May 14, 2014, - 3:27 pm

GOP CA Gov Candidate Hosted Shariah Finance Conference; Jihad Darrell Issa, Jeb Bush Defend Him

By Debbie Schlussel

I always have to laugh when the blind lumpenconservatariat gush over Congressman Darrell Issa’s grandstanding on Benghazi and how the Obamaniks subject our U.S. Embassy officials to terrorist attacks and murder. That’s because, as I’ve repeatedly told you, Issa, himself, has a long history of supporting Islamic terrorists and dissing their American victims. He loves Hezbollah, had multiple orgasms over his terrorist-in-chief buddy Yasser Arafat (whose “small hands” and “sense of humor” Issa gushed over), and called the 9/11 attacks “simply a plane crash.” And, now, he’s defending a Republican candidate for Governor of California over a rival’s accurate report that the man hosted a Shariah finance conference as a Treasury Department official.

darrellissaevilneelkashkari

arafatthumbsup

Arafat/Hezbo FanBoy Jihad Darell Issa Defends Shariah Pimp Neel Kashkari

And FOX News is taking Issa’s side on this, too, in a biased article casting doubt on the very true fact that a Republican candidate for office supported Shariah openly and proudly. It’s so predictable. Also predictable is that the drooling masses of “conservatives” won’t notice or care and will still pant over Issa’s every phony, grandstanding escapade.

Tim Donnelly, the Tea Party candidate for California’s Republican Gubernatorial nomination, noted on his Facebook page that Neel Kashkari, the GOP establishment candidate for California’s Republican Gubernatorial nomination, hosted a Shariah finance conference at Harvard, when Kashkari was a Treasury Department official in the Bush Administration. All of this is entirely true. Kashkari did this, and he served as the Bush Shariah-pimp with your tax dollars (the program from the tax-funded and unconstitutional event is posted below). Yes, Kashkari–the Romney/Jeb Bush/Condi Clueless Rice/Jihad Darrell candidate. They’ve all endorsed the guy–all of the Republican establishment guys (and, make no mistake, Issa is every bit as establishment as the Bushes and Romney). For some reason, FOX News seems to think it’s important to note that Kashkari is Hindu, as if this somehow makes it untrue that Kashkari hosted an event pimping Shariah (which he definitely did do). Why? Are there no Hindus or non-Muslims who support Islam and play water-carrier?! Um, ever heard of the word, dhimmi? That’s the very definition. Non-Muslims under Islam (who generally end up doing Islam’s bidding). And there are, sadly, plenty of those of all religions, even Hindus (despite the fact that Muslims very much want a jihadist takeover of India and deadly purge of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, etc.).












kashkarishariah

neelkashkariislamicfinance

On November 6, 2008, Kashkari–then a Bush Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury–hosted a tax-funded event with Harvard Universiry, entitled, “Seminar at the U.S. Department of the Treasury: Islamic Finance 101.” The event’s purpose was to encourage the implementation and provision of Islamic-compliant financial services, in direct violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Kashkari not only hosted the event, but he delivered the “Welcome.” Why did he host and speak at this event if he is anything other than for Shariah finance? And why didn’t he host a Christian or Jewish finance event? Or why not a Wiccan-compliant finance event? Or, heck, a Satanist Bitcoin one? This was the only religion-related event he hosted, because Islam was the only religion the U.S. Treasury was promoting (which is still the case). It was the only religion he pimped. And he should answer for that, no matter what FOX News or Jihad Darrell tell you.

And to prove that what he did–promoting Islamic law in America as a U.S. official–is so noxious, Kashkari’s friends at HAMAS CAIR–the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which even the Obama Justice Department says is an unindicted co-conspirator in HAMAS terrorism–is up in arms that Donnelly mentioned this. Because “thou shalt not speak ill of Shariah” in CAIR’s view. Yes, CAIR–whose officials openly said they want the Koran to replace the Constitution. That’s who’s siding with Kashkari and deems him a halal Republican. And Jihad Darrell a/k/a Darell Issa, a known longtime supporter of Islamic terrorists who kill Americans, including Hezbollah and Arafat. You know what they say about “the company you keep.” This is the company Neel Shariah-complaint Kashkari keeps. Would you vote for him? I wouldn’t.

It is doubtful any Republican will ever again become Governor of California, now that illegal aliens have taken over and their anchor babies dominate the electorate (a sure sign of things to come across America if and when amnesty is implemented). But, still, do you want the shariah-compliant, Romney-preferred, JebBushian, Jihad Darrell candidate–Neel Kashkari–to get this nomination and know that his support of shariah finance in America will go unpunished?

Or should voters finally send the GOP a telegram letting ‘em know: we will not support organized Muslim attempts to take over our country and get rid of the very basic Constitutional rights, like the separation of mosque and state, that we hold dear and which are essential to our continuing freedom?

And why isn’t anyone calling Jeb Bush–who wants to be Prez–to the mat on this? Is his support for a Shariah pimp not a big deal?

Anyone who thinks it isn’t a big deal, clearly doesn’t think freedom and Western civilization are a big deal either. Because they are willing to give both of those away, just as Neel Kashkari, as a member of the United States executive branch, demonstrated he was willing to give those away.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

37 Responses

RINOs are running scared since Obama’s blackness trumped anything and everything as people not only ignored his criminal acts, subversive secrets, ineligibility, overt hatred and avowed promise to “fundamentally..”, but actually voted for him twice.

They see it as their only chance of survival is to run minority candidates.

DS_ROCKS! on May 14, 2014 at 3:53 pm

Yes, they’re not serious about Benghazi. They deliberately flit from issue to issue –Benghazi for a while, IRS abuses for a while, Mexican gun running for a while, but never stick with anything. They state that the ‘new issue’ whatever it is, is now more important, so they wind up bleating about issue after issue, drop the issue, move on to something else, and of course, impose no serious accountability on the Administration.

Little Al on May 14, 2014 at 4:19 pm

    I don’t think the RINOs are responsible for your channel surfing habits Al. The coverage may “flit” and obviously some events are more high profile than others but Benghazi has been ongoing for about 2 years now.

    Frankz on May 14, 2014 at 4:38 pm

      They’re not my channel surfing habits (whatever those are). They are, indeed, those of the Republicans.

      Their ‘concern’ about Benghazi has been episodic, inconsistent, and disjointed, interrupted by whatever ‘hot-button’ issue may arise.

      And even more fundamentally, as I’ve said here before, Benghazi is a substitute for a Republican inquiry over the entire Arab Spring policy of the Democrats. Republicans have never questioned the whole basis of the Democrats’ Arab Spring policy, mainly because they agree with it. A little bit of sparring over Egypt, then, let’s flit over to Syria, then maybe Benghazi — but never questioning aid to the Palestinian terrorists, or a fundamental challenge to the Administration’s anti-Israel policy.

      And Iran? Just a little bleating about this sanction or that sanction. A sustained campaign by the Republicans to militarily stop Iran’s progress towards nuclear capability? Dream on.

      So Benghazi bleating, such as it is, is at best a surrogate for more fundamental issues.

      And, by the way, I don’t know what a RINO is. The so-called RINOs are, indeed, Republicans, not just in name only. This is what the Republicans are today. Maybe we could more accurately say that the Republican Party is a separate, distinct political party in name only.

      Little Al on May 14, 2014 at 5:00 pm

      But, upon reflection, maybe you are right about my channel surfing preventing me from seeing the light on the Republicans’ efforts on Benghazi. So I stopped my channel surfing long enough to think about this issue, and, I have to admit, I underestimated the Republicans.

      After all, it only took two years for their Select (sic!!!) Committee to start functioning. I am sure within a decade or two we will have a report, or maybe an explanation that because, woefully, the shameful Democrats did not cooperate.

      Little Al on May 14, 2014 at 5:55 pm

        Oops. Looks like I got so caught up in channel surfing that I didn’t adequately proofread my 5:55 entry. I’ll try to concentrate better next time.

        Little Al on May 14, 2014 at 6:13 pm

    You are of course right that RINOs are not really serious about anything besides bi-partisan initiatives though.

    Frankz on May 14, 2014 at 4:52 pm

      And, oh, er, um, I forgot — the Republicans’ serious multi-year campaign to reduce Government spending. How could I have forgotten the Republican’s serious, heartfelt drive towards fiscal austerity on both the local and national levels?

      Little Al on May 14, 2014 at 5:12 pm

        If you want to know how to find a RINO then as I mentioned the rule of thumb is to look for an exaggerated interest in bi-partisan initiatives.
        There is no RINO that doesn’t have that as his bottom line.

        Frankz on May 15, 2014 at 7:16 am

          Folks looking for bipartisan compromise aren’t RINOS — they’re R’s.

          Little Al on May 15, 2014 at 8:41 am

        The Republicans are only serious in comparison with the Dems as far as reducing government spending goes.

        Frankz on May 15, 2014 at 7:29 am

        The rest of your criticisms are standard media banter.

        Frankz on May 15, 2014 at 7:33 am

          What a substantive reply!

          Little Al on May 15, 2014 at 8:42 am

Darrell Issa was a grandstander before Benghazi and he’ll still be one afterwards.
Personally I don’t care, it’s got Jon Stewart running interference making jokes for the dopes and that makes me smile.
FOX has plenty of questionable coverage these days but hey at least they still have coverage of sorts.

The Sharia finance stuff is disgusting but not really surprising.

Frankz on May 14, 2014 at 4:48 pm

I would sit at home and let a Democrat take office rather than assist dhimmi Republicans who have so little regard for their own country.

Worry on May 14, 2014 at 4:59 pm

CAIR: Remove ‘Islamist Extremism,’ ‘Jihadism’ From 9/11 Museum Video

sal on May 14, 2014 at 5:55 pm

It’s California so what do you expect? Nothing more to see here…move on.

IceNoMore on May 14, 2014 at 6:11 pm

Issa is forever just-a Woopin & a Whompin, and a wailing and a whoopin. (That was a #6 from Blazing Saddles if anyone remembers). He is forever positioned in the middle of the shit slinging ring, but I never see anything really being done. Like a referee in professional wrestling. He is there all right, but what the hell good is he doing?

#1 VATO on May 14, 2014 at 8:56 pm

    “Work, work, work…”

    nadie on May 16, 2014 at 10:01 am

Does this idiot not know that the vile cretin Arafat was notorious for RAPING BOYS?

Admiring this pig’s “small hands” may be a euphemism for something else in Darrell’s mind.

Pathetic loser.

Nonbeliever on May 14, 2014 at 8:59 pm

Hey all…

Can I get in on this circlejerk…?

Or is it an invitation-only club…?

Liz Katz on May 15, 2014 at 2:31 am

    Only if you’re a radical leftist lesbian self hating Jew.

    Frankz on May 15, 2014 at 7:31 am

@Liz Katz

SPEAK !………

HK on May 15, 2014 at 8:34 am

bread and circuses

General P. Malaise on May 15, 2014 at 10:06 am

This guy is a Goldman Sachs alumni and was heavily involved in the TARP taxpayer-save wealthy investment bankers billions asses-giveaway.

David on May 15, 2014 at 10:31 am

Is it just me, or does this guy look exactly like Raza, the terrorist leader from the Iron Man movie?

Sean M on May 15, 2014 at 11:09 am

You can add Pete Wilson to the defenders of Kashkari.

FriscoKid on May 15, 2014 at 12:42 pm

Neel Kashkari was a former Goldman Sachs Golden Boy who left to join the Treasury Department, where he was responsible for overseeing $700 billion in bailouts to his former employer and other Wall Street firms. In short, he is the perfect person to lead lessions in Islamic Finance 101.

However, to save everyone time, I will articulate the basic principle of Islamic Finance 101:

Steal money from the Infidels (i.e., the public at large) and give the money to friends and cronies.

Pretty simple, huh? Once you learn that basic principle, all the rest is just supporting detail.

Ralph Adamo on May 15, 2014 at 3:39 pm

I do not know why CAIR,wants sharia law for the entire earth.Next the earth will be like the middle east with wars,car bombs,etc,etc..going off all the time. If Islam groups feel another Islam group insulted Muhammad,than they will have an all out war for what they said or think they said..Some Pastors in Houston claim the reason for violence in Syria has nothing to do with Islam or muslims at all. They claim the real reason for so much violence is all due to climate change.They now attach climate change for why countries in the middle east be as they are.As climate change continues make harsher and harsher conditions on earth more wars will break out,more violence shall soon come to be.. They speak like Islam is wonderful-climate change is bad.

Steve on May 15, 2014 at 4:26 pm

Helped any more Islamic rapists into the country lately? Sluttsel.

Nocturna on May 15, 2014 at 5:15 pm

    Is there any other kind of Islamist Noctanal?

    Frankz on May 16, 2014 at 6:48 am

That man has no chance of winning in California.

Worry on May 16, 2014 at 3:13 am

OT Deb –

what’s up wish the Detroit Fez?:

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140515/METRO01/305150039

Nick Fury on May 16, 2014 at 1:31 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field