July 13, 2012, - 12:11 pm

Condi Clueless: NO to Liberal, Anti-Israel Mother of HAMASastan for VP; Obama in a Skirt (Voted 4 Him)

By Debbie Schlussel

Condoleezza Rice, or as I more aptly call her on this site, “Condi Clueless,” has often bragged, “I’m an affirmative action baby.” And she’s right. She got everywhere in life and in the Republican Party not on competence, qualifications, or conservative principles, but on the fact that she’s a Black chick. And only on that fact. She’s a liberal Sovietologist who is the mother of HAMASastan. She’s a pro-abortion liberal who voted for Obama and supports gay marriage. Is it really a victory over Barack Obama if the VP candidate on the other side is Barack Obama in a skirt . . . or in Condi Clueless’ case, Barack Obama in a femme lesbian pantsuit? HELL, NO!

condoleezarice.jpgmitthappens.jpg

Matt Drudge says Condi Clueless is the frontrunner to be Mitt Romney’s Vice Presidential choice. If that’s to be believed–and much of self-hating, anti-Israel Jew Drudge’s stuff is NOT to be believed–then I will not vote for Romney. I really don’t need an Obama clone a heartbeat away from the Presidency and first in line to be the nominee after Romney exhausts his chances, if he’s elected. And by the way, she voted for Obama. Condi Clueless refused to endorse John McCain in 2008. And she refused to say for whom she voted. And when Obama won, she hailed it as “historic.” Is that really whom you want as VP? Then, you’re a moron. And just a partisan with no principles to stand behind it.

There is nothing conservative about this woman. There is plenty to dislike though. Condi Clueless repeatedly denounced the right of Jews to live where they want in Israel. She repeatedly called for the dismantling of settlements, demanding that Jews living in Jerusalem (for thousands of years) and its suburbs leave. Condi Clueless is the Mother of the HAMAS State. She is the one who pushed Israel to leave Gaza and force Jews to leave their homes, the way she once would have been forced to leave her home in redlined residential areas in the United States, decades ago. Condi Clueless is the one who called for democracy in the Arab world. As the execrable Dr. Phil would say, “An’ howz that workin’ for ya?” Condi Clueless is the one who demanded elections in Gaza, spent gazillions of your tax money to fund the PLO in the elections, then was shocked–shocked!–when HAMAS was elected, saying “we never thought this would happen,” when it was obvious to even the most clueless imbecile (except her) that HAMAS would, indeed, win. Then, after that, she sent Jimmy Carter to meet with HAMAS and make nice-nice, so she could have plausible deniability. After she denounced Carter, he said that she was in on the whole thing. And on that, I believe him. That’s how she works. And she also sent her own Assistant Secretary of State to meet with HAMAS and Islamic Jihad in Egypt.

Condi Clueless is also the one who set up the Bush $500 million mortgage bailout fund . . . for the Palestinians. And she repeatedly pressured Israel to release Marwan Barghouti, the mastermind of several Palestinian terrorist homicide bombings. After Blackwater contractors were burnt to a crisp and hung to the cheers by Iraqi Muslims in Fallujah, Condi Clueless forced Blackwater to institute a “cultural awareness and sensitivity training” course on Islam. That’s not to mention the award Condi Clueless gave to Hezbollah official Nibal Thawabteh. Afer HAMAS won her “democratic” elections in Gaza, this is what the moron-ette said:

Palestinian people have apparently voted for change, but we believe their aspirations for peace and a peaceful life remain unchanged.


HUH? And there’s a whole lot more. This is just the Cliff’s Notes version.

Condi Clueless supported the repeal of don’t ask, don’t tell, probably for personal reasons. It’s a well-known secret in political circles that she’s a WNBA fan, if ya know what I mean. To cover up what every one pretty much knows, she spent her time as Secretary of State engaged in stupidity, like telling us her music playlist and using sexual innuendo, telling us that she likes the song “Rocket Man” because it reminds her of her first boyfriend (which must have been her Ken doll). And I dare you to show me one single conservative position she’s ever taken on a single issue. You cannot.

condicluelesspiano.jpg

Bend Over for Condi

Condi Clueless got her jobs as National Security Advisor under Bush daddy and Bush son and Secretary of State not because she was qualified. In fact, her expertise–her only expertise–was as an expert on the Soviet Union, which fell ages ago. She had zero knowledge or experience on the Mid-East. Yet, she was picked over many more qualified White men who had lifetimes more experience on the world’s hotspots–primarily the Mid-East and Africa. And she was picked over them for the same reason she’s been picked for anything: she’s Black and has a vagina. And for most of the Bush term, her only achievements were the many stories showing her working out and how physically tough she is. Who cares? And, by the way, her “training” in foreign affairs was under her mentors, Madeleine Albright’s father and the Israel-hater Brent Scowcroft. And even though she was a Sovietologist, she missed the Georgian-Russian conflict and brief conflagration because she was too busy creating HAMASastan and Fatahstan to notice.

Condi Rice bragged in the now-defunct George Magazine, “I’m an affirmative action baby.” And elsewhere, she’s touted preferences for minorities in admissions, hiring, and promotions. She’s also a fan of government set-asides for minorities and other forms of affirmative action. At Stanford and elsewhere, every single thing Condi Clueless got–every single promotion–was because she is a Black female. She was, for example, the first Provost of Stanford to never have been a dean or a department chair. Why? Only because she’s Black. Before that, it was a requirement. And it still is. Except for her. Because, hey, she fills two minority slots (three, if you count her sexual preference). She thinks she deserves things merely because of skin pigmentation and female plumbing. Republicans–specifically, conservatives–are supposed to be against that. We’re supposed to be for merit and for a competitive free market without intervention based on skin complexion.

In short, Condi Clueless is a liberal no different than Barack Obama. But if she were a Democrat, she’d be just another of millions of them. So she chose the Republican Party where millions of clueless bots now think she’s the greatest. But when you ask them why, they just can’t say. I asked a woman who touted her to me to name a single conservative position she’s taken on any issue. She could not.

If you want to win so badly that your choice to beat Obama is Obama with an R after her name, do me a favor: don’t vote. If she is the choice, I’ll just throw my vote away on a third party, ‘cuz I ain’t gonna vote for her. If this is “the best” Romney can do now, it’s a strong hint that he won’t do much better or different than Obama as President. And to all of you Palinbot idiots, your false heroine, Sarah Palin, endorsed Condi Rice for Veep. More evidence she (Palin) is an idiot and complete ignoramus.

If indeed Mitt Romney picks Condi Clueless as Veep, it’ll be yet another example of what we all know . . . Mitt Happens.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

95 Responses

I hope Drudge is wrong. The other irony is that liberals hate her b/c she’s a Republican. This pick may be worse than Palin. At least Palin is feminine.

David on July 13, 2012 at 12:28 pm

I’m with you, Debbie. If Rice is the pick, I will sit this one out also.

PDMac60 on July 13, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Jews U ARE haters !…….

    Anything that do not go as U palned ,,,,,, U call it anti-semitic ,,, U are really resists !!!!
    Just like Blacks in America > whites !

    get a life,,,,we can see throuh U …… conaving manipulators,,,,,,,,,,,

    fight your own fight….. don’t try to pull the whole WORD INO IT ….. &
    pay your way ! by yourselve !

    MAYA WIERTEL on July 14, 2012 at 9:22 am

      Maya, thank you for sharing the Polish view with us.

      skzion on July 14, 2012 at 1:53 pm

I for one am hoping he will choose Alan West, who I wanted in the top spot to begin with.

On a more humorous side, choosing Condi could serve one purpose (assuming she is straight). I am specifically referring to something said by Jack Nicholson to Tom Cruise in the breakfast scene at Gitmo in the movie “A few Good Men” (This line has been taken out of the movie the last few times I have seen it on cable).

I_AM_ME on July 13, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    What’s the line?

    David on July 13, 2012 at 12:47 pm

      David –

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/A_Few_Good_Men

      Look under “Col. Nathan R. Jessup”

      I_AM_ME on July 13, 2012 at 12:58 pm

        Even if he chooses this nobody, I’ll still vote for Mitt over Hussein. I’ll have to hold my nose AND hold my breath, but I’ll vote for Mitt. He can’t be any worse than Hussein.

        David on July 13, 2012 at 2:03 pm

She would be a very weak choice. Only worse potential choice would be the northeastern feminist Kelly Ayotte – all the blandness of Rob Portman plus all the faux conservatism of a woman that couldn’t respect her husband enough to take his name.

As for Condi… I just don’t see it. Romney isn’t an outside of the box sort of guy. If there is only one good thing that can be said of him, it is that he isn’t the type to jump for a desperate “game changer” as McCain did. He abides by the process, and that process hasn’t included Condi except in the minds and sensationalist headlines of the media. My expectation is that he will choose among the heavily vetted Paul Ryan or Bobby Jindal.

Brian R. on July 13, 2012 at 12:40 pm

So, tell us how you REALLY feel about Condi, Debbie! Actually, you’re spot on as usual on all counts; and i don’t want anyone associated with Bush’s presidency running on Romney’s ticket either. There’s the facts about her, as you presented. And there are the political implications of having her as well. The last thing Romney needs is to have someone who was so associated with the Bush presidency reminding voters that a Romney presidency wouldn’t be any different. Obama needs to go. Let’s not give the Dems anymore ammunition than what they’ll gin up on their own.

Rick on July 13, 2012 at 12:44 pm

I certainly hope that Condoleezza Rice is not being seriously considered as a VP option. As Debbie’s article makes clear, it is not for nothing that she has been given the nickname KindaSleaza Rice. Perhaps the Romney camp has simply “thrown” her name out there to gauge the response from the Republicans and the public at large. So far, I do not sense any groundswell of support from any significant demographic sectors—not even from members of the Obama camp, which would be very happy with the selection of Rice, as a way to confirm Romney’s current loser status.

As I’ve said before, either Romney doesn’t really want to win, or he picks some very poor advisors. Either way, Romney’s failure to go for the jugular on Obama’s many, many weaknesses and vulnerabilities suggests that Romney’s nickname, Mittens, is not going away anytime soon.

Ralph Adamo on July 13, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    Ralph Adamo on July 13, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    Ralph, Romney refuses to go for the jugular because Romney is not a conservative and so does not feel very passionate about anything conservative. His advisers are not conservative. That is why they are so easy on Obama.

    The fact that he would even consider liberal Condoleeza Rice shows he is not going to win the election–and if somehow he DOES win, it is just going to be four more years of the same.

    John M. on July 13, 2012 at 2:06 pm

I don’t see Condi Rice as any kind of logical choice for the Republicans, unless it’s the obvious pandering to beat the Dems at playing the race card. I don’t like Rice as VP choice simply because she represents the worst foreign policy of the Bush years–creating and fomenting phony, mon-existent Arab/Muslim “democracy”, which inevitably leads to Sharia theocracy ala Iran and Jimmy Carter.

Although history can repeat itself..Reagan went with Bush Sr. hardly a true conservative, and later was such a weak president that he ushered in the BJ Clinton era. Remember not to confuse “Republican” with “Conservative”.

nailsagainsttheboard on July 13, 2012 at 1:00 pm

Are the Republicans entertaining Rice because she is a liberal black?

Why not the liberal Colin Powell?

Palin was selected in 2008 because she was a good looking, smart woman and a conservative. This is a better choice even though I disagree with it. It is better than Rice as VP. Rice selected as a liberal woman. This is a mistake.

Reagan won in part because he chose his political opponent in the primaries, Bush as his VP. Even though he was somewhat liberal, not a conservative, Reagan was able to pull off a big win. Bush W selected Cheney a proven conservative from his dad’s administration.

What about Santorum? Or Newt? Bachmann? These were vetted during the primaries. They would be better than Rice.

Panhandle on July 13, 2012 at 1:05 pm

Thanks for Debbie for underscoring how Condoleeza Rice has made it to the top echelons of American life on her blackness. If she were white, given her skill level, she’d bee a fairly competent middle-level corporate or government agency manager — at best. And her political judgment is anything but sound.

Personally, I don’t think for an instant that Romney will pick her as his running mate. First, Drudge’s veep “predictions” in the past have proven laughably wrong. Second, Romney may be a moderate in conservative clothing, but he’s not dumb. He knows that to pick a Bush-era retread like Rice would turn off the swing vote by the millions.

Hopefully, this breaking “story” will end Matt Drudge’s credibility once and for all.

Seek on July 13, 2012 at 1:08 pm

But…she plays the PIANO! And she…WORKS OUT…AT A GYM!!

Oh, yeah, she’s a brainwashed moron.

David on July 13, 2012 at 1:08 pm

Not only that, but the it won’t diminish the threat that Obama still poses to the Mitt.

Regardless of which token minority or gender they choose for veep, a vote against Obama will still be pushed as (by liberals) and perceived by the average person as being possibly motivated by racism.

I have to come to terms with the fact that the election is Obama’s to lose.

DS_ROCKS! on July 13, 2012 at 1:09 pm

Great minds think alike. I think that Romney would probably win election with her on the ticket (single woman vote, etc.), but to what end? If we are hunting for a minority, put West on the ticket. He is smarter than Romney, better on the issues, and he was an active frontline soldier.

The space between Condy’s teeth is only exceeded by the space between her ears. Arrogance and ego do not translate into intelligence. In fact, the two most arrogant, egotistical presidents in recent memory, Carter and Obama, were the two worst presidents.

Jonathan E. Grant on July 13, 2012 at 1:47 pm

Well put Debbie. I don’t think I could vote for Mitt either if he chooses C. Rice for VP. If she is a frontrunner, I’d like to see the list of the people who didn’t make the cut. How many people did the Romney camp say no to for VP because they: weren’t a minority, didn’t have a vagina, weren’t liberal enough, or was just male and too white?

Jarhead on July 13, 2012 at 1:48 pm

Good grief this rumor has already been debunked. The last thing Romney would want to do is remind people of the hapless Bush Administration.

Repeat on July 13, 2012 at 1:54 pm

If Mitt Zombie choses Condi Rice, it is over for me, I will sit this one out. I have never had to do this before. I should have not voted McCain, but there was no one else on the pseudo right.

JudyBuzz on July 13, 2012 at 1:56 pm

    I cannot stand that witch! She made such nice nice with those Albanian muslim terrorists who murdered so many OLD Christian people in Kosovo. I will NOT vote for any ticket with her on it… it would just make me sick to her in office.

    Alabama Pride on July 14, 2012 at 8:46 pm

I can´t believe that the Romney camp will chose this monster for VP. This would be a self destructing mistake.

jerry1800 on July 13, 2012 at 1:56 pm

I agree also with Debbie, if Condi is the pick I am out. One question for you though Debbie. Some people say that even if Obama was born in the U.S. and is a citizen that he is still not eligible because his father was not a citizen. I personally have no clue if that is true or not. I have heard both sides of the argument. My question is, if Mitt picks Rubio, doesn’t Rubio have the same problem? PLEASE enlighten me. Thanks.

John on July 13, 2012 at 2:06 pm

    If Obama was born in the USA (debatable), he is a natural born citizen and eligible to be president of the United States. It is black and white in the Constitution, and is covered by the Second Article of the Constitution and the 14th Amendment. Any one who says otherwise does not know the Constitution. But then, neither does Obama nor the Supreme Court.

    Jonathan E. Grant on July 13, 2012 at 2:23 pm

      Obama-Putin was almost definitely born in the USA. The paper trails point in that direction (not that anyone is following them) and to think he was born in Kenya sends someone *almost* on the right track on a fools errand. Again, the paper trail (and other facts) point directly to Hawaii and off to Washington (state) after he was 2 months old.

      Kenya should be forgotten (as BHO Senior is NOT his bio dad…can’t prove this 100% but those who know the FACTS know this is true). The proper guy to investigate was pedophile/porno-lover-pervert Frank Marshall Davis.

      What HAS been scrubbed from NATIONAL and State records by now is what happened in Stanley Ann Dunham’s (Obama=Putin’s mum) from February-August 1961 (when Obama-Putin was born). All those records have disappeared. ALL of ‘em.

      There are many books pro and con on Obama and obfuscators on BOTH sides. Dinesh D’Souza being VERY disingenuous in his tome “The Roots Of Obama’s Rage” on the Right. Here are the sneaky so-called “investigative reporters/authors” on the Left who KNOW that the roads the set down in their tomes on Obama-Putin are WRONG and LIES…

      Dave Remnick
      Sally Jacobs
      Janny Scott
      Jodi Cantor

      There is a dude who wrote a fawning book on Obama-Putin and his Wookie (I think he’s Scott or Chris Anderson…but I am going blank on the name so forgive me if I have the name wrong) BUT was inadvertently honest when it came to the STRUGGLE Obama-Putin had in “writing” his first tome “Dreams Of My Father”. It has been forensically proven unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers wrote it. If one reads all Ayers’ book and DOMY they can figure it out, too. Writing style (especially GOOD writing style) is hard to hide.

      Anyway. All that just to inform anybody still thinking he was born in Kenya. He is hiding something WAY more nefarious and slimy and unseemly than that!

      Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 2:42 pm

        Obama-Putin. Can I borrow that one?

        John on July 13, 2012 at 2:54 pm

          Please do! But Obama-Putin could NEVER out-Putin Putin. He’s not even in the same building but they do have a lot in common…even thou’ Obama is way out of the true KGBer’s league!

          Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 3:32 pm

        Skunky, are you referring to David Maraniss’s “Barack Obama: The Story”? It is being featured this weekend on booktv.org (c-Span) It fits your description.

        Rochelle on July 14, 2012 at 2:37 pm

      Sorry Jon, but I think you are wrong. Also it isn’t the Constitution alone that makes the determination. Article two section 1 requires the president (and these requirements devolve onto the VP as well) be natural born. However it is not the Constitution but rather Supreme Court decision that defined natural born as born in country to two citizen parents. By virtue of his British father Obama was never eligible regardless of where he was born. Same goes for Rubio. I’m not clear on Jindal’s background but I don’t believe he’s natural born either.

      Richard on July 13, 2012 at 7:13 pm

        That’s my point Richard. I have heard both arguments. Which is correct? The media won’t even touch this, so no answers there. All they say are that “experts” have already laid this to rest but never cite which experts. I have no clue where Obama was born, where ever it was its clear he hates this country. But the naturalized vs native citizen issue is just never even talked about.

        John on July 13, 2012 at 7:21 pm

          Do I have to say it again?

          Going after the “not born in the USA” is like a dog chasing it’s tail.

          The facts say (and as I said before…not that anyone is following them but FACTS they still are…) he was born here.

          If you wanna take him down the way is that he lied about EVERYTHING about himself. EVERYTHING. Not that anyone cares…

          Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 8:12 pm

          John, naturalised citizens are ones whose citizenship was not originally US. Native born are just that, but not necessarily natural born. And finally natural born have been determined by the US supreme court to be those born in country to two citizen parnets. This is simple, but by feigning ignorance the left who so desire their ineligible candidate have managed to obscure the matter.

          Richard on July 14, 2012 at 9:48 pm

Kudos to Judy for the great “Mitt Zombie”. I should have thought of that! I love it even better than Flip Floppney (not mine, but great…) and McRomney!

Great article full of stuff Conservatives SHOULD know. Here is the key and I know y’all HERE see this more and more as I do…

“…she chose the Republican Party where millions of clueless bots now think she’s the greatest. But when you ask them why, they just can’t say.”

It’s disheartening to see the closer to the bone I get about Conservative issues that so many so-called Conservatives are no better than know-nothing Liberals! Thank goodness this is my favourite site!

Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    I think Vladimir Putin is smarter than Barack Obama however. :)

    Worry on July 13, 2012 at 5:13 pm

      Yep Worry. You’re correct! I do call him Obama-Putin (because he would loooooove all that Putin has) but I know that Putin is waaaaaay more everything than Obama could ever hope to be.

      Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 5:44 pm

Mitt, Mitt, you’re full of …

dee on July 13, 2012 at 2:30 pm

Choosing Rice would be a tactical mistake for Mitt.
The Obama team would seize it as an opportunity to attack Romney calling Rice a “Hangover” from the “Failed” Bush policies.
Racist ?? Naw, of course not !!
Mitt would expend a lot of capital to defend his Veep choice instead of exposing the blatant fraud that The One is.

Shootist on July 13, 2012 at 2:31 pm

Nicely written and well articulated Debbie, if Romney picks Rice as his VP candidate, then I’ll sit out more likely, and right now I’m thinking of sitting this one out and not vote at all (like if my vote or any of our vote counts these days).

And Mrs. Rice’s foreign policies are no different than Obama’s, hell, her foreign policies regarding the middle east is VERY similar to Ron Paul’s. More and more conservatives who are like programmed robots on saying that “yadda yadda if Romney picks Condilezza Rice for his VP candidate, I’m going to vote for them, it’ll be better than Obama yadda yadda”, of course Obama is horrible and a mediocre leader for this country, we all know that, BUT for some of those brainwashed conservatives, you have to know Mrs. Rice’s policies in general, both domestic and foreign.

And we all know that Republican voters are going to vote for Romney, no matter what, because their programmed like shill hacks, and the samething can be said for Democrat voters regarding Obama, they to are programmed hacks. I was listening to a liberal talk show last week and this fill in for that liberal talk show host said that he voted for Obama 4 years ago and he was duped and manipulated by Obama and is not going to vote for him this fall. The liberal talk show that I listen to is a “middle-of-the-road centrist-liberal”, NOT a far-left freak, ie, MSNBC!

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on July 13, 2012 at 2:40 pm

I don’t want Rice in the WH. That said I will not allow any of the stupid decisions (and there will be many) that the GOP makes keep me from voting. Sitting out this election is a treasonous act. Don’t be a fool. Obama has to go. I will vote against Obama no matter who or what I have to vote for. As for those that behave as children and sit out in 2012, you’re an idiot. SHAME ON YOU.

Joseph Samuel on July 13, 2012 at 3:08 pm

Leave Condi out of it for a minute – the fact that Debbie would even CONSIDER voting for Romney can only mean that she has a screw loose.

Every four years, these McCain freaks tout their ability to bring all these liberal voters into the fold, and at the same time turn conservatives into “captive” voters who will be “forced” to vote for McCain or Romney or whoever. Well, Debbie, as long as these midgets are able to reliably deliver voters like you every time, we will never see a conservative nominee again. If Romney’s promised “strength by default” with conservative voters is genuine, we actually WOULD be fools to ever nominate someone like Ronald Reagan.

Do what you like on election day, Debbie. Romney lost my vote during the primaries with his sleazy, profoundly insincere gutter attacks – which he now refuses to deploy against BHO, natch. GOODE 2012!

Statusmonkey on July 13, 2012 at 3:34 pm

    Status, who the hell is Goode? Whoever he/she is they are not gonna win.

    And you should know that the vote for Romney IS a very special exception BECAUSE Obama-Putin is such a stealth Commie and the Progressives and their ever-increasing incrementalism have taken more ground than they ever should have been allowed (with the aid of the so-called “right-wing”).

    DS (like myself) IS making a special exception for special and scary circumstances. She is stopping at Rice for very GREAT reasons…reasons not known or understood by most so-called Conservatives. And she is correct. If I take issues seriously on the Right I would have to do the same. I would have to ponder it thou’ because I do believe in my vote. And DS never said she would NOT vote. I would NEVER not vote. At the end of the day though, after all of my thinking IF I voted for Mitt Zombie with CR on the ticket I’d know that I would be eschewing VERY wise advise from DS. It’s not an easy equation but by now I know when DS does or says something it is with lots of knowledge, understanding and fact(s) behind it. It’s been my experience that second-guessing her is not the wise (or real) path.

    Her point on Palin is right on the mark too. More apt and telling than ANY crap a Liberal can spew (they know even LESS than the so-called Conservatives!) on why she is dopey.

    You should know all that by now and your dismissal of her is off the mark.

    Are you a Branch Paulinian? Hmmmm.

    Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 4:06 pm

      Am I a Ron Paul supporter? Um, no … in fact, one of my favorite t-shirts has a cartoon picture of Ayatollah Khameni on it, with the words “SAVE THE AYATOLLAH! RON PAUL 2008.”

      Pretty sure that I DO understand the liberal creds of Condi Rice. But everything DS says about Rice is CERTAINLY true of Romney as well – including the part about benefitting from affirmative action. If nominated, Condi would be the (slightly) more conservative candidate on the GOP ticket.

      As for VIRGIL Goode, he is the Constitution Party candidate. And he and Romney have a roughly equal chance of winning the election. Romney is on the losing end of a FATAL enthusiasm gap. Given my choice of GOP defeats, I would rather see Romney DESTROYED by a 45-state landslide than limp his way to a “respectable” McCain style defeat. Until the conservative MAJORITY becomes willing to desert liberal GOP nominees in the election, we might as well make John McCain our nominee for life.

      Statusmonkey on July 13, 2012 at 6:17 pm

        Status, Mitt Romney is not great. He is ONLY getting my vote AGAINST Obama-Putin. That is IT.

        You must take it as a “it goes without saying” all the stuff you pointed out on Romney (DS has written many, many columns calling him what he is!). Go to Gregg Jackson’s site and you will find even MORE reasons to not like him…but he is the only game in town to take Obama-Putin down. The same so-called “Conservatives” I mocked are the reason why. There was ample opportunity to pick someone else but too many people knew too little and followed the (dumb) leaders.

        He’s going to the dance. Like it or not. But his pick for Veep will decide whether some vote for the 3rd wing fool or any other idiot on the ballot. I am ok with that. (Better than NOT voting).

        If you’re a Constitutionalist you must be gutted that we don’t have one anymore. You should know that more than the average bear. I know it and don’t like it at all! It’s serious stuff but the Kardashian life goes on…

        Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 6:41 pm

          Not great? Seeing as how he’s every bit as liberal as Rice, I don’t know why adding HER to the ticket would be such an unbearable poison pill for you or Debbie.

          I feel sorry for you, the way you’ve sold yourself on the idea that Romney is a viable candidate. This moribund dingleberry needs to be DUMPED from the ticket, NOW, while there’s still time left to save America with an authentic conservative – or at LEAST a moderate.

          If I had an audience as big as DS does, I’d be using it to try to get Romney dumped before the convention. If we could get one million Republicans to change their party registration in protest over the next 2 months, the politicos’ ideas about what is and isn’t “impossible” might actually start to soften up.

          By the way, your boy’s website still lists John Roberts as one of his ideal justices. Still.

          Statusmonkey on July 13, 2012 at 7:09 pm

          Are you on drugs Status? You didn’t comprehend a fricken’ word I said but are babbling like a loon about the ghosts in your machine! I don’t feel sorry for you….mental cases irk me.

          Whatever. You’re thick as a brick and I will ignore you from now on.

          Romney is hardly our “guy”. I had the guy for 4 years as Governor. I know what he is all about. You’re smoking the crap Obama-Putin did in college if you think for one second getting Mitt Zombie dumped before the convention can happen. He is on to the convention because not enough GOPers have a brain in their head in the first place! DUH! Poof…you’re gone.

          Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 8:08 pm

      No, I saw further along that it likes the Constitution Party. A vote for a third party under these circumstances is indeed a vote for Barack Obama. The only role that third parties such as the LIbertarian and Constitution, play in our system today is that of spoiler. The most significant showing for a third party candidate for the presidency was that of H. Ross Perot in 1992. He received over 19% of the popular vote, and thus paved the way for Bill Clinton getting in with only 43% of the popular vote. The postmortems of that race indicated that nearly all of Perot’s vote came out of G.H. Bush’s hide. Perot made the Clinton Presidency possible. I also suspect that at least some third parties fail to pass

      Worry on July 13, 2012 at 8:07 pm

        Thank you Worry! You nicely and succinctly explained what a LOSERTARIAN is allllll about.

        Spot on as usual! :D

        Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 8:18 pm

          You’re “ignoring” me? Do you promise?

          If you actually mean what you say about this election being such a “special exception,” and defeating Obama being so important, then why oh why would the addition of Condi Rice to the ticket change your vote? Hmm?

          Let me put it in the form of a multiple choice question for both you and Debbie.. Would you rather see (a) a respectable 2012 defeat for Romney, followed by a respectable 2016 defeat for Lindsey Graham, followed by a respectable 2020 defeat for maybe John McCain (again), and so on, world without end, Amen, OR (b) an ANNIHILATION of Romney in 2012, a total transformation of the GOP in 2013, and a victorious (or at least VIABLE) conservative nominee in 2016? There is no (c) or (d). I definitely don’t see “victory” anywhere on the menu that the tree-humper handed me.

          Romney is straight up UNELECTABLE. If you want to hold your nose and jump on the pyre with him this November, then I say happy landings. But know this: you aren’t sacrificing your integrity to defeat Obama (which isn’t even on the table with Romney as the nominee). Instead, you are sacrificing yourself tprance the credibility of McCain-Specter Republicanism in 2016 and beyond. Since Romney can’t win anyway, wouldn’t you rather see him drag down Graham-Specter-McCain-Hatch with him? Why are you helping to keep these losers at 45%?

          Statusmonkey on July 14, 2012 at 1:34 am

    Statusmonkey, you are by default a Barack Obama supporter. A for for the Constitution Party is in effect a vote for Barack Obama. It is a third party that is even more marginal than the Libertarian Party.

    Worry on July 13, 2012 at 7:55 pm

      Actually, I consider a vote for Mitt Romney to be a vote for Obama. If Romney had a patriotic bone in his body, he would give way to a viable candidate. I don’t think you grasp how many people will be boycotting him this fall.

      If you want to dump on those voters, then fine, fire away. But they won’t be voting for another liberal Republican. And Romney will lose.

      It’s as simple as that.

      Statusmonkey on July 14, 2012 at 1:54 am

        I’ve been clear for months that I will not vote for Mittens either, for reasons similar to statusmonkey. The fact is that if one will always vote for the lesser of two evils, one effectively permits greater evil in the future. Me, I’m tired of this chicken game every four years.

        I wish that the smart people here who will vote for Mittens would stop asserting that those who disagree with them are idiots or traitors. There is a perfectly rational case for the other side.

        BTW, I am not convinced that Mittens is doomed against Hussein, given the latter’s low scores on whether he’s doing a good job. Hussein has been below 50% for years. That’s why I certainly will not vote for Mittens.

        I also don’t see why Rice should dissuade voters from voting Mittens if the point is to unseat Hussein. I think Rice is clearly worse that Mittens, but nowadays, the VP is even less important than formerly.

        skzion on July 14, 2012 at 2:29 pm

Relax, everyone;rice for VP ain’t gonna happen. All Romney’s negatives aside for a moment, he’s far too canny to go with Rice.
I think of her, and what first comes to mind is that G-d awful scowl on her face aimed at Netanyahu.
If her not so thinly disguised contempt for Israel– and I think Jews in general, also– doesn’t trouble Romney enough to eliminate her from consideration, it’ll trouble me enough to be a no show for him in November.
Like I said, though, ain’t gonna happen.

lee, of the lower case "l" on July 13, 2012 at 3:34 pm

Will she even be available for this job? I’d much rather see her get the NFL commissioner’s job – the one she wanted. As for why she became provost, I think it’s more b’cos she was Secretary of State, rather than b’cos she was a Black chick.

But everything else Debbie wrote about her is correct – and to top all that, if one reads all her statements about islam and Muslims, having her in the WH would be like having someone like Jane Fonda in the WH in the 1970s.

I: Nope, she was Provost before working for Bush–either Bush. She admits she is an “affirmative action baby” (her words). DS

Infidel on July 13, 2012 at 3:43 pm

Sorry Ms Thang, your Jewish Supremacy views are yesterday. We in the African American community are increasingly identifying with our Palestinian brothers and sisters. We feel their suffering. We can relate to it. Not you.

Dont like you dissing a sister either. Who you think you are?

Mustafa on July 13, 2012 at 4:22 pm

    Ha-ha-ha Mustafa, you loser! You are so stupid you prolly eat your feces too! You’re dumb, a masochist and love having sympathy for the devil. I wouldn’t waste a MOMENT having a go as DS when you’re a complete POS who should look in the mirror and realize he’s a loser.

    You’re so dumb. It would be sad if I didn’t get a kick out of how you’re a tree who looooooves the ax!

    THAT’s why you love the garbage “palestinians” so much. You are kin and kismet.

    Skunky on July 13, 2012 at 5:40 pm

    Mustafa, do Blacks identify with rocket and mortar attacks on villages in Israel? Do Blacks identify with suicide bombers and those who randomly knife people just because they are Jews? That is what the Palestinians do, and they are proud of it. I suspect that many Blacks would not identify with you Mustafa, unless they were hardcore anti-Semites. As for Jewish Supremacism, give this a bit of thought. If the Jews of Israel had truly wished to get rid of the Palestinians, do you really think that it would be that hard for them to do so? Gaza and the West Bank are compact areas that could have been flattened and firebombed into non-existence in a matter of days, but that never happened. Israel has been in existence for sixty-four years, and the number of people who consider themselves to be Palestinians has only increased. That does not sound like a genocidal policy to me. During the period of the Third Reich, Jews virtually vanished from countries such as Germany, Austria, and Poland(and to a lesser extent in other occupied countries). These were countries that formerly had large and vibrant Jewish communities. Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler accomplished this feat in less than seven years. It was a monumental effort that tied up resources, rolling, stock, and scarce personnel. Badly needed supplies, ordinance, and reserve troops were given a secondary priority when their shipment interfered with The Final Solution. Now, sixty-four years after the creation of the State of Israel, where are the mass graves? Are there any forced labor camps housing Palestinians? It is hard to see any signs of emaciation among those Palestinian protesters. Many seem to be rather chunky actually. There are no gas chambers or furnaces to be seen. Yup, those those darn Jews are wiping Palestinians off the face of the earth. Mustafa, Jews in the United States actually assisted greatly with setting up the NAACP. Jews also were instrumental in furnishing legal counsel and financial resources to the Black community during the Civil Rights Era. In contrast, what has Islam done for Blacks? It enslaved them long before the New World was even discovered. Also, when the sugar islands of the Caribbean and the plantations of North and South American were set up, those lovely Muslim Arabs procured and transported their Black captives to the slave vessels anchored and docked along the coasts of Western Africa. If you say that is in the past, I would only partially agree. Even if the slave trade is a mere odd trickle now, its attitude manifests itself in Islam to this day. Ask how foreign maids, whether Muslim or not, are treated in Saudi Arabia, Oman, or Bahrain? When their passports are taken from them, and they find themselves beaten, sexually abused, and sometimes even killed, has slavery truly disappeared? Think about it Mustafa. I would prefer to live under a mythical Jewish ascendancy over what Islam has to offer on a daily basis. There would not even be a contest.

    Worry on July 13, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    Mustafa, ‘ Who you think you are?’

    Easy to answer your poor questioning. If you are able to read you might just find that Ms Schlussel is an educated lawyer who deals in facts and not fiction. Strength, principles, resolve, intellect and empathy are woven into the fabric of her daily existence.

    When you accept the path of education in logic and reasoning, you too can enter a debate and answer facts, instead of attacking the messenger, with arrogant ignorance.

    Eyes Wide Open on July 13, 2012 at 9:27 pm

    Hey pinhead I speak for myself and do not need liberal morons to tell me otherwise. I believe as a black conservative that Condi Rice is nothing but a black RINO hack who got where she is because of it. If you feel that you identify with Palestinian murderers and thugs that’s on you. I happen to support Israel. So while you and Ms Rice have that in commom bully for you. Just don’t get mad at Debbie for pointing out yours and Codi’s stupidity.

    Ken b on July 15, 2012 at 3:06 pm

Mustafa on July 13, 2012 at 4:22 pm

Abeed Mustafa,

Yes, you have a slave mentality if you are supporting the violent, barbaric, invented “Palestinians.” If you think you are indeed “brothers” with the Palestinians, then they are laughing at you, Abeed.

John M. on July 13, 2012 at 4:34 pm

If Condirino gets the VP nod, it will be a green light for P

Not Ovenready on July 13, 2012 at 4:54 pm

I meant:
If Condirino gets the VP nod, it will be a green light for Ron Paul to run as an independent.
If, by chance, Romnoid-Condirino win in Nov, the end to resisting a Muslim takeover will have come.

Not Ovenready on July 13, 2012 at 5:15 pm

I don’t think Condi’ll accept the nod, to be honest. And its also come out that Mittens is meeting with Marco Rubio in Boston this weekend. I can only pray that Rubio’s the guy. He’s the only other guy I’d want, besides West or Ryan. We need new blood. Not a recycled Bush person.

CG: Rubio is a disaster: for amnesty and used his GOP and State Legislative credit cards to pay for auto repairs and his mortgage. Zero ethics. DS

Cicero's Ghost (NB) on July 13, 2012 at 5:29 pm

    Cicero or Pompey, Senator Rubio is a shill for La Raza and the open borders crowd. If you like The Dream Act, illegal aliens trying to become lawyers, and creating a huge Hispanic underclass, Senator Rubio is the man to choose. He is as guilty of playing racial politics as any Democrat.

    Worry on July 13, 2012 at 6:51 pm

      Worry:

      EASY, dude. I mentioned him, along with 2 others. Personally, I’d like to see West get the pick. He’d NEVER be offered it because he speaks the truth too bluntly for sissies with “delicate” sensibilities. But I don’t think Rubio is a La Raza shill. Please post some articles to back up that assertion.

      I’m not trying to be combative. If you have evidence of this, I DO wanna know. Oh, & your swipe at my handle is pretty lame. I’ve got enough conservative creds for the both of us. Tread lightly, Brother.

      Respectfully,

      The Poster Formerly Known as “Con Chef (NB)”

      Cicero's Ghost (NB) on July 13, 2012 at 11:04 pm

        Cicero was proscribed by a Triumvirate headed by Octavian. Subsequently, Cicero was captured and executed by the Triumvirate’s agents as he tried to flee to Macedonia. He was as dead and gone as his former colleague Pompey. They both contributed to the fall of the republic. The only lame thing here is your hypersensitivity.

        Worry on July 14, 2012 at 3:53 am

          Worry:

          You know, for someone who doesn’t know JACK SHAT about me, your characterization of me as “hypersensitive” is pretty pathetic. Cicero’s Philippics are 14 of the best orations AGAINST the power grabs of Caesar ever recorded.

          Let’s not forget who took the initial swipe at who, ok?

          Cicero's Ghost (NB) on July 14, 2012 at 7:32 am

          Cicero, you just made my point. I will not respond further, since you seem to have quite a few issues unrelated to this site. Good Bye.

          Worry on July 14, 2012 at 8:38 am

    Ms. Debbie:

    I sincerley respect your opinion. I guess I should delve a little deeper when it comes to Rubio. As others have mentioned. What would you think of West (even though it’d NEVER be offered to him) or Paul Ryan!

    I thank you for your original response & your candor.

    The Poster Formerly Known as “Con Chef (NB).”

    Cicero's Ghost (NB) on July 13, 2012 at 11:09 pm

Condi Cluless is an enemy of Israel. Make no mistake about it.

I don’t know how serious Romney is about considering her for the VP slot. If he is seriously considering her, then it can be fairly speculated that Debbie was right all along about Romney being no better than O’Bama on supporting Israel’s struggle to survive.

There is NO Santa Claus on July 13, 2012 at 5:54 pm

DS pulls no punches and gives a frank and open ‘cameo’ of the real Condi. Let’s no forget the late Gaddafi’s infatuation with the piano playing politician whose photographs were found in his compound.

On a serious note. The Romney team have pulled Condoleeza Rice out of the back pocket for several reasons. Never in modern USA history has the nation been so divided, all due to Barry. Barry has offered Africo-Americans the earth, moon and the stars without working to effect this prize. Along with this they see a bi-racial man whose colour managed to get him into the WH. Barry achievements are nil, everything paid for by welfare and nefarious means, even the ultimate accolade, the Nobel prize. These voters have seen Barry bringing out his ‘personal army’ of Black Panthers, Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson and Sharpton to bang the drum of their behalf and this makes them feel included in the great USA. Their working to achieve is never factored in as Barry is going to give them welfare packages galore, he’s on their side whatever happens, because he knows, his family lived in huts in Africa and he knows hardship…..the biggest selection perception exercise of all times.

So this week Romney is boo’d by the Afro-Americans. They don’t understand that the USA is bankrupt and it’s time for the crew to step forward and leave the passengers behind. They see him as the rich white man minus hardships, not the perservering hardworking university graduate whose double degrees paved a way for achievement. They don’t see his stable family of 5 sons who in turn have had their own children. In their minds the comparison broadens with their allegiances to the ‘underdog’ Barry’s muddled childhood, if he can do it, so can they……on welfare, affirmative action, smoking cannibis etc.

Please listen to this. Ms Rice expounds on the state of the USA since Barry’s inception to the WH. He has squandered every international shred of ‘common friendship’ and played USA allies for fools. Orchestrating the MBH ME Arab Spring, with disasterous human consequence, and then watching from the side lines with impotent leadership.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/audio-exclusive-the-speech-that-landed-condi-on-r

Ms Rice is saying what everyone thinks. I don’t think she’ll be on the ticket. However, testing the waters for the VP is a game with the voters. American voters need to understand that Barry is not for them, that’s a ruse, he’s for the people of his father’s religion.

Eyes Wide Open on July 13, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    Ms. Rice would fit perfectly in an Obama Administration, and that really is not hyperbole. Also, if a moderate Republican picks a liberal Republican as a running mate, there would be serious questions about the sincerity of his views on the Affordable Care Act and tax policy. We do not need another evolving president.

    Worry on July 13, 2012 at 6:55 pm

I’d rather express my opinion about Ms Rice with a verse from a song by a little band from Maryland…

Condoleeza Rice is nice, but I prefer A-Roni.
And that man on the T.V. who speaks to the dead, you know that man’s a phony.
Everybody move to Canada and smoke lots of pot.
Everybody move to Canada right now. Here’s how we do it:
Bum rush the border guard before he and his dog ever knew it.

I love that song.

And what kind of name is “Condoleeza” anyway? Doesn’t that belong in a sitcom?

The Reverend Jacques on July 13, 2012 at 8:49 pm

rice wanted Arab spring.

No Rice-A-Romney for me, thanks.

Donald on July 13, 2012 at 10:45 pm

Rice like Powell both used their skin color to “get ahead” both are worthless if taken a good luck at. Powell with his brazen rank climbing because he was black and Rice the same way was able to convince some people to give her a chance. She never with all the advantages ever amounted to anything.

Jonathan Gartner on July 14, 2012 at 10:06 am

“….she voted for Obama…refused to endorse John McCain…refused to say for whom she voted…she hailed it as “historic.””

If she, like Colin Powell, endorses Obama, or fails to endorse the Republican, than she is obviously either a clueless (as Debbie always points out) idiot, or a traitor. Why don’t Condolesbo and Powell just go ahead and endorse Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot, Mao, Robert Mugabe, Andropov, Kruschev, Stalin, Lenin, Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, Kim III or W(hatever)TF is his name, and just get it over with? Answer: They got where they are because of Affirmative Action, and so their allegiance to liberalism trumps everything else, even patriotism.

CornCoLeo on July 14, 2012 at 10:55 am

kissinger,halfbright and condi cluless are a bunch of surrender monkeys who did great harm to america but clueless pretended to be a republican so i dislike her the most.these liberals have been snatching defeat from the jaws of victory since wilson went for the armistice instead of marching to berlin like gen.pershing wanted .pershing said “if you don.t we will be doing this again in 20yrs”.roosevelt did it in ww11 when he trusted stalin over churchill and we are still facing those bastards over nukes as well as the chi-coms and ragheads all of them were helped by liberal traitors.

BRUCE on July 14, 2012 at 3:37 pm

Condi stopped Israel from destroying Hezbollah in Lebanon during the 2006-2007 war. Cheney wanted Condi and the U.N. to leave Israel alone and let her finish her job in Lebanon, but Condi threw a conniption. The Washington Post covered it in an article it published on Condi and Cheney’s books and their differing accounts/views on various topics. Cheney was spot-on; Israel should have been left alone. If only once, Israel would stop cow-towing to the U.S. and take care of business, the world would start to become a better place; in fact, we should let Israel take care of the entire Middle East the way it needs to.

Dina K on July 14, 2012 at 11:37 pm

Condi Rice indeed would definitely be the wrong choice for vp.

Dave on July 15, 2012 at 1:01 am

Debbie, I would love to know who you feel is a suitable VP candidate to the Israel worshipping, WWIII invoking, Iran killer Romney. Please enlighten us and tell us who would be good for Isra….I mean America.

If you hate Condi for encouraging an end to settlement expansion than you might as well hate the entire world (the exception of netanyahoo and the settlers themselves). Considering you actually wrote an article blasting Alan Douchowitz, one of the most hardcore zionists on the planet, I suspect nobody but you is “Jewish” enough or supportive enough of Israel. You are an embarrassment to the Jewish community.

daniel stein on July 15, 2012 at 1:08 am

    You can’t be a settler if you’re returning to reclaim your own land.

    BethesdaDog on July 15, 2012 at 4:55 am

    Danny, when did you convert to Islam?

    The only time you think of your Jewish roots is when you want to murder Jews, you piece of filth.

    skzion on July 15, 2012 at 12:24 pm

      Skzion

      Typical zio response, unable to argue the substance so you have to resort to insults. So your superior intellect told you I wanna murder Jews because I find it comical that your goddess big Deb doesn’t feel the dersh isn’t supportive enough of Israel hahaha pathetic

      daniel stein on July 15, 2012 at 7:53 pm

    Tim, I have explained my reasoning several times already, as have others here.

    skzion on July 15, 2012 at 12:28 pm

She’s the female version of Colin Powell. An opportunistic over-rated hack.

Powell was promoted over more-deserving, better-qualified members of the military leadership ranks only because of his race and his relationship to the Bushes.

BethesdaDog on July 15, 2012 at 4:59 am

    Yeah BethesdaDog both her and the backed up Colin are also partisan liberal hacks who voted for Da Wun and owe their careers to one or both Bushes.

    Ken b on July 15, 2012 at 2:58 pm

Debbie,

Condi made the statement that it was historic. She shouldn’t be pilloried for that, as it was true. Would have been historic if Hillary won too. I would like to see Nikki Haley as VP, or Huntsman, but Debbie, who would you want as VP?

colt13 on July 15, 2012 at 10:03 am

    Seeing all this anguish and acrimony over the vp pick kind of feels like watching an apocalyptic battle over how to arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.

    Does anyone on this site seriously believe that Romney is electable? That he ISN’T doomed by a massive enthusiasm gap?

    Romney is the problem with this ticket. Dump him! I might even settle for Jeb Bush at this point.

    Statusmonkey on July 15, 2012 at 6:29 pm

To all who are saying “I’ll sit this one out”……what the heck are you thinking? Sounds like you might be cutting off your noses to spite your faces. So, while I certainly hope that Romney opens his eyes and picks a true conservative, there is no way in hell that I will not vote Republican in the election. I’ve often said that I do not care if they run Satan against the agitator in chief, I’ll vote for the devil. Anybody and anything but barrack hussain obama.

Tim Lee on July 15, 2012 at 10:34 am

    Having said that, why WOULD Romney pick a conservative? Clearly, your vote is already in the bag.

    Statusmonkey on July 15, 2012 at 6:33 pm

I know that I’m a little late posting on this topic(woring weekends sucks sometimes still someone has to keep the taxes flowing for the freeloaders) but I have this to say. Fear not guys Ole Etch-a-Sketch will not pick Condi Rice as his running mate. Why? Because he doesn’t have the stones to pick her and we should count ourselves lucky. I completely agree with Debbie on her not being qualified. I for one knew that she was clueless when she kept referring the Muslim tome The Holy Koran and keept referring the Bible as jus the Bible. It’sthe little things you watch out for. She as Sec State was no better tan the retard that we have now stinking up Foggy Bottom. The is a woman who had Madeline Halfbright’s daddy and Brent( I hate Israel)Scowcroft as mentors. No wonder that she has her jaded worldview of the Middle East in general and Israel in particular. In the one area where she should have been chosen to really help GWB she was useless and screwed the pooch on everything. Does this sound familiar? Debbie is also spot on about calling her Odummer in a dress because we have an unqualified dolt who is in that oh so brilliant dude Joe Biden’s words “articulate and clean” running the county. With that said I still will go and vote because Obama-Putin(Skunky you got him pegged there) and his klingon need to go back to Chicago preferably on a rail.

Ken b on July 15, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Debbie I’m for any Romney veep pick who can help send obamination back to community activism. The Jews rule Palestine because it’s G-d’s will. It doesn’t matter what Condi thinks. But if Obama gets his way America will be ruined. At least Romney’s plan isn’t to redistribute assets to his peeps and impoverish everyone else. Also Debbie I send you a hearty mazel tov for your courageous blogging and being so funny and probably cute but I couldn’t say for sure since your picture up top may be from the Clinton administration.

A1 on July 15, 2012 at 11:45 pm

Having read this I thought it was really informative.
I appreciate yoou finding the time and energy to put this informative article together.
I once again find mysel personally spending way too much time
both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worth it!

alcoholarchive.com on February 12, 2014 at 7:56 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field