September 22, 2009, - 6:28 pm

Two Minority Ex-Coaches–Both Caught Faking Race Hate-Crimes

By Debbie Schlussel

And this year’s Tawana Brawley/Al Sharpton Hate-Crime Fakers of the Year Award goes to . . . .  Well, it’s a tie between Jose Jefferson and James Clay.  Both were former sports coaches who were very, um, “creative.”

blackwhitemask.jpg

The first dude, Jefferson, had the nerve to fake the hate-crime after he was the beneficiary of affirmative action employment.  Chutzpah.

A former football coach was sentenced Tuesday morning to a year in jail for making racially charged threats to employees at Ameritas, where he worked. . . .

An anonymous letter showed up on Jefferson’s desk at Ameritas, where he was working as a licensed insurance broker. When he tried to find out who sent it, [his] attorney [David Watermeier] said, he was rebuked.

Watermeier said co-workers resented that Jefferson had been hired through a friend and considered him less qualified.

Jefferson now accepts responsibility for writing two anonymous letters in response that anonymously threatened death to all blacks and said one who worked there would be killed on a date in February.

Ameritas gave black employees the option of not coming to work for two days, police said.

In March, police arrested Jefferson and Christina Donald, who has admitted helping Jefferson write the letters. She is awaiting sentencing.

I hate to sound like a liberal in saying that I feel partially sorry for this guy because he has two sons with cerebral palsy.  But I do.  Still, faking racist death threats is inexcusable.  And the way you show co-workers that you deserved your job is by working hard and doing it well, not faking racist death threats so you look like a victim.

If I were the judge, I’d probably have sentenced him to a year of community service to victims of Black-on-White racism and/or crimes.  But I note that a White guy in his shoes–faking/making death threats–would have been thrown in the slammer, like he will be.

Far worse, though, is the case of James Clay, who deserves every day of his sentence:

A former high school basketball coach in Ohio has been sentenced to four years in prison for setting fire to his home, which prosecutors said he had done to portray himself as the victim of a hate crime.

Authorities who responded to the fire at James Clay’s house in Troy found a spray-painted racial slur on his car.

The 2007 fire came days after Clay, who is black, was charged with sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl.

At a sentencing hearing Monday, Judge Robert Lindeman told Clay that the community was the real victim.

The 42-year-old Clay was convicted Sept. 3 of aggravated arson. The four-year prison sentence will be added to a five-year term he is serving for sexual battery.

Two men who cried “wolf.”

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

19 Responses

It demeans and injures victims of real racism when people concoct fake racism in order to bring attention to themselves. And not in a good way.

Good riddance!

NormanF on September 22, 2009 at 7:07 pm

I wonder how long it will take the Odopey administration to make protesting him a hate crime?

Jarhead on September 22, 2009 at 8:55 pm

We just oughts to LYNCH DEM NIGROES for lying…right Miz Dayzee?

EminemsRevenge on September 22, 2009 at 9:39 pm

We just oughts to LYNCH DEM NIGROES for lying…right Miz Dayzee?

Deleted on September 22, 2009 at 9:51 pm

This hate crime bully actually claimed that he was a victim of the hate from his neighbors…..Hmmm…this sounds familiar. Where did I hear this before?

Self Hating Black on September 22, 2009 at 11:22 pm

Debbie, I just loved the way you use to blow a hole in the lone wolf theories of all the Muslims (would be terrorists acts), including groups and individuals.
The equation always equals Muslims!, if it quacks like a duck?
I miss those kinds of observations you made!, for as you know!, more and more of these clowns will be coming out of the woodwork!

bruce converse on September 23, 2009 at 12:08 am

OK, so now that criticizing blacks in society will be against the law soon because Obama cant be criticized without you being called a racist. I am glad I voted for Alan Keyes. Every time some fool calls me a racist if I trash Obama, I tell them “I voted for a Black President, his name is Alan Keyes.” Remember Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton were called racists. Geraldine Ferraro, too. LOL!! Granted there are examples of racist critics. That is something the GOP should explain. There will always be racists, however legitimate criticisms can occur without silencing all opposition. When the leaders can’t explain that the liberal drumbeat floods the discussion.

Oh sh*t, Condaleeza Rice said we would be attacked if we pull out of Afghanistan. Now how is the MSM and liberals gonna spin that comment to be racist? And if Jimmy Carter said all criticisms are racist then what explains Jimmy’s sh*tty presidency?

These incidents only show the power of racial victimization. Both knew there was benefit to being on the victim side of a hate crime, but they got caught. They didn’t cry wolf, they cried something more powerful hate victim.

CaliforniaScreaming on September 23, 2009 at 12:10 am

    You voted for Alan Keyes? Woohahaha. No, you are not A racist. You just can’t even tell black from white.

    Color Blind on September 23, 2009 at 12:52 am

The number one example of abusive use of hate crime victim is probably Clarence Thomas. He accused the Senate of “high tech lynching” when the senators asked him about the sexual harassment accusation. That pretty much shut everyone up.

He is now sitting on the Supreme Court representing the the highest law and order for this country.

Thomas on September 23, 2009 at 1:03 am

    Have you even thought of being remotely accurate in what you post? Anita Hill and her entourage had more than ample time to make their case, and failed to do so during Senate hearings held at the time. In fact, Ms. Hill was quite happy to follow Mr. Thomas from one position to another during his time in the Reagan Administration, rather than file a civil service or criminal complaint against Mr. Thomas. Mr. Hill was a law school graduate and attorney, and not a lowly clerical.

    Sorrow01 on September 23, 2009 at 1:30 am

Sorrow1. The argument you made is the same argument by which the male senators gave Thomas the benefit of the doubt. The senate has tremendous pressure to confirm the the first black supreme court justice unless there is overwhelming proof of wrong doings. As we all know, there was only “He said” and “She said” arguments in the FBI report. The final vote was 52-48. Among the 52 yea votes, many were conservative GOPs who cared more about Thomas’ conservative legal view and democrats who were concerned about political black slash if they voted against him.
But if you put the known facts into perspective, reasonable people can see reasonable cause why Anita Hill was reluctant to come forward at the time the alleged incident occurred.

At the time Anita Hill worked for Clarence Thomas, she was 25-26. Smart as she might be, she essentially was socially inexperienced simple person from a small town of Oklahoma. Her race and gender might have helped her to get into Yale and land a good paying job in DC. But it did not help to build her own confidence.

The year was 1981 when Clarence Thomas allegedly started the sexual overture on her. Thomas not only was her boss, he was one of the few fast rising blacks in the bureaucracy and he always carried himself in a very authoritative way. To an inexperience black young woman coming from a southern rural town, Thomas was a very intimidating figure. However as a lawyer, she also fully realized that there was no chance she could prove in the court that Thomas violated the law. After all she was not raped. The most likely result of her complaint would be that she got transferred to an unknown position and it would be a career ender for her in Washington. She would also greatly disappointed her family and hometown people who regarded her as a prodigy since young age.

Weighing her own future and the expectation from her family, she resisted but decided to stay put. In her own word, she said that she subsequently went to EEOC with Thomas because civil right was the area she was interested in and the sexual harassment from Thomas appeared had stopped. In less than a year, she found a faculty position and left the government.

If there were 50% of female senators, Thomas did not have chance as female could probably relate to the indecisiveness to to lack of self confidence. To those macho male politicians, they could not figure out why women could not fight back or just leave when they were abused.

Thomas on September 23, 2009 at 6:57 am

    I read your response, and it did not contain anything other than Anita Hill’s allegations. Also, your veiled affirmative action slam against her was really pretty amazing:”Her race and gender might have helped her to get into Yale and land a good paying job in DC.” It is a racist and sexist remark. Finally, it is unlikely that a Yale Law School graduate would have trouble finding any employment, unless they were academically at the bottom of the barrel.

    Sorrow01 on September 23, 2009 at 10:52 pm

[Thomas-The senate has tremendous pressure to confirm the the first black supreme court justice unless there is overwhelming proof of wrong doings.]

Who was Thurgood Marshall, you know the guy whose resignation from the court opened up the seat Thomas was nominated for?

I_AM_ME on September 23, 2009 at 8:03 am

Idiots like this are the kind that give White Nationalists all the ammo they need.

It’s a sick thing. But it does happen. Kinda like the dope wrote that fake Book about surviving the Holocaust. Just gives ammo to the haters.

-Pat

Patrick on September 23, 2009 at 8:16 am

Let’s think about this, a fake hate crime while Odopey is campaigning for President. Coincidence?

Jarhead on September 23, 2009 at 11:11 am

People talked about “reverse discrimination” a lot recently. Then we can’t forget about “reverse hate crimes.” I hope yall still remember Ashley Todd. Although it turned to be a comedy, she could have easily turned on some hot blooded whites if she had done it right.

If you don’t remember the name, you should remember her face.

http://current.com/items/89445757_ashley-todd-fake-mutilation-exposed.htm

Color Blind on September 23, 2009 at 12:58 pm



People seem to be angry at fake hate
crimes for good reason. The people doing fake hate crime are trying to
manipulate our sympathy.  But fake hate crimes are being staged by people
of all races, black, white, and yes, Jews too.Here is a one from last
year: “Freshman who reported swastikas drew them as
well”
 If you are only angry at blacks who made up hate crimes
but not whites or Jews, then you are not really unbiased.

Color Blind on September 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm

People seem to be angry at fake hate crimes for good reason. The people doing fake hate crime are trying to manipulate our sympathy. But fake hate crimes are being staged by people of all races, black, white, and yes, Jews too.

Here is a one from last year: “Freshman who reported swastikas drew them as well” (http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2007/11/05/News/Freshman.Who.Reported.Swastikas.Drew.Them.As.Well-3079332.shtml) If you are only angry at blacks who made up hate crimes but not whites or Jews, then you are not really unbiased.

Color Blind on September 23, 2009 at 2:15 pm

You knew this was coming Debbie. Two tiered raced based discipline. In Arizona if you are Black/Hispanic/Mexican you will be disciplined differently than White counterparts. More lenient to minorities. The race card victimization never ends.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/viewpoints/articles/2009/09/19/20090919maceachern0920.html

CaliforniaScreaming on September 23, 2009 at 6:22 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field