May 4, 2012, - 4:26 pm

Source: Obama May Release Bin Laden Death Photos to Aid Re-Election

By Debbie Schlussel

As we all know, sunshine is the best disinfectant.  And, yet, Barack Obama’s early life and a good deal of his Presidency is shrouded in secrecy.  It’s not just that he won’t ask his friends to release video of himself applauding anti-Semitic, anti-Israel comments made by Rashid Khalidi in the presence of Obama,  William Ayers, and several others  (and a Milwaukee-based Muslim kids’ dance troupe that simulates beheadings of Americans and Jews).  It’s not just that he won’t release transcripts from any of the colleges he attended or grad school.  It’s that he won’t release the photos and videos of the killing of Osama Bin Laden and his subsequently dead body.  But he might end up releasing those secreted materials as his re-election hopes narrow.

obamasmiling.jpg

After the killing of Bin Laden just over a year ago, Barack Obama refused to release any visual evidence of Bin Laden’s dead body and how he ended up meeting his 72 re-virginized ugly chicks.  And Judicial Watch, which does excellent work in seeking to disinfect America from partisan secrecy, filed suit against the CIA and the Department of Defense.  A judge recently ruled against Judicial Watch in ridiculous reasoning not based on any American law, statute, or  Constitutional provision.  The judge held that it might offend other countries and hurt our relations with them, which is interesting because all of these countries pretend they are against Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, so how could they be offended?  (Obama also insisted, in his speech after Bin Laden was killed, that Bin Laden “was not an Islamic leader.”)  And, again, whether or not they are offended does not trump any American’s or American organization’s right to obtain photos and video via a Freedom of Information Act request, unless the items sought are the subject of an ongoing investigation or would compromise sources and/or methods–neither of which is the case here.  The potential to harm international relations with the release of a photo is not a legitimate legal definition of “national security risk.”  We aren’t talking confidential, classified information in a diplomatic cable, here.

But Tom Fitton, the mensch who heads Judicial Watch, told me the other day that the photos could be released soon.  He said:


It would not surprise me in the least if Obama reversed course and released the bin Laden photos to help his reelection effort.

And I think he’s spot on. If Obama is losing to Mitt Romney–whether badly or in a tight race, come mid-to-late October–I believe that suddenly all of his statements about not wanting to “spike the football” will be thrown out the window.

He’ll do what it takes to win. And if it takes the Bin Laden photos and video, he’ll release them.

Yet another good reason to want Obama to lose . . . aside from the many very obvious ones.

So, what do you predict? Will Obama be desperate enough to contradict himself yet again, in order to secure a win in November?

I’ll bet that “Hail Mary” passes like the Bin Laden photos release are atop his playbook.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , ,

40 Responses

I am glad you like Judicial Watch. I am a member, but have not mentioned them here because I did not know your opinion. But I’m glad I made a good choice. (I also like the Weasel Zippers blog). Continue to apply boot to scumbags’ nads, rinse and repeat, Deb!

Occam's Tool on May 4, 2012 at 4:39 pm

    Barry Sotero is phenomenal.

    He pulled the trigger and took photos. What a guy!

    He’s not desperate. No, not at all… Get OUT! I just know MOOOOOOCHEL will strip the whitehouse when she leaves, too.

    As Goes... on May 4, 2012 at 6:20 pm

“The judge held that it might offend other countries and hurt our relations with them, which is interesting because all of these countries pretend they are against Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, so how could they be offended? ”

Good point, Debbie.

DS_ROCKS! on May 4, 2012 at 4:42 pm

Well, I do think release of the pictures could harm international relations. After all, we are in appeasement discussions with the Taliban, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Iran, and so on. They might delay those discussions for a couple of weeks to punish us if President Obama releases the photos.

And the judges? Law schools became PC years ago, so I’m not surprised at anything they do. I’m sure they have classes in these schools about how to get around precedents & statutes that they don’t like.

Little Al on May 4, 2012 at 4:47 pm

I’ve always believed he was holding them in reserve for when he needed them.
The guy is shameless.

Systolic on May 4, 2012 at 4:48 pm

    Muslims like Barack are allowed to lie to Infidels – no questions asked.

    bobby99 on May 4, 2012 at 7:03 pm

I believe he will release them.

And politicizing it will backfire on Obama. Exploiting the SEALS heroism for partisan advantage wouldn’t be an act Americans look upon favorably.

If Obama is desperate, he might just do stupid things to throw away his lock on re-election.

He might end up making “Mitt Happens” look good to the voters, despite all his shortcomings.

NormanF on May 4, 2012 at 4:49 pm

It’s taking this long to release them because his friends in Hollywood FX department are still creating them…I’m sure they will be badly forged like his BC but the media won’t care! The water coolers at MSM, CNN and the other lame stream outlets are filled daily with Obama Kool Aid!

Allen on May 4, 2012 at 4:57 pm

I’m normally the one of the last people to think that Obama has any clue about Muslims, but one thing he does deserve credit for is allowing the Special Forces to barge into Pakistan to take down Osama. There is no way Bush would have allowed it, since Pakistan was such ‘an ally’.

Despite all the reservations I have about Mitt, I doubt that he’d have been as bad as Bush had he been in his place (i.e. not hunting for Obama in Pakistan to keep the relationship w/ Pakistan alive and well)

Infidel on May 4, 2012 at 5:16 pm

    The only problem with that is that exterminating Osama bin Ladin was a relatively easy thing to do for him politically. Compared to other more active groups today, Osama bin Laden’s organization was marginal. He was a führer screaming out orders and reprimands from a bunker that he could never leave, which gave such pronouncements less and less weight over time. Mr. Obama would have founn it quite easy to take out such a character if it meant that he could henceforth treat Islamic terrorism as nothing more than a law enforcement issue. The Democratic Party had been fixated on Osama bin Laden for years not due to any outbreak of patriotism. Rather, if that party was capable of reducing the entire issue of Islamic terrorism to one man in the public mind, the elimination of that one man would make it all vanish. I actually think that President Bush would have ordered Osama bin Laden’s elimination for the same reason. It was easier to take out what had become a scarecrow than to actually deal with Islam and its followers

    Worry on May 6, 2012 at 4:10 pm

This freak, Obama-Putin is getting away with so much and IF he wins in November I will blame the Americans. They will give us the leader we deserve IF enough of the brain-dead vote this charlatan in after all he has wrought.

I’d also like to alert all DS fans that the Southern Poverty Law Centre (who like to keep her in their cross-hairs) have pretty much admitted that they are NOT in business to go after the extreme LEFT (like all the OWS vermin). Eff them! You know their on the devils side!

American, are you watching? Have you seen was Obama-Putin and Cankles Clinton have done to a Chinese Activist????? OWS should protest THAT! It’s actually a worthy cause. That story ALONE should chill you and tell you what has happened to America. The Chinese fella doesn’t get amnesty BUT his dole-bludging Auntie does and so will his drunk-driving Uncle! Priorities!

Wake the eff up America! The media is all a-twitter about Obama-Putin and his “composite” girlfriends but NONE of them vetted him and continue to cover for the lying liar. Didn’t the author of “A Million Little Pieces” loose credibility for the same thing???

I don’t care if you agree with me on the following BUT you have to ask yourself WHY so many things are buttoned-up and hidden on BHO(P)…like him or NOT…you MUST wonder what he is hiding…

1) Never have been shown a REAL birth certificate. “Birther” has been given a mocking name but why is he hiding it? The last one he released can be dismantled on Adobe Illustrator. MY BC can’t and I was born AFTER Obama-Putin.

2) Why does he have a Connecticutt Social Security Number?

3) DS herself discovered his selective service papers were forged.

Hmmmmm….Birth Certificate, Soc. Sec. # AND Selective Service all called into question. What a coinkydink! Something stinks!

4) Why hasn’t he released his college transcripts? He’s so smart. Why so secretive?

5) It has been forensically proven he did NOT write his horrible tome “Dreams of My Father”. Bill Ayers did. Hell, you can figure it out by reading DOMF AND any Ayers book. Writing style is hard to hide. And Obama is a CRAPPY writer and Ayers, although a repugnant and unrepentant domestic-terrorist is a very good writer. How come Obama’s TWO books have TWO different writing styles (because Ayers wrote the first one and Jon Favreau wrote the SECOND one).

6) C’mon! Y’all know that Obama-Putin was NOT the mastermind of the Osama kill! That stupid picture tells the story in ONE SHOT. Sitting on the side like a kid’s table on Thanksgiving! Obama-Putin didn’t have the guts to make the call and the fact that that friggen’ hack Panetta had the guts to give it a go should tell you how HORRIBLE this administration is.

7) Everyone in his past has been virtually vapourised. Even if you believe nothing listed above you MUST wonder where everyone is? Even the worst of the worst came crawling out of Bill Clinton’s past!

Obama-Putin is NOT who the media projects him to be and you need to be beholden to pretzel logic to still think he is. He’s been openly copping the Putin-Chavez way to keep his Commie arse in the WH…and he hates the job but LOVES the Power and the perks. (And America ignores it for the most part…his Putin and Chavez ways!!)

He is a lying liar and has circumnavigated getting things done by circuitously taking powers directly away from CONGRESS (who don’t seem to care that much) and strong-arming his WAY into law, legal or NOT.

The Fast and Furious/Gun Runner scandal ought to be enough to jettison this fraud from office but the WHOLE of Congress does not have a pair of gonads between the lot of them. So he and his Stedman Graham (Oprah’s “beard”) look-a-like pal (Eric Holder) live another day even though they should be behind bars! Oh, and why is it that JOHN CORRZINE is still free as a bird? That alone should tell you who is getting a pass in this society today!

It will be BOEHNER, in the end who will not take it to the limit. He’ll be the one who will help sweep it under the friggen’ rug! I ain’t believing NOTHING (even that ferkakta “draft” Jihad Darrell is shopping around!!)’til some actual action is taken. ACTION!

If this fraudulent freak is re-elected in November I will have lost all faith I have in America. Because the people got to fat and stupid to cherish what we had and pissed it away making us all less free!

Skunky on May 4, 2012 at 5:33 pm

    GREAT comment, Spunky!! You really outlined a number of very salient – and troubling – factoids about our Fraud-in-chief, the Great Ovomit!

    One other aspect that would be interesting and/or enlightening on which to focus a little more light would be O’s sexual history & predilections – at least before Moochelle the Amazon cornered and roped him in. There’s a terrific website, http://www.HillBuzz.org, run by a very dedicated blogger named Kevin Du Jan (sp?), who was a dyed-in-the-wool supporter of Hitlery UNTIL O and his Chi machine kicked her out of the primaries. Many of Kevin’s friends & subscribers also felt great anger at the DNC and positive hatred of Odumbo for what they did to their “heroine.”

    The result was that Kevin, his blog and many of his followers did a one-eighty and became VERY anti-Obama, anti-DNC (and, in fact, anti-everything Democrat!) and pro-Palin, pro-Conservative and pro-GOP!! What a stunner!!

    My mention of that site is to point out that Kevin pretty much has/had the goods on O from his days in Chicago and his many visits to what they call, “Boyztown” – i.e., the gay district in Chicago. This would be in sync with the fact that several gay men claimed to have known him and, indeed, had brief affairs with him back in that day. The only problem is, at least three of these so-called “close personal friends” have all died, supposedly from natural causes, although one, I believe, was murdered. Now, THAT would be interesting to Google!!

    Joy on May 6, 2012 at 2:40 am

Bs, that was not what the judge said!! I read the reprt and it’s nothing like you wrote,but why am I surprise ? You fabricate everything to suit your third grade readers in this blogg.

Sam on May 4, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    BS Sam, it’s NOT fabrication as you mentioned buddy, furthermore Sammy-boy, if Debbie fabricates everything then explain to me and answer my question, why do alot of bloggers, pundits, media people, etc. steal her work, plagarize off of her and never give the woman any credit for her original work? Care to comeback and explain any of that to me instead of standing on you’re little soap-box and and belittle her and us the readers/posters by calling us “third-graders”! It’s people like you Sam why this country is in a meltdown along with the media as well.

    “A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

    Sean R. on May 4, 2012 at 8:45 pm

      “The affidavits they have provided are sufficient to establish that DOD conducted an adequate search for responsive records and that the records identified by the CIA were classified materials properly withheld under exemption 1″

      That is what the judge said.

      petebone on May 5, 2012 at 12:26 pm

And don’t forget Jonathon Pollard. He may be released in October if he’s still alive, G-d willing.

David on May 4, 2012 at 5:48 pm

GOD I LOVE YOU SKUNKY!!!!! BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO!!!!!!

Hollywood on May 4, 2012 at 6:39 pm

Plus there is the added pressure from a successful professional treasure hunter saying he has figured out where Obama’s( sorry Osama’s body) is and he is diving for it. Barack Ahood Obama who has kept so much a secret for his Russian Masters can not let the truth out.!!!

bobby99 on May 4, 2012 at 6:48 pm

Here in Brazil, in our hundredth Federal Constitution, it is expected that there will be no crime of opinion denied anonymity. And since young I kept my eyes on America, because he is aware of its strategic importance to the freedom of Latin American countries. So I dare say that in my opinion: – President Obama is a weak to govern a country strong. In politics tupiniquim (Brazilian) everything is possible with the party of current President Dilma, because the apparent affinity between Obama and our Workers Party seems likely that he release the pictures of Osama electoral purposes only, which would be unfortunate. I hope that the voter is also ripe for reproach him. God bless America, and America will save us!

Francino Medeiros Mirco on May 4, 2012 at 7:13 pm

Francino,

Don’t look to America to save you, you’re on your own – along with the rest of the world.

Everyone needs to read George Washington’s Farewell Address of 1796, Google it! You will swear it was written about todays events. Just goes to show you that the lies of todays politicians where the lies of the long dead politicians of the past.

Washington warned us that we the citizens must guard our freedom against the desires of political parties and the manipulations of politicians. Washington never said cling to a political party and put your faith in politicians. Washington stated specifically that politicians will agitate by telling us that our “problems” are caused by another, easily defined (and vilified), group of our fellow citizens and that if we elect the clever politician they will provide the solution. We have learned nothing from the past.

What do we think is going to happen in November. That we are going to elect “our heroes,” “our saviors” who will get to work voting themselves out of power by reducing the size, scope and influence of government? The Republicans can’t muster the votes to cut funding to NPR, but we think that THIS time they will cut the Departments of Energy, Education and EPA and simplify the tax code? I hope they do, but past performance is an indicator of future results!

Republicans get fat feasting at the same trough of government excess as the Democrats. Government intrusion forces us to create PACS and various special interest groups that seek out a “friend” in elected office that can protect us from another politician pushing a harmful agenda. So we send money to the “friend” who promises they will do all they can to protect us. If government becomes less intrusive, we will have no reason to buy a political “friend” or “protector” and the politicians know it. So they simply tell us what we want to hear, “less government” and “lower taxes” is what we hear on the campaign trail.

Starting in 1913 with the passage of the 16th amendment that made the income tax constitutional, we have been on the slippery slope away from the U.S. Constitutions idea of minimal government intrusion and maximum individual freedom. We don’t need revolution in America. We need to figure out a way to get back on track. I think that’s what the “Tea Party” movement is about. Backing politicians who ARE willing to vote away government power and authority and return freedoms usurped back to the people. This means voting against incumbents and watching the new guys to see if they live up to their “Tea Party” talk. If not, then we vote them out. If we do this over the next 100 years we might get things sorted out. Otherwise, duck while the political pendulum begins to swing away from the “do nothing” Republicans and back to the Democrats over the next 4 years – and the political dance goes on and on . . . right foot forward and left foot back. . . right foot back and left foot forward. . .

Mike on May 4, 2012 at 10:10 pm

I wonder if Bin Laden had a son if he would look like Trayvon?

Hollywood on May 4, 2012 at 10:26 pm

Any American who actually believes that bin Laden didn’t die at least a decadeo ago is living in a make believe world. The intelligence community was in general agreement that he died back in late 2001; yet, we have a president and complicit Congress and media who pretend Obama made a bold decision to sen a group of Navy Seals to kill him last year but refused to present any physical evidence of his actual capture and death. The members of the elite Navy seal team who supposedly captured him have all met with untimely deaths in a tragic war incident in Afghanistan. All of the videos of bin Laden released by our government post 911 were horrible fakes that any layman could discern as such. The only worse fakes are the Obama/Dunham family photos that are the worst photo-shopped pictures you can find on the Internet.

Gary Welsh on May 5, 2012 at 12:13 am

Of course he will release the photos. And we couldn’t see this one a mile away? Ohhh..Gary. JFK is still alive on an island owned by Aristotle Onassis too. In a wheelchair, but definitely alive. Yeah, I am definitely a good driver…yeah

#1 Vato on May 5, 2012 at 3:43 am

This whole thing is a hoax. NO ONE KILLED BIN LADEN. He died of natural causes — lung and/or kidney disease — in 2001. Al Jazeera reported his death, Bhuton reported his death (and was murdered herself shortly thereafter), and it was fairly common knowledge to people who paid attention. Even if his death wasn’t reported, every purported “Seal” that took him down had a helmet cam and there are no photos? LOL LOL! Then the poor Seals that supposedly conducted the raid ALL die in another mysterious death. This is just too ridiculous, too obvious, and Ovomit STILL goes around in his delusional state bragging about a non-event! That LIAR!

Viki on May 5, 2012 at 3:56 am

Bobby 99

You know Bobby; it is the religious duty of a Moslem to lie in three cases; to save his life , to save the life of a Moslem or if it is in the best interest of Islam. This is confirmed by a Hadith that Muhammad uttered

G. R. Scharoubim on May 5, 2012 at 11:15 am

“The Obama Administration drafted a memo to protect the president from blame if the mission to kill or capture Osama Bin Laden would have failed. That way Obama could blame the general instead of taking the blame himself. Mukasey wrote about it this week in The Wall Street Journal.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303916904577374552546308474.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Skunky on May 5, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    Great article on our Narcissist in Chief. I hope everyone take time to read the WSJ article you recommend.

    Jimbo on May 5, 2012 at 1:24 pm

I much more worried about Mitt’s promise to undue everything Obama has done. It includes selling off the Chrysler and GM and bring Osama Bin Laden back from the dead ;-).

Visteo on May 5, 2012 at 1:41 pm

Sorry to change the subject folks, but scroll down on this blog-page and on the “Hamtramck: Sharia prom Girls, etc.”, you’ll notice all of the moronic and dumbass Hamtramck trolls STILL trolling on that thread making complete fools of themselves and talking out of their asses.

In that article, Debbie is right and spot on on what she said about some of the folks in that godforsaken district of Hamtramck, nowadays a good number of the folks in that area are complete off their rockers and the Hamtramck trolls have proven DS’s point and our point. And there doing the typical boring and lame BS of, “yadda yadda racists racists yadda yadda”, “yadda yadda hateful hateful yadda yadda”, etc. A) what race and ethnicity is islam, & B) what race and ethnicity are muslims suppose to be?

Those Hamtramck trolls can keep that cesspool of a district Hamtramck to themselves, and I assume they get NO type of tourisim in that area, because of muslims moving into that area and NOT assimilating and adapting to the lifestyle and values of the community, etc.

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on May 5, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    Thanks for the heads up Sean! Luckily, it is so far down only the trolls are circle-jerking each other on it. They are like a micro version of the disease that infected Hamtramck (now infecting a thread where everyone else has moved along).

    NOW I know they left the “I” out of Hamtramck for “Invading, Islamic Imbeciles Imploding Indigenous Inhabitants”.

    I have never been but can feel and mourn at the dumpster they made Hamtramck into. It’s a shame when Americans let that happen!

    As goes Hamtramck, so goes America…

    Skunky on May 5, 2012 at 5:56 pm

Exactly Skunky, and check this out maam, last night one of those malcontent Hamtramck trolls said this quote, “I can’t WAIT for a future where people like Ahmed are in charge and people like you are regulated to these sorts of internet backwaters”, that quote sends a chill up you’re body, and I called out that Hamtramck troll for advocating fascism in this country. We all know that NOBODY in this country CANNOT silence and trample on anybodies 1st Amendment rights, and I educated that Hamtramck-fascist troll about the 1st Amendment.

Skunky, I was thinking about this today, fascisim is emerging from the far-left politically, fascisim from religion is emerging from “islam”, NOT christianity, judiasim, hinduism, buddhisim or even secularisim. And I a f__ing hate these mind-control thought-police PC fascists, they make me sick and get on my goddamn nerves just like those dumbass Hamtramck trolls. And we’ve all moved on from that thread, as I said earlier on today Skunky, I assume tourisim in Hamtramck is non-exisitent because of the many muslims moving into that once beautiful district and turned it into a cesspool of you-know-what for not assimilating and adapting to the lifestyles of that area! And I pity those trolls on that thread for quasi advocating for islamic dogmatic BS policies at that so-called prom in Hamtramck. And where the hell is “Americans for Seperation of Church and State”, why haven’t these frauds said anything on this? Oh that’s right, it’s muslims who’s imposing their dogmatic crap on those students at that school, not christians, jews, etc.!

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on May 5, 2012 at 8:44 pm

    That’s right Sean, and with them taking umbrage with DS and then turning right around and admitting that THEY FEEL EXACTLY THE WAY SHE WARNS US THEY FEEL they prove DS’ point better than she does.

    DS can educate us all day long (and she does) but in the end it is the Mooooooslim haters themselves who prove her point VIVIDLY and in living colour by what they say and how they react (or don’t react).

    I am glad to be on her side and against them. 10 years and counting after 9/11 I know what the score is.

    Skunky on May 5, 2012 at 10:04 pm

Hey, Skunky: lend me a swig of some of that Haterade. I’m that thirsty.

First: SURE Obama-lama-ding-dong will release those death pictures. It’s just that Hollywood doesn’t work THAT fast enough, no matter how much you pay them.

Second: Osama made my pizza yesterday. Damn, it was good. I’ll go for the donair next week. (Google “donair” – you’ll find out.)

Obviously, my friend Satan finally had the balls to kick him out of his realm for not paying rent. Serves you right Osama.

The Reverend Jacques on May 5, 2012 at 8:49 pm

I am conservative and not a fan of Obama but he killed Osama and Bush prevented it at many turns.

Read John Loftus’s account of how we had Osama nailed due to his falcon craze and read the Navy Seal’s story of how they almost had him in Tora Bora and the chase was stopped irrationally a number of times.

facts of life on May 6, 2012 at 12:56 am

    My understanding is that all (or most) of the chances to find Bin Laden were BEFORE 9/11 – and that was on Clinton’s watch. Many people who were privy to this info commented over the years that it was Clinton who didn’t want to get into THAT shooting war (in Afghan & Pakistan). Bush was totally focused on Iraq after the US and Northern (Afghan) Alliance forced out the Taliban. It may have been a very costly and strategically erroneous policy – or, as many others have surmised, Osama may no longer have been alive? – but, IMHO, Bush could’ve used that particular victory (“Osama dead or alive!”) when things started going South in Iraq…

    Joy on May 6, 2012 at 2:28 am

The forced OBL moment came about as the world was glued to the Royal wedding in London, a strategic moment for WH incumbent. What do the experts in body language reveal about these makers of history as they sat there….more ummm’s and aaah’s than a stuttering clinic.

The tentacles of this deception have spread far and wide.
* Why did we only see the front half of the ‘downed helicopter’
against the fence
* How could a helicopter of the magnitude killing all the Seals
go down to ground rockets, stench of fishiness….
* Who authorised the Bin Laden women and children to go to
Saudi Arabia, private planes etc.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/9232365/Bin-Laden-widows-and-children-prepare-for-new-life-in-Saudi-Arabia.html

Bin Laden had a vociferous son who was trying to gain residency in the UK by marrying an older British woman, he failed in his effort. Why is it that no one is coming out from the ultra large family to bat on Bin Laden’s behalf…

And the million dollar question, who qualified for the ‘loot’ of $25 Million in the capture of Osama.

As Winston Churchill said ‘In the time that it takes a lie to get halfway around the world, the truth is still getting it’s pants on.’

Eyes Wide Open on May 6, 2012 at 3:55 am

I have found that the truth has very little to do with reality, where malicious lies have the advantage over it, because not many will stand by the truth if push comes to shove. And even among those who claim to stand up for the truth there sare those who will sacrifice truth for advantage beit monitary or political, because we live in a world full of corrupt people.

Kenneth T. Tellis on May 6, 2012 at 9:35 am

So somewhere in a government vault is a picture of a dead guy with a long beard. What does that prove? Absolutely nothing. The question is why was that guy’s body dumped into the sea so fast? The government says that DNA proves the body to be Bin Laden. But it would have been impossible to take proper DNA tests during the short period the body was earthbound. We know that it’s a common practice for people in power to use doubles.Was the man killed simply a double for an already dead Bin Laden? This would have served to promote the myth of Bin Laden’s importance to radical Islam.

Jerry on May 6, 2012 at 3:22 pm

If he thinks he is a rat in a sinking ship, he will release them. Mr. Obama is not one to let any principle stand in the way of what he really wants.

Worry on May 6, 2012 at 3:48 pm

It took him three years to forge a birth certificate. How long will it take him to photoshop some pictures and say they are of dead bin Laden?

salt1907 on May 6, 2012 at 4:39 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field