May 31, 2013, - 8:21 pm

EXCLUSIVE: US Palestinian Muslim Leader Accused of Sexual Harassment by Several Muslim Chicks

By Debbie Schlussel

DebbieSchlussel.com learned this evening that Palestinian Muslim leader, immigration defrauder, and FBI award revokee Imad Hamad has been accused of sexual harassment by Palestinian Muslim Michigan State Representative Rashida Tlaib. In a letter received by DebbieSchlussel.com late Friday afternoon, Tlaib claimed that she and many other women were sexually harassed by Hamad. The letter is below (click on the letter to read the whole thing). The married, devout Muslim Hamad is the Senior National Advisor for the Muslim-dominated, openly pro-HAMAS/Hezbollah American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) and the Midwest Regional Director for the organization. And, predictably, the ADC ignored alleged repeated complaints by several women about Hamad’s groping and other physical and verbal harassment. That’s the Islamic and Arabic way.

imadhamadafat.jpgrashidatlaib

alienvpredator.jpg

Alien v. Predator: Imad Hamad v. Rashida Tlaib

Click on each portion of the letter to read the whole thing . . .
tlaibhamad
tlaibhamad2

As longtime readers know, Hamad, a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist was to receive an award from the FBI in 2003, but the reward was revoked after a column I wrote exposing Hamad in the New York Post. The FBI thanked me and told me he is the subject of over a dozen terrorist and immigration related investigations. Hamad who was born in the terrorist hotbed of Ein El-Hilweh refugee camp in Lebanon, came to the United States in the early 1980s on a student visa and violated that visa. There is no record that he ever attended classes, and he engaged in a sham marriage to a woman with U.S. citizenship with whom he did not live. He was allegedly caught on FBI surveillance tape recruiting and raising money for the PFLP, which is on the State Department terrorist list and which is responsible for the murder of Israeli tourism minister Rechavam Ze’evi, as well as many other murders and homicide bombings. The U.S. government fought to deport Hamad for over two decades, but under pressure from U.S. Senator Carl Levin, the Clinton Administration finally gave in, and he is now a U.S. citizen, despite marriage and immigration fraud. Hamad has gone on Detroit local television stations and praised Palestinian Authority TV for teaching three-year-olds to become homicide bombers, which Hamad called “patriotic.” He was quoted in the Detroit media, asking if it is okay to wear Hezbollah t-shirts. He called Hezbollah–the terrorist group which murdered hundreds of Americans–“the heroes.”


In recent years, Hamad was set to be stripped of his citizenship and tried because he lied on many immigration forms about his terrorist activity and because he allegedly continued to raise money for Palestinian Islamic terrorist groups, which may have included HAMAS. Hamad reportedly hired a former Assistant U.S. Attorney to defend himself in the matter. However, the whole investigation and prosecution was tabled because of Hamad’s close personal relationship with then-FBI Special Agent in Charge Andrew Arena and Obama U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade, who allegedly intervened. And Hamad skated yet again.

(Bush’s U.S. Attorneys were cronies of the schmuck Hamad, too, with U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Collins orchestrating the aforementioned FBI award before it was revoked. Collins was also Hamad’s date to a Detroit News luncheon when the paper named the terrorist lech one of its Michiganians of the Year, an award no one at the paper could explain when I asked about it on my radio show. The next Bush U.S. Attorney also hung out with and protected Hamad against prosecution. He’s now a Bush-appointed, liberal, soft-on-Islamic-terrorism federal judge.)

Now, he is accused of sexual harassment by several women in his own community.

Take note that Rashida Harbi Tlaib, who was Obama’s Muslim outreach chick, is as slimy and despicable as Hamad. She committed election fraud by lying about where she lived so she could get elected to the Michigan House of Representatives, according to her own father. She also lied to the Detroit media about Israelis “shooting” her grandfather, even though there is no record of any such thing. Detroit Free Press Muslim reporter and resident propagandist Niraj Warikoo reported this false claim as fact, and, after much loud complaint from me, the paper was forced to correct the fraud and issue a retraction. And Tlaib has tried to impose her Islamic views on Michigan casinos.

Tlaib is a constant thorn in the side of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, as she personally drives to homes where illegal aliens are being arrested for deportation and blocks them with her car to prevent the arrests and deportations of those with violent criminal records and multiple previous deporations. She constantly calls and harasses ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) leaders in the few cases where they are actually able to have their agents do their jobs and deport violent, dangerous illegal aliens. She repeatedly lies about ICE and ERO officials to make their lives miserable while she aids and abets lawbreakers. As an employee of the Muslim-dominated ACCESS (Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services), her job was to aid and abet Muslim illegal aliens get into and stay in the United States. Now, she continues that “job” on your dime.

Frankly, I couldn’t care less if Tlaib was sexually harassed by Hamad, as this is one of those “Alien v. Predator” cases where I hope the war lasts forever and both sides lose.

Let allah sort it out. And note that both Hamad and Tlaib are the kind of vile scum Muslims pick to lead and represent them . . . and you, now that they are a growing and dominating force in what was once America.

By the way, did I mention that I am shocked–shocked!–that a Muslim man would ever harass women. Who’da thunk it?

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

38 Responses

“this is one of those “Alien v. Predator” cases”

LOL!

DS_ROCKS! on June 1, 2013 at 9:58 am

We need not mention that Islamic sexual modesty is nowhere in evidence here. Actually Muslim male harassment of women is an every day event in the Muslim World. Its just new here.

And like I care about this particular case – they made their bed and now let them sleep in it!

NormanF on June 1, 2013 at 10:45 am

Hey Debbie they are both reprehensible creatures. So which one is the alien and which one is the predator…LOL!

Ken b on June 1, 2013 at 10:51 am

Just imagine the outrage in the media if this would be a Catholic priest or a Jewish rabbi…. and now?

Oh wait… it’s a muslim. I forgot the are above the law…

Herman on June 1, 2013 at 11:10 am

Hi Debbie

I don’t think calling them “Chicks” is useful, you should use another description

bill

bill on June 1, 2013 at 1:16 pm

    Lower-case bill, why don’t you go back to your usual feminist web site?

    skzion on June 2, 2013 at 12:03 am

Maybe they will both step in front of a moving car.

Coleslaw Patriot on June 1, 2013 at 2:24 pm

Who cares?

AR on June 1, 2013 at 2:56 pm

never thought I would b put in the position of defending but this is crazy.
Just last week I read about sexual harassment in the US Military and how they fail to respond to complaints Actually the leadership was accused of intimidation and punishment.

I hate radical and political Islam but this is kind of salacious and it is straight out propaganda. Lets stick to Al Qaeda and how the United States Government does or does not respond to this real threat.

sanjay on June 1, 2013 at 3:17 pm

    Sanjay, you’re a consistent apologist for Islam who poses here as a “moderate.” We get lots of your type. What you consider important couldn’t be less important to me.

    Incidentally, showing the sleazy underbelly of Islam is important work, as it counters the crap about Muslim sexual and moral purity.

    Buzz off you pissant.

    skzion on June 2, 2013 at 12:00 am

      Thanks for saying that Skzion. I felt the same way but I am sick of pointing it out. Others need to start telling these frauds they are NOT fooling us.

      I’m tired of it. They deserve NO legitimacy.

      Skunky on June 2, 2013 at 12:16 pm

“Frankly, I couldn’t care less if Tlaib was sexually harassed by Hamad, as this is one of those “Alien v. Predator” cases where I hope the war lasts forever and both sides lose.”

If you dont care why would you loose some KB in writing this subject?

A: What is KB? DS

auction on June 1, 2013 at 7:06 pm

@auction

Auction means KB(kilobytes) I think. He’s a bit stingy with the bandwith.

Zarus on June 1, 2013 at 10:41 pm

@auction
To answer your question auction.
There’s no special reason to waste KB on Tlaib’s issues but Arab misogyny and chauvinism is something you couldn’t do justice to easily even with Megabytes of bandwith.
I was going to ask if Tlaib had four male witnesses but I think that’s rape.
I forgot sexual harassment is always the female’s fault in the Arab world.
Only in America, huh?

Zarus on June 1, 2013 at 10:52 pm

Zarus,

In a Muslim country, she could be the one accused of infidelity if she couldn’t produce the required number of male witness to prove rape.

And under Sharia – that means stoning! Islam is so progressive on matters of sexual morality. You gotta love how the woman’s viewpoint is ALWAYS represented, eh?

Rashida Tlaib should shut the heck up! She’s fortunate its only sexual harassment here.

NormanF on June 2, 2013 at 12:29 am

It seems surreal and bizarre to watch head chopping 7th century barbarians use our pussified, liberal, politically correct system to go after us and each other. How do they know when to chop a head and when to file paperwork? I am sure they will be getting the two confused on live national TV here very soon.

RT on June 2, 2013 at 2:22 am

I’ve just finished “Reading Lolita in Tehran” by Azar Nafisi. It is “a memoir in books”, described on the cover by Margaret Atwood as “a literary life raft on Iran’s fundamentalist sea”.

I recommend it. And yes,I guess that for a woman to make an accusation of sexual harassment in that “fundamentalist sea” would be most unwise.

“The woman that you gave me, she gave me fruit from the tree, and so I ate.”

As far as Adam was concerned it was all “the woman’s” fault, and God’s fault as well, for giving him the woman!

Do many of the world’s religions still live in the spirit of that moment? Strange if so, as God blamed them both, but Adam foremostly.

And the fundamentalist regime in Iran, as described by Dr.Nafisi, appears to consider her and all Iranian women so dangerous they must be policed, controlled and silenced at all times.

We (all of us children of Adam) need to learn to control ourselves and fight our own selfishness and imperfections – longing for the day when our Creator will make us perfect – and we will effortlessly reflect all his beautiful qualities. And we desperately need the help of God’s holy spirit and right teaching through his congregation.

What we don’t need are religious policemen haranguing and harassing us wherever we go. That is a way of putting people off the whole idea of God I think. It reminds me of how the teaching of hellfire torment (the unBiblical teaching) in my Catholic Convent schooldays put me off the whole idea of God and the Bible for many years.

I am about to set off to the Kingdom Hall for some wonderful comforting teaching this morning.

sue on June 2, 2013 at 2:59 am

    “Religious policemen” only harass you, Sue the Pom, because you’re a fraud. You use your religion shamefully as a shield for your craven and cowardly ways. You are only fooling yourself.

    You declared here that you would not do a thing to help the Jews under any form of Islamic tyranny or harassment. Eff you.

    If I can see you 100%, God sure as hell can as well.

    “The louder he spoke of his honour, the faster we counted our spoons.”

    Skunky on June 2, 2013 at 12:13 pm

      I perhaps ought to make it clear that no religious policemen have harassed me. We don’t, as yet, have them in the UK. I was referring to the experiences Dr.Nafisi was writing about.

      sue on June 2, 2013 at 2:01 pm

        Oh no, it’s sue. She’s another apologist for Islam, making it just another “Abrahamic religion.” For sue, the problem is not Islam but some nebulous religious extremists. She’d not lift a finger to stop the killing of anyone, being a moral coward. Instead, others should defend her while she engages in religious masturbation here.

        Double yuk!

        skzion on June 2, 2013 at 4:47 pm

          After 9/11, National Geographic ran an interview with a Muslim cleric named Anwar Al- Anwar Al-Awlaki – he was described as the guy who could combine the best of East and West and Islam. He was also Nidal Hasan Malik’s mentor. If you look closely enough, every Islamic leader turns out to be an Islamic terrorist. People don’t want to know. We have enough pro-Islamic BS in America to fertilize Al-Awlaki’s remains several million times over. Nothing good develops from our repeated appeasement of Islam!

          Double yuck!

          NormanF on June 2, 2013 at 8:23 pm

        Sue The Pom, you give trouble to the religious (who should NOT be harassed) by disgustingly misusing your religion to hide your own moral weaknesses behind. I am all for the religious freedom of the deeply religious (Islam does NOT count in my book, or Scientology or Santeria or VooDoo…) but NOT for religious frauds. Like you.

        Skzion has your number. He is so right is his declaration that you come here to wank above your waistline. Moral pervert!

        As you can tell, I find you deplorable. And I will call you out on you using your religion to hide behind. Disgrazia!

        Skunky on June 2, 2013 at 5:51 pm

I agree w/ Debbie – this is one more of those Alien vs Predator scenarios that has become common. It’s the only thing that delays the demise of civilization, unless the rest of the population wakes up.

Honestly, I don’t have any sympathy for Muslim women or any other Muslims who don’t apostatize & jettison their relationship w/ their Muslim relatives. The bar has gone higher, since too many of those apostates still have a soft corner for their unapologetic Muslim relatives, and that’s a bunch of ‘allies’ that we don’t need.

As an aside, I wonder whether Hamad is a Shia and Tlaib is a Sunni, which would also partly explain this – it’s a disguised Shia-Sunni battle at play

Infidel on June 2, 2013 at 3:18 am

I encourage every one to sign the “Khaybar” petition! Now is not time to remain silent:

https://www.change.org/petitions/human-rights-ngos-condemn-upcoming-antisemitic-khaybar-ramadan-mini-series

You can make a contribution to human rights, justice and peace in the world. Rest assured, each one of us can make a difference!

Thank you!

NormanF on June 2, 2013 at 4:19 pm

EEOC Claims Trucking Company Must Accommodate Muslim Employee’s Religious Objections to Transporting Alcohol

http://ia601705.us.archive.org/15/items/gov.uscourts.ilcd.58267/gov.uscourts.ilcd.58267.1.0.pdf

jill on June 2, 2013 at 6:13 pm

Jill,

The Obama Administration is implementing Islamic Sharia. And we know what hypocrites and frauds Muslims are about alcohol! No one is forcing them to consume it – its just work-related transportation. Orthodox Jews don’t ask for special treatment in handling pork. Its just special treatment for Islam.

NormanF on June 2, 2013 at 7:50 pm

obvious political assaults against
a kindly moose-lamb-pig

btw
jizzlam is the only
large scale so-called religion
that has never condemned slavery

in the usa
the only major political party
that never condemned slavery
are the democrats

is this coincidence
especially

when the demorats openly
defend moose-lamb terrorism
and seek legal retribution against
any who dare to criticize
moose-lamb terror

prestigio on June 3, 2013 at 12:09 am

Infidel.

Both Hamad and Tlaib are Muslim Sunni. She is actually as him from what they call Palestine.

I hope that helped.

D: Actually, Hamad is from Lebanon and Tlaib was born here. Neither are from the non-existent “Palestine,” as is typical for these fraudulent “Palestinians.” DS

Daniel. on June 3, 2013 at 1:12 am

    There are no “Palestinians”. It presupposes they actually want to have a country. They have no real interest in one. But along with the rest of the Arabs – they do have a real interest in destroying Israel. But that all gets ignored in the conventional wisdom that peace is still possible because it hasn’t been tried hard enough yet.

    Yeah, sure.

    NormanF on June 3, 2013 at 9:50 am

Anyone notice that most of these broads that yell sexual harassment are FUGLY?

RT on June 3, 2013 at 3:23 am

Another fascinating book about women in Islam (for those whom might be interested) is Sattareh Farman Farmaian’s “Daughter of Persia”. It is blurbed as: “A woman’s journey from her father’s harem through the Islamic Revolution”.

Which I suppose it is. She was the child of a Persian nobleman, by his third (or possibly fourth?) wife, and she was also the first woman – or one of the first – to be arrested by the revolutionary guards.

Obviously, she escaped with her life, which many did not.

It is an extraordinary story and a great read.

sue on June 3, 2013 at 12:46 pm

Call me what u want but there is room for other opinions.

What does this post even prove? I do not believe that muslims r more moral no matter what they claim.

U r doing what liberals love to do.pointing out and relishing so called conservatives foibles..Be it Sanford, Gingrich, or Bachman.

I am not trying to mitigate behavior for Islam.I just think that posts like these are counterproductive.lets stick to the dangers of radical Islams philosophy and how Americas being soft on and suooorting oppresive Islamic societies.

Most people would categorize my views as radical. Your views are just incoherent and bordering on fascism.why don’t you just ask for your version of the “final solution”.

Sanjay on June 3, 2013 at 1:57 pm

    Sanjay, it’s not about equal opportunity here. It’s about fact and fiction and the lies that get told to keep the fiction to be erroneously seen as FACT. The smart peeps here are so done with what (and caring about) what your side says.

    “…lets stick to the dangers of radical Islams philosophy…”

    That’s a rich sentence. Now you’re dictating what can be said on this site and embracing a philosophy that the very owner of this very site does not agree with. And neither do I. She had long ago convinced me of that too, so what your slinging is just dumb, old hat and NOT truthful.

    There is a Pakistan because of sorts of your ilk. Think about it.

    Skunky on June 3, 2013 at 7:13 pm

U actually have a point about The Pakistan thing… The partition of India was one the biggest human migrations ever, while at the same time the bloodiest.

India remained a secular democratic society while Pakistan wanted to be a Islamic republic.
It is hard to be tolerant of intolerance.

One can be vigilant and stick to principles without stereotyping and resorting to the very forms of action that we abhor.

sanjay on June 3, 2013 at 10:10 pm

Hello Sanjay, Salman Rushdie writes movingly about what happened at the partition of India, when both sides turned upon each other (in “Midnight’s Children”). Many years later there was an article in “The Spectator” about the trauma of those times still haunting the survivors. I wish I had kept it.

And, yes, I agree, the problem is how to write about what is happening without resorting to stereotyping, and while keeping “the law of loving-kindness” on our tongue.

sue on June 4, 2013 at 2:57 am

    Sue The Pom, what the hell do you care about “stereotyping” (an old Libtard whinge) when you have made it clear that you’re a wuss and won’t lift a hand to help anyone in need? You hide behind your religion but we all see you for the unprincipled coward you are. You’re nauseating.

    Sanjay, go re-read Skzion’s post. I was just bolstering what he wisely said. We know who you are. You are also not tricking us.

    Again, because of myopic morons like you, there is a Pakistan…and you have already agreed with me. You’ve been exposed. Fully.

    Skunky on June 4, 2013 at 11:39 am

      Skunky, Sue & Sanjay are birds of a feather. As we both know (but others may not) these two are willfully committed to inaction. They will not consider that a certain ideology (Islam) is the problem. Sue hides in “Christianity” (in quotes, because Christians do have just wars, but Sue will not accept the notion); Sanjay hides in “Hinduism” or “Sikhism” (in quotes because neither of these religions counsels passivity, and Sikhism in particular requires the wearing of a ritual knife symbolizing the destruction of Islam).

      They cannot intelligently engage us because they are morally deficient and religiously wrong. So they just blather sweet nothings here.

      Nauseating.

      skzion on June 4, 2013 at 1:30 pm

        Perfect summation, Skzion. So glad you posted it!

        These sorts are beyond tiresome to me now. I feel a sense of alarm as to the way things are going and how arrogant and yet stupid human beings can be in 2013. I will eventually ignore these two jokers but I feel the need to get thru’ to the very small amount of critical thinkers out there in how one can zero in on the flaws in dopey fools’ arguments and expose them completely.

        Sue The Pom should pay me and you the equivalent of a lifetime of psychotherapy. We were able to zero in on her character flaw in expert time that many others wallow in therapy for years trying to sort out. Not that she’ll use the gem.

        Sanjay is just a dope. He needs a helmet to wear each day with “Pakistan” written on it. That’s all.

        Skunky on June 4, 2013 at 5:17 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field