May 1, 2013, - 6:06 pm

Would You Date Martha Stewart? Putting Herself Into Online Matchmaking Has to be Publicity Stunt

By Debbie Schlussel

Martha Stewart’s empire is struggling. She’s just discontinued two magazines and her show was dumped by even the Hallmark Channel. Her TV presence on PBS is easily beaten by younger, hipper chefs and crafters on various cable channels. And, now, at age 71, she’s put herself online as a dating specimen on Match.com. It’s gotta be a publicity stunt, since the only time you ever hear her name anymore is in the lawsuit between Macy’s and J.C. Penney about which can carry her merch, and now that case has ended (with J.C. Penney winning–Macy’s can’t sell her stuff). Or maybe Match.com paid her for the venture and publicity that comes along with it. I’m sure others will say, “Well, if Martha Stewart can do it, maybe I’ll give it a try.”

datingmarthastewart

Reports say Stewart’s online dating profile seeks a man from age 55-70 (she’s seeking a younger man for a reason: vanity, and relative boytoyism). But what kind of guy wants to date a 71-year-old (used to be) billionaire chick who tells you how to make crocheted pastel cashmere Q-tip covers? Maybe a guy who wants to be kept? I don’t know. But I know that usually people of her wealth and stature go to private, expensive matchmakers or they meet others in their own lofty social circles.

What do you think is going on here? I smell a Jason Collins-style publicity grab, in which people praise her “courage” for dating online.


In any event, would you date Martha Stewart? I get the idea that it is not an easy role to play. Unless you check your testicles at the door . . . forever. I like her crafts and recipes, but she’s every guy’s nightmare: an overbearing liberal who knows who to do everything better than you and has scads and scads more money than you, too. She’s definitely the man in the relationship. Every relationship.

Might be worth it for that future multi-million dollar contract to write the tell-all book, “Dating Martha Stewart.” But I get the idea the chosen man (or men) will be required to sign a confidentiality agreement.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , ,

87 Responses

I wouldn’t – for most men she’s too old. I can see a guy marrying her for the money.

It just won’t be for love. That said, I think she has a good idea of what if any potential suitors will show up at her door.

No – I can’t see that Match.com dating profile helping Martha Stewart’s love life at her age. I can see it helping Match.com’s bottom line.

NormanF on May 1, 2013 at 6:17 pm

    With a name like Norman, what kind of action you gettin’?

    AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:36 pm

      AR, why are you flaming regulars on here? You tried that with me yesterday and I had you waddlin’ away with your shriveled up scrotum impacted in your pyorrhea-ridden mouth.

      Try dismantling people’s arguments and stop drive-by flaming non provoking posts . The regulars here are more than capable of shutting you down. They are more clever and more smart than you are on your best day.

      And you big-notin’ that you’d “hit it” with Martha Stewart shows what a filth-pig piece of garbage you are.

      Martha Stewart wouldn’t “Lewinsky” your angry inch if she was suffocating and there was oxygen in your pea-sized balls, ya dig? She may do it to you with yo’ Mama’s mouth, thou’.

      Leave Norman alone. He’s way too classy for a pig like you.

      Skunky on May 1, 2013 at 9:02 pm

        Freedom of speech. What a wonderful thing. I sense anger and hostility. Have you considered counseling?

        AR on May 1, 2013 at 9:39 pm

          I’ll go to counseling once your court mandated sex offender therapy sessions are all done.

          I don’t have to go to counseling. I’m not the wanker posting over 4 times I wanna “hit” it with old, Martha Stewart.

          That would be YOU, wowser!

          Skunky on May 1, 2013 at 10:08 pm

      What a naive comment, there, AR. I can’t imagine that you have much experience with women (and I’m pretty sure that you’ll retort with some sputtering denial and Internet boasting and fling some lame insults at me for (accurately) calling you out as a virginal schlub or perhaps a latent homosexual as evidenced by your unwarranted and odd comment on a man’s name), but I’ll bite anyway.

      First off, a guy’s name is irrelevant (as are looks and wealth if you know what you’re doing). I worked with a Norman and his nickname was “score-man Norman.” An unassuming guy by chance, bespectacled and slightly pudgy, but an expert pickup artist by trade.

      In fact, the old saying about “still waters…” has been and continues to be abundantly beared out(?) by the evidence of the noticeable percentage of guys who seemingly hook up with women out of their league. There are secrets and there are techniques plied by these men which you can’t learn from pick-up shows or courses on how to pick up women, BTW. I, myself, don’t quite understand them, but I’ve seen them in action a multitude of times.

      Anyway, enough of that. I’m sure any time spent replying to you is wasted.

      As for Miss Martha, I always got the sense that she either had a lipstick Lesbian air about her or maybe asexual. But she does seem damn well preserved and if I was in her age range and single, I’d definitely take a shot at it.

      DS_ROCKS! on May 2, 2013 at 8:18 am

I wouldn’t date her if she were a Lezzer or with Anthony Weiner’s very own twittered private parts.

You summed her up nicely. She’s an unhappy shrew. It goes so well with hypocritical Libtardism (redundant).

Dating sites are for desperate losers. And crafty sociopaths looking for their next victim. Even the so-called religious ones. I just picture crafty malevolent sorts mapping out 25 zillion ways to put one over on desperate lonely hearts types.

Yuck!!

Skunky on May 1, 2013 at 6:43 pm

    Hey, it ain’t me talking an interest in what other people post about Martha Stewart. But if that is how you roll.

    AR on May 2, 2013 at 12:36 am

      That’s right AR. You’re the sad perv who’s own hand is even tired of handling your own “boys”.

      You’re the freak who posted over and over again how you’d like to “hit” haggy, shrew Martha.

      I’ll hit it.
      AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:34 pm

      M Rivera, the other thing that all of the older broads always say is that they like coffee and conversation. Face it, any normal man would simply hit it and quit it. Maybe have sum fun and get a few bucks in the process.
      AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:38 pm

      Drink a couple of “forties” and let Martha get some qood quality wine and she’s be good to go. You’ll hit it!
      AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:40 pm

      Any man that would not hit that is probably a homo. Even Howard Stern and Fabio on TMZ said they would hit it.
      AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:41 pm

      Go on and hit D.
      AR on May 1, 2013 at 9:01 pm

      What do you care what I would hit or would not hit?
      AR on May 1, 2013 at 9:48 pm

      When you’re frontin’, you ain’t doing NOTHIN’. Bragging about your own hand does NOT count, Loser.

      Or as Bill Parcells famously said…”Potential means you haven’t done a f***ing thing”.

      Skunky on May 2, 2013 at 12:39 pm

        Lol, Skunky.

        skzion on May 2, 2013 at 6:14 pm

        Skunky, I think you did a good thumbnail sketch of AR’s existence. Someone like that would go to mausoleums to hit on the urns.

        Worry01 on May 3, 2013 at 5:46 am

    I suspect that AR gets what he can get from flickering screens. When you engage in juvenile put-downs of others, it is a sign of a shriveled sense of self.

    Worry01 on May 3, 2013 at 5:36 am

30 years ago…maybe.

WilliamMunny on May 1, 2013 at 6:44 pm

On a lark, I responded to a match.com email that I’d like to meet women 45-65 in my area. 80% of them are blond and their pics look 30 years younger than their stated age. Every one, even the full figured ones over 60, says they exercise several times a week and love to go hiking and camping. And of course they all require their dates to have an income of >$75K/yr. I’m not looking but I see if I ever was, I’m in for a dismal time.

mRivera on May 1, 2013 at 6:56 pm

    M Rivera, the other thing that all of the older broads always say is that they like coffee and conversation. Face it, any normal man would simply hit it and quit it. Maybe have sum fun and get a few bucks in the process.

    AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:38 pm

    They also want you to have a PhD, MA, BA and be able to do things like international travel, dine at exotic restaurants, for me exotic is a take out special at the local Chinese joint, and be able to support their high maintenance issues. Face it, if a lot of cats were making up to 100 Gees, then I suspect they would not be with a woman 60 plus. Don’t get me wrong, there are some hot women in their 60s and 70s, take Suzanne Summers, Raquel Welch, Catherine Denevue, Susan Serrandon and Victoria Principal, for example. All very doable.

    AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:59 pm

    Did you really end up on a blind date with Candy Crowley and did you have to take out a second mortgage to pay the restaurant tab? Inquiring minds want to know…….

    Victoryman on May 2, 2013 at 9:45 am

I think I’d rather go out with the Iranian chick who poisoned the orange juice at Starbucks.

Seriously, I met my wife on Match.com, and most of my friends meet their girlfriends/wives on Match.com. Why?

If you say hello to the women at the office, you can face charges of sexually harassing them.

If you say hello to the women working out at the gym, you can be accused of sexual harassment and lose your gym membership.

If you say hello to a woman at a grocery store, you can be accused of sexual harassment, particularly if you are feeling the melons and cantaloupes at the same time.

Can you say hello to a female student at college? Hmm, well you might be brought up before the Student Disciplinary Council.

Match.com is safe, and it works. Best of all, no one you meet there can accuse you of sexual harassment…except if it is a coworker whom you chose.

Jonathan E. Grant on May 1, 2013 at 7:03 pm

I should have added that the women screaming sexual harassment will be sitting home, alone, on a Saturday night, ten years from now, wondering why she is alone and not married.

Jonathan E. Grant on May 1, 2013 at 7:05 pm

I can’t imagine how hideous these old broads look like with some of the makeup washed off and nekkid. Probably enough to scare the stink off shit. I don’t like putting the knock on someone because of their appearance, but if they try to pass themselves off as hot but are extremely NOT, they have it coming.

RT on May 1, 2013 at 7:22 pm

    Drink a couple of “forties” and let Martha get some qood quality wine and she’s be good to go. You’ll hit it!

    AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:40 pm

I’m not gonna lie, I’d take one for the team. I just like the thought of making the impossible possible. If nothing else just for the chance to see if I could get her to put her feet behind her head like bugs bunny.

Celestial Time on May 1, 2013 at 8:14 pm

desirable
in terms of money only
from what I’ve heard

ever talk to her family

prestigio on May 1, 2013 at 8:16 pm

I’ll hit it.

AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:34 pm

    AR

    From the looks of your posts you’d probably hit Rosanne Barr or Joan Rivers.

    Ken b on May 2, 2013 at 8:39 pm

Sounds like she’s going for another dreadful “reality” show.

For real, I’d go out with her once just for fun. Guys here won’t admit it, but I bet most guys here would, too. Not long term dating, but just once. And, she’s really not a bad looking old dame.

But, I just doubt she’s going out with any regular guys. Plus, as you say, Debbie, she does seem like a major league jerk.

Now, YOU, my dear Debbie, that’s a whole ‘nother story!!! I bet you are really a very fun, sweet honey to hang around with. Call me.

Jeff_W on May 1, 2013 at 8:41 pm

Any man that would not hit that is probably a homo. Even Howard Stern and Fabio on TMZ said they would hit it.

AR on May 1, 2013 at 8:41 pm

With my boyish good looks and charm, she would be putty in my hands, even though I am 62 years old.

Dale Zalaoras on May 1, 2013 at 8:46 pm

    Go on and hit D.

    AR on May 1, 2013 at 9:01 pm

I just vomited a little in my mouth.

Truth on May 1, 2013 at 9:08 pm

Wow. Some of you must be pretty desperate to want to tag Martha Stewart. Her 36c’s are now 36 longs. When she removes the clothes pins from the back of her neck, her face falls down to where her boobs used to be. When she takes her steel laced old lady underwear off, her ass hits the back of her heels.

Better you go out with Betty Thumb and her four sister.

Jonathan E. Grant on May 1, 2013 at 9:09 pm

    No way is she a 36-c. She is a 34-b at best.

    AR on May 1, 2013 at 9:42 pm

four sisters.

Jonathan E. Grant on May 1, 2013 at 9:09 pm

    It’s just that neutered nub “AR” (AKA “Sal”), JEG.

    He’s the only transvestive, geriatric fetishist to post more than once that he’d kick it with old Martha.

    And believe me, Old Martha wouldn’t be wearing the granny kickers…they would be on pig-vomit AR’s hairy and disgusting arse…once they went passed his womanly (as in “Mama’s Family” Mama) thighs, that is.

    Skunky on May 1, 2013 at 9:33 pm

      What do you care what I would hit or would not hit? One can make a reasonable inference from your postings that you have certain proclivities. See your posting on 1 MAY 13 at 2133 hours.

      AR on May 1, 2013 at 9:48 pm

        LOLOL, you sad and flaccid dope. I don’t care who you *fantasize* about ‘hittin’. I just wanted to remind peeps that lonely horn-bags like you are tap, tap, tappin’ away about old broads they *wish* they could bang.

        While real, hot, handsome men (that ain’t you, Junior!) are too busy banging their *REAl* chicks to crap on about what they ain’t gettin’ like sad, yucky YOU are. Loser.

        Skunky on May 1, 2013 at 10:05 pm

          You must care. You keep postin’

          AR on May 2, 2013 at 6:49 pm

    Rosie Palmer and the Blister sisters, maybe?

    DS_ROCKS! on May 2, 2013 at 8:00 am

Well, you never know. She may wind up with a woman, and come out as a lesbian, in order to get a second wind (no pun intended). After all, Jason Collins is trying to revive his sagging career by announcing he’s gay…maybe ole’ Martha is trying the same thing.

Little Al on May 1, 2013 at 11:21 pm

Yes, sad but true, it is possible to learn something about people’s social lives by the times, days and frequencies of their posts. I don’t claim to have a social life, so, personally, I don’t give a shit. And, here’s a little free advice from the hood for any of the fellas thinking about romancing high maintenence women:
“Pussy’s sweet, but so is honey.
Beat yo meat and save yo money!”

RT on May 1, 2013 at 11:27 pm

Re: this entire post: Mee-yow!

Joe Guiney on May 2, 2013 at 3:09 am

I don’t know her motives but Martha got to be Martha by thinking outside the box. She started her career as a stockbroker, somehow got into catering company events and the rest is history. Back then, being a caterer was being a “servant” so for someone with a degree from Barnard, that was quite a step backwards as opposed to the white collar world of Wall Street.
She may actually be looking for someone but I’ll bet she approached Match.com and said “have I got a deal for you!”” They need her more than she needs the publicity from them. Lots of mainstream women are still leery of computer dating services and MS gives them an aura of respectability. I wouldn’t use match.com because a friend my age tried and from a Jewish perspective, it didn’t work out so great for her but I think it CAN be a good resource.

Italkit on May 2, 2013 at 5:49 am

    Looks like she’s not thinking too much ‘outside the box’ now. (cue rim shot)

    Nir Leiu on May 2, 2013 at 6:00 am

    Italkit, thanks for responding to Debbie’s column, and not to some of the awful comments Debbie got from other posters. I think it’s quite evident that Martha has snagged a marketing deal with Match.com or she wouldn’t be doing this publicly. EVERYTHING Martha does is about money!

    Made me think about Kim Kardashian and the multitude of magazine covers I’ve been seeing about how FAT she’s getting during her pregnancy. I swear that girl is wearing a fat suit! But she and her mother are angling for a big old contract from Jenny Craig or one of the other weight-loss companies for when Kim pops the baby out and wants to lose the baby weight. That girl doesn’t do ANYTHING unless there is a paycheck in it for her.

    As for Match.com, I live in a neighborhood where most of the women are over 55 and either widowed or divorced. Many have used dating sites, primarily e-harmony, to find men. The women who use Match.com complain that the men they meet are pretty much only looking for some free strange. They say that the e-harmony men seem to be more interested in relationships. That said, my across-the-street neighbor, a 60-something divorcee, used Match.com and met six men and married one of them after dating for two months. He’s a drunk, but she isn’t choosy.

    The over-55 men in the neighborhood who are widowed or divorced pretty much date women who are 20 years younger. They meet them at church, in the grocery store or at the country club. I know one man who used a dating service after his wife died, but it was e-harmony. He met five women and married one of them.

    DG in GA on May 2, 2013 at 12:12 pm

Lot of ageist saddoes on here.

A cynic once remarked: ‘It’s easy to satisfy a senior – they’re
just so doggone grateful!’

Martha’s fav tune: ‘Rock n roll is here to stay!’

Nir Leiu on May 2, 2013 at 5:57 am

    “Senior” is a state of mind. The last time I was a “senior” was in high school and I’m only 5 years younger than Martha.
    Thanks for the ageism comment. It’s a problem world wide

    Italkit on May 2, 2013 at 6:38 am

    Nir, a raging shut-in pervo posting multiple times about kickin’ it with Old Martha and you’re upset about ageism on the posts? Priorities.

    And this thread highlights that men in 2013 are pathetic and don’t know how to be men anymore.

    Many went on about how Martha looks, which I admit IS great for her age. What seems to be lost is what an absolute shrew she is. This is known by almost EVERY ONE. Any REAL MAN would run, not walk away from even a second with this mean, old lady…no matter how well preserved she is. One of the few real men on this thread even joked he’d rather date the Mooooslima who poisoned the OJ. He should give lessons on how to be a real man. It is needed!

    But in 2013 men like to have miserable lives with shrews like this. They are used to it because men are feminized and not men anymore. The women rule and are mean to their men and wear the pants while men are pathetic wimps today.

    DS alluded to it (how nasty MS is and how she’d not be a joy for ANYONE!) in her column but it seemed to go over most people’s heads.

    Skunky on May 2, 2013 at 10:17 am

      I honestly may not have understood some of his comments, Skunky. I’m linguistically naive, even after reading this blog. Some of the comments just go over my head.

      Italkit on May 2, 2013 at 10:40 am

        Italkit, you have an online history of truly wicked behavior. Others here may buy your “daffy old lady who’s in MENSA and really attractive, so the daffiness is cute” shtick, but not I. (Oh, and not Debbie, who welcomed your “departure in a huff” a year or so ago.) Wicked behavior is most repulsive in the aged, who should finally have achieved at least some decency. You are in no position to chastise anyone–as you do here yet again.

        And please, ditch the “pity me” business as well.

        skzion on May 2, 2013 at 6:46 pm

          Skzion, I did not know that about Italkit. I thought her handle was always her handle.

          I do remember someone leaving in an absolute huff when I first became a regular a few years ago. Could it be?????

          Skunky on May 2, 2013 at 7:14 pm

          It could be, Skunky. Not THAT many regulars leave here in a huff. All I can say is that Debbie expressed annoyance with a huffer who did indeed come back as Italkit, and her annoyance was based on similar considerations as mine.

          skzion on May 2, 2013 at 7:44 pm

          “mk750″ was the nick, I think.

          skzion on May 2, 2013 at 8:33 pm

          And to answer your question, Skunky, yes, you and she “had words.”

          By the way, Italkit could have diffused this situation any time. She has my email. Even without it, she could have acknowledged a serious transgression. If she apologized sincerely, that would be that. To her credit, I guess, she hasn’t apologized insincerely.

          I will tell you this: when I hit 75, I will apologize with alacrity when I screw up. Who knows how long one has? Anyway, by then, I hope I have matured enough to avoid taking malicious shots at anyone.

          skzion on May 2, 2013 at 10:55 pm

          Wow. Skzion! I never knew she was the freak to get agro @ me ‘cuz I called Lady Junk-Junk an “Italian Slut” (just sayin’ what Junk-Junk said about herself in an article…this is from memory…I did not look it up…). I just assumed that nutter got gone and stayed gone.

          I must have thought she and the ‘MK’ fool had somethin’ in common because that is the only one I thought of when you said she actually had another handle (which I never knew but perhaps I suspected).

          And I am spot-on with my “competitive” theory. Wow, oh, wow.

          She does owe you an apology, Skzion. I think a lot less of her now.

          Skunky on May 2, 2013 at 11:31 pm

      But then again, Skunky, you’re way to young to worry about ageism but when you’re my age and have been scrounging a living because you got laid off after 50, it IS a priority. It is a genuine problem in the US and Israel and probably elsewhere. My 60 year old husband hasn’t worked in 5 years and he hasn’t had a good job in 12.

      Italkit on May 2, 2013 at 10:43 am

        Could lack of a decent job be because the US has been invaded by the entire world? California’s population increased 300,000 in ’12 alone. It is up to 38 million. The rest of the nation will follow suit. Go to any government office and you will see foreign invaders working jobs in which they are not qualified, do not speak English and simply have no clue as to what they are doing. There are mere affirmative action pons.

        AR on May 2, 2013 at 11:04 am

        Italkit, almost all of us will get old. Our time will come unless we shed this mortal coil before we become alterkakers. I am sensitive to that.

        I am talking about peeps crapping on about *dating* an old person. And “men” actually thinking *dating* a shrew like MS has ANY rewards.

        Seam M. gets it. And Nick Fury’s comment is awesome! Forgot about that.

        Skunky on May 2, 2013 at 11:19 am

          Skunky, thanks, now I understand. As for SK, I honestly don’t remember what that thread was about. Life is too short to hold on to resentments. As he said, WE HAVE EACH OTHER’S emails and he could have written privately to me and demanded an apology in a timely fashion. I would have given it but since he chose to defame me a year or more later in public, it’s off the table. He can rot is sodomite hell.

          Italkit on May 3, 2013 at 4:17 am

          Italkit, sweetie: sodomite, sodomite, sodomite, sodomite. Oh I’m so hurt. Duh. Are you happy, oh malevolent, senile one?

          It figures that you would misunderstand the reason why both Skunky and I think you should apologize to me. It has nothing to do with “Lady” Gaga 3 years ago. It has to do with your vicious effort to humiliate me with the “sodomite” slur. After all, if I called you a kike, it would be accurate, in a sense, but barbaric nonetheless. YOU should have emailed me to apologize, but you didn’t because you are cognitively impaired and malicious.

          I suppose I could reprint Debbie’s just and devastating comment about you when you left in a huff, but why should I bother? I will note, however, that given your email to me about a homo-related issue involving a relative, it takes especial gall to hurl anti-gay slurs at me here.

          As Jews do not have hell, I will not be rotting in it. You, however, are a rotten Jew. You create only hatred through your existence. The world will be a better place without you. I hope that day will be soon.

          Kisses.

          skzion on May 4, 2013 at 10:12 pm

      Skunky – perhaps some spanking would set her right. (I’m not entirely into that – but anything to please a lady!)

      Nir Leiu on May 2, 2013 at 2:35 pm

ROTFLMAO!!! Debbie, you’re hilarious, “crocheted pastel cashmere Q-tip covers.”

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on May 2, 2013 at 9:22 am

Martha is at home now, waiting for the congratulatory phone call from the golfer-in-chief….or at least, from his angry wife. This whole kerfluffle is a publicity stunt created by Martha and Match.com. A symbiotic promotional event to the max. How long until Martha appears on CNN to be “Interviewed” by one of the arm waving empty skirts? I notice a huge uptick in the TV commercials for E-Harmony featuring the slimy creature who is the spokesman. I call him “Mr. Ooze.” This Martha stunt will help fatten the bottom line of these “Dating” sites. Now, who would want to “Date” Martha. Obviously, homosexual men would love to be seen with her. Maybe Joe Biden could sneak a quick dinner with her if he could get away from his harridan wife for a few hours. How about Mr. Spitzer? Client #9 would definitely fit the bill. Little Anthony Weiner? Maybe. How about ex-governor Sanford. They could “Hike the Appalachian Trail” together. The perfect match for her, however, would be the cutie Don Lemon from CNN. Perfect and filling all the requirements. Homosexual, black, on TV (Even though no one watches him or his channel) much younger and probably would appreciate the Martha advice to re-do his apartment in pastels with lots of chintz.

Victoryman on May 2, 2013 at 9:42 am

gee I would date her I bet my paintings would sell like crazy

martin on May 2, 2013 at 9:43 am

Way toooo much drama to date Martha and be caught in her spider web – like the movie “The Fly” with Big Martha spider looking at you squirm. Probably give the man a heart attack or stroke within a couple years anyways.

Rick g on May 2, 2013 at 10:00 am

I would date her. I still find her attractive, and I admit, I probably have mommy issues. When Debbie says she does everything better than you, and has more money, that is my mom and I.

colt13 on May 2, 2013 at 10:01 am

Eww. She’s 71, so who would date her other than some other old person? Plus, she’s a hyper-controlling hag. So yeah any dude dating her would have to check his nads at the door, and put on his Victor/Victoria’s Secret teddy, and learn to dust and mop.

Sean M on May 2, 2013 at 10:16 am

….I guess Maaaarrrrtthhhaaaa!!!!! ran out of her daughter’s boyfriends to steal…..

Nick Fury on May 2, 2013 at 10:38 am

I vaguely recall Tom Arnold doing this exact same shtick years ago. Everybody move along, there’s nothing to see here.

Irving on May 2, 2013 at 11:55 am

Martha. What’s your kick back from Match.com????

Another publicity stunt.

Dana Perino suggested Bob Beckel.

I not in. At 66 she’s way to old for me.

Panhandle on May 2, 2013 at 12:16 pm

    Hi Panhandle -

    I suggest Dana Perino. For me!

    Nir Leiu on May 2, 2013 at 2:31 pm

She’s certainly an attractive 71 year old.
Unfortunately she specifically requires that you make over $150K a year, so I’m not qualified.
At least you would expect to get some decent meals out of the deal. She can cook!
She also listed her political views as “very liberal”, so we would not be compatible.

Seriously, this is a publicity stunt.

Steve G on May 2, 2013 at 12:55 pm

I am getting upset reading these comments by the men posters who usually sound quite intelligent. Norman, congrats on the match luck. I am on match occasionally and have dated a couple of nice guys on there, and I am neither lonely nor desperate. I am quite attractive and about to turn 50. Needless to say, my stock went way down at 45 and now I only get mostly men 10-20 years older contacting me. Seems I am royally screwed next year in terms of agism. I am getting wiser and better like fine wine. WTF is wrong with 70??? If you have class, intelligence, take care of yourself, and keep you sexual game, what does age have to do with anything?

CJ on May 2, 2013 at 1:16 pm

    CJ – you win the award for the best post on the subject (esp. your last three sentences).

    If that’s you on your avatar – you look extremely lovable.

    Good wishes,
    Nir

    Nir Leiu on May 2, 2013 at 2:29 pm

I meant congrats to Jonathan…

CJ on May 2, 2013 at 1:17 pm

I’ve dated older women most of my life but now I’m beginning to look for younger because the older women feel the need to control every aspect of their lives including you and that ain’t gonna happen here. However I could date Martha Stewart, she takes good care of herself reasonably ok looking and I could visit the Ferrari dealership every week. Otherwise at 51 I’d stick with the thirty-year olds.

MANGOG on May 2, 2013 at 6:06 pm

Would I what?

No … hell no.

Jack on May 2, 2013 at 6:30 pm

Most any woman is good for atleast a couple of hours of your time, give Martha a break. As long as I keep my own place.

MANGOG on May 2, 2013 at 7:01 pm

Poor Martha. I couldn’t date a woman like her because 1. she’s waaaaay older than me and 2. she’s a vapid control freak who would cause me to do her bodily harm because at heart I’m a nice easy going guy and 3. she’s an Obama loving libhag and that alone would drive me up a freaking wall. She’d be better off finding a younger man(and by that I mean between the ages 25-38)who is liberal, not too bright(redundant) and has no testiculars.

Ken b on May 2, 2013 at 9:07 pm

    Sorry about that I meant to put LOL after my stating that I’d cause MS bodily harm. I would never hit a woman even if she’s an old controlling libshrew.

    Ken b on May 2, 2013 at 9:15 pm

She’d have better luck tadpoling on vk.com (the russian fb) and any number of Islamic terrorist boychiks (such as tamerlan who had profiles there) would rub up to her to get into the country.

Fabulous But Incognito on May 2, 2013 at 9:33 pm

Even tough she’s not an un-attractive woman, her persona and attitude, Yuck! I’m a gentle man but I’d be so hellbent on strangling the life out of her in the first five minutes
I’d, um, sorry…I think I meant to say, I kinda’ dislike her.
In plain english, no thanks.
BTW, I heard she’s Polish. Could she really be the reason why and where Deb’s anti-Polish sentiments really started?

'lil' napoleon on May 3, 2013 at 12:53 am

I wouldn’t date her because I don’t swing that way. :-)

Elizabeth Anne on May 3, 2013 at 1:52 am

It is probably a publicity stunt. Martha Stewart has been going through some lean years lately. I am surprised that she is not pushing reverse mortgages yet.

Worry01 on May 3, 2013 at 5:41 am

In all fairness to Martha, she used to be attractive enough:

http://tinyurl.com/cm2qgtk

skzion on May 3, 2013 at 1:29 pm

That is me Nir, thank you for the kind words…

CJ on May 3, 2013 at 1:39 pm

There’s something very sensual about holding Martha Stewart’s hands, snuggling up to her and holding her tightly. I’ll admit it. I could never settle down with someone like that, but she definitely has what it takes to get a man’s mojo working in the short term.

Seek on May 3, 2013 at 1:56 pm

No chance in hell she’s really looking for a date. She can find one of those at any of the dozen or so affairs she would regularly attend and with someone in her social circle.

I’ve no doubt at all that she’s a secret spokesperson and being paid to promote the site. It makes no sense for her to be on a dating site and less that she’s agreed to such a “job”.

Jules on June 13, 2013 at 6:34 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field