 on September 19, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    Solomon2, when you post you mostly straddle the fence. The fact that you said what you said tells me that either you don’t read DS’ posts or you don’t agree with her research.

    If you even read ONE of her posts you would FOR SURE know how the AS is gonna end. The ones who don’t are Dhimmis or can’t follow at straight line.

    Skunky on September 19, 2011 at 6:58 pm

Skunky,

“And NO, I do NOT think Russia is better off now than when they had a running chance at TRUE freedom and democracy once the wall came down.”

The wall came down in Germany. You know that, right?…

Um, dude… I could compare dicks with you (or Debbie) and come out on top but none of that should matter. You’ve given no factual data to prove your statements are true. Where is the evidence Russia is worse off now than they were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? Where is the evidence anti-Mubarak protestors attacked Lara Logan? You’ve offered nothing but random statements that you probably don’t even know how to defend… seeing as how you haven’t managed to do so yet. So far, you’re posts have been worthless. Anyone can SAY anything, asshole. Prove it. Do some research and prove what you’re saying has merit. Because I’m pretty sure everything you’ve said so far has been wrong.

mom on September 19, 2011 at 4:58 pm

“Skzoid,

For example, mom (who may well be a man) either did not know the approximate proportion of Muslims in the world, or knew it and lied about it. As between ignorance and lying, I think the latter is more likely. If so, we are seeing a typical pattern of Muslim lying.”

It was a flippant remark. Besides, the supposition was not that Islamic people alone do not deserve democracy but that all barbarian nations and heathen (who will not bow their knee to almighty Jehovah) do not deserve democracy and couldn’t handle it if they got it…. which is, of course, a backwards and absurd statement. Ergo, duh, well over half the world isn’t Christian.

mom on September 19, 2011 at 5:03 pm

“…However, the difference between the two shooters is that Islamists are religiously motivated with evil intention, with martyrdom, 72 virgins and a payment to the shooters parents. Ask the Fort Hood psychiatrist, an educated person why he was screaming the war cry ‘Allah Achbar’ as he continued to kill and maim his colleagues as did the 9/11 terrorists.”

How is that different? Some kid shoots me because he’s an outcast or some kid shoots me because he’s a religious nut, I’m still dead. What about that Christian nutbag up in Norway who killed all those people? What about the Oklahoma bombing? What about David Koresh, Jim Jones and the Mormon Compounds? Are these people less nuts or more nuts than the other nuts? They’re all nuts. It’s the same damn thing.

“Have not noticed any suicide bombing coming from the Jews, Amish or the Hindus.”

Really? You didn’t read about the invasion of the West Bank, the Amish school where that guy raped and killed all those girls a few years back, the Hindus… nothing off the top of my head but do your own Google search and you’ll find all kinds of crazy wack-jobs of every variety.

“…The USA has about 300 million people, of course they’ll be other nutters but proportionately per capita the most hideous murders have come from the Islamic terrorists.”

If you mean 911 then yes… they killed a lot of people that one time. But, beyond that, your statement is totally false. Try supporting it with some statistics. Show me some hard news sources (as in, not Debbie) or real live academic studies.

“Having lived in the USA, Canada, Britain, Africa, Europe and the Pacific Rim over the last 8 years I do not need to use Snopes as a reference. The evidence is first hand to support my previous posting.”

Oh, yea, because anecdotal evidence is superior to actual research every time…

“The facts below speak for themselves.”

Hm…

mom on September 19, 2011 at 5:15 pm

To Mom:Have not noticed any suicide bombing coming from the Jews, Amish or the Hindus.”

‘Really? You didn’t read about the invasion of the West Bank, the Amish school where that guy raped and killed all those girls a few years back, the Hindus… nothing off the top of my head but do your own Google search and you’ll find all kinds of crazy wack-jobs of every variety.’

Your explanation does not demonstrate a single suicide bombing coming from the Jews, Amish and Hindus.

Suicide bombers are terrorists working on the principle of effecting as many victims as possible. The premeditated evil intention of confined spaces, planes, underground trains and speeding above ground trains. Islamic warfare, terrorising the innocent and unsuspecting. With the Geneva Convention’s rules of warfare, soldiers could at least surrender waving a white flag. These innocent civilians had no choice. Islamic cowards, all in the name of an ideology where life means nothing.

‘“Having lived in the USA, Canada, Britain, Africa, Europe and the Pacific Rim over the last 8 years I do not need to use Snopes as a reference. The evidence is first hand to support my previous posting.”

Oh, yea, because anecdotal evidence is superior to actual research every time…

Having been a witness to the London 7/7 bombings I can factually report to you Mom, that not a single perpetrator was anything other than a Muslim.

The facts are the facts, opinions are just opinions and not worth the paper they’re written on. Snopes cannot be classified as expert witness testimony. Change your sources and become informed. Snopes caught out lying, online info.FYI.

‘Well, well, well, the famous SNOPES.COM, that most liberals use, almost exclusively, when defending their positions, has been CAUGHT in a huge LIE! Oh yes they have! Of course, this will mean nothing to liberals. They will say that the SUPREME COURT is wrong!
They will just say that the documentation has been altered. They will claim that the links are phony. You see, overall, liberals are just as narcissistic
(fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity), as Barrack Hussein Obama himself. No matter how many REAL FACTS you confront them with, they chose to ignore or discredit, rather than look at them for what they are. They CANNOT be wrong!
Just like Thelma & Louise, they’d rather drive off a cliff, rather than having to admit they are wrong, or even say, “We are sorry.”
So, here’s a bit of info, which I think you will find very interesting. Some friends, who wish to remain unknown, sent this to me but you know me, I just got to throw it out there.
I’ll keep yapping’ until either I die, by natural causes or when some Muslim or a ballistic liberal takes me out. Here is the DOPE on SNOPES.
“Well, how interesting. Seems the U.S. Department of Justice has changed their website. Gone are the colorful and patriotic red, white and blue U.S. flag decorations on the page.
They have been be replaced by stark black and white, and, at the top of the page, is a rather interesting quote:
“The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people.”
Catchy, huh? Just one tiny, little (too small to be relevant, obviously point. The quote is from C. Wilfred Jenks, a British man who in the 1930?s was a leading proponent of the “international law” movement, director of the International Labor Organization (ILO), which had, as its goal, to impose a global common law, and which backed global workers “rights”.
Call it New World Order, call it Marxism, call it Progressivism, and call it Socialism. Under any of those names it definitely makes the DOJ look corrupt in their sleek, new, black website with Marxist accessories to match.
Go here and see for yourself how very interesting that they couldn’t find a nice quote from one of our Founders. People, we have lost our Republic and control.
Next, I went to Snopes to check this out and they said it was false and there were no such dockets, so I Googled the supreme court, typed in Obama Kagan, and guess what?
Yep you got it. Snopes lied. Every one of those dockets is there.

Eyes Wide Open on September 19, 2011 at 8:25 pm

Muslim/Maoist mom made now says that it actually knew the proportion of Muslims but made “a flippant remark” that just happened to more than double the correct figure. Yeah, I’ll bet. Poor mom is a compulsive liar, as Muslims and communists of are. I always feel happy when I think of McCarthy and the blackballing of Hollywood’s communists. We need another round.

But since we won’t get it, we might as well call anti-human beasts like mom what they are.

skzion on September 19, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    Szion: With regard to the above debate, will have to close the matter with the old adage which I’ve repeated here previously,

    ‘Better to win an argument with a wise man, than win with a fool’….

    Sage-like advice Szion, my full permission to use it against those that just don’t get it.

    Cheers.

    Eyes Wide Open on September 19, 2011 at 9:13 pm

That’s right Eyes…and the freak was very foolish and very dumb.

Even though the pig “Motives” :D has flown the coop, I will treat the above moron the same way I treated him…I just ignored him.

As disgusting as he was, he had more of a brain than the fool above.

Skunky on September 19, 2011 at 10:53 pm

    OOOOPS Skunky & Szion: Correction coming up…

    ‘Better to LOSE an argument with a wise man, than win with a fool’

    Eyes Wide Open on September 19, 2011 at 11:17 pm

Three of my posts are “awaiting moderation” because they make you look stupid.

mom on September 19, 2011 at 11:11 pm

Eyes,

“Suicide bombers are…”

Thanks for the Jr. High essay but I know what a suicide bomber is; I just don’t understand why you think their civilian victims are more dead than a soldier’s civilian victims? Do you know how many civilians we killed in Iraq? A lot.

“Having been a witness to the London 7/7 bombings I can factually report to you Mom, that not a single perpetrator was anything other than a Muslim.”

Really? You saw the bombers… or you saw them on TV like the rest of us? Because I’m not impressed that you saw some smoke.

“The facts are the facts, opinions are just opinions and not worth the paper they’re written on. Snopes cannot be classified as expert witness testimony.”

Your testimony has nothing to do with the word “expert”, child. Snopes has a high rate of accuracy. Much higher than most “expert” witnesses like you, anyway.

“…No matter how many REAL FACTS you confront them with, they chose to ignore or discredit, rather than look at them for what they are.”

That’s you, champ.

“…Call it New World Order, call it Marxism, call it Progressivism, and call it Socialism…”

Call it Nazi lizard-man aliens from the 5th dimension?

Man, you are a riot.

mom on September 19, 2011 at 11:27 pm

Since my posts are still “awaiting moderation”…

“A Gallup analysis of more than 130 countries nearly a decade after the 9/11 terrorist attacks suggests that one’s religious identity and level of devotion have little to do with one’s views about attacking civilians.”

h ttp://www.gallup.com/poll/149369/religion-not-color-views-violence.aspx

“…a poll released today by the Abu Dhabi Gallup center shows that American Muslims are the religious group in America most likely to reject violence against civilians.”

h ttp://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/08/02/285734/gallup-poll-american-muslims-arent-anti-israel-reject-violence/

h ttp://www.abudhabigallupcenter.com/149372/views-violence.aspx

Busting the myth of Sharia Law taking hold in the west:

h ttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/10/religion.law1
h ttp://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-06-12-Sharia-law-in-the-USA_n.htm
h ttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/26/AR2010082605510.html
h ttp://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/08/10/3088943/op-ed-shout-down-the-sharia-myth-makers
h ttp://www.aclu.org/religion-belief/nothing-fear-debunking-mythical-sharia-threat-our-judicial-system

mom on September 19, 2011 at 11:35 pm

Wake up Mom:

Snopes caught out lying, online info.FYI.
————————————————————
Your testimony has nothing to do with the word “expert”, child. Snopes has a high rate of accuracy. Much higher than most “expert” witnesses like you, anyway.

“…No matter how many REAL FACTS you confront them with, they chose to ignore or discredit, rather than look at them for what they are.”

That’s you, champ.

“…Call it New World Order, call it Marxism, call it Progressivism, and call it Socialism…”

Call it Nazi lizard-man aliens from the 5th dimension?

Man, you are a riot’

————————————————————-
Comprehension obviously not one of your stronger points, Mom.. This was an online piece about the LYING SNOPES…you just don’t get it, do you. Online….FYI…not my words.

Eyes Wide Open on September 19, 2011 at 11:48 pm

Eyes,

Oh, I got it. It was meaningless drivel by some other poor sap like you. Same thing.

mom on September 20, 2011 at 12:50 am

??????? ???????? ? ???! ???? ??????? ?? ?? ????? ????? ???????? ???? 11 ?????? 2011 ???????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ????????? ?? CNN ? CBS ? ???? ?????. ?? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ????? ????? ????? ? ??????? ?????? ??? ???????? ? ???? ???? ?? ????? ? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ??????? ?????? ? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? ????? ????? ???????? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ?? ????? ? ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ? ????? ??? ????? ????? ? ??????? ???????? ??? ???? ????? ????? 200-300 ?????? ?? ????? ????. ??? ???? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ???????? ?? ??????. ??? ??? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ?? ???? ? ??? ???? ??? ?? ?????? ??????. ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ? ???? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ??????? ? ??? ??? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ? ????? ???? ??????? ? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ? ????? ????? ?? ??????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ? ??????? ?? ??????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????????. ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ???. ???? ??? ?????? ?????. ???? ?????? ??? ????? ????????? ?????????. ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ????????? ???????? ????? ????????? ? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ? rutting ??? ??? ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ????? ????. ???? ?????? ??? ??????! ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???. ????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ??????. ????? ?? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? strong ?????? ???? ? ????????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? ??????? ????? ????????. ??????! ??????! ??????!

dearest egypt on September 27, 2011 at 5:51 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field