September 14, 2012, - 9:53 am

Kate Middleton: Islamo-Pandering Hijab Barefoot Photos Far More Offensive Than Topless Ones

By Debbie Schlussel

There’s much buzz about topless photos that have emerged of British royal Kate Middleton. They were taken while the Duchess of Cambridge was dressing at a “remote” house” (um, rocket scientist tip: close the drapes/blinds . . . Einstein-level advice, I know). But far more offensive are the photos (such as those below) of Middleton wearing the Islamic headscarf and otherwise pandering to Muslims in Malaysia by removing her shoes along with her Prince husband, in deference to Islam. Remember, this is the country whose leader–to great cheers–called for more Islamic homicide bombings and mass murders of Jews and a “final victory” of the world’s Muslims against the Jews. And, per usual, the British royals are pandering to the Malaysians, despite that. For all the talk about Kate and William being fresh blood and faces, their Islamo-pandering behavior–kissing the asses of those who openly support Islamic terrorism–is the same old crap we saw from Queen Elizabeth (who refuses to ever visit Israel) and her inbred son, Prince Charles of “I Wish I Was Your Tampon” fame, who appointed himself “the ambassador for Islam.”

They Heart Islam . . .

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, William and Kate, are the same old thing, with better fashions and fewer wrinkles. Oh, and by the way, the anti-Semitic, anti-Israel site, London Muslim, is having orgasms over the photos. Princess Kate down with the jihadist struggle! Alhamdillullah [praise allah]. ABC’s “Good Morning America” reported that Kate was wearing a “fashionable hijab.” Newsflash: it’s just a plain white scarf. And what’s “fashionable” about wearing the garb of oppression–a head-covering mandated by Islam for women because the men cannot control their impulses and aren’t expected to because a strand of hair might turn them on to the point of raping the “open meat” of a woman with visible hair? Just asking. If that’s “fashionable,” it must be the year 700. Or, sadly, 2012 for British royals.

More Photos . . .


Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

59 Responses

German review

“The turmoil in Libya, Cairo, and Bangladesh is a return to the Middle Ages, when people were beheaded and stoned to death. No pathetic anti-Islam film can justify hate-filled murder.”

“Naked hatred is raging against a country that many people in the world regard as a symbol of freedom. When US flags burn, embassies are vandalized, and diplomats are murdered, it is an attack on the West, and not just America!”

First thing that lying fascist Hussein Obama did after somehow this con-artist got elected even before apologizing in Cairo – first thing this mongrel mixed breed but full-muslim did was reduce the number of nukes the US possessed WHICH ONLY would be used on ONE enemy – THE BARBARIC MUSLIM WORLD.

bob on September 14, 2012 at 10:11 am

Maybe the Muzorrhoids should bomb Heathrow or another important
Place in Merrie Olde to set them straight

Lisa on September 14, 2012 at 10:22 am

If you are required to wear such stuff anywhere, it is best not to go to such a place. Why legitimize such practices through your presence. Shunning induces a behavior change, while pandering encourages it.

Worry01 on September 14, 2012 at 10:25 am

    I agree – we have too often caved in to the demands that Western women dress with coverings suitable for a medieval culture – which it is.

    LindaF on September 14, 2012 at 12:26 pm

Only way WW2 ended was Germany AND Japan were bombed into submission, surrender and then drug into the 20th century. Bombed on their populated cities because those people deserved it by being the source of their armies.

For starters Tehran must be bombed and by a nuclear attack and then every Muslim feces-hole that shows any Islamism. They are breeding like rats purposely to take over the entire world. Every day their popuation grows as Obama pushes for contraception here. Obama is dogsheit!

Obama must be eliminated from this equation.

bob on September 14, 2012 at 10:25 am

This git prolly knows ZERO about Islam. And these tards pander and pander and it influences the dopes who adore them.

I am glad I am not a Pom. I would not want to be a British subject. Australia needs to wake up and make themselves a Republic.

I never liked this git and I especially detest her dopey sister. The only kind thing I could say is that fashionably (hijab aside…I would do no such thing for any Islamist…that fraud death-cult) she wears some beautiful clothes…but I never judge peeps by that. And the worst of the humaniods these days are well dressed.

Skunky on September 14, 2012 at 10:34 am

    Skunky, you have to remember what purpose she serves. Even now, such matters are almost always arranged. I think the Windsors did not want a repetition of what had happened with Prince Charles and Diana. Prince William was not going to be allowed a long bachelorhood. The problems with Prince Harry would be swirling around Prince William as well if the marriage had not happened. I wonder if they will obtain Pippa Middleton for Harry? A cash settlement should be arrived at, and the whole lot dispersed.

    Worry01 on September 14, 2012 at 11:01 am

      I’m with you Worry. The 60′s and the Liberals have tried to stain the true gift of being an American but we know how awesome it is. And if the right people fight in tandem, we can restore America to be the best it can be. I am hoping for that because I AM an American in it’s in my DNA.

      Also, Worry, you’re a gent so you may not see this as much as I do but have you noticed how many Yanks are enamored with the British royals? It is always jarring for me. ESPECIALLY with how the Charles and Diana union ended. They have always left me cold.

      I love being a citizen and NOT a subject!

      Skunky on September 14, 2012 at 7:29 pm

I always like that Americans are CITIZENS and Poms are Royal SUBJECTS. It’s one of the many things I am grateful for!

Skunky on September 14, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @Skuzzy,

    What a profoundly important distinction. Americans are “subjects,” too. You’re just too fat and complacent to realize it.

    Thanks for clueing us in on your fashion preferences – that’s some news we can all use, obviously. Of course, if you lived in an Islamic country and didn’t wear a hijab, someone would probably run up to you and throw acid in your face. You’re a courageous roaring lion in a safe country like America, but I’ll bet you WOULD put on the whole get-up if you had to live in one of those other countries. Of course, any change to your looks would be a vast improvement.

    Statusm0nkey on September 14, 2012 at 11:58 am

Look at that second photo. As covered up as the princess is, Barney the purple dinosaur can’t keep his eyes off of her. He’s practically undressing her with his eyes, the disgusting savage. No wonder these muslims cover up their women, to protect them from their own neighboring muslim savages. What a backward people/religon/society.

James D. from the Republic of Texas on September 14, 2012 at 10:50 am

If not for the asshole Brits million of Jews would have escaped to Israel before WWII. The Brits who stole more land than anyone have no morale authority to criticize Israel. All the Brit soldier involved in preventing in enforcing the restriction of Jews return should have been executed as war criminal. By the way people may ask why Prince Andrew has no family does not look like Phillip while all his other brother and sister look exactly like that German ass hole. Lizzie was fooling around.

madman on September 14, 2012 at 10:58 am

I swear, I have got to get me an Outrage Industry going. It apparently pays very well and the hours are short.

Suggestions?

Jack on September 14, 2012 at 11:05 am

Looks like a worthy successor to both Prince Charles & Diana. And looks like they’re prepping themselves to be the future Sultan & Sultana of the UK – the Ummah Kalifate.

The House of Windsor can become the House of Mohammed when QEII is no longer around. Although she looks like she’ll outlive both her son & grandson ;)

Israel is better off by ‘their royal highnesses’ not visiting them. Really speaking, Riyadh, Doha, Manama, Muscat and Dubai are more their cup of tea.

Infidel on September 14, 2012 at 11:10 am

England had more senses in the 700s than they do today

Infidel on September 14, 2012 at 11:12 am

I bet when the British Empire was in charge in these ass backward islands they wore boots.

These Brits are the ones that voluntarily gave up their guns, turned them in to be melted down. When you have no “hand” (as Seinfeld used to say) then you take off your shoes for anybody.

Ambassador Chris Stevens (may he rest in peace) took his shoes off too. Did not do him any good.

Panhandle on September 14, 2012 at 11:20 am

    The Ambassador to Lybia took his shoes off long B4 he took his post in Trypoli, he started practicing as junior diplomate at the Consulate in East Jerusalem,this is when he started ” understanding” thr Palestinian “problem”. I said it B4 & will say it again, all who wish Israel I’ll, whether in thought or deeds, some tragedy will come into his person or to his close family. History proved it over & over again, huge & powerful Empires, vanished, the all mighty Roosevelt, the beloved president, who refused to bomb the railways to Auschwitz, finished his life in bed with Polio, the Christian faith is based on the Jewish Bible, yet many Christians wish Israel would go under, the 1st. 5 Popes were Jewish, I suspect Jesus’ mother was too, his fathers faith isn’t relevant …

    Nomis101 on September 15, 2012 at 6:55 pm

      There is no legitmate historical connection between the post 135 C.E.,2nd-4th century Hellenist-Roman counterfeit man-g-d image “J-e-s-u-s C-h-r-i-s-t[from 2 pagan Greek terms for a deity],and the actual Rabbi from Natzrat(Nazareth),whome Esebius said was known as “Ribi Yehoshua” who taught Torah in an observant community and attended a Beit Knesset,not a gentile church.”

      The gentleman whom I am quoting from has done over 40 years of research proving that Xty didn’t start till 135 CE,when there was a joining of Roman Syncretisms and corrupted stories passed down by Hellenized Jews,whereas,Eusebius says his original followers called “Netzarim(an offshoot of the P’rushim)’ ONLY accepted the Tanakh and their own Hebrew Matitiyahu,never accepting the heavily gentile redacted Greek N.T,excized Saul/Paul as an apostate from Torah and rejected his writings.By 333 Constantine had completely eradicated them!The church took the jews history,twisted with some paganisms,backdated it and made it their own!What better way to get rid of the Jews than ‘stealing the show!”Now the Muslims are trying to do the same!This is why I am now following Judaism and digging for the truth!Let’s promote Judaism,Torah and Israel like a house on Fire,so people will see “the real thing” instead of this satanic counterfeit!…As for William and Kate: several hundred years ago,they’d have lost their heads for treason for covorting with the ‘Saracens!’

      Itproman on September 17, 2012 at 5:50 pm

Debbie, Orthodox Jewish women cover their hair too.

Surely you can make a case against these people without discrediting covering hair? There is so much else, their pandering to Mahatir’s country as you rightly noted. Why ruin it, when someone can say
“Well Jewish religous women cover their hair too”

For the record, many Orthodox Christians do too, the Russian Orthodox still do.

Hadara on September 14, 2012 at 11:45 am

    Hey Mo Using “Hadara”

    You’re a muzzie . . .

    As Goes... on September 14, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    Why does Kate have to look like a muslima when she visits a mosque? She isn’t muslim and everyone knows it so if she has to cover up she should do it in a christian manner, for example:

    http://www.openlettersmonthly.com/likefire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/cocotte1.jpg

    When you wear muslim style outfits people think you approve of Islam.

    I would prefer that Christians not visit mosques because that also shows approval of Islam.

    After the display of Islam this week in all its murderous destructive violence any approval of Islam shows a lack of understanding of what is good and evil and further shows support of evil. If you cannot see that mobs of people burning flags and destroying property is evil than you do not understand the truth.

    Lady in Northern Virginia on September 14, 2012 at 1:45 pm

      Lady, her dress is totally un-Muslim and FTR, if she were to come to Israel and visit the Kotel, she’s be required, as a married woman to cover her head and have her arms and upper chest covered as they are in this picture. Don’t go by Ivanka Trump’s version of Orthodox modesty, even as a Modern Orthodox woman she’s pushing it.

      Italkit on September 19, 2012 at 5:54 am

The Rabbis permit us worship in Mosques though not Churches.

I don’t think attacking the baring feet and wearing scarves is very conducive to fighting the Islamist threat.

In Albania and Russia Jews often share facilites in Mosques, and do worship in them. Chabad permit it.

Moshe on September 14, 2012 at 11:51 am

    Hey Moshe,

    Do you always babble incoherently?

    As Goes... on September 14, 2012 at 12:09 pm

      As Goes, Moshe is just another Muslim.

      FWIW, I believe Orthodox Jewish women cover their hair when they are married. They don’t go full-burka at 6 years.

      skzion on September 14, 2012 at 1:38 pm

        sk, some very religious Moroccan girls do cover before marriage and there is a trend towards married women going full burka. There are even some single women in NY who go full hijab because that actually was originally how we did it too.

        As for “moshe” he may be hiding behind a Jewish name but Chabad allows a lot of things that aren’t kosher like driving on Shabbat rather than staying home even tho there’s no requirement to attend synagogue. They actually have adopted a lot of christian thinking, like mandatory attendance at worship and their monastic attitudes towards study. They are really not a reliable authority for Torah as they tend to know more about Tanya which is the Alte Rebbe’s interpretation of Torah. I do not support them in any way.

        Italkit on September 19, 2012 at 6:01 am

        this is idiotic at best, so she wore a scarf whats the big deal. and no Muslim women is required to wear a burqa at 6 80% women in my city of 8 million Dont even wear a hijab. Its not forced or something its a choice. Nuns cover their head to go nuts against them. Again no one here really knows anything about Islam and the way we live just the idea they have from their news and movies and they have so much anger against Muslims over that.

        ali on September 19, 2012 at 8:29 am

      As Goes, you are dealing with a Muslim hiding behind a Jewish name. You are receiving a heavy dose of taqqiya/kitman from Moshe. Unfortunately, it lacks the candlepower and literacy to pull it off. You will find a similarly incoherent comment given by someone who misspells Christian as their name. Islam is rather shameless in its deceptions, since it has a complete lack of respect for non-Muslim listeners.

      Worry01 on September 14, 2012 at 3:57 pm

What do you expect from people who got their job through nepotism?

Jonathan E. Grant on September 14, 2012 at 12:42 pm

Is she endorsing female circumcision?

LM on September 14, 2012 at 12:50 pm

Now that our FB is acting as a branch of the Saudi “morality” police (now there’s an oxymoran!) being assigned to seek out those film makers, whill they also correct women with shiort skirts or too much lipstick on US streets?

My guess is that B. Hussein is so closely associated with his islamical terrorist allies, he will require all female gov’t workers to be in full burkhas soon after November. BHO has
gone head first and with both feet into this totlaitarian cult.

Otto Schaden on September 14, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    @Otto,

    If the Feds were actually sincere about wanting to stop offenses to Islam, they would drop a couple of bunker busters on the NYC headquarters of Planned Parenthood. Anybody think they will do that? They’re awfully, um, SELECTIVE in how they pander to Islamists.

    Statusm0nkey on September 14, 2012 at 2:14 pm

I got fed up and you’re a fucking Jewish Zionist leave if they want to greet the British screwed no matter Islam are free to do it! better release Palestinian who are oppressed!

Cristian. on September 14, 2012 at 1:44 pm

    Cristian? Did you mean Christian? Why not take a basic English course before you post here again? What you put down is as meaningful as what would come from a delirious addict in detox. Using crude expressions does not impress anyone here. In fact, it makes you look like someone who never got out of middle school successfully.

    Worry01 on September 14, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    I think you mean Cretin.

    Not Ovenready on September 14, 2012 at 5:56 pm

I actually have gotten to the point where I support the wearing of hijabs, and I agree now with the reasoning that they are necessary in order to help Muslim men to control their impulses.

After all, we have just seen in a number of countries where Muslims have attacked our embassies and diplomats, and degenerated into (overtly) wild, mindless mobs, supposedly because of a fifth-rate movie over a year old. If they are capable of such rabid violence with so little a pretext, they probably are at such a low level that seeing a woman without a hijab or comparable covering would set off similar reactions.

Should we drape our embassies in some sort of covering now, in order to reduce the prospect of violence, since supposedly that is what is done to reduce the chances of violation of Muslim women?

Little Al on September 14, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    Nothing keeps egyptian men from groping egyptian women in public. Whether egyptian women are covered or not they are still groped so at least for our embassy in Egypt I don’t think covering it with a cloth or 10 layers of cloth will do anything to stop egyptian men from attacking our embassy. They would merely burn the cloth covering and carry on as on September 11. Perhaps we should just close our embassies that are being attacked and throw their diplomats out of our country.

    Lady in Northern Virginia on September 14, 2012 at 2:43 pm

Little Al, I believe the situation in Egypt for women is even worse than you’re describing. Women in Egypt are subject to sexual harassment and assault on, virtually a daily basis. And it does not matter whether they’re covered in a burka or not — by merely being out on the street, they’re vulnerable. (It was said that during the Mubarek era, the police were given Viagra so they could commit multiple rapes.) It’s just another aspect of a derelict, savage culture.

With respect to our embassies, I think they should be closed ( no more visas) and all aid money stopped.

J.S. on September 14, 2012 at 2:50 pm

@Hadara: sure some Jewish women and other religions cover their hair, but the operative part is that Hasidim don’t throw acid in the face of or rape and murder women who don’t.

DS_ROCKS! on September 14, 2012 at 3:11 pm

    No, they don’t do that…yet. So far all they do is beat them up on the street in public, I have a friend it happened to, and throw human excrement and garbage at them. And while they are subtle about it, they do touch “immodestly” dressed women by pushing past them in full body contact, sitting close to them on a bus or actually shoving them. I haven’t had things thrown at me and I do dress modestly with my head covered but I have been physically pushed and “contacted” in close quarters.

    Italkit on September 19, 2012 at 6:05 am

i was sent to malaysia for my r&r when i was a young paratrooper in viet nam,1968,two clerks stole my r&r to hawahii or austrailia so i was all ready pissed before i got there.i was walking through some back alleys with my chinese whore when four malay ragheads approached and demanded money.they were acting like bad asses untill i showed them my gun all i saw after that was ass holes and elbows running away.i knew that ragheads were crazy people who we should kill, not bring them into america.i never saw those clerks again.to bad!

BRUCE on September 14, 2012 at 5:02 pm

The only ‘Royals’ that matter are the ones in K.C. And the only Prince is this one on first base. This prince and his whif are in the same boat with the real housewives, HoneyBooBoo , and the rest.

Not Ovenready on September 14, 2012 at 5:59 pm

Prince Charles once said to “[f]ollow the Islamic way to save the world.” So, this kind of behavior is pretty normal in that family.

Rodrigo Veleda on September 14, 2012 at 11:27 pm

I find the whole scarf wearing by an English Royal totally offensive and humiliating to western culture !

Shane on September 15, 2012 at 3:24 am

Haha! XD Excuse me..Mother Harlot. You really are what a “dumb blonde” is all about. Stupid cünt! She’s a future Queen..she was simply following the rules and showing respect to others belief. It’s called etiquette and respect.. :) Of course someone like you,would no nothing about it. :) Continue on writing..old bîtch! Let the world see how stupid and desperate you are. First Zayn..and now our beloved Kate? Hahaha! Have fun with your own writing Jewish slût.

An Outsider on September 15, 2012 at 4:53 am

    Calling Debbie a slut because she is Jewish, you automatically called future “queen” a Slut…as her mother is 1/2 Jewish. Thank u 4 that. Taking of respect. Now, kate to whom u show so much respect, is seen w/ upper body naked in public…your future queen….God is Great, & in 48 Hrs. Silvia Berlusconi’s magazine will publish much more of her naked skeleton, & there is nothing the German royal family in England…can do 2 stop the publication. So much self respect the “future queen” has for herself, her family & her British subjects, naturally – for you too. Now, go take another Budweiser light & get drunk.

    Nomis101 on September 15, 2012 at 6:41 pm

    Outsider, you should stop worshiping Kate; don’t you know that you are forbidden to think well of an infidel? Although, in fairness, she may have converted to Islam by now.

    The Brits are an odd people. They radically changed so much in the past 20 years, but hold onto the one thing they really SHOULD have changed: their preposterous monarchy.

    skzion on September 16, 2012 at 8:30 pm

The British royals are rich white trash.
Isn’t the duchess of cambridge Jewish?
Too bad that Hillary wasn’t at the ambASSador’s side.

Peter Piper on September 15, 2012 at 11:25 am

    Peter, the royals are indeed white trash. It’s amazing how such a vulgar bunch–ugly, stupid, and incompetent–have so revered.

    Can anyone recall the last royal who did anything of consequence? The only one I can remember in the past 100 years would be Bertrand Russell (3rd Earl).

    skzion on September 16, 2012 at 8:39 pm

London 2day has more Mosques than Istanbul, Kate Middleton’s mother is 1/2 Jewish, if she becomes next queen, her child will be 1/3 Jewish. This should immediately kill the duke of Edinborough & hopefully the queen as well.

Shana Tova Dear Debbie.

N: Not true. She’s not Jewish. That’s just wishful thinking by Jewish people who actually care about the Royal family–a group of inbred false idols. There is no evidence of any Jewish blood in this family. Thank G-d. DS

Nomis101 on September 15, 2012 at 6:30 pm

The British monarchy is just an expensive welfare institution and the royals in waiting are pandering both to Malaysians and to Muslims back at home.

England is already lost and America is heading in the same direction. Acting like an “abeed” doesn’t incur Muslim goodwill and respect. Just the exact opposite.

By embracing their barbaric customs, we’re already showing them that we don’t have the will to stand up for our beliefs and our way of life.

In the behavior of Prince William and his wife Kate and in the behavior of American officials in the Muslim World, the writing is now on the wall.

NormanF on September 17, 2012 at 3:55 pm

you know zero about islam :)

sara on September 18, 2012 at 9:36 pm

Islam has honored and valued women, that is why it has been ordered that women must keep themselves covered. it is not oppression. its dignity and honor. Women are not an object of lust, that is the reason, they have been asked to cover themselves and men have been asked to lower their gaze in order to value the honor of a woman. Unlike western modernism where enticing topless photos are alluring thousands of men. and if it is a symbol of oppression then why dont Mr.writer take a look at AMISH. there is something called RESPECT, when u ll have that for your women, you ll not allow your women to look like a sex-object to your fellows. Women have a feeling of security once they cover themselves up. Any women can try that if she disagrees. Secondly this the so called modernity and liberalism that has led to construction of thousands of porn sites. If nudity would ve been the basis of honored then animals would have been the most-honored creatures on planet earth

Yasir on September 19, 2012 at 6:42 am

Yasir – hilarious… why aren’t Muslim men required to conceal themselves? Why must a woman hide the figure and face G-d gave her because Muslim men can’t control their animal lusts around uncovered women? Your comparison with the Amish and Orthodox Jewish women is an inapt one. They are not forced to dress modestly, they do it because they want to. There isn’t the compulsion that exists in Islam.

FYI, the biggest consumer of porn and prostitutes on the planet is the Muslim World. Islam has an institution of “temporary marriage” that’s an Islamic fig leaf for prostitution. Yup – in its beheadings, stonings of adulterous women, beatings of women, reducing them to invisibility and ensuring their testimony in court is only worth half that of a man and in women getting a lesser share of property then men – wow, Islam really respects women!

And when Muslim men don’t molest and rape women, they keep them as personal property and breeding machines. Oh by the way – porn merely illustrates human sexual behavior and its amazing your kind breeds like rabbits despite all the sexual repression in Islamic societies.

This American will take modernity, with all its drawbacks over a barbaric and cruel 7th Century Sharia lifestyle any day. I value my freedom to think, dress, eat and go where I want and so do my fellow female Western compatriots.

I’m not a dhimmi and Muslims are more bestial in their behavior than any wild animal found in nature.

NormanF on September 19, 2012 at 3:16 pm

this author sounds such a racist come on you cannot paint all of the Muslims with the same brush this debbie chick seems so dumb muslims wear scarfs to show our modesty and ya dont nuns cover themselves as well and clearly mary jesus mom is wearing a scarf then how can you say that it is oppression clearly she is a hypocerite and looks like muslims are a better christians then the christian themselves cuz we follow more of what jesus taught then the Christians themselves!

sabana on September 19, 2012 at 6:10 pm

So its okay to have the french take naked pics of the princess, but its not okay for her to wear a hijab. GOT IT!! You jews are soo fuckin smart!!!

Tomas on September 23, 2012 at 9:30 am

Agree with you man! May this debbie die in a state of Jew & may she never receive the true guidance & may dogs eat her dead body. Just can’t wait for her to die in this state ..WEEHEHEHHEE :D

XYZ on September 30, 2012 at 9:43 am

I’m sure not every jewish agree with Debbie , you asking why Islam is growing in uk ? Why not jewish? All the prophets from Adam till jesus are jewish, but yeat the jewish religion is not growing? Why ? Well becouse of people like you who comented here full of hate & shit just like Debbie, that’s what is wrong with jewish, there are lots of them want a world full of naked and drug psychos, thy think this is the ideal world for them, that’s why they want there jerms to be every were , but I’m sure there also lots of Jews are nice people, who are not fumed up and waisted, shalom, salam

Aram on February 14, 2013 at 5:02 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field