August 3, 2007, - 12:45 pm

The Muslim Bow-Tie Brigade: Who Killed Chauncey Bailey?

By
If you’re from the Detroit area, then you probably remember Chauncey Bailey. The classy, smart reporter and columnist was a rare reasonable liberal who had a nose for hard news and covering the story. He wrote for The Detroit News before it became the pan-Islamist-occupied Detroit Newsistan that it is today, with shoddy reporting, extreme bias, and out-and-out untruths, and a crappy “editorial” page to go along with it. Back in the day, as a young reporter, Bailey was one of Detroit’s most prominent Black journalists, and I always read whatever was under his byline (until he left town in 1992).
As the editor of the Oakland Post, he was gunned down and murdered, yesterday, in broad daylight, in downtown Oakland. Why?


Was Chauncey Bailey Murdered by Muslims?

Some bloggers in the know think it was because he was involved in an expose of . You’ll remember that Black Muslims connected with this bakery perpetrated the same Muslim v. Muslim violence you see in the Mid-East (and Mid-East Dearbornistan) when , verboten in Islam. After a few years as an Oakland Tribune reporter, he took the helm of the Black newspaper, The Oakland Post, so he could work on in-depth exposes like this one.
Yesterday, after word of the shooting murder, Little Concrete Piranhas (LCP) posted this:

Appears like nothing, but Chauncey Bailey was well known for exposing Black Muslims to their evil ways in the past.
Did it catch up to him?
ONGOING Investigation!!!

As I :

Shi’ite vs. Sunni Muslim violence in Iraq? Fuhgedaboutit.
We’ve got our own version right here in the States: extremist, bow-tied Black Muslims versus Arab Muslims (many of whom are also extremist).
First, on Thanksgiving Eve, bow-tied Black Muslims trashed two White Arab Muslim-owned convenience stores in Oakland, CA, for selling alcohol and pork to us Infidels. Then, they torched one of the stores and kidnapped its Arab Muslim owner.
One of the perpetrators is Yusuf Bey IV, the son of a prominent Black Muslim leader who founded “Your Black Muslim Bakery, Inc.”, which encompasses a Muslim bakery, school, and other enterprises.

Rockdog and Bud of LCP write:

We got a gut feeling black muslims did this murder. Nothing concrete but Chris Thompson/Chauncy Bailey did writing about the Black Muslims and Yusuf Bey in Oakland Ca.
Heres a link http://www.rickross.com/reference/bakery/bakery4.html
We are at work and can’t do a lot of research here.

Oh, and by the way, their “gut feeling” is far more concrete and reliable than Michael Chertoff’s “gut feeling” while he .


Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 3, 2007, - 10:18 am

Add Maria Conchita Alonso to List of Rare, SANE Actors

By
It’s a short list, but Latina actress Maria Conchita Alonso has earned her place on it. Alonso is officially–at least on this issue–one of the saner minds in Hollywood.
Reader Richard Z sends this AP article, in which she denounces Jeff Spicoli a/k/a Sean Penn for visiting and feting Venezuelian totalitarian dictator Hugo Chavez. Right on:

CARACAS, Venezuela – Hollywood star Sean Penn applauded President Hugo Chavez as the Venezuelan leader lambasted the Bush administration and demanded an end to war in Iraq.
Chavez met privately with Penn for two hours Thursday, praising the actor as “brave” for urging Americans to impeach President Bush.


Maria Conchita Alonso Calls Cabron Sean Penn to the Mat

“In the name of the peoples of the world, President Bush, withdraw the troops from Iraq. Enough already with so much genocide,” Chavez said before an auditorium packed with his red-clad supporters.
Penn sat near the front, at times applauding and nodding in agreement. He is the latest in a series of celebrities who have visited Caracas, including actor Danny Glover and singer Harry Belafonte.
Chavez said he and Penn discussed the question of “why the (U.S.) empire attacks Chavez so much,” saying Venezuela’s oil wealth is a key reason.
He also said Washington is “afraid that the people of the United States will learn the real truth” about the situation in Venezuela, citing his social programs for the poor.
“If the people of the United States, those millions and millions of poor people … if that nation realizes what is truly happening here, there would be a revolution in the United States,” Chavez said, eliciting applause from Penn.
Some Chavez opponents were angered by Penn’s visit.
Cuban-born actress Maria Conchita Alonso, who grew up in Venezuela, said Penn is lending support to a “totalitarian” leader who wants increasing control of society ‚Äî a charge Chavez denies.
In a phone interview from her home in Beverly Hills, Calif., Alonso said although she respects Penn as an actor, she hopes he “comes to his senses and he realizes that he’s being used.”

Penn did not speak publicly. Chavez said the actor came wanting to learn about Venezuela.
“That man has opposed the war in Iraq with all his strength, and not only that, he went to Baghdad … and now he comes here. He’s going around touring the ‘axis of evil,'” Chavez said with a chuckle.


Hahahaha. Joe-Pesce-in-“Goodfellas”-funny.
Brava, Maria. It’s well past time someone in Hollywood spoke out against this punk. She can keep hoping, though. Neither Jeff Spicoli, nor his alter ego Penn, will come to their senses.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 2, 2007, - 2:38 pm

Should Chertoff (& Myers) Be Disbarred?: Officer of the Court Did Not Report (or Do Anything) About Payments to Terrorists

By
Earlier today, I told you how Michael Chertoff, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, .
As an attorney and officer of the court, he had a duty to report this to his boss, Attorney General John Ashcroft. And as Assistant Attorney General of the United States, overseeing all criminal investigations, he had a duty to take action to stop the criminal payments from going on. Instead, he did nothing and tacitly agreed to the continuation of the illicit payments.


(Chertoff/Count Olaf from Fark)

That makes him criminally culpable as a co-conspirator, but is also certainly grounds for a grievance against him as an attorney. I’m not sure to which State Bar(s) he belongs, though I’d suspect he, at least, belongs to the State Bar of New Jersey, where he was a Judge and Justice Department official. Maybe other attorneys or DHS employees have some insight on this.
But certainly Mr. Chertoff should be investigated by the body which issues his license to practice law.

Did The ICE Princess Cover Up a Federal Crime, Know of Funding Terrorists?

(Julie Myers Diet Coke by David Lunde)

Then, there’s , Chieftess of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) a/k/a “The ICE Princess.” She surely knew about Chertoff’s silence on this matter, as the White House personnel person, vetting candidates for the job. As such, since she, too, is a licensed attorney (again, I don’t know where; perhaps, Missouri), she had a duty to report Chertoff to the Bar. And she had a responsibility to report him to criminal authorities. Then, there’s the question–since she worked for Chertoff at Justice–whether she was in on the meeting disclosing the Chiquita-terrorist payments or otherwise knew of them in that capacity. If so, she had a duty to report this to Ashcroft, etc. If she knew and didn’t, then she, again, is vulnerable to a grievance.
And to think, President Bush reportedly wants to make this woman a Federal Judge. Oy vey.
***
Also, did the ICE Princess report her friend Wayne L. Baker, when he , James P. (J.P.) Ronayne (formerly McCarthy) [USA v. Ronayne, Case No. 1:07cr207, U.S. District – New Mexico (Albuquerque)], indicted on federal drug charges?
If not–since as an attorney, she had a duty to report him–that’s also grounds for a serious grievance.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 2, 2007, - 12:54 pm

Comedy Club Owner Says He Was Duped, Defrauded Into Writing a Letter for Muslim Defendant Robert Mustaq John

By
**** UPDATE: Reader Barry Popik sent me info that Al Martin’s New York Comedy Club featured open Yasser Arafat fanatic and Palestinian Terrorism Supporter Ray Hanania in 2002 (and Martin also featured him in 1997). As Barry says (facetiously): “Yeah, just like the Beatles. All you need is love.” But Al Martin tells me he will NOT feature Hanania, again. Great news.****
Earlier today, I posted a , a Muslim who already received a lenient plea deal for sending me an anti-Semitic death threat. I noted in my column that, among the letters Mr. John submitted to the Court for leniency was a letter by New York Comedy Club owner Al Martin. Mr. Martin contacted me, telling me he was duped into writing the letter, that he was never aware what was involved. I feel bad for him given what he has written me, so I withdraw my call for you to boycott his New York Comedy Club. But I must say that he was very easily duped because he failed to investigate why he was writing the letter.


Legendary New York Comedy Club Owner Al Martin

I have not seen the letter he wrote, because the Court did not post it in the record. I called the Court, this morning, to ask why not, and I was told that there was so much mail (from you) and documents, that the court was slow in docketing them. Here is Al Martin’s letter followed by my response and a subsequent interchange:

From: AL MARTIN
Date: Aug 2, 2007 12:37 PM
Subject: FROM AL MARTIN REGARDING ROBERT JOHN
To: writedebbie@gmail.com

John submitted a letter to the judge from Al Martin, owner of the New York Comedy Club, praising him and asking for a lenient sentence. Boycott Martin and his comedy club. Clearly he thinks anti-Semitic death threats from Muslims are funny. Let him know you don’t appreciate his “taste” in “comedy.”

Debbie,
I am Al Martin owner of the New York Comedy Club.. I have been a long time fan of yours and have heard you on numerous talk shows.
Naturallly I was shocked to hear I somehow wound up in your column.
This Robert John guy took a course many years ago on stand up comedy at my club. He recently asked for a letter of referance. I had no idea what he was involved in. I had no contact with him since he had taken my class years ago. Would you have a picture of this guy ? I never put anything about leniency in the letter since i had no idea what charges were pending against him.. Actually if I remember correctly, he said it was it was a domestic dispute.
Is it to late to contact the judge regarding this fraud. If so, who do i contact, or can you put me in contact with the proper authority.I feel horrible that this low life twisted my words and duped me into something i never would have done.
This is a terrible misunderstanding. I am a proud jewish man . I would not support the kind of garbage of a man that you are describing on your website.
Please help me to correct this misunderstanding.You have wrong information, And this can be hurtful to me. I can understand if it is warranted, but this is a serious misunderstanding..
Please help.
Al Martin

Here is my first response:

Al:
I did not see the letter, b/c it is not recorded on the court docket or in the court file. I can only go by what Robert John said in his letter. I’m glad to hear that you did not do this. However, I must question why you would write a letter of reference for something when you hadn’t a clue what it was for or what this person looks like. Sounds like you aren’t even sure who he is. So why write a letter? That puzzles me. Since you were aware it was for a criminal matter, don’t you think you should have done the tiniest amount of investigation and asked for the court case name or number? Sounds like it really didn’t matter to you. Don’t you think if someone told you they wanted a letter of recommendation for a “domestic dispute” that you should have looked into what the details of the dispute were and for what and whom you were vouching?
I’d never write a letter for anyone I didn’t know or couldn’t remember, especially if I was told it was for a legal, criminal matter. I hope you will indeed contact the judge and tell her that the letter was obtained under false pretenses and that you were duped and a fraud was committed upon the court. I will post your letter on my site. And I hope you will contact the court as soon as possible. It is, frankly, probably too late. But I hope you will do something. Perhaps this soft on crime, liberal judge who has a predilection for kindness to extremist Muslims will reconsider. Or if I can convince the do-nothing Justice Department to appeal the sentence, perhaps this will help.
If you are worried about what is “hurtful” to you, I only wish you had the same concerns when you blindly wrote a letter praising someone you can’t remember. I do feel bad for you, though, because you were apparently duped. But it sounds like you made it very easy and couldn’t be bothered to check into it, until it has now come back to bite you.
Would love for you to please send me a copy of the letter you wrote. I would be interested to see what you wrote on behalf of someone you can’t remember for what you were told was a “domestic dispute.” That is where this “serious misunderstanding” started.
Debbie Schlussel

Here’s Al Martin’s response:

I do know what Robert John looks like…I was curious if it was the same Robert John refferanced in your article., Though now I have no doubt it is , Because there is only one person i wrote the letter for.
AL MARTIN

My 2nd response:

Then why are you asking for a picture? How could it be two different people? What–Robert John who threatened my life and got a soft sentence, helped by your letter, is different than the one who took comedy from you, but one knew the other and duped you into writing a letter for one that was used for the other? Come on. I really wish you had looked into why your letter was needed. You say it was a “domestic dispute.” What if it really was and the guy was beating a woman senseless? Would you write a letter for that? Come on. You would lend your name to that person so he could get leniency? What did you think a letter from you was needed for? A harsher sentence? When someone needs a letter like this, it’s quite obvious what it is for.

There’s a lesson here. Muslims are very deceitful when they want to get out of prosecution for crimes, especially hate crimes. It is up to us to not blindly help them in this endeavor. I don’t think I need to tell any readers of this site this, but never write a letter on someone’s behalf unless you know the person well and understand how the letter will be used.
In this case, it was successfully used to help a Muslim fanatic get a far-too-lenient sentence.
And this begs the question: Were Robert John’s other letters obtained under similarly fraudulent ruses? Bet on it.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 2, 2007, - 11:45 am

Another Reason Why We Don’t Need Political Advice From Celebs

By
In the August 6, 2007 issue of Newsweek, Catherine Zeta-Jones, star of reminds us why nothing celebs say is relevant or in touch with reality:


This is Your Brain on Drugs. Any Questions?

Q & A: Catherine Zeta-Jones
Zeta-Jones plays a chef in the movie She spoke to Nicki Gostin.
Is it true you couldn’t boil water?
I can, but I must admit I never got boiling an egg right. If someone wanted a hard-boiled egg I’d boil it till the shell exploded, and if they wanted it soft, it would be raw. I actually think cooking an egg is quite a difficult feat to pull off.
Do you cook for your kids?
I do now. I have somebody who helps me cook at home.

Can’t boil an egg. Thinks cooking eggs is “quite a difficult feat.” Hmmm . . . and I thought it was just one of the basics, like Mac & Cheese.
But to insulated Hollywood . . . .

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , ,

August 2, 2007, - 10:32 am

OUTRAGE: Homeland Security Chief Chertoff Allowed Payments to TERRORIST GROUP! Myers In On It?

By
Earlier this year, I wrote about a Washington Post article alleging that then-Bush Administration personnel official (now head of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement) , Bush’s first choice to replace Tom Ridge as Homeland Security chief. The article claimed that Myers expressed strong concerns against Kerik. Well, we know why: The ultimate choice, her former and current boss, Michael Chertoff, was waiting in the wings and paid her back by pushing Bush to give her the ICE slot, for which she was sorely unqualified. You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours.


The Serpenthead Tacitly Helped Fund Terrorists

Now we learn that not only did Myers apparently heavily scrutinize Kerik, but she did the exact opposite for her crony, Chertoff. Today’s Wall Street Journal reports that, as a high-ranking Justice Department attorney, he allowed his friends at Chiquita to pay Colombian Terrorists over a hundred grand. Yup, folks, the Secretary of Homeland Security looked the other way when a banana company–where his friends worked–paid terrorists. If that issue had been raised by then White House personnel official, Julie L. Myers, do you think Chertoff would, today, be Homeland Security chief? Well, now, I understand why Chertoff has no prob when he’s here in D-Mecca. He apparently approves of terrorists of all kinds. Gee, America, aren’t we lucky he’s heading “HOMELAND SECURITY”?!
Oh, and BTW, Myers worked for Chertoff when he allowed the payment so terrorist to continue, so she probably knew about it and might have even been at the meeting where he allowed the payments to continue.
Here are the details from the Wall Street Journal. Not surprisingly, Chertoff declined to comment:

Chiquita Under the Gun: After Disclosing Payments to Colombian Terrorists, Prominent Ex-Director Faces Legal Jeopardy
By LAURIE P. COHEN
August 2, 2007; Page A1
In April 2003 Roderick M. Hills, then-head of Chiquita Brands International Inc.’s audit committee, went to the Department of Justice with other Chiquita representatives with a stunning admission: The company had been making illegal payments to a violent Colombian group that the U.S. branded as terrorists. . . .
In March of this year, Chiquita pled guilty to engaging in transactions with a terrorist group and agreed to pay $25 million in fines, the first time a major U.S. company was charged with having financial dealings with terrorists. Now Mr. Hills, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, faces the possibility of personal criminal charges. A federal grand jury is looking at his role, and that of other high company officials, in continuing the company payments for almost another year after the meeting with the Justice Department. . . .
A paramilitary organization had threatened to kidnap or kill employees on the banana farms of Chiquita’s Colombian subsidiary, Banadex, and Chiquita was concerned that its employees could be harmed if it cut the payments immediately. Lawyers familiar with the case say Mr. Hills and Mr. Olson [Chiquita General Counsel Robert Olson] believed senior Justice Department officials [DS: MICHAEL CHERTOFF] understood this and were deferring any demand to stop the payments to the United Self-Defense Forces, known by its Spanish abbreviation AUC. Chiquita ultimately paid $1.7 million over seven years. . . .
U.S. prosecutors took a dim view of Chiquita’s dilemma and its delay in stopping the payments. “I regarded this as a murder investigation,” from the start, says Roscoe Howard Jr., former U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., who helped lead the Chiquita prosecution before he left his position in 2004. “Even though Chiquita didn’t murder anyone, that’s what the money was used for — to buy weapons.” . . .
Both Mr. Hills and his wife, attorney Carla Hills, have a long history of public service. A patrician and well-connected Republican, he began his government career as counsel to President Ford. She served as both a cabinet member and as the U.S. trade representative. . . .
On Sept. 10, 2001, the State Department designated AUC a terrorist organization. [DS: The Journal article goes on to detail how the payments to the terrorist group continued, anyway.] . . .
On April 24 [,2003], Mr. Hills nevertheless went to the Justice Department with Messrs. Olson and Urgenson and Ms. Harris to report the payments. Among those attending was Mr. Hills’ longtime acquaintance Michael Chertoff, then in charge of the Justice Department’s criminal division [DS: he was Assistant U.S. Attorney General] and now chief of the Homeland Security Department. Mr. Hills and Mr. Chertoff were colleagues at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP in the early 1980s, when Mr. Hills already had been a White House counsel and SEC chair and Mr. Chertoff was still a junior attorney. . . .
Mr. Hills and Mr. Olson left the meeting confident that Mr. Chertoff had deferred a decision about whether payments [DS: TO A TERRORIST GROUP!] could continue, according to lawyers familiar with the case. Ten additional payments were made between May and September totaling about $134,000, according to court filings. . . .
Mr. Taxay [a Justice Dept. attorney on the case] declined to comment, as did Mr. Chertoff through a spokesman. . . .
Chiquita made half a dozen more payments totaling more than $145,000 through February 2004, according to the criminal complaint. Mr. Howard, the former U.S. attorney whose office handled the case, says the continuation persuaded him that Chiquita “shouldn’t be treated any differently than 19-year-old drug dealers.” In December 2003, Mr. Taxay, the Justice Department lawyer, told an attorney representing a Chiquita employee that the company could face charges for the continued payments. . . .
Even as Chiquita began turning over documents relating to the payments to the Justice Department, it kept making payments. They stopped only after a new CEO, Fernando Aguirre, arrived and ordered them ended in January 2004.

Yes, these payments all continued because our HOMELAND SECURITY chief did nothing and stood by as a company–whose director was his law firm crony–financed terrorists’ murder of innocent civilians. He knew it was happening. He did nothing to stop it, and he even left the company’s lawyer with the impression that it was okay to continue. Michael Chertoff has the blood of innocent people on his hands. And how do we know this is the only set of payments to terrorists that he allowed to continue? What if a company paid off Hezbollah, HAMAS, or Al-Qaeda? Did he look the other way then, too?
So a federal grand jury is looking into this. Are they looking at Chertoff? Not likely. But they should. What he did was criminal. The AUC has murdered plenty of innocent Colombians. And he allowed the funding of that to continue.
Sorry, but America simply cannot allow a man who knowingly sat by as his friends paid off terrorists to remain as the head of Homeland Security, which is–HELLO . . .?!–supposed to protect us against them.
Isn’t this how they got Nixon? And that was a robbery that he didn’t know about until after the fact. These are payments to terrorist murderers that Chertoff allowed to continue without cease, terrorists who murdered innocent people. Well past time for Chertoff to go.
Glad to know that Julie Myers did such a good job “vetting” her past and future boss to head Homeland Security. Who else like this did she pick for Bush Administration jobs?
And a P.S.: One wonders if a story like this would have made it to the Journal’s front page under the new, incoming Murdoch administration. Highly doubtful.
This should be headline news across America.
**** UPDATE: The Washington Post is even tougher on Chertoff, which he merits:

On April 24, 2003, a board member of Chiquita International Brands disclosed to a top official at the Justice Department that the king of the banana trade was evidently breaking the nation’s anti-terrorism laws.
Roderick M. Hills, who had sought the meeting with former law firm colleague Michael Chertoff, explained that Chiquita was paying “protection money” to a Colombian paramilitary group on the U.S. government’s list of terrorist organizations. Hills said he knew that such payments were illegal, according to sources and court records, but said that he needed Chertoff’s advice.
Chiquita, Hills said, would have to pull out of the country if it could not continue to pay the violent right-wing group to secure its Colombian banana plantations. Chertoff, then assistant attorney general and now secretary of homeland security, affirmed that the payments were illegal but said to wait for more feedback, according to five sources familiar with the meeting.
Justice officials have acknowledged in court papers that an official at the meeting said they understood Chiquita’s situation was “complicated,” and three of the sources identified that official as Chertoff. They said he promised to get back to the company after conferring with national security advisers and the State Department about the larger ramifications for U.S. interests. . . .
Sources close to Chiquita say that Chertoff never did get back to the company or its lawyers. Neither did Larry D. Thompson, the deputy attorney general, whom Chiquita officials sought out after Chertoff left his job for a federal judgeship in June 2003. And Chiquita kept making payments for nearly another year.
What transpired at the Justice Department meeting is now a central issue in a criminal probe. According to these sources’ account, the Bush administration was pulled in competing directions, perhaps because its desire to avoid undermining a newly elected, friendly Colombian government conflicted with its frequent public assertions that supporting a terrorist group anywhere constitutes a criminal offense and a foreign policy mistake.
Chiquita’s executives left the meeting convinced that the government had not clearly demanded that the payments stop. Federal prosecutors, however, are now weighing whether to charge Hills; Robert Olson, who was then Chiquita’s general counsel; former Chiquita CEO Cyrus Friedheim; and other former company officials for approving the illegal payments, according to records and sources close to the probe. [DS: How ’bout charging CHERTOFF?]
The company has already pleaded guilty to making $1.7 million in payments to the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), and it agreed to pay a $25 million fine. But last week, lawyers for the former Chiquita executives sent letters to the Justice Department, asserting that their clients did not intentionally break the law but believed they were waiting for an answer from the highest levels of the Bush administration. . . .
On April 24, [2003] the company executives met with Justice officials, including Chertoff. They disclosed the payments and Justice officials said they were against the law. Hills said he agreed, but stressed that Chiquita would have to withdraw from the country if it did not pay AUC, and noted this could affect U.S. security interests in that region.
That’s when, according to the five sources, Chertoff acknowledged that the matter was complicated, and said that he would get back to them after conferring with other administration officials.
A week later, Hills and Olson told the company board’s audit committee that Justice had advised them that there would be “no liability for past conduct” and that there was no “conclusion on continuing the payments,” according to a summary of the case filed by the prosecution. The company authorized new payments to AUC starting on May 5.
After Chiquita officials got no answer from Chertoff, they met with Thompson, who praised them for “doing the right thing” in disclosing the payments, and said he, too, would try to get back to them on how to proceed, defense sources said. Thompson, now general counsel for PepsiCo, did not respond yesterday to a request to comment. . . .
The attorney general of Colombia, Mario Iguaran, and other Colombian officials have dismissed Chiquita’s assertions that it was a victim of extortion and paid AUC to protect its workers. An Organization of American States report in 2003 said that Chiquita participated in smuggling thousands of arms for paramilitaries into the Northern Uraba region, using docks operated by the company to unload thousands of Central American assault rifles and ammunition.
Iguaran, whose office has been investigating Chiquita’s operations, said the company knew AUC was using payoffs and arms to fund operations against peasants, union workers and rivals. At the time of the payments, AUC was growing into a powerful army and was expanding across much of Colombia and, according to the Colombian government, its soldiers killed thousands before it began demobilizing.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 2, 2007, - 5:29 am

Justice For Muslims v. “Justice” for You: Federal Judge Azrack Goes Soft on Robert Mustaq John

By
**** UPDATE: I withdraw my call to boycott his club. ****
On Tuesday, Robert Mustaq John was finally “sentenced” for sending me a death threat.
The Muslim alien from Trinidad and Tobago, who now lives in the Bronx, NY, sent me the e-mail, below, featuring pictures of Daniel Pearl in mid-beheading and other states of pre-rigor mortis, with the text, “JEWgirl,u Might Be Next” and “KILL ALL KIKES” in blood-red, bold capital letters.
I say “sentenced” in quotation marks because Federal Magistrate Joan Azrack was not only soft on Mr. John, she took the unusual step of departing downward–by two-thirds–both from the mandatory sentencing guidelines for Mr. John’s crime and from the recommendation of the Federal Probation Officer in his Pre-Sentencing Report.


Judge Azrack sentenced Mr. John to only four months in prison (plus 400 hours of community service), even though she was actually required to sentence him to 12-18 months, as required by the sentencing guidelines. In addition, Federal Probation Officer Jeffrey Houser recommended that Mr. John receive a year in prison, the maximum sentence for the Misdemeanor to which soft Justice Department officials allowed him to plead in a very generous deal. It is rare that a Federal Judge does not follow the recommendation of the Probation Officer, even rarer that she goes so much softer on the criminal.
They want Stanislav Shmulevich to serve four years in prison for flushing a Koran down the toilet, but this Muslim who believes in the Koran and wanted to behead me in conjunction with it, gets only four months?
That Azrack, a Magistrate–a judge NOT nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, was allowed to sentence Mr. John in his native New York at all is, in and of itself, a strong indication that Justice Department officials simply didn’t care about my case–me being the Infidel victim, Mr. John being the Muslim, anti-Semitic perpetrator. Even the Federal Probation Officer said he’d never seen anything like it. Normally, the perpetrator would be sentenced here in Detroit, where I–the victim!–reside. And he’d be sentenced by an actual, confirmed Federal Judge, not a clinician like Magistrate Azrack, who was appointed by her peers in the liberal Eastern District of New York.
I’m not surprised by this. As I’ve repeatedly noted on this site, at every step of the way, I’ve had to fight for “justice” against Robert Mustaq John. That’s why I had to wait almost four years for a simple matter to go to court, whereas the Justice Department immediately pounces on non-Muslims who send far more benign e-mails to Muslim extremists who advocate their deaths.
Were it not for this website and you, my loyal readers, this Muslim death-threat sender–Robert Mustaq John–would have been free to send e-mails like this, without penalty. If I didn’t have a voice, the FBI and Justice Department wouldn’t give a damn. And for far too long, they didn’t give a damn anyway.
They barely give a damn now. The Justice Department attorney assigned to this case didn’t say the government will appeal the sentence, which is generally the case when the Judge gives such a soft sentence and has such a downward departure from both the recommendations of the Federal Probation Officer and the requirements of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
Perhaps if Mr. John had displayed some phony, taqiyyah-filled [taqiyyah is the Islamic precept of deceiving the infidels] remorse for what he did, we could understand the undue softness for Muslim hate-crime perpetrators displayed by Judge Azrack. But John didn’t even do that. In the absurd letter he submitted to and read before the Court, Robert Mustaq John claimed that his e-mail to me was “comedy,” that he was trying to get attention for his website as an aspiring comedian. Please look at his e-mail. Do you see a website mentioned ANYWHERE? Do you see anything funny about it?
“KILL ALL KIKES.” Haha, funny. “JEWgirl,u Might Be Next.” Hilarious. Daniel Pearl in mid-beheading. A real Dave Chappelle, this guy. What the heck is funny about anything he wrote to me and clearly meant to scare me? Where’s the humor?
PUH-LEEZE. He knew what he was doing. He sent me the e-mail to scare me and to threaten my life. Period. It had nothing to do with showbiz. That’s just complete baloney.
And John didn’t stop there. He said that because I wrote a column he didn’t like in the New York Post–a column about a Muslim terrorist who was going to get an award from the FBI (which was revoked as a result of my column)–and promoted it on the Howard Stern show, that I “am a part of the entertainment business – which can be a raunchy, politicallly incorrect or sleazy environment.” So that makes it okay to tell me he’s going to behead me, apparently.
John also claims that he, too, as a “comedian” who sends out the “humor” of anti-Semitic death threats, is “a part of the entertainment business.” Uh, Mr. John, there is NOTHING entertaining about what you sent me. Not in the least. Then, he compares himself to a stupid rap group, saying he sent me his death threat was a way to launch his career:

When we look at a rap group with the name NWA which stands for “Niggers With Attudes” [sic–DS: it’s actually, Attitude, singular, not plural] (I apologize to the court for having to use the ‘N’ word) on e may think that nothing good can come out of them. Yet they have produced household names like Dr. Dre. and ICE Cube. Ice-T, another rapper out of this group, had his share of controversy with his song called ‘Copkiller’, which predictably caused a hailstorm of free publicity and thus sales. Ice-T presently stars in NBC’s long running his Law & Order.

Yes, Law and Order. That’s the one thing–from beginning to end–that has NOT occurred in the case of this absurd idiot’s death threat on me and his attempt to silence me from writing more columns like the ones I’ve written in the New York Post. That’s what this was about–to frighten and silence me. The “entertainment” and “comedy” excuses are BS.
John submitted a letter to the judge from Al Martin, owner of the New York Comedy Club, praising him and asking for a lenient sentence. Boycott Martin and his comedy club. Clearly he thinks anti-Semitic death threats from Muslims are funny. Let him know you don’t appreciate his “taste” in “comedy.”
Mr. John was ordered to report for prison on August 17th. That means on December 17th, I’ll have to worry about him again, as I do about the other Muslim death threats the Justice Department won’t do a damn thing about because I’m not a Muslim and the perpetrators are.
I only hope that for the four months he’s in federal prison that Robert Mustaq John finds “fame” and is very “popular” with his fellow inmates.
Because Magistrate Azrack has been so soft on Mr. John every step of the way, I doubt he’d have gotten any jailtime, but for many of your letters you sent via snailmail to the Court. I’ve read all of them, and it is gratifying to know that all Americans are not sound asleep, that there are concerned citizens like you who want to take our country back from the politically correct Judge Azracks and scary Muslim criminal Robert Mustaq Johns who are harming it beyond reclamation. Judge Azrack knew you were watching and at least felt the compulsion to give him some sort of punishment.
Thanks to Mary J., Pamela W., Richard S., Lee M., Paul N., William W., Ruth G., Kenneth R., Paula F., Felice S., Kevin M., Lawrence P., M. Anna G., Peter M., and all those who took the time to write snailmail letters to the judge. All of your letters were excellent and, I believe, had an impact on this liberal, soft judge.
(If you sent the Judge a letter and I missed your name, my apologies. I went by the letters that were posted to the Court file (which for some strange reason, not all were). I appreciate your help on this. Thank you.)
****
A friend writes:

I am so sorry that your email stalker did not get a stronger sentence. The judge in the case was absurd. Perhaps she should have pretended he was a border patrol agent.

Indeed.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 1, 2007, - 3:16 pm

OUTRAGE: Vital Immigration Functions OUTSOURCED! PLUS, ICE Princess, Now the Queen: Agents Ordered to Demure to Royalty

By
Question for all Americans: Do you think that private contractors should have the job of monitoring and facilitating the deportation of illegal aliens? Would you trust a private company that is trying to make the biggest buck off the least amount of expenses to monitor aliens and, when the time comes, help make sure they’re outta here?


Don’t Dare Address the Holy ICE Queen

(Queen Julie of the Crony House of Myers by David Lunde)

Well, that’s what Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is doing with important Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) jobs, and it’s kinda scary. With all undue respect to incompetent , if he can’t get the job done, he should step down . . . not farm out vital national security functions to private contractors who will do little background checks–if any–on whom they hire to monitor and help dump aliens out of the country. They’re farming these tasks out for the ENTIRE country. Not a good sign. I mean, what are we paying ICE and its DRO division for?
Oh, and BTW, they aren’t asking for U.S. Citizens for this job. HUH?! This guy Torres has so much stuff with extra-marital girlfriend juggling, that he’s endangering America and taking trained, qualified agents (of which he is not) out of the mix for vital immigration enforcement tasks.
Here’s the info I received from a very concerned retired ICE Supervisor in the know:

Hello Debbie, I don’t know if you have seen this as of yet. It sounds like to me that my old employer Homeland Security is farming out it’s responsibilities to a civilian agency. The job description paragraph is basically what ICE and Detention and Removal are suppose to be doing now. I guess by doing this if something goes wrong Homeland Security has someone else to blame.

Here’s the contractor ad, farming out what you pay taxes for Trained ICE Agents to do:

Military Professional Resources Incorporated (MPRI)
MPRI is recruiting for a contract with DHS/ICE for Detention and Removal Full Service Case Management:
Electronic Monitoring/Alternative to Detention Initiative:
JOB DESCRIPTION
Incumbent will provide support to the EM/ATD initiative by monitoring the activities of illegal aliens released from Federal Custody and pending deportation from the United States. Such monitoring will include physical placement of monitoring devices (ankle bracelets), review of surveillance of aliens, home visits to ensure compliance with release conditions set by federal agencies, case management updates in automated systems, and facilitation in the obtaining of travel documents for aliens for their eventual removal and deportation.
REQUIREMENTS:
MPRI is competing for a contract with a major federal government agency and is seeking former/retired federal, state and/or local law enforcement officers who would be interested in supporting an Electronic Monitoring/Alternative to Detention initiative for a major federal government agency. This will be a full time position and will become available in 26 major cities (list is provided below.) Salary will be determined upon award of contract and is negotiable dependent on experience and qualifications. Familiarization with immigration procedures and processes a plus but not required. Knowledge of foreign languages a plus but not required. Incumbent will be trained in detention procedures and processes concerning electronic surveillance and home monitoring devices (i.e., electronic ankle bracelets, etc.). Must have reliable transportation and be willing to work odd hours/shift work.
If you are interested please visit our website at www.mpri.com and click on the CAREER tab and the drop down menu will have the Individual Information Form (IIF). On the IIF please indicate Job Id XXXX in the “positions of interest” portion. Also, please send an updated copy of your resume to Lee Manriquez at lee.manriquez@L-3com.com or to Mike Morrell at michael.morrell@L-3com.com , 571-227-6930.
Field Office Listing
AOR = Area of Responsibility
Atlanta, GA Baltimore, MD
AOR: GA, NC, SC AOR: MD
Boston, MA Buffalo, NY
AOR: CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT AOR: Upstate NY
Chicago, IL Dallas, TX
AOR: IL, IN, KS, KY, MO, WI AOR: North TX, OK
Denver, CO Detroit, MI
AOR: CO, WY AOR: MI, OH
El Paso, TX Houston, TX
AOR: Southwest TX, NM AOR: Southeast TX
Los Angeles, CA Miami, FL
AOR: Central CA AOR: FL, Puerto Rico, U.S. VI
Newark, NJ New Orleans, LA
AOR: NJ AOR: AL, AR, LA, MS, TN
New York, NY
AOR: The five boroughs (counties of NYC) and the following counties:
Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess, Ulster, Rockland, Nassau and Suffolk
Philadelphia, PA Phoenix, AZ
AOR: DE, PA, WV AOR: AZ
Salt Lake City, UT San Antonio, TX
AOR: UT, ID, MT, NV AOR: Central South TX
San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA
AOR: Southern CA AOR: Northern CA, HI, Guam
Seattle, WA St. Paul, MN
AOR: AK, OR, WA AOR: IA, MN, NE, ND, SD
Washington (Fairfax, VA)
AOR: DC and VA

Meanwhile, totally oblivious and clueless to the happenings and irresponsible relinquishment of important immigration enforcement functions by her top minions, the ICE Princess, er . . . ICE Queen World Tour. And I’ve gotten quite a few reports from the field on that, too. Apparently, on July 24th, ICE Chieftess spoke to a San Diego national convention of ICE agents involved in Computer Forensics. The day before, agents tell me they were admonished not to approach The ICE Princess in the hallway or anywhere and not to address her. In other words, stay away from the Holy Queen. But all hail her.


All Hail The ICE Queen

(ICE Queen by David Lunde)

I mean, who does she think she is–Queen Elizabeth?! Well, apparently, when you are a crony, your uncle was a General, and your husband was your bosses chief of staff among many other positions in King George’s Castle, apparently you are royalty . . . or like to think you are. The only thing missing is a lady in waiting. Oh wait, she has that, too–ICE Director of Investigations Marcy Forman-Friedman a/k/a . While addressing her subjects–but making careful not to have any meaningful conversation with them–she was completely out of breath while promising the sun, moon, and the stars, all while everyone knows it’s T Minus 5 Months at the most with this woman, what with a recess appointment and a Senatorial hold on her gazillionth re-nomination.
(On a related note, to those agents who’ve sent me missives from the various stops on the , I haven’t forgotten about you. Waiting for more reports from other stops on the non-Immigration Enforcement waste of money designed to denounce me (because all the illegal aliens have been rounded up and there are no problems with immigration enforcement other than me, apparently).)
G-d save this sinking nation.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 1, 2007, - 2:11 pm

Islamic “Coma,” The Sequel: Your Muslim Doctor Could Kill You

By

It’s the “Brave New World” version of medicine, Islamic-style. Yup, the Muslim medical community acting out the real-life version of the movie, “Coma.”

Since I’ve already told you about so many (like , who refused care to his Jewish patient, Joseph Applebaum, and essentially murdered him by doing so), it’s no surprise to me.

First, Do Harm

In Australia, a Saudi Muslim doctor is acting out the part of “Coma’s” Dr. George (who gives his patients an excess of drugs and painkillers to murder them and harvest their organs).

Saudi Muslim Doctor Sanaa Ismail, an anesthetist, and Dr. Azizi Bakar, another Muslim medical doctor, are under investigation for killing their 16-year-old patient, Vanessa Anderson. They gave her too high of a dosage of painkillers and murdered her. The cases raises other questions, as neither doctor was screened or vetted much (it’s hardly different here in the States) and one of the doctors, Dr. Ismail, has his salary paid by the Saudi Government, an arrangement which is NOT unusual in Australia’s public hospitals. Does that happen here? If Saudi and other Gulf State med students are studying and doing residencies here–AND THEY ARE–then, yes it does happen. And if so, it’s a very dangerous development. When you consider their cases, do you really think we need to import more foreign (mostly Muslim) doctors to America? Or LESS?:

THE inquest into the death of a 16-year-old girl who died in a Sydney hospital after being hit by a golf ball may have to be reopened following allegations about the competence and assessment of two overseas-trained doctors involved in her care.

The allegations — aired on ABC TV’s Stateline program in NSW last night — claimed neither of the overseas doctors treating Vanessa Anderson had been “subject to any appointments or selection process”.

Anderson died in 2005 while being treated for a fractured skull caused by the golf ball.

The inquest at Westmead Coroners Court, which held its final hearing two weeks ago, heard there were “a number of deficiencies” in her care, including one doctor’s failure to give anti-convulsive drugs as ordered by a consultant.

Another doctor, anaesthetics registrar Sanaa Ismail, increased the dosage of painkilling drugs to a level the consultant in charge told the inquest was “too high”.

It has now emerged that the inquest may be reopened after a senior hospital anaesthetist, Stephen Barratt, wrote to Deputy State Coroner Carl Milovanich about the allegations. . . .

In his letter, Dr Barratt said Dr Ismail — whom he was supervising — had previously been judged by him to be “not safe” to treat patients after two previous incidents just months earlier. Dr Barratt also revealed he was “unhappy” with how the inquest had unfolded and added “you need the truth”.

Azizi Bakar, the doctor who had failed to provide the anti-convulsive drugs ordered by a consultant, was the other doctor whom Dr Barratt suggested had not been properly screened prior to employment.

Dr Ismail faced questions during the inquest over her decision to double the dose of a painkilling opiate drug, oxycodone, to treat Anderson’s headache, despite the fact that she only spoke to the patient for a pre-operative check.

Dr Ismail said she did not realise Anderson was already receiving Panadeine Forte, a painkiller with a high level of codeine, another opiate drug.

Dr Barratt’s letter alleged that Dr Ismail’s salary was being paid by the Saudi Government, an arrangement that he said was “not unusual in the public hospital system — that is, there are many others like her”.

“In fact, a few months before the Vanessa Anderson incident a bureaucrat from the Department of Health came pleading with us to take more of these ‘trainees’,” Dr Barratt wrote.

Professor Picone said “learning exchange” arrangements was a “feature of any modern health system”. Out of a total 11,000 doctors in NSW public hospitals, about 100 at any one time would be paid for by an overseas government or other agency, she said.

Do you want a doctor whose very salary is paid for by the government that teaches its young citizens to hate Christians and Jews, to hate Americans–that the killing of them is an Islamic precept? Do we really need more physician “trainees” who have little respect for American infidel life?

What is Michael Chertoff doing about it? (Answer: Nothing . . . and )

Of course, there are many good Muslim doctors who wouldn’t kill you. But they don’t exactly come equipped with a tattoo on their foreheads, which says, “I’m one of the good ones.”

Can you tell the difference between the good ones and the Dr. Ismails and Dr. Ibrahims? Me, neither.

Use Muslim doctors at your own risk.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 1, 2007, - 1:33 pm

Get Ready for PAWNN, The Newspaper: Murdoch’s Wall St. Journal Could Take Anti-Israel, Pan-Arabist Slant

By
A few months ago, on the day Rupert Murdoch announced his intent to bid on the Wall Street Journal, I , who owns at least (he said he planned to acquire more), Murdoch’s company which runs FOX News Channel and his other properties. I’ve written about the Prince before, and right after 9/11. He’s the one who offered Rudy Giuliani $10 million after the attacks if America would change its policy toward Israel, blaming American foreign policy for 9/11. (Rudy told him where to go.)
I told you how Al-Waleed bragged that when FOX News ran stories on the Muslim riots in France, he called Murdoch to complain. Within a half hour, FOX News stopped using “Muslim” riots and changed to “civilian” riots, even though all of the “civilians” were Muslims.


James Murdoch & the Saudi Prince, Who Tried to Bribe Giuliani,

Now Own & Run the Wall St. Journal


That’s why I call FOX News Channel, “PAWNN”–the Prince Al-Waleed News Network. Since the Wall Street Journal is far more pro-Israel and anti-Islamist than FOX News, you can be sure Prince Al-Waleed will be having a lot of conversations with Murdoch objecting to the excellent Wall St. Journal editorials and editorial columnists. Get ready for PAWNN, The Newspaper.
Or maybe the editorials will be changing quickly . . . in the other direction. Today’s New York Sun reports that Murdoch’s son, James Murdoch–who may run the Journal operation–is virulently anti-Israel:

The just-published diaries of a communications director for Prime Minister Blair, Alastair Campbell, indicate that James Murdoch launched into a foul-mouthed tirade that suggested that the behavior of Palestinian Arabs was justified by their poor treatment by Israelis. The outburst occurred at a private dinner with his father, his brother, Lachlan, Mr. Blair, and others at no. 10 Downing St. in January 2002.
The elder “Murdoch was at one point putting the traditional very right-wing view on Israel and the Middle East peace process and James said that he was ‘talking f- nonsense.’ [Rupert] Murdoch said he didn’t see what the Palestinians’ problem was and James said that it was that they were kicked out of their f‚Äî homes and had nowhere to f- live,” Mr. Campbell recorded, adding that the News Corp. chairman was “very pro-Israel, very pro-Reagan.” [DS: Now, he’s very pro-Hillary.] . . .
James Murdoch, who heads News Corp.’s BSkyB satellite broadcasting division, has been intimately involved in the firm’s $5 billion bid to take over Dow Jones, which publishes the Journal. The elder Murdoch brought James to a critical meeting last month in Manhattan at which the pair sought to win over members of the Bancroft family, which controls Dow Jones. . . .
It is widely assumed in financial and publishing circles that James Murdoch would have ultimate responsibility for overseeing operations at the Journal if the takeover bid is successful. James Murdoch, 35, is also seen as the most likely heir to chairmanship of News Corp. when his father, 76, retires.

Let’s hope for the best with the Wall Street Journal. But expect the worst. Rupert Murdoch has a business to run . . . and a whiny, royal shareholder to please.
And he’s shown he’s all too willing to give in to that shareholders’ demands. With news of his son running the show, looks like the cave-in will happen fast and easy.
PAWNN, The Newspaper.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,