By Debbie Schlussel
The number of infiltrations this Talal Chahine/Elfat El-Aouar/Nada Nadim Prouty Hezbollah ring perpetrated–because our top intelligence and counterterrorism agencies don’t do their jobs–is getting so large and so sad, it’s comical.
I’ve already told you that Hezbollah’s FBI/CIA Agent mole, Nada Nadim Prouty‘s sister Elfat El-Aouar, is married to Hezbollah financier and fugitive Talal Chahine (and that she helped her hubby launder the $20 mill to Hezbollah). And I told you that another sister of Prouty’s, Rula Nadim Al-Aouar, a gynecologist, also defrauded immigration and engaged in a sham marriage. And I told you that Nada Nadim Prouty’s cousin, Nidal Al-Aouar, is a well-known Lebanese pan-Syrian terrorist. And I told you about Nada Nadim Prouty’s sham husband, Chris Deladurantaye, and how his current wife was claiming he was just an “innocent” lawbreaker who needed the money and never got paid, nor saw Prouty after that initial marriage. I also said I heard there was another sister.

Nada Nadim Prouty:
Hezbollah’s Illegal Alien FBI/CIA Agent Is Part of Larger Ring
And it looks like there is another Lebanese scamster in the extended family, a former sister-in-law . . . who married another Deladurantaye brother in yet another sham marriage. In today’s New York Post, Jeane MacIntosh reports:

The illegal immigrant with Hezbollah ties who faked a marriage to get U.S. citizenship, and then landed jobs as a top-level federal agent, has a former sister-in-law who pulled the same scam and is now a Marine officer, The Post has learned.
Commissioned Officer Samar Khalil Nabbou Spinelli married the brother of the sham first husband of disgraced former FBI and covert-ops CIA agent Nada Prouty, according to a tangled trail of public records.
The Lebanese women, who came to the United States on nonimmigrant visas, wed Michigan brothers Christopher and Jean Paul Deladurantaye in 1990, records show.
Prouty, who pleaded guilty last week to conspiracy and immigration-fraud charges, admitted in Detroit federal court that she never lived with or consummated her relationship with Chris Deladurantaye, and married him just to obtain citizenship.
A source close to the brothers told The Post both men agreed to the deal.
Spinelli and Prouty lived with Prouty’s sister, Elfat El Aouar, during the time they claimed to be married, while their husbands lived elsewhere, according to public records.
Records show once their naturalization was finalized, the women filed for divorce – and went on to federal jobs. . . .
Spinelli enlisted in the Marine in 1990 and rose to the rank of commissioned officer, which required US citizenship.
Nada Prouty used Spinelli, who is now remarried to a Marine, as a reference when she applied for an FBI job in 1997. . . .
Spinelli – along with Nada Prouty’s sister and her Hezbollah-connected husband, Talil Kahil Chahine – was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the feds’ case against Nada Prouty.
She’s the only named co-conspirator who is a military officer. [DS: The only? Well, thank Heavens for small favors.]
As part of her plea, Nada Prouty admitted she conspired with the others to defraud the government of the “valuable benefits of citizenship,” including government jobs, security clearances and “U.S. military commissions.”
Newsweek reported that as part of her plea, she’ll have to answer questions about her sister and brother-in-law while wired to a lie-detector machine.
Spinelli, now stationed in Japan, could not be reached for comment.

Gee, that’s a shocker.
Like I said in another post on Chris Deladurantaye, as long as American spouses who participate in sham marriages aren’t prosecuted–and they almost never are–they will continue to do so.
These two brothers conspired to sell out their country. Whether they meant to or not, they knew they were helping two Lebanese Arabs defraud the U.S.
And they must be punished. The brothers should be tried for conspiracy to commit immigration fraud, etc. But, sadly, they won’t be.

By Debbie Schlussel
For the first time since 1974, the U.S. won baseball’s World Cup. And to put the whip cream and cherry on top, we also ended Cuba’s winning streak of nine straight titles. The U.S. beat Cuba 6-3. This bodes very well for the U.S. Olympic Baseball Team.
Congrats to Team USA’s Jayson Nix and Jason Jaramillo–who got two runs each–and Pitcher Brian Duensing, who was nearly perfect through the first three innings, yielding just one hit. In the past, Cuba has engaged in dirty tricks to win, but the U.S. was prepared, according to the Team USA website:

Knowing Cuba has a history of trying to take the completion out of its game by making questionable moves, the USA expected the unexpected and were not at all rattled.

Picture of the Day: I Love These Men in Uniform
I’m sure this was welcome news at the Castro Communist sickbed. Wonder if he’ll assign people to whip the beaten Cuba team.
Hmmm . . . Maybe Michael Moore can do a “documentary” on how Cuba’s play in the World Cup was really better than ours. And that the sport is really not as American as apple pie (well, he might have an argument there).
U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A!

By Debbie Schlussel
Hey, Julie Myers, if you have not yet cleaned out your desk in advance of Thanksgiving, now might be the time. Before it’s time to eat turkey, you may be doing a lot more than eating crow.
Sources in the know inside ICE tell me that CNN a/k/a the “Crescent News Network” did a Freedom of Information Act request on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), regarding Julie Myers’ Halloween party and the Blackface incident. I hear that approximately 100 pictures of Ms. Myers at the party will be dropped on CNN, today. I’d bet–since Ms. Myers conveniently erased them–that we won’t see her posing with the Blackface employee. But my instincts tell me that this is the beginning of the end.
The snowball has started to roll down the mountain, and it can’t be stopped no matter how much ICE’s Veruca Salt demands

Daddy, I want a Golden Ticket, and I want it now!

My sources tell me that several U.S. Senators and Members of Congress are aware of the “photo drop,” as are most of the ICE top honchos.
Can’t wait for the “photo album” to be released. If this woman had any dignity whatsoever (and we know she hasn’t a shred of it), she’d spare her agency–and, frankly, herself–further embarrassment, which this is sure to cause.
You cannot run the nation’s primary immigration enforcement agency (and she’s barely running it now) and have this going on at the same time.
The good news: Maybe her kid will finally be raised by someone other than a nanny.
Stay tuned.

By Debbie Schlussel
When I’m wrong, I’m wrong. And a Black ICE agent contacted me to tell me I was wrong to assume that the Black DHS employees group–the one that sent a disgusting, gushing letter praising Julie L. Myers to U.S. Senators after ICEPrincessBlackfacegate–speaks for Black ICE agents. In fact, the agent says the group does not and that the agent is disgusted by the whole Julie Myers Blackface incident. I hope–and think it’s safe to assume–that this agent is not alone in this sentiment.
Mea culpa:

I am a black ICE Agent. First, let me say that the National Association for African Americans in the Department of Homeland Security (NAADHS) does not represent me. In fact the organization does not represent the majority of black ICE Agents. I am an avid reader of your blog, but I am surprised that you used the broad stroke that most people (including Julie Myers) use. You assumed that NAADHS represented every black agent in ICE. Apparently, just like Julie Myers did. Just because they may think the costume incident was ok, rest assured it is not. Her half-assed apology is even more insulting. In the future don’t assume that all blacks are represented by any one person (Jesse [Jackson]) or organization.

FYI, I never assumed Jackson speaks for Black Americans. In fact, I’ve repeatedly written that he and Al Sharpton and other race merchants are out to shake down others for themselves only, and not the Black community. However, the Black community repeatedly allows him to act as their spokesman, with little vocal divergence. And Jackson (and Louis Farrakhan), sadly, remain among the top four most admired figures in Black America in poll after poll.
But I am surprised I have not heard Black ICE agents screaming and shouting about this. If this were an anti-Semitic thing, I sure would be. And I’ve written a lot against this, too. I’m just very, very surprised at the silence. I understand that you don’t want to jeopardize your jobs, and that they are very vindictive at ICE, but I’m shocked that this DHS group would endorse and send letters out for her. That’s disgusting. I’m glad they don’t speak for you. And, again, thanks for your clarification.

By Debbie Schlussel
**** UPDATE/CORRECTION, 11/20/07: Black DHS/ICE agents tell me the DHS group purporting to represent them does NOT represent them. So, I’ve changed part of this entry pertaining to that, per their statements. My apologies. They say they do not support Julie Myers. Good for them. ****
Ever since Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Chieftess Julie L. Myers a/k/a “The ICE Princess” praised and awarded an employee’s Blackface costume, I’ve been hearing from top ICE officials on the Seventh Floor (where Myers and top ICE honchose have their offices) of the Chester A. Arthur Building (current ICE headquarters) that Myers has been asked by the Bush Administration to step down. And since then, I’ve posted that rumor and news that Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri) put a hold on the Myers nomination and that Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid said the Bush Administration should give up on The ICE Princess.
Again, last week, a ton of ICE agents sent me stories that Myers is finished. That the Bush Administration will pick someone else after her nomination disintegrates before the end of the year and her recess appointment ends.

The Blackface ICE Princess: Julie Myers’ Nomination Still in Trouble
(Julie Myers Blackface Image by David Lunde/Lundesigns)
Then, Saturday, there was this AP wire story that everyone sent me. There was little in it that was news to me or readers of this site. We’ve known Myers’ nomination was in trouble after the Blackface award and accompanying lies and cover up by Myers. The story repeated what I’ve already highlighted on this site, about the Halloween party and costume “award,” McCaskill’s hold, Reid’s comments, etc.
But here’s what was news in the story. As many ICE agents predicted on this site and in e-mails to me, Sen. McCaskill has no backbone. She wimped out, saying she will allow a full Senate vote on Myers. A hold stops such a vote dead in its tracks, so we now learn that McCaskill is willing to withdraw her hold, as ICE agents foretold.
But what is bigger news is that Senator Kit Bond (R-Missouri) does have backbone. He is the second cousin of Mr. Julie Myers, John Wood a/k/a John Myers-Wood-Myers and was a big booster of his to become U.S. Attorney in Kansas City. But here’s what he has to say on Myers:

Even some of those expected to defend Julie Myers seemed shaky.
“The way things are going, we may not ever vote on her nomination,” Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., who is a second cousin of Myers’ husband, said Friday. “Our nation’s immigration enforcement agency needs non-controversial leadership. That would be best served by going in a different direction with this nomination.”
Bond’s reaction was a surprise, said ICE spokeswoman Kelly Nantel, and Myers is trying to speak with the senator about it.

I take it he will not be carving Turkey on Thursday with that side of the family. Good for him. He has guts.
And here’s more news: An unrepresentative organization of Black DHS employees has ZERO self-respect. It sent a letter supporting Myers to Senator McCaskill. HUH?! If Myers gave an award to a guy wearing a prosthetic big nose and a yarmulke, I would never accept her phony story that she didn’t know there was anything wrong. She or her fawning boss, Michael Chertoff, obviously promised the Black Homeland Security agents a whole lot more affirmative action and plum positions and promotions in exchange for their being bought off. Sorry, but you can never expect to gain your fellow DHS employees’ respect when you sell it out, yourselves, so easily:

The group, the National Association of African-Americans in the Department of Homeland Security, sent a letter to Reid this week praising Myers’ commitment to black employees.

Yes, we all know what the word “commitment” means here. It means succumbing to shakedown, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton style. Why else would this group sell itself out?
And finally, more news: Sen. Joe Lieberman, whom some misguided conservatives have adopted as some strange new hero merely because he supports the war in Iraq, demonstrated once again why he is the King of Panderstan. We all remember how, when he got the Dem Veep nomination, he went on “Meet the Press” and repeatedly gushed over and praised racist, anti-Semite loon and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. And how, at the Dem Convention that year, after giving “The Jenny Jones Show” a “Silver Sewer Award” for despicable TV, Lieberman appeared at a Democratic fundraiser hosted by Jones’ executive producer.
Now, here’s his latest well-fertilized utterance, which makes me ask, just what does The ICE Princess have on him? Or what is she doing for him?:

“Senator Lieberman regrets her lapse in judgment regarding the Halloween incident,” spokeswoman Leslie Phillips said. “He is inclined to support her nomination, given the committee’s review of her entire record, the fact that the union representing 7000 ICE employees supports her and her year’s experience in office.”

What a phony . . . and a tool. And given my contact with the union, I don’t believe that for a second. What I think he’s referring to is FLEOA, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, which in the past has featured such tools, phonies, and suck-ups as Islamo-pandering ICE Special Agent in Charge Brian Moskowitz a/k/a “Abu Moskowitz” as officers. FLEOA is NOT a union, and when FLEOA’s chief endorsed Myers the first time around, many ICE agents quit the organization and stopped paying their dues.
So, will ICE’s Veruca Salt get her Wonka Golden Ticket to another year of disastrous “leadership” atop ICE and woeful immigration enforcement? Or will she go the way of Veruca in the Wonka movie and book, as many ICE agents are telling me?
As I’ve been saying, I believe–and let’s hope!–it’s something closer to the latter.

By Debbie Schlussel
Back in February, I was the first to blog about Brian DePalma’s and Mark Cuban’s anti-troops movie, “Redacted.” Six months later, a number of other conservative blogs, and then Bill O’Reilly, discovered America and jumped on the bandwagon. And now, nine months later, the movie has debuted.
As I’ve written, the movie focuses on an anomalous incident in which American soldiers allegedly raped an Iraqi girl. No prob that this is a blip and completely unrepresentative of the majority of our troops, sacrificing to help those many in Iraq who hate us. Mark Cuban e-mailed me that this movie is actually “patriotic.” Um, sure doesn’t sound like it.
Well, now that “Redacted” is hitting theaters, even the most liberal of mainstream movie critics hate it. Take the Wall Street Journal’s Joe Morgenstern. His headline in today’s paper:

“Redacted” Is Dismal

And his review matches the headline:

Brian De Palma’s “Redacted” argues that the horrors of the Iraq war are being kept from us by inept or venal news media and the government’s propaganda machine. That’s a tenable premise for a provocative documentary; the horrors of every war elude description, and Mr. De Palma is clearly desperate to get a purchase on the chaotic nature of this one. But his film isn’t a documentary. It’s a work of propaganda in its turn, a digitally photographed meditation on our media-saturated age in which our men in uniform, like the news crews that cover them, create their own realities by shooting digital video of their exploits. The film’s core is a speculative and utterly unconvincing reconstruction of an incident that reportedly involved, among many horrors, the rape and savage killing of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl by members of a U.S. army squad. The Americans are portrayed with varying degrees of loathsomeness, but there’s not much variety in the film. It’s all an awful aberration.

Remember, this is a liberal’s review. Yep, exactly as I predicted back in February. As I wrote back then:

Why not make a film about the many rapes of Iraqi women by their fellow Muslims? Or about how many U.S. troops have saved countless women from the mass raping of Uday and Qusay Hussein or the rapes by their fighting Sunni and Shi’ite co-religionists? Well, DePalma would never do movies on those things. Because, hey, they aren’t anti-American. And that would portray the Muslims, not American troops, in a bad–and truthful–light. And we can’t have that in Hollywood.

And, again, this sure doesn’t sound “patriotic” to me, Mark.

By Debbie Schlussel
I’m not sure what Stephen King thinks of Christians. Maybe those of you who read a lot of his work can tell me. But if “The Mist“–a movie out Wednesday for the big Thanksgiving Weekend–is true to his novella, “Skeleton Crew,” on which it’s based, then he certainly doesn’t care too much for them.
I can’t post a complete review here until late Tuesday Night, but the fact is that, in “The Mist,” the biggest villain besides a mysterious mist produced by (who else?) the military (guess King doesn’t like our troops so much either) is a Christian woman, who wears her religion on her sleeve. Played by Marcia Gay Harden, the Christian woman resembles the Fred Phelps folks from the Westboro Baptist Church who protest at troops’ funerals and shriek our troops deserve to die because of our sins. This woman echoes them and blames the plaugue of the mist (and the monsters it spawns) on our sins. Among them, she cites abortion and stem cell research. And she causes the murder–the “sacrifice”–of innocent soldiers. Just like the Phelps team.

Um, here’s a newsflash: Conservatives and religious Christians detest the Phelps crew of protestors. We don’t agree with them. And we’re not like them, no matter what Stephen King thinks.
Yup, the evil conservative Christian preaching against abortion and stem cells and sexual promiscuity is America’s greatest villain, in the eyes of this movie.
Sad that King can’t find a more believable enemy than that. Looks like the mind of King has gone feeble.

By Debbie Schlussel
A slew of new selections today and Wednesday (will post those Tuesday Night) at the movies. Also don’t forget that the GREAT “Blade Runner: The Final Cut” (Read my review and preview) rolls out in the rest of theaters nationwide this weekend and next. The new releases:
* “Beowulf“: Cool 3-D CGI version of the epic poem. Far more exciting than what they made you read in high school and far less serious. Kinda silly, but very entertaining. “300” on steroids, as played out by WWE types who parody themselves. Read my complete review.

* “No Country for Old Men“: The Coen Brothers put the Cormac McCarthy novel onscreen. This bloody, violent movie set in South Texas stars Josh Brolin and Tommy Lee Jones. It’s very entertaining and exciting until about 3/4ths of the way through. It lost me there. Yes, no clean ending. The movie just kinda stops at the 3/4 mark and slowly dissolves.
Brolin is Llewelyn Moss, working class man who lives in a trailer with his wife. While hunting in the desert, he finds a bunch of dead Mexican drugrunners in their trucks. Then he discovers a briefcase with over $2 million in it, which he takes. But he makes a mistake, being the man of compassion that he is. He returns to bring one of the dying men water. Instead, he’s falled into a trap. And he knows it.
Psychotic criminal killer Antoine Chigurh (Javier Bardem) now knows who he is, since Moss runs and leaves his truck–traceable license plates and all–behind. Moss is now on the run, desperate to hold on to the $2 mill . . . and his life. As he tells his wife, at what point does someone stop looking for their $2 million? (ie. never)Clever Chigurh is chasing him and killing many men in his wake, with his air-compresser-turned-deadly-weapon. But Moss is almost as clever as Chigurh. Sheriff Tommy Lee Jones who tries to protect him is too late to the scene, but has a lot of good lines. The best one:

He died of natural causes. . . natural to his profession.

This action-packed movie is kind of like an old Western, only it’s set in the Wild South of 1980 near the Texas-Mexican border with all of its drug-smuggling and associated killing. And it’s more exciting. Very entertaining, a great movie, and definitely not for kids. Again, it’s very violent and bloody. And we even see the psychotic murderer Chigurh performing self-surgery.

* “Mr. Magorium’s Wonder Emporium“: Hmmm . . . An eccentric man who dresses in sartorial splendor and heads a business in a kid-centric industry decides it’s time to go, so he decides to turn it all over to someone younger who embodies the qualities that he thinks are best. No, it’s not “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.” It’s a far inferior rip-off with far superior special effects and a very dull storyline.
Instead of Wonka (Gene Wilder) and a candy factory, in this one we get Mr. Magorium (Dustin Hoffman) and his Wonder Emporium–kind of like the FAO Schwartz toy store, only with magical toys and mobiles featuring real, live fish. And books that come to life. Where Wonka was smart and enigmatic, Magorium has a lisp and is just not as scintillating. Instead of dwarf Oompa Loompas, Magorium has Bellini, the giant, muscular, bald bookmaker, who lives in the basement.
Where “Wonka” showed us many different kinds of kids who embodied various sins and gluttony, this one only has one kid–a good kid with no friends and a great collection of hats. But he’s the same kid as Wonka’s Charlie Bucket. Both are fatherless and both are decent kids, awestruck by the wonderment around them. And unlike Charlie, he doesn’t inherit the toy store. Instead, it goes to Mr. Magorium’s assistant and store manager, Molly Mahony, a frustrated classical pianist. She doesn’t want Magorium to go, but he says it’s time. He’s helped in his quest to leave, by hiring an accountant (Jason Bateman).
Does the magic reside with Mr. Magorium, or in all of us? Instead of “Wonka’s” morals of honesty and integrity, that’s the amorphous question/message in this film.
Good for kids and fascinating special effects. But like I said, it’s a cheap copy of “Wonka” with more expensive special effects, and not nearly as good. Rent that for your kids.
* “Love in the Time of Cholera“: More like, “I’d Love to Die of Cholera Instead of Wasting Time Seeing This Movie.” It’s hardly surprising this extremely awful movie is being touted by Oprah as a recent Oprah book club selection. It’s simplly awful. And way too long and boring.
The cliched story: A poor, illegitimate poet (Javier Barden) falls in love with a rich girl who is then married off to someone else, while he pines for her. You’ve seen it onscreen so many times, but never quite and horridly done as in this one.
The difference: This one features the main male character crying repeatedly over a woman who dumped him, has a female-on-male rape scene, and consists such scintillating and touching dialogue as this, uttered by a woman during a sex scene:

I’ve never been able to understand how your thing works. . . . Besides, I think it has too many bits,

and

My heart has more room than a whorehouse,

and

I’ll be damned. You screw just like your father,

uttered by the uncle of the main character when he walks in on his nephew en flagrante delicto.
The setting is late 1800s and early 1900s Colombia, and even though his love is married off to someone else, he pledges eternal fidelity to her. But, one day, he is raped by a woman on a boat and starts sleeping with hundreds of women (almost as many as the NBA star who died) and writing about them. Sorry, though, guys. This really isn’t your kind of movie, it’s bad Lifetime Network fare, mixed with a lot of toplessness and semi-porn, done Oprah style.
It’s got histrionics and overwrought melodrama ad nauseam, non-stop talking by women in sex scenes with the man’s mother (who resembles the school headmaster, Mrs. Garrett, from “The Facts of Life”) listening through the walls, a sex scene complete with a fart or snort (I couldn’t tell which or care less). Oh, and there’s that scene when the poet finally gets the girl–and they are in their seventies. We get to see, saggy naked old people (including a topless woman) having sex. Eeuuww. Please, make it stop.
Only good thing about this movie–besides that it ended–is one line:

I am not rich. I am a poor man with money, which is not the same thing.

Again, don’t forget: this is an Oprah book club selection. Figures. It stinks. Watching this is torture.

By Debbie Schlussel
This is so precious.
Today, on the ABC hag-yenta-fest known as “The View,” a segment featured a female American soldier who married a Muslim translator she met in Iraq. The hags were all gushing over this union with the “Religion of Peace,” when Baba Wawa claimed that women in Iraq watch “The View,” and that’s why they needed to pixelate the Muslim hubby’s face.
Then “The View” hags asked the Muslim hubby if he and his mother watched “The View” in Iraq and what his mother thought of it. His hilarious response:

Well, to be honest, she like [sic] Oprah better.

The Spew: Muslim Iraqi Smacks Down “The View” Hags
Not that I like HOprah, but this verbal smackdown was much needed for these unduly haughty hags.

By Debbie Schlussel
On Tuesday, I told you that the Dr. Phil shows on Katherine Lester–the smalltown girl who fled to the Middle East to meet her deceptive Palestinian Muslim MySpace boyfriend, “Abdullah Psycho” a/k/a Abdullah Jimzawi a/k/a Abdullah Jinzawi, and convert to Islam–were airing yesterday and today.
I watched yesterday’s show (today’s hasn’t aired yet, here in Detroit). And the key word that comes to mind is this: Whitewash.
These two words were never mentioned during the entire show: Islam and Arab. Gee, I wonder why.
Also, Dr. Phil is a complete dummy. He repeatedly said that Lester is in war-torn Gaza while she is in Jericho in the “West Bank.” Uh, how can a city be in both Gaza and the West Bank? I know that’s the goal of both HAMAS and Fatah, who want to erase what’s in between (Israel) and have a greater Islamic state, but right now, those are two separate regions. Hasn’t this dumb, fat, bald guy, with dime-store country advice ever looked at a map? Hello . . . ?

Dr. Phil Meets Katherine Lester:
From Cute Small-Town Teen Girl to Islamic Palestinian Brainwash-ette

Then, there’s Dr. Phil’s repeatedly calling the place where Lester is “Palestine.” Uh, Dr. Phil, there ain’t no Palestine. Not yet, anyway. He refused to mention Israel, ever, which might be a good thing.
But then Lester’s annoying, useless mother–who seems to have aided in this whole thing (by doing nothing except go on Dr. Phil), more than hindered it; and seems like a very lax (read: incompetent) parent–repeatedly said that she’s afraid her daughter “will get killed in Israel” and that if her daughter “gets killed in Israel, she’ll never be notified by Israel.”
Uh, Mrs. Lester, if you’re kid has run away to the Middle East, don’t you think you could do an iota of research to find out where she is? She’s in Jericho, which is, sadly, controlled by Palestinians. Her daughter would never “get killed in Israel (except by Muslims),” but she would “get killed in the Palestinian Authority” and “areas controlled by the Palestinians.” And, yes, the Israelis would notify you if your daughter was killed. It’s the Palestinians, chickie, who wouldn’t.
Advice for Mrs. Shawn Lester: Learn the difference. If you really care about the fate of your idiotic daughter, try acting like it.
We know Dr. Phil doesn’t really care about anything but promoting himself, so his being completely ignorant of something that’s in the paper every single day is soooooo predictable.
A few other bits of disinformation by Dr. Phil: The Palestinian Muslim boyfriend is not 20. He’s at least 25. And his and this dummy, Katherine’s online relationship was not conducted in secret. Her father and stepmom openly endorsed it over a year ago on “Good Morning America.”
I mean, Dr. Phil, can’t you get a single fact right? Do a tiny bit of research with your gazillion Dr. Phil staffers, bookers, and producers that you abuse and overwork daily (a friend of mine used to be one, so I know–they hate his guts)?
Here’s some advice for Dr. Phil: Stick to shows on “I slept with my sisters’ brother-in-law’s daughter’s son”. And stay out of the Middle East. You don’t have a clue, Oprah’s village idiot. Hardly a surprise.
The only good part was Katherine Lester’s mother saying, “She’s so stupid.” Yup, and so is her mother, especially for participating in this Dr. Phil Minstrel Show. The other highlight: The Muslim Palestinian boyfriend called this idiot American girlfriend a “slut” and a “dirty whore.” She a Muslim Arab would never call an infidel girl those names, would he?
This was only Part I. I’ll tell you if Part II is any worse. I’m sure it’s no better.