October 28, 2011, - 4:08 pm

VIDEO – Attack on US Embassy in Bosnia: That’s What We Get for Risking US Soldiers’ Lives for Islam

By Debbie Schlussel

I’m still trying to figure out what we got in our “Muslims, Please, Please Like Us” campaign in Bosnia, where we risked US soldiers’ lives and our intelligence, weapons, and money to help Bosnian Muslims against all the Christians in the area.  Clearly, it didn’t win us the respect–just the disdain–of Muslims, to the point that they attacked the U.S. Embassy there, today.  Is this a surprise to anyone?  Shouldn’t be. . . at least, not to those of us who know Islam and know that the Muslim world laughs at us for helping them.  They only respect that which they fear.  And they certainly don’t fear us.  That’s for sure.  Don’t expect to see anything like this in Angelina Palestina Jolie’s upcoming “love story” movie (which she wrote and directed), about a peaceful Muslim Bosnian who falls in love with a Christian woman in the region.  That’s her Islamo-pandering tripe.  And this is real life.

islamiccrescent.jpg

Muslim Sniper: America’s Reward for Helping Muslims Take Over Sarajevo

Oh, and by the way, note that the media reports and Matt Drudge call the gunmen “Islamist”–a non-existent thing–because they don’t have the guts to call the violent attacker what he really is:  MUSLIM. He shares one thing with the thugs who attacked the US Embassies in Tehran, Beirut, and two East African capitals and the Israeli Embassies in Buenos Aires and Egypt: Islam. Not “Islamism.” Islam. And the Muslims in places like Dearbornistan, who might put out BS statements condemning this attack, won’t condemn Hezbollah’s attack on the US Embassy in Beirut or Iran’s attack on the US Embassy in Tehran. Why? Because they are frauds who support today’s episode of Islam v. America, too.

Ask yourself which was better: Sarajevo when Christians hosted the Olympics? Or Sarajevo, after America butted in, helped Muslims take over, and now they shoot at our embassies? THIS. IS. ISLAM. . .

A gunman has fired shots at the US embassy in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo, wounding at least one policeman guarding the building.

After a 30-minute standoff in the city centre, a police sniper wounded the man and he was arrested. . . .

Photographs from the scene showed a bearded man walking down the street carrying an assault rifle.

Bosnian TV reports identified him as Mevlid Jasarevic, a 23-year-old Serbian citizen from Novi Pazar, a town in Serbia with a large Muslim community.

Reports said he was a member of the Islamic fundamentalist Wahhabi sect.

Um, if they are Sunni, they are almost all Wahhabi.

Bosnia’s bitter 1992-95 conflict between Muslims, Serbs and Croats ended with the US-brokered Dayton accord.

More like US-forced, after taking Muslims’ side against Serbs and Croats.

Like I said, this is what we get in return.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20 Responses

Deb, let delve a little deeper. During WWII, the Muslims sided with Hitler. When Nazi Germany invaded and captured Yugoslavia, the Muslims and the Croats ran concentration camps, wherein the Serbians were slaughtered by the hundreds of thousands. Of course, most of the Jews were wiped out. (Croatia, a Catholic region, was set up as a Nazi puppet state)

After the war, under Tito, the country was held together. However, once Tito died, the Muslims, who had once been a 10% minority in Kosovo, started raping and torturing the Christians in Kosovo, which, incidentally, is the ancient land of Serbs and the Serbian Eastern Orthodox church. Eventually, there were only a small number of Christians left (10-20%), and following U.S. intervention, the Christian churches have been pretty much destroyed by the Muslims, and most of the rest of the Christians fled for their lives.

One more note: During WWII, the Serbs saved over 500 allied pilots, mostly Americans, whereas the Croats turned them over to the Germans, and the Muslims just slaughtered them (with a couple of exceptions)

I guess this shows, as South Vietnam, Taiwan, Serbia, and now Israel knows (or will know), be wary of being called an ally of the U.S. You may end up with a knife in your back.

Jonathan E. Grant on October 28, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    Johnathan you should dig deeper yourself…

    My Croat family fought against Nazis. My great grandfather was a general in Tito’s army (the Partizan’s being majority Croat).

    It’s unbelievable how people don’t know history when it comes to former yugoslavia. Years of Serb-ruled communism created propaganda and lies about Croatia, whilst hiding grim truths about nazi-allied Serbia.

    The whole of Dalmatia fell under Mussolini so all Dalmatian Croats were Partizans fighting Ustashe & fascists/nazis, alongside many Croats from other Croat regions. So no, not all Croats were allied to nazis.

    And no, Croatia wasn’t some state created by nazis. It existed long before under King Tomislav’s Kingdom of Croatia and included all of today’s Croatia AND Bosnia & Herzegovina (B & H is Croat territory lost to Ottoman jihad).

    As for Serbia, well 6 months before WW2, Serbia proudly declared to Hitler that they had ‘cleansed’ Belgrade as the 1st European ‘judenfrei’ city and burnt the last synagogue to the ground. There were even jew-hating Serbian stamps made to commemorate this (google and you will find them). The fascist nazi-allied Serb chetniks/royalists under Draza Mihailovic were fierce jew-killers.

    Meanwhile, catholic cardinal Stepinac saved many jews lives, and was honoured for this.

    The only people fighting against fascists and nazis were Tito’s communist Partizans.

    So no, it’s not a case of bad guy croats and good guy serbs. Far from it.

    Reality is that Tito’s communism turned out to be a bad idea, like all communism, hence the reason for the break-up of Yugoslavia.

    I hope the truth reaches out to more people instead of the usual false propaganda spread about Croats, and that my family didn’t fight nazis/fascists in vain for their memory to be smeared.

    K on December 19, 2011 at 1:56 pm

Does anyone know why administrations going back to KKKlinton have pandered to muslims around the world and here? The same thing is happening in most other Western (and Australia) countries.

Are they “courting” the anticipated voting power of muslims when they are allowed to flood the host country?

Is it petrodollars – we hope that by being nice to muslims we’ll curry favor with muslim oil countries?

DS_ROCKS! on October 28, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    DS Rocks:

    It is all about the $$$$$. Do you remember, back in the 70’s, ABSCAM, where FBI money dressed up as Arabs interested in bribing congressmen, and how congressmen fought over the briefcases full of money?

    Did you know that Jimmy Carter received millions for his Carter Center from the Arabs? Or that his peanut farm was refinanced at an extremely low interest rate (5% versus 18% for everyone else) by an Arab bank? Or that Bill Clinton has made millions speaking and “consulting” with Arab leaders?

    Any other questions?

    Jonathan E. Grant on October 28, 2011 at 5:07 pm

Unhappy Arabs!!!
The Arabs are not happy!
They’re not happy in Gaza . They’re not happy in Egypt . They’re not happy in Libya . They’re not happy in Morocco . They’re not happy in Iran . They’re not happy in Iraq . They’re not happy in Yemen . They’re not happy in Afghanistan .. They’re not happy in Pakistan . They’re not happy in Syria . They’re not happy in Lebanon .

So, where are they happy?

They’re happy in England . They’re happy in France .. They’re happy in Italy .. They’re happy in Germany .. They’re happy in Sweden .. They’re happy in the USA .. They’re happy in Norway .. They’re happy in every country that is not Muslim. And whom do they blame? Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves.
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!

Eyes Wide Open on October 28, 2011 at 4:44 pm

Shocking this occurred right after Friday prayers, nu?

Have no fear, the traitors in the cia, the friendly brothers, the executive, DoD, (in)justice, state, et al will increase muslim “outreach” so this doesn’t happen here…

Something surely drove this poor, peaceful muslim to it – oppression only begets resistance – or as my jihadi acquaintances say: “How can you expect those who only want the freedom to practice their religion in peace to always stand by while The Prophet and Our Religion are attacked; there will be Freedom Fighters?”

Right, Traitors? Takbir!

Sgt. Friday on October 28, 2011 at 4:54 pm

Wow, Eyes Wide Open – that was profound! Saving that one… :)

Nathan on October 28, 2011 at 4:59 pm

Yep. good article. Unfortunately. JG spot on as well. Damn shame. I’m sure it’s some enlisted guys job to dust off the big bombs. I’d like to see less dusting.

samurai on October 28, 2011 at 7:57 pm

Any one need more proof we shouldn’t be involved in this whole sloppy mess?

petebone on October 28, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    Guess what, Pete: they will bring their sloppy mess here, do to clowns like, oh, say, you—who don’t shut off our borders.

    Occam's Tool on October 30, 2011 at 7:12 pm

JG, your post was so interesting. Thanks for that.

I am very curious about Croatia and what happened in the early 90’s. I know almost nothing about the conflict but since I have met some Croatians, I have been meaning to learn more about it. Of course I know Moooooooslims were the main problem.

Thank the Lord for DS. At least here she can post the truth without equivocation. It is very upsetting that she knows so much about the truth and yet she is the only one who tells us like it is. Without this site, I’d still prolly be trying to find some excuse (when NONE is warranted) for the Moooslim scourges.

I hope more people learn soon. I am so tired of their BS. And the ones who are suing the Catholic school have an equal amount of hubris to match their chutzpah for using our own petard to blow us up. Pun intended.

Skunky on October 28, 2011 at 9:18 pm

during world war 2 the mufti of jerusalem led a waffen ss division of bosnian muslims. hunted down and murdered jews.

Bill C. on October 29, 2011 at 1:10 am

Angelina Palestina Jolie’s upcoming “love story” movie is about a “female Bosniak war victim having a complicated love affair with a Serbian war criminal,” …………

Ronald Reagan never got enough credit for greatly contributing to the creation of the modern Muslim terrorist movement due to his support of the Muslm terrorist of Afghanistan.

John Prewett on October 29, 2011 at 9:35 am

“Serb Muslim” shoots at American Embassy.

Makes me wonder if he did it cause he was a Serb angry at American support of Muslims,…. or did he do it cause he was a Muslim angry at America for its alleged support of Israel ?

John Prewett on October 29, 2011 at 9:45 am

No Deb, that is what we get for WASTING US Soldiers’ lives on Islam.

Steve D. on October 29, 2011 at 10:00 am

american troops in libya http://thedailylibyanpost.blogspot.com/2011/10/proved-usa-troops-in-libya.html

gg on October 29, 2011 at 5:28 pm

No US troops or embassys should ever be posted in a Muslim country. Muslim nations are too evil and uncivilized.

Truth on October 30, 2011 at 8:26 am

Angelina Jolie’s movie is about a Bosnian Muslim man falling in love w/ a Christian woman? But that’s halal in Islam – after all, for them, women are tilth, who are to be plowed (it’s in the Quran – in a chapter whose title is ‘Woman’). So a Bosniak getting hold of a Christian Serb/Croat wouldn’t have anything un-islamic about it. It would have been fun to see the reaction to Jolie had she flipped those 2 – had a Muslimah fall in love w/ a Serb man. She’d probably have gotten the 3rd degree from her Jihadi pals. As for real life, such a Muslim woman would have been honor-killed.

I’m not surprised @ this – remember the Bosniak who shot up a mall in SLC before getting killed, and getting a hero’s funeral in Bosnia? And Sarajevo – after the independence of Bosnia, Sarajevo has gone from what used to be a cosmopolitan city to one that is now preey much just Muslim.

Of course, there are apologists like Stephen Schwarz who claim that the problem is just Wahabis, not Sufis like him, but the point remains that both Bosniaks and Albanians in Kosovo – the other pet Bush/McCain project of carving out a part of Serbia from it – have been problematic. To those who thought that the Albanian’s (‘Kosovars’) only problem was those eeeeeeevvvil Serbs, they’ve had skirmishes w/ Macedonia as well. Of course, none of that fits Washington’s Animal Farm motto of ‘Muslims good, Others bad’.

Infidel on October 30, 2011 at 8:27 am

Serbia basically had a hunk torn off of it in order to make this new “Jihadi State” An analagous situation would be for the United States, after a sufficient number of Mexicans had infiltrated in, to be forced by the United Nations to either cede New Mexico to Mexico, or allow it to become an independent state. Serbia was deprived of its formerly recognized territory due to such infiltrations and an international community that is happy to ethnically cleanse areas where Islam is involved.

Worry01 on October 30, 2011 at 12:14 pm

The Serbs with the Russians as their allies since we threw them under the bus, are itching to get their territories back. With the help of Catholic Croatia they are going to split Bosnia between them. We should have let the Serbs handle the muzzies, they are very good at it.

Drakken on November 1, 2011 at 12:55 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field