December 22, 2011, - 8:30 am
Schmuck of the Year: NYTimes’ Thomas Friedman Stands By “Jews Bought Congress” BS
I don’t begrudge the gentile and Arab Muslim Jew-haters and Israel-attackers as much as their Jewish anti-Semitic comrades. My fellow co-religionists who hate themselves and where they come from have a serious mental illness that is, sadly, celebrated as greatness in our culture. One of the worst of the so afflicted is Thomas Friedman, the New York Times columnist who has a past with the anti-Israel “Peace Now” movement in Israel and who would race from his DC-area mansion and run over his own mother if it meant the chance to eat shawarmeh with King Abdullah (either the Saudi or Jordanian King Abdullah, take your pick as he bends over for both) and attack Israel.
Recently, Friedman wrote a New York Times column that echoed some of the most vile anti-Semitic rhetoric coming out of the Stormfront crowd. He claimed that when Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu got a standing ovation after his speech to Congress, it was “bought and paid for” by Jewish money. This is the same kind of rhetoric you can regularly hear from the Pat Buchanans and neo-Nazis of the world, and from the various speakers to anti-Semitic Muslim groups around the country. It’s shorthand for, “Evil Jews use money to bribe leaders to do evil.” It’s a centuries-old canard used by anti-Semites in murderous pogroms and Holocausts against Jews throughout Europe and the Arab and Muslim worlds. Remember that, the next time you see this mustachioed fraud on NBC’s “Meet the Press” or elsewhere, such as hosting TV shows on the History Channel.
Reality Check: In fact, Congress is pro-Israel, not because of the Jews (many of whom are not pro-Israel) or “Jewish money” (much of which goes to consistent Israel-haters like Obama with no concern for what he does on Israel or other issues that should be of Jewish concern) but mostly because of the large pro-Israel Christian population in America. Despite this, Tom Friedman never lets the facts get in the way of his desire to be loved and accepted by Jew-haters. It’s a common mental illness among Jewish anti-Semites, who hate themselves and their heritage. His self-hatred is the most precious thing he has, other than his cheesy mustache. Now, this scumbag, Friedman, stands by his BS:
New York Times columnist Tom Friedman told The Jewish Week Tuesday that he regrets writing in his Dec. 13 column (“Newt, Mitt, Bibi and Vladimir”) that the standing ovation Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu received in Congress this year “was bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.”
“In retrospect I probably should have used a more precise term like ‘engineered’ by the Israel lobby — a term that does not suggest grand conspiracy theories that I don’t subscribe to,” Friedman said. “It would have helped people focus on my argument, which I stand by 100 percent.”
Of course he stands by it . . . just as he stands by his friends in HAMAS and Saudi Arabia rather than standing with America and what’s best for its interests. Now, I could engage in anti-Semitic stereotypes using Tom Friedman as Exhibit A, since he never puts America first. But, then, that would be saying that Tom Friedman is actually a Jew in any way other than an accident of birth and our misfortune that he trumpets his obviously Jewish surname to justify his pan-Arabist BS.
In truth, Tom Friedman isn’t a Jew in any way shape or form. Instead, he’s a far-left radical in a tweed coat with a BS Pulitzer Prize. And if you ask his patrons in the Gulf states and the Middle East, to them, he’s just the pet camel . . . bending over and assuming the position.
I’m not sure who paid for Friedman’s mansions, aside from many gullible dumbasses who bought his cliche-filled, toilet-paper-worthy books. But I wouldn’t be surprised if his writing and commentary was bought and paid for by the Arab Muslim lobby. Someone needs to look into that.
If we were back in 1941 Europe, Tom Friedman would be rounded up and sent to the camps, just like every other Jew. He’d likely have avoided the ovens playing the same kapo to Jew-haters that he so masterfully plays today.
Today, Tom Friedman’s nothing more than a Ron Jeremy look-alike (from the waist up) with far more dangerous views. My apologies to Mr. Jeremy for the comparison because, after all, Jeremy provides a service with some value on the market. One is a porn star who is honest about it and happens to be Jewish. The other writes anti-Israel porn for Muslims, pretends otherwise, and happens to be Jewish.
Like I said, at least Ron Jeremy provides does something of value. I can’t say the same for Thomas Friedman, whose only “service” is servicing his friends in the Muslim world in the way only a suicidal masochist would.
Tags: Anti-Israel, anti-Israel porn, anti-Semitic porn, Benjamin Netanyahu, Binyamin Netanyahu, bought and paid for by the pro-Israel lobby, Congress, Israel, mansion, Middle East, mustache, New York Times, Peace Now, people with mustaches, porn, Pro-Israel lobby, Ron Jeremy, Thomas Friedman, Tom Friedman
The real sickening part of the story is that the biggest number of subscribers to this rag of a paper are Jews who think they are being intellectual by purchasing the NY TIMES. In fac, they are true anti-intellectuals. The only good national newspaper is the Wall Street Journal (usually).
Look, the NY Times has always been anti-Semitic. Founded by German American Jews in the mid 1850’s, the paper has always reflected a disdain for Eastern European Jews (you know, the ones who have won a plurality of Nobel Prizes for science, literature, Medicine, economics, etc.). In 1896, the NY Times had an editorial encouraging the blocking of Eastern European Jews to our country, arguing they were dirty, uneducated,and uneducatable.
In 1947, the editorial (written by a an anti-Semitic Christian) opposed the founding of Israel.
Of course, being self hating Jews, the descendants of the founders did what came naturally…they converted to Christianity, and I truly feel sorry for the Christians, because these people will become self-hating Christians as well as anti-Semites.
Thus, Thomas Friedman fits into the long, anti-Semitic history of the NY Times. This history would end if Jews just stopped buying this anti-Semitic, anti-American rag of a paper.
Jonathan E. Grant on December 22, 2011 at 10:36 am