January 27, 2014, - 12:58 pm

Dinesh D’Souza: No Tears for HAMAS CAIR Hero, Hitler Fan; Said US Deserved 9/11; Bush Indicted Dem for Same Crime

By Debbie Schlussel

Dinesh D’Souza committed a federal crime, the same crime that far-left liberal Democrat trial lawyer Geoffrey Fieger committed, and for which he was indicted by a Bush Administration federal grand jury in 2007. Obama’s indictment of D’Souza is not a political witchhunt. But it is politics based on a crime that D’Souza knowingly, deliberately committed and thought he’d get away with. Well, he didn’t.

dineshdsouzarobertspencer

Islam/Hitler Fan Dinesh D’Souza w/ Fellow Huckster Slobbert Spencer

I’ve got nothing but contempt for all of those “conservatives” who are publicly shedding crocodile tears over D’Souza, the “conservative” commentator who blamed American decadence for 9/11, saying we deserved it because we upset Muslim sensibilities about modesty and so on. As I’ve noted in the past, he wrote a whole book on this perverted thesis. In case you don’t believe me, read his particularly disgusting column, “Who Speaks for Islam?” in which he praises Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood adviser Dalia Mogahed and Islamotool John Esposito. D’Souza, a darling of the HAMAS CAIR and other Muslim lecture circuits, believes in immigration amnesty and the superiority of Muslims and their religion over yours and mine. He also thinks America should side with Al-Qaeda in Syria and go to war there. He said so in his “Obama 2016″ plagiarism hack job “documentary” (read my review). No tears for him from me. Oh, and where are all his Muslim buddies, especially those from HAMAS CAIR–at whose events he appeared and spoke gushingly–now that he’s been indicted? They ain’t defending him. That’s for sure. And neither am I. I usually don’t defend Islamopologists, and I certainly don’t side with Hitler fans. D’Souza endearingly quoted Der Fuhrer in an anti-Semitic quote for the Yom Kippur edition of the Dartmouth Review, when he was editor-in-chief.

I have to laugh when I read the comments of D’Souza’s moviemaking partner, Gerald Molen, saying, “I have never feared my government until now.” Um, are you saying that D’Souza didn’t circumvent federal election and campaign finance laws? His own friend, Wendy Long, says he lied to her about the source of the contributions. Maybe she’s lying, too. But one thing is clear: D’Souza is the source of the funds and he knew what he was doing. Mark Levin, who claims to be a lawyer, says he read the D’Souza indictment and doesn’t see that a crime has been committed. Huh? Did federal campaign finance laws change, and he’s the only person in the world who knows about it?

It’s funny that Molen, who produced “Schindler’s List,” doesn’t get that his buddy D’Souza had an affinity for Hitler and has a current love affair with the modern-day Nazis in Islam who are far worse than the Nazis ever were. (I think he does get it, but D’Souza is making him a lot of money with entree to conservatives, and the Benjamins rule this hypocrite Molen.) Did Gerald Molen fear his government when the Bush Administration prosecuted trial lawyer Geoffrey Fieger for the same thing? Did Mark Levin cry, “Partisan witch hunt!” Fieger was indicted on four counts by the Bush Justice Department (read the federal indictment), so perhaps the Obamaniks are being soft on D’Souza, as they’ve indicted him on only one count (read the federal indictment). In 2007, the Bushies went after Geoffrey Fieger because he funneled about 20,000 to the Presidential campaign of John Edwards. He gave the money to third parties to give to Edwards, so that he could funnel more money to Edwards’ campaign than he was personally allowed to give under federal campaign donation limits.






Back in 2007, the Detroit U.S. Attorney’s office, headed by then-U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy III a/k/a “Abu Porno”–who is now a Bush-appointed federal judge–was in bed with the terrorist-enabling, terrorist-financing Detroit Muslim community, so they refused to go after them. Murphy refused to push the indictment of his crony Imad Hamad, a Palestinian terrorist who apparently committed immigration fraud and was to be stripped of his U.S. citizenship (and who was recently fired from his perch at ADC because he sexually harassed several women). So, Murphy–desperate for headlines and positive PR because he wanted to become a federal judge–went after Fieger.

Of course, it was political. And, of course, the indictment of D’Souza is political, too. But, in both cases, they broke the law and created the basis for the indictment in the first place. Both Fieger and D’Souza thought they were more important than federal election contribution limits, so they knowingly, deliberately orchestrated a way around them. They thought they wouldn’t get caught. But they were.

In Fieger’s case, he managed to charm the jury and was acquitted. But D’Souza, as charming as he believes he is, isn’t actually quite so charming. There are his mancrushes on Hitler and extremist Muslims, especially his cronies at un-indicted co-conspirator in HAMAS terrorism, CAIR. And then there is the fact that he was fired from the Presidency of King’s College, a Christian college, after he, a 52-year-old, checked into a hotel suite with a 20-something chick he identified as his “fiancee” even though he was already married. He feigned puzzlement that there was anything wrong with that. This guy–who dated and was also “engaged” (euphemism) to Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham–really gets around.

And now his getting around has gotten around to him.

No tears for Dinesh D’Souza from me. The only sad thing here is that the publicity and phony, partisan outcry from the right over this lout and his deserved indictment, will only serve as good publicity to make him more millions on his next hack job–probably as plagiarized and old news as “his” “Obama 2016.”

While his next movie is in a theater near you, I won’t be saddened one bit if D’Souza ends up in a correctional facility near you, too.

For the record, I don’t think there should be federal campaign finance limits because they inspire crimes like D’Souza’s and Fieger’s, and then we don’t know who is funding whom. I believe that, with full disclosure on donors–especially in the instantaneous age of the internet–anyone should be able to donate however much they want to whomever they want. Instead, what happens is that anonymous donors and union machines donate to third party PACs and other organizations to fund campaign ads and we never know who is behind it.

So, I think the laws that were used against Geoffrey Fieger and are being used against Dinesh D’Souza are silly and ill advised (and I would rather see the government go after terrorists and other dangerous criminals than campaign finance law violators). But, right now, they are the laws.

And Dinesh D’Souza broke them no differently than Geoffrey Fieger did. He deserved to be indicted, and he deserves to be convicted. Because he is guilty.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20 Responses

I agree, open up campaign financing for all to see.

Tommy Thomas on January 27, 2014 at 1:34 pm

While I believe you should be able to contribute as much as you want to the political party/candidate of your choice, I agree with Debbie here that Dinesh D’Souza had an obligation to follow federal election laws. What’s that old saw – if you aspire to be a role model for others, more is expected of you. And I’m tired of the phony “conservatives” defending him – they have no principle and they should have been out there protesting Geoffrey Fieger’s indictment for the same crime. Heck, the Feds don’t indict someone for a jaywalking ticket! D’Souza committed a felony, pure and simple!

I’m not shedding any tears for him either and in fact the most hilarious aspect of all this as Debbie would no doubt agree is that “conservatives” find their much vaunted law and order beliefs can be thrown out of the window if the person affected by wrong-doing happens to be on their “side” of the aisle. Debbie is an attorney and we both are in complete agreement the law should not play favorites.

Breaking the law is no excuse and if D’Souza didn’t know that to begin with – he wouldn’t have ended up where he is today. More to the point, his extremist Muslim buddies aren’t going to be there for them after he praised them to the skies. Crime – and a lack of adult responsibility shouldn’t pay in this country. If he winds up in a country club prison, well he has no one to blame for his own downfall but himself. And this unabashed Hitler/Muslim fan and wannabe 911 Truther won’t be missed!

What goes around comes around and D’Souza deserved it in spades.

NormanF on January 27, 2014 at 2:46 pm

Good column Debbie. I was waiting on your take on the D’Souza indictment and you gave some omuch needed light on the subject. My thing with this guy is that anyone who is a fan of scumbags like Hitler and nutty groups like CAIR and HAMAS deserves what he gets. Yes our government(even at the helm of a moron like Odumbo) should spend its time going after terrorist dirtbags but if idiots like D’Souza broke the law then they should pay the price. I also brought this up when former VA Governor Bob McDonnell got into his trouble. If you didn’t do anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about right? I do wonder Debbie how both Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham feel about their former bo getting indicted. They like Mark Levin will probably defend him to the hilt. It’s also funny that you mentioned Levin. His buddy Hannity goes up against Michael Savage on another radio station in my area today at 3pm. I sure that you know that these two guys hate each other and it will be The Walbanger vs The Weiner Nation. Vannity says that he’s not worried but we will see.

Ken b on January 27, 2014 at 2:55 pm

    Not so sure about Michael “Savage” Weiner. He’s a bit of a fraud, as well. He goes to great lengths to hide and conceal the fact that he’s Jewish. You know, change the last name, constantly blame and bash Israel, single out almost exclusively Hollywood & media personalities with Jewish names, etc. He pretends to be this tough guy, but in reality he’s the type to cower and cave, then quietly make a secret deal with CAIR, hence his Jan 13, 2014 (I think that was the date) show where he states that Muslim immigration will save Europe and the West!

    Texan on January 27, 2014 at 3:33 pm

      Agree Texan, and this is why I’m listening to Michael Savage’s show (Michael Allen Weiner to be precise) not too often as I did, let us say a year ago and many years ago at this time. I do remember that MS two weeks ago, when he used populist rhetoric on his show by saying that what you said Texan that: “Islamic immigration will save the west and a salvation to the western world, etc., etc.”, that wasn’t the first time that MS said that, he’s said that on a few occasions on his show.

      Now to the OT, over the weekend, I saw some of my conservative friends on Facebook, who used absolute “cognitive dissonance” 101 by being apologist for Dinesh D’Souza and NOT knowing all of the details on what he allegedly did, by being very corrupt in this scenario, and yes of course, using Obama as the boogieman in their comment, at the very sametime, NONE of us here are fans and supporters of Obama, we all think that the man’s a phony and a wannabe dictator who could careless for this country, etc.!

      “A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

      Sean R. on January 27, 2014 at 3:52 pm

I am no fan of D’Souza — either of his lawbreaking or of his pandering to Muslims.

But I would like to see campaign legal standards applied equally to Republicans and Democrats in a general sense. I don’t like to see IRS harassment focused disproportionately on the Tea Party, and I don’t like to see Members of Congress, especially, but not only, Democrats, get away with all kinds of criminal activity. Yes, Fieger was guilty, but he was an easy target, due to his defense of assisted suicide.

I would like to see all the politicians and officeholders guilty of election fraud, again, disproportionately Dems, be appropriately penalized for their crimes.

Little Al on January 27, 2014 at 3:20 pm

D’ Souza may be many things but he isn’t a traditional conservative. No, he is a skinny-assed Indian with a blonde white-girl fetish. Why doesn’t Abu Indian alien date and marry a nice Indian woman? Who did Gd make Indian women for, Vietnamese Eskimos?

Also proves my long held belief that some white women will f**k ANYTHING including this androgynous Indian POS!

Deal with that!

get real on January 27, 2014 at 3:34 pm

Yup, it is true. He has exclusively dated ONLY blue-eyed blonds. His first wife, all dates in between, and his current wife et al — all blue-eyed blonds. Yeah, a fetish he no doubt picked up from hours of intense porno viewing. Somehow, I’m guessing the money he came up with for this politician is a blue-eyed blond?

EP: Ding, Ding, Ding! https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1440&bih=697&q=Wendy+Long&oq=Wendy+Long&gs_l=img.3..0l2j0i24l8.58.4213.0.4413.21.17.4.0.0.0.500.2429.5j9j4-1j1.16.0….0…1ac.1.32.img..2.19.1950._wONIA3Hdws DS

elmo p on January 27, 2014 at 4:17 pm

Yes, maybe but there are problems here.

“But it is politics based on a crime that D’Souza knowingly, deliberately committed and thought he’d get away with. Well, he didn’t.” –

Well how do we know?
We don’t know about Benghazi.
We don’t know about the IRS.

We do know however that D’Souza had become a thorn in Obama’s paw apparently.
We know he apparently had an affair because it got media attention and the timing is suspicious to me.

This is something that shouldn’t be ignored and more importantly Conservatives can’t afford to ignore it.
Those days are gone.

I’m as inclined to believe this is non-politcal as I’m inclined to believe that the guy that directed “Innocence of Muslims” is in jail for parole violation.

Scary thing but not something you want to pretend isn’t happening.

If it turns out he’s guilty so be it but I won’t assume it.
What for? Why?

I despise D’Souza for some of the comments on 9 11 the way many Muslims despise decadent Americans but that doesn’t stop me asking questions.

Also if the administration will go this far to silence somebody like D’Souza and I believe they will.
What won’t they do?

Frankz on January 27, 2014 at 5:28 pm

Rule of law is a wonderful concept if the people who administer it are subject to it but otherwise it becomes a game for mugs really very quickly.

Frankz on January 27, 2014 at 5:45 pm

Dinesh D’Souza was an utter fool to do what he did. He is getting what he deserves finally.

worry01 on January 27, 2014 at 6:28 pm

    yeah, but what worries me is that we’ll get it along with him.

    Frankz on January 27, 2014 at 6:54 pm

and of course we only know what this corrupt administration can accuse him of because that’s unfortunately the situation now which is why i’m not playing along.

If it was somebody who would be elected to office with a history of duplicity maybe I’d be less suspicious because there’d be more scrutiny.

This is a cheap hit and run and I want nothing to do with it.

Frankz on January 27, 2014 at 7:01 pm

Not sure why Ted Cruz was huffing and puffing about D’Souza on CBS yesterday. Cruz is talking too much and not doing enough homework. Guess he’s not as smart as advertised. Sorry, Ted, got to scratch you off the list.

adam on January 27, 2014 at 9:31 pm

D’Souza’s views fit somewhere on the left end of the “Conservative” “intellectual” spectrum with a bit of added Islamophilia, perhaps because he wants to be among the first to welcome our new overlords and get first dibs on the virgins.

Mordecai on January 27, 2014 at 9:45 pm

Little Al on January 27, 2014 at 3:20 pm: “I don’t like to see IRS harassment focused disproportionately on the Tea Party…”

Except that it wasn’t. A significantly larger proportion of conservative special interest groups filed for 501(c)(4) IRS tax status than progressive special interest groups after the Citizens United decision. Between 2010 and 2012, the number of 501(c)(4) applications leapt from 1,500 to more than 3,400.

Interestingly, 176 applicants for 501(c)(4) status had used the same address in their applications. The only known denial of tax-exempt status occurred to a progressive group.

EMC on January 28, 2014 at 12:56 am

D’Souza is just another Asian huckster.

Pray Hard on January 28, 2014 at 10:39 am

    Pray Hard, I don’t see how him being Asian is relevant. The picture shows him next to another huckster who is hardly Asian.

    skzion on January 28, 2014 at 9:16 pm

I think you are way overboard on this review. I like the movie simply because it gives people who are 5-10 years behind on the Alinsky plan, and still watch regular TV, a way to respond to the America haters.

Bluzey on July 4, 2014 at 10:56 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field