September 28, 2011, - 1:11 pm

Farmer Tells Topless Rihanna to Leave His Land; “View’s” Hasselbeck Calls Him “UnChristian”

By Debbie Schlussel

I’ve had it with these arrogant celebrities pushing their filth and trashy values on everyone else.  That’s why I especially applaud Irish farmer and landowner Alan Graham for asking topless pop singer Rihanna to leave his property, where she was filming a video for her new single, “We Found Love.”  (Who the heck watches music videos anymore, anyway?)  Graham said he thought it was “inappropriate.”  Spot on.

elisabethhasselbeck.jpg

But always reliably airheaded faux-conservative Elisabeth Hasselbeck of ABC’s “The View” attacked the farmer on the yenta hag-fest, this morning, saying Graham was unChristian and unJesus-like because she said “Jesus didn’t turn people like this away.  Jesus welcomed the prostitutes.”

As you know, I’m not a Christian.  I’m proudly Jewish.  But even I know a little something about the Christian Bible.  Um, Ms. Hasseldumb, were the prostitutes Jesus welcomed writhing around topless?  Were they filming vapid music videos?

PUH-LEEZE.

Hey, I have an idea!  Why don’t the Hasselbecks invite prostitutes and a topless Rihanna to their home for their three young kids to see?  I mean, they wouldn’t wanna act “unChristian” and “unJesus-like,” right?

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly




31 Responses

Right.

Hasselbeck thinks decency is beneath society and no one has the right to insist on it.

That along with trashing property rights is just what I expect from a faux conservative.

Hey, that probably ends where her own home begins. Soo typical!

NormanF on September 28, 2011 at 1:47 pm

Love how just she called Rihanna a whore.

Luis on September 28, 2011 at 1:48 pm

Hasselbeck definitely is a moron and she would not be on TV if she wasn’t good-looking. That’s why she stuck up for Rhianna. Bimbos who have gotten where they are due to their taking more and more clothes off and enchanting men have to stick together.

Besides that, her comments on current events are totally inane.

Robert Lefkowitz on September 28, 2011 at 1:55 pm

Just another whore having another whore’s back.

CaliforniaScreaming on September 28, 2011 at 2:01 pm

Please, what terrible thing did we do in a previous life to be inflicted with Hassle-Pluck?

Nir Leiu on September 28, 2011 at 2:12 pm

I’d watch the view if Hasslebuck would go topless on the show. But only her. I don’t want to see my breakfast twice. As far as Rihana is concerned, she needs a little slap… oh wait, too late…

Gino on September 28, 2011 at 2:31 pm

Sorry, you want get me criticizing Rihanna. First, she is very pro-Israel.

Second, what kind of red blooded American male wouldn’t want to see a girl topless?

And was she actually topless, or wearing a tiny bikini top?

JEG: I know. I’ve written about her support for Israel:
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/23052/dhimmi-brit-bands-cancel-israeli-concerts-but-rihanna-other-bands-still-making-israeli-dates/

But still.

The reports say she went topless. I would agree if it’s only the bikini in the shots. But the reports say she also went topless, later on. DS

Jonathan E. Grant on September 28, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    Time to trade in your porn collection for a few good books, Jonathan.

    shegundala on September 29, 2011 at 11:41 am

    Her reps should have been more precise in their description of the contents of the music video in the contract. That way the farmer could have decided before the confrontation.

    The idiots on the view don’t realize that was PRIVATE land. It’s none of their business what the farmer wants on or off the land, so long what the farmer was requesting was legal, which in this case it was. He could have been held accountable for them using the land for an illegal purpose, as well.

    As I think I’ve mentioned before, I watch Riff-Trax to go to sleep, as comedy helps. Otherwise, I read.

    I apprciate Rihanna sticking up for freedom and against scum.

    Occam's Tool on October 1, 2011 at 7:35 pm

Rihanna uses nudity as a distraction away from her inability to actually sing. According to the Daily Rash, when Rihanna was on Saturday Night Live last year she came really close to hitting the right notes. http://www.thedailyrash.com/rihanna-comes-very-close-to-singing-in-key-on-saturday-night-live

Holly Wilson on September 28, 2011 at 4:57 pm

they justdo this to keep themselves in the spot light
im to the point a tastefully dressed woman gets attention more than one disrobed

ted 409 on September 28, 2011 at 5:54 pm

HER BREASTS AREnt even showing AT ALL
WHATS so bad ishes covered her breasts
totally and just lacks a shirt

T: If it was just that, it’s no big deal. It’s that she went topless. There just aren’t pics and video of that online. DS

ted 409 on September 28, 2011 at 6:05 pm

Why would anyone inflict the View on themselves, voluntarily? I hate going to doctor’s offices and car dealers at that time because they always have that crap on the TV. I try to change it when I can so my head won’t explode.

JeffT on September 28, 2011 at 6:15 pm

Rihanna is a very pretty girl but I feel as if she does not have a brain cell in her head. I have felt that since she has come on the scene that she has people who manage her who lead her in a certain direction. And without people who really have your back (mental health) and just have eyes on one’s wallet…here comes exploitation! That being said, I still think at this point she exploits herself…because she is a very unintelligent girl who was lead in a very in a very lascivious way. A mind is a very terrible thing to waste and not all are born with smarts.

Look what happened to Britney Spears. Her lifestyle pushed her over the edge and what she thought nourished her (when she was young and “green”) eventually destroyed her. What I don’t appreciate about her is that she still projects an image similar to the one that led her down a horrible road to make $$$. I don’t like that.

What I don’t like about BOTH of them is their lack of smarts and their mucking up of the culture. It’s gross and is NOT paving the way for GREAT American achievement.

Occam’s Tool, I am sure you have seen many young girls (and older women) on your couch who at one time thought they were being cool and cosmopolitan when that type of lifestyle led to devastating depression because they thought they were strong but instead were shaming themselves.

(And it’s crap like the shiite that comes out of EH mouth that has made me soooo sick of the Christians who pull that stupid crap out when they don’t want judgement. If I had been born Jewish I believe I would be as proud as DS because I love how Jews are NOT encumbered with that BS. That would be a natural gift for ME. If only!)

Skunky on September 28, 2011 at 6:57 pm

Jesus also asked people how they expected to escape the damnation of hell.

sg on September 28, 2011 at 9:19 pm

It was very unChristian of Jesus to turn over the tables of the money-changers at the Temple and act so angry at their presence. Jesus wouldn’t have acted like that.

gmartinz on September 28, 2011 at 11:06 pm

Why do these people in pop-culture TV-land and Hollywood feel the need to tell us what Jesus would do when they lead lives that are quite unattached from Jesus, the Holy word, or just about anything respecting God?

pitandpen on September 29, 2011 at 5:54 am

On what basis did Hasseldumb assume that just b’cos Mr Graham didn’t want a topless woman on his property, he was a Christian? He could just as easily have been an Athiest or an Agnostic, w/o being tolerant of any sort of public nudity. There are plenty of Agnostic people who have no taste for such behavior in public.

Infidel Pride on September 29, 2011 at 7:38 am

E. Hasselbeck is welcome on the view because she’s dumb. A conservative with even marginal knowledge and intelligence could easily put the rest of that liberal coven of hags in a corner.

shegundala on September 29, 2011 at 11:45 am

Ha! Jesus also told her to sin no more!

John K on September 29, 2011 at 11:57 am

Personally, I don’t see the big deal. Rihanna topless is pretty much what you’d see in all those National Geographic articles from the ’50s and ’60s, right?

DS_ROCKS! on September 29, 2011 at 6:36 pm

I’ve got one more. When Jesus drove the demons known as legion out of the man (who roamed the country side naked and could not be bound with chains) and sent them into the herd of pigs, the pig farmers ran away to tell the people what had happened. When they returned they found the man CLOTHED and in his right mind.

sg on September 29, 2011 at 7:57 pm

The biblical account of Jesus and the woman about to be stoned is that he told the crowd that any without sin should throw the first stone. After they disperse he tells the woman to go and sin no more. Not to keep doing whatever the hell she wanted. It seems that hollywood christianity has a more liberal interpretation and is a lot more user friendly.

gary on October 2, 2011 at 10:09 am

Jesus forgave the penitent; some of whom were prostitutes. That didn’t mean he encouraged or approved of their behavior, as Hasselbeck might be suggesting.

shegundala on December 14, 2011 at 11:07 am

Hasselbeck is just annoying,what I don t understand about this people is:they spend their time thrashing us conservatives,another idiot would be Katheleen Parker,they clam to be conservative,but when it gets tough they side with the opposition,and then they go back to “being good conservative” Hasselback was a conservative probably for a few days,she was hired and became famous bc she got the gig at the view bc they needed a conservative for the show,the superficial kind,Hasselback is that….eeeewww!!!! I watched the show once bc of her,but left it when I saw how superficial she was.

Juan on February 3, 2012 at 2:14 pm

Holy crap! I can’t believe she pulled the religion card. That is so typical of the “Views” usual drivel of self-serving disingenuous shock jock analysis of current topics.

myother on May 8, 2012 at 10:42 am

    Well after re-reading my previous comment I guess I can believe it.

    myother on May 8, 2012 at 10:45 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field