January 28, 2015, - 6:33 pm

Remembering the REAL King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, Extremist Extraordinaire

By Debbie Schlussel

I would say it’s hilarious the way the late Saudi King Abdullah is being eulogized. But it’s not funny. It’s sad and disgusting. That’s because the truth of it all is the exact opposite. And because Americans–especially the news media, including FOX News–have a short memory. Here’s what I remember about King Abdullah, which apparently everyone else forgot.

bushkissesabdullahobamabowkingabdullah

kingabdulllahhitler2

I remember the King Abdullah whose most treasured possession was a dagger given by Adolf Hitler to the Saudis as a token of Jew-killing.

I remember when then-Crown-Prince Abdullah visited then-President George W. Bush at his Crawford, Texas ranch in April 2005. At the time, Abdullah was already the de facto Saudi King, as his half-bro, King Fahd, was unable to function and near death as a result of a stroke. As you may recall, Abdullah insisted that no women be in the air traffic control tower OR on the tarmac at the small Waco, Texas airport. This is the guy who is so orthodox in his Islamic views that no females were allowed to be present. And, in a stark violation of U.S. civil rights laws, President Bush and his minions complied. And Bush smooched him like they were lovers at a “Frankie Goes to Hollywood” reunion concert.







I also remember that, despite their aversion to women in any position of authority or security at the Waco airport, Abdullah’s Saudi posse holed up at the Mansion on Turtle Creek, the Hotel Crescent Court, and the Four Seasons Hotel, where, as the stories go, they liquored it up and went to strip clubs–you know, where women were taking it all (or most of it) off. Shocker: these Muslims were (and are) hypocrites.

I remember that Abdullah headed Saudi Arabia when they had Imad Mughniyeh, the mastermind of Hezbollah’s terrorist operations, in his country and did nothing to capture and turn him over to the West to face justice. Mughniyeh masterminded many terrorist attacks on Americans, including the bombing of the U.S. Marines barracks and Embassy in Beirut in which over 300 were murdered; the torture murders of Navy diver Robert Dean Stethem, CIA Station Chief William Buckley, and Col. Rich Higgins; and many other murderous operations against Americans. King Abdullah let Mughniyeh go . . . so that he could plan further operations, and the Saudis did this despite American appeals to turn Mughniyeh over for trial. The Saudis refused. And this went against Abdullah’s professed Sunni war against Shi’ite Iran, as Shi’ite Mughniyeh was Iran’s chief terrorist in the Middle East at the time. (Mughniyeh was later killed in a car bomb reportedly done by the Mossad. Israel always has to do clean up on Aisle 8–which is every aisle of the Middle East.)

I remember when King Abdullah secured tens of thousands of Saudi-sponsored student visas from President Bush, with Saudi students now making up over 100,000 of the U.S. population at any one time. A number of them have been involved in terrorist operations for Al-Qaeda and Al-Qaeda related organizations. And when they’ve been convicted of crimes, as Homaidan Al-Turki was for raping and torturing his Asian Muslim maid (he was also under FBI investigation for terrorist recruiting), the Saudis demanded we apologize to them. Yes, King Abdullah’s Saudis. In fact, Colorado’s then-Attorney-General flew to the Kingdom to apologize to King Abdullah for the conviction.

We needed King Abdullah as a cold ally because of the oil–and more importantly, the assets–the Saudis control in America. They own large chunks of American businesses and have a lot of cash in our banks. If they withdrew large segments of those funds and investments, it could crash the U.S. economy. Plus we needed Abdullah’s pass-fake on fighting extremists in his country. He, like his predecessors, with a nod and a wink, pretended to fight extremists on his soil, even as his minions, including his relative and Ambassador to the U.S., Prince Bandar, had his wife, Princess Haifa Al-Faisal, previously paying the 9/11 hijackers’ rent and expenses.

But we need the Saudi monarchs in power because if they fall, the Al-Qaeda and ISIS factions they pretend to oppose, will take over. And that is partly why they throw bones to these extremists. The majority of Saudis on the street are Bin Ladenists and ISIS-lovers at heart.

So, while we need the stability and order of the Saudi royals, that doesn’t mean we need to pretend they are saints. We need to recognize who they really are.

And that starts with King Abdullah. He may be six feet under. But, sadly, his memory in the public statements of the Obamaniks and mainstream media, including FOX News, goes well beyond lip service, and far too deep into the anal cavity.

King Abdullah was an enabler of terrorists, even as we pretend that he helped America fight them. And he had a personal love affair with the same extremism terrorists embrace. Just as ISIS wants women as baby incubators and cooks, Abdullah wanted them off the tarmac and grounds of the Waco airport and on the stripper poles of Texas. And, in contrast to his image as a bulwark against extremism, he was a guy who loved reminders of Hitler’s Holocaust.

That’s who King Abdullah was. Got that?

King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia . . . now enjoying his 72 Helen Thomases.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly, PDF & Email




Tags: , ,


25 Responses

Debbie, I disagree that we need the Fahds, Abdullahs, Salmans or other members of the Saudi royal family in power. As you point out, their ‘opposition’ to al Qaeda or ISIS or any other Jihadi group is just a charade.

I’m fine w/ letting these Jihadis take over Riyadh – it’s not like that country ain’t an Islamic shithole already. Just turn off all the immigration of their people to the US, and boot out any of their people here who violate any law – like Homaidan Al-Turki or the many like him. I mean, in what way would living in Riyadh be much different from living in Raqqa?

Oh, and one more thing – the next time these Jihadis even try any terror operation against the US – regardless of whether it succeeds or not, regardless of whether it’s an actual act of violence or a money transfer to Hamas/____ (fill in your favorite Jihad group) – use it as a pretext to declare war on Jihadi Arabia, and level their oilfields. Once they can’t sell oil, their money will dry up overnight: it’s not like they can sell anything else. Once that happens, and they’re not allowed to move out of their country, they can become another Syria, and stop funding Jihad worldwide.

We just need to disabuse ourselves of the notion that they have to be allowed to come here.

Infidel on January 28, 2015 at 7:41 pm

I liked when Obola shook-bowed to him. Ol’ king Petrol was laughing at him.

DS_ROCKS! on January 28, 2015 at 8:14 pm

Saudi Arabia and King Abdullah were happy to harbor and encourage terrorists as long as they did not threaten the regime. Despite the plaudits, Abdullah was an extreme misogynist, as noted by Debbie. This now deceased monarch imbibed the ideology of ISIS(iSLAM)until he drew his last breath. There was nothing progressive or reformist about him. Abdullah was a power hungry old man who held on the the reins of power long after he had become simply a husk of a man.

Worry on January 28, 2015 at 8:24 pm

Great article about the king in the Jerusalem Post:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/How-did-Saudi-King-Abdullah-become-a-world-hero-388919

FBS on January 28, 2015 at 8:54 pm

A Death of a Loathsome subhuman vermin. Islam Delenda Est.

Occam's Tool on January 28, 2015 at 9:13 pm

    “Islam is to be destroyed.”

    PhillipGaley on January 29, 2015 at 3:03 pm

King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia–R.I.H.

JeffE on January 28, 2015 at 11:26 pm

Screw the sand-dwelling Saudis.

Soddy on January 28, 2015 at 11:47 pm

Of the nineteen hijackers who attacked this nation on September 11, 2001, fifteen were Saudi Arabian. In fact, they are just the tip of the iceberg. In the years since September 11, a growing body of evidence has emerged illuminating the central role Saudi nationals have played in the rise of Al Qaeda and its terrorist attacks against the United States.

A Second Look at the Saudis
http://www.asecondlookatthesaudis.com/

Peter on January 29, 2015 at 1:23 am

    Not only is that correct but I am gonna share something that always bugs me (even though I include myself as guilty as well…)…nobody can name them…any of them, let alone all of them…other than Mohammed Atta.

    I can never remember their names. I always forget them. I need to memorize them and learn them once and for all.

    I know DS knows ’em all. She is the exception, but including myself…shame on us for NOT knowing ALL of their names!

    Skunky on January 29, 2015 at 11:14 am

Fox News lionized King Abdullah as a great reformer, while almost simultaneously reporting upon some poor blogger being flogged.

Worry on January 29, 2015 at 2:44 am

The Department of Defense, on the orders of chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Jack Dempsey, has started an essay competition to “honor King Abdullah.”

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=128034

The Pentagon contest will be hosted by National Defense University and the press release for the contest notes King Abdullah’s support of the US-Saudi alliance and calls the the king “a man of remarkable courage” highlighting his service as a royal commander of the Saudi national guard before becoming king.

Apparently it was not enough that Kerry showed obnoxious reverence for Abdullah, now he must be honored by the US military which has had its service members killed by insurgents from and funded by Saudi Arabia during Abdullah’s reign.

Obama praised Abdullah “as a force for stability and security in the Middle East and beyond.” Many analysts have accused Abdullah of turning the uprising in Syria into a proxy war with Iran. In 2010, WikiLeaks published U.S. diplomatic cables which identified Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest source of funds for Islamist militant groups.

Recently Saudi Arabia has come under criticism for its treatment of imprisoned blogger Raif Badawi, who was sentenced to 10 years in prison and 1,000 lashes to be carried out at a rate of 50 per week for charges including insulting Islam.

Such hypocrisy from Obama (sending a delegation of 20 people for his funeral) and our government.

Nancy Brenner on January 29, 2015 at 10:30 am

Worry, the blogger being flogged was someone who dared criticize Islam. Well, had he lived in Paris, or anywhere else in the West, he’d have been killed by Jihadi vigilantes.

Obama – one just can’t make this stuff up. A day before he went to Riyadh, he was in India, lecturing his hosts there on religious tolerance. Something that is not wanting in India – nobody is persecuted for their religious beliefs there, and just a clarion call by some Hindus to reconvert Muslims back to Hinduism is what has Leftists riled.

But following that, Obama goes to Sowdi Barbaria, and not a word from him about religious tolerance: a blogger who wrote against Islam is in hospital waiting for recovery until he is re-flogged his full sentences.

So Hindus trying to convert Muslims – problem. A Muslim regime flogging someone for writing against Islam – no problem at all.

Infidel on January 29, 2015 at 10:45 am

I noticed the “Wookie” wouldn’t wear a hijab in Jew-hating Saudi Arabia…but instead of saying ‘good on her” like many so-called “Conservative” dopes, it makes me sick because when she is doing it, she is doing it just for HERSELF…she don’t give a toss about any other female forced to wear such a disgusting and hypocritical thing. I do not think she loves Islam as much as her sociopathic husband does but she, like most elitist potentates, is ONLY making a statement for herself…if left up to her she WOULD make sure all other females would have to comply to the nonsensical covering up Mooooooooooslims force female to do. She is indeed a political dominatrix and her whole “public” persona is a fraud. Many of us see thru’ that thou’.

Great column. What a depressing truth. It really puts in to perspective how far USA has fallen, the many years (and political parties & politicians) it has taken to get here and just how far bent over we are.

THIS is the real illustration of what can happen when all the wrong people take over and institute their poison. The natural state of humans on this earth is not love, peace and kindness as the dupe hippies like to spew but tyranny, oppression and dirty tricks and deeds. It’s good to be King!

Skunky on January 29, 2015 at 11:08 am

    Michelle Obama would never make a real statement. She just likes to flaunt her own freedom, rather like an out of control brat who knows that no one will step in to stop things. This freedom is not meant for others.

    Worry on January 29, 2015 at 11:39 am

    Skunky,
    I was thinking abut this and since Obama’s going big in Iran maybe they’re really not so worried about putting on a show for the Saudis maybe.
    Iran has nukes. Saudi’s don’t yet. Obama and McCain aren’t good for much of anything but they do like to use America’s state apparutus to lean on people. That’s about all they’re good for. Better hope they don’t lean to far one day but it won’t be them picking up the tab.

    japple on January 29, 2015 at 3:12 pm

    Careful what you say about the Mooch Skunky. Remember what Han Solo said about upsetting wookies…lol!

    Ken B on January 29, 2015 at 6:25 pm

      LOLOL Ken B! I DO know what Han Solo said! I was an avid Star Wars geek as a kid & I remember all that good stuff! 😀

      Skunky on January 29, 2015 at 7:44 pm

It’s sad when this site is painting a more accurate picture than mainstream media…

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/01/24/saud-j24.html

Vivian on January 29, 2015 at 1:18 pm

Our Muslim president pays homage to a dead Muslim.

Politically Islamically correct.

Although, it is great you pointed out the hypocrisy of the Saudi King.

The wookie bitch goes along because she hates this country and does not like being in the White House.

For both of them, who the dead King was and what the dead King did is irrevant.

Panhandle on January 29, 2015 at 1:49 pm

Well you know Bush right?

japple on January 29, 2015 at 2:57 pm

(it won’t post)

japple on January 29, 2015 at 3:02 pm

I disagree with the notion that the US “needs” the Saudi “Royals.”

For example, there was really much more benefit in keeping Saddam Hussein in power in Iraq to keep Islamoterrorism in check. Instead, George H.W. Bush and the US Military RESCUED the Saudis, thereby HELPING the cause of Islamoterrorism. What they should have done was let Saddam Hussein invade Saudi Arabia and wipe the Royal Family out. Then, after they were gone, step in to expel the Iraqis.

Today, the US has another golden opportunity that will be wasted, and the US Government will do precisely the wrong thing again. Right now, there is a glut of oil relative to demand, and oil and gas prices have dropped, as everybody knows. The Saudis are maintaining or increasing their market share by letting prices drop, thereby putting the crunch on US producers, threatening the pathway of US energy independence. Obama and Congress are doing nothing about this, thereby helping to strengthen the Saudi oil industry and weaken the American oil industry.

So what SHOULD the US do under these circumstances. The US Government–if they really cared about Americans and the World economy–would RAISE THE STAKES for the Saudis, putting the crunch on THEM.

How? There are many ways. The US Government could subsidize US producers, thereby encouraging them to bring even greater supplies of oil to the market, dropping the profits of the Saudis lower and lower. The US Government had no problem subsidizing the banking industry after their gambling sprees didn’t pay off, creating the financial crisis of 2008, so why not subsidize something that BENEFITS Americans for a change? Additional pressure could be put on the Saudis by ordering the cut off of all financial aid to all Islamic nations and by increasing military and financial aid to Israel. And finally, no weapons of any kind should be sold to the Saudis, so as to make them as vulnerable as possible.

Of course, none of this is going to happen. The US Government’s policy has always been to do the wrong things when it comes to the Saudis.

Ralph Adamo on January 30, 2015 at 2:32 am

Great post as always Debbie. You’re right the Saudi royal family in general and King Abdullah in particular are/were nothing but a bunch of hypocritical Muslim ragbags. They practice their strict form of Islam (case in point as far as their treatment of their women) but yet they come to the U.S. and party like it’s 1999. Strippers gotta eat too right? They talk a good game about helping us with our war on terror but give and wink and a nod to groups like Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah. Heck most of the 9-11 hijackers came from their carphole country. Your pictures remind us how our past and current presidents have played kissy face and threw their backs out bowing to the now dead King. The only reason why Saudi Arabia isn’t a glass parking lot is because of oil and their money. Heck the dopey conservatives lauding the dead king seem to forget that his nephew Al-Waleed bin Talal owns
a big part of News Corp which owns Fox News. It’s also fun to listen to dopey libtards try to say that Odumbo is responsible for the cheap gas prices. That’s like when they were saying that SUVs and not the drivers were causing all of the accidents a few years ago. The only reason for cheap gas is that the Saudis are sticking it to that commie Putin and they are trying to hamper our own energy efforts. Much like Obowma has been doing for the last 6 years. We can continue to see the new Saudi king being sucked up to by Obama with his angry wookie in tow. It to was also funny to see Chewie being ignored by the Saudis as they shook our deflated pResident’s hand. As far as her not wearing a scarf/burka whatever she shouldn’t just put the full mask over her head. The optics for the White House would’ve been better…LOL.

Ken B on January 30, 2015 at 12:53 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field