July 6, 2012, - 12:58 pm

Brad Pitt’s Mom Disses Jolie-Pitt Politics, Lifestyle: Publicly Endorses Romney, Opposes Gay Marriage

By Debbie Schlussel

Can’t wait for the Jolie-Pitt family Thanksgiving!

Normally, I don’t care about the activities or rantings of celebrities and their relatives (that means you, Katy Perry’s anti-Semitic, embarrassing tool of a dad). But I gotta give credit to Brad Pitt’s mother, Jane Pitt, for her recent letter to the editor of a Missouri newspaper, which is making the news. While you’ll often see the Pitt parents, of Reagan Country’s rural Missouri, accompany their son and his skanky, pan-Muslim girlfriend Angelina Jolie–the two most conceited movie stars alive!, there have long been rumors that Mrs. Pitt did not like Jolie or her and Brad Pitt’s lifestyle. And now we see proof. The letter to the editor will not change a single vote. And she knows that. Jane Pitt wrote this as a deliberate public dig at her son and skank-in-non-law because they publicly support Barack Obama and endorse gay marriage, famously saying they would not get married until gay marriage was legal. They’re probably pro-abortion, too–thus, the pro-life notes in the letter. And I give kudos to this mom from Missouri for her chutzpah! I think she’s probably also rightfully bothered that Jolie turned her son into such a chick. It’s no mistake that the man’s name goes first in the hyphenated Jolie-Pitt name for the illegitimate and adopted United Nations fashion accessory kids. Mrs. Pitt knows that their politics and lifestyle are not so Jolie at all. Maybe that stupid leg pose Skankelina repeatedly did at the Academy Awards was the last straw.


Jane Pitt Takes Public Dig at the Far-Left Jolie-Pitt Politics

Jane Pitt calls the president “a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage” just months after her son reveals his support of Obama. . . .


An anti-gay letter urging Christians to vote for Mitt Romney that was printed today in The Springfield News-Leader has been confirmed by the newspaper as having been penned by Jane Pitt, mother of Brad Pitt.

Um, opposing gay marriage is NOT “anti-gay.” The Hollywood Reporter is defaming Mrs. Pitt by employing that description of her.

The letter — itself a response to another opinion piece in the newspaper justifying Christians’ rights to refuse to vote for Romney because he is a Mormon — identifies Mrs. Pitt as “a Christian [who differs] with the Mormon religion.”

But, Pitt continues, “any Christian should spend much time in prayer before refusing to vote for a family man with high morals, business experience, who is against abortion, and shares Christian conviction concerning homosexuality just because he is a Mormon.”

Pitt goes on to write that “any Christian who does not vote or writes in a name is casting a vote for Romney’s opponent, Barack Hussein Obama — a man who sat in Jeremiah Wright’s church for years, did not hold a public ceremony to mark the National Day of Prayer, and is a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage.”

Good for her. And I love how she mentions the Jeremiah Wright BS, which should bother Jolie and Pitt, if they really had the consciences they pretend to have. On the other hand, as I’ve noted repeatedly on this site, Jolie has zero love for the Jews or Israel, but Islamogasms are a regular part of her lifestyle. The nutty Jolie-Pitt Middle Eastern politics are disgraceful. She’s repeatedly visited Palestinian refugee camps, praised the inhabitants’ songs about terrorism against Jewish civilians, made digs at Israel, and has a wardrobe filled with more fashion-forward hijabs than even most Muslim women could dream of. I also reported on her attendance at an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic Arab hate-fest in Jordan. And that’s aside from Jolie’s personal harassment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents for not pandering enough to the kids of illegal aliens on U.S. soil, including anchor babies and illegal aliens themselves. So, maybe she would have made a perfect fellow Jeremiah Wright congregant along with Obama and Oprah. She probably agrees with his attacks on Jews and support for HAMAS, since she and Brad have a luxury residence in the anti-Semitic apartheid state of Dubai. (Yup, they care about gays being able to get married, but not about Jewish Israelis being able to travel to or even do business with Dubai and other Arab boycotters of Israel. Priorities!) There’s a good reason–several of ‘em–why I call her “Palestina Jolie.”

angelinajoliearabconf.jpg

Skankelina Jolie at anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-HAMAS Arab Children’s Conference Hate-Fest in Jordan, 2004

The Jolie-Pitts, both hubby Skankelina and wife Brad, needed to be told off. And it’s all the more delicious that it’s been done in public. Time for daddy Pitt to join in with the Missus.

I’ll bet there are a lot more parents of movie stars who feel the same way about their delusional famous kids’ wacko politics.

(The thing is, Mrs. Pitt is in for a huge disappointment, as are we all. Romney, while a tiny tad better than Obama, will do nothing for her in the realms of abortion, gay marriage, or anything else. He’ll be far more liberal and un-Christian in his policies than any of these people are deluding themselves into thinking.)

angelinajoliequeennoorwetkiss.jpg

Skanks for Terror: Angelina Jolie and Jordanian Queen Noor Exchange Wet Kiss at Arab Children’s Conference Hate-Fest, 2004

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

41 Responses

Let’s hope she doesn’t get the “Daddy Voight” treatment, she probably loves those grandbabies quite a lot.

CJ on July 6, 2012 at 1:23 pm

Good for Jane Pitt!

Frankly, it doesn’t matter much to me since I couldn’t care less about celebs and their relatives, but still nice to see one celeb relative with some sense.

I’ll never figure out the Angelina Jolie worship. She’s not ugly, but I don’t get where she’s this raving beauty. To me Jennifer Aniston is much hotter and babeulicious.

Jeff_W on July 6, 2012 at 1:45 pm

I read your blog quite often and I share the same views as you regarding politics and Muslim “religion of peace” BS. In addition I am an Israeli.
After reading this article I realized that you against abortions and same sex marriage? Why, because we live in Muslimstan?? Women in the free world can choose what to wear, who to marry and yes, weather to have a child or not. And why are you against same sex marriage? What’s wrong with two people wanting to legalize their relationship? So what if they are from the same sex? Who said that its wrong, the bible, the society? The bible also said that cheating on your spouse is wrong.. I don’t see a law against that. Not in US.. maybe in Iran, they will stone a woman for being raped because its considered cheating. Society dictates a lot of things, not so long a go society dictated that slavery is acceptable…

Karen on July 6, 2012 at 1:54 pm

    The “bible” does not say cheating on your wife is wrong.

    And you’re an idiot.

    FrenchKiss on July 6, 2012 at 2:04 pm

      FK, surely you jest regarding adultery (Lev 20:10).

      skzion on July 6, 2012 at 10:05 pm

        While we’re on the topic of Gay Marriages, Fruity Pebbles, and Fruit Loops, I just realized something about Chief Justice John Roberts: he’s gay. I’m not precisely sure how this epiphany came to me, but I think the realization came about as a result of articles written about the Roberts decision in the ACA case decribing him as having come “out of the closet” to the liberal side.

        Something else clicked in my mind when I read that “out of the closet” phrase for the second time. I wasn’t sure what it was, but I instinctively wanted to see photos of John Roberts. The ones that were produced from online searches typically showed Roberts with a thin, tight-lipped smile, not a genuine one, and rarely was his mouth open to make his teeth visible, as it would be in a natural smile. Sometimes haughty, sometimes supercilious, and sometimes just a fake posed would-be smile; Roberts’ smile was more of a smirk, and immediately suggested to me that this was a man hiding deep personal secrets, conveying a message that says: “I know something about me that you don’t.”

        Looking further at his photos, I then knew what Roberts actually wanted to keep in the closet: his real sexual orientation. To me, the physiognomy of Roberts’ facial features indicats the characteristics of an effeminate male. Of course, I’m not saying that all homosexual men have effeminate features. Many well-known homosexuals or bisexuals evince no such features (e.g., Rock Hudson, Raymond Burr, and Montgomery Clift come to mind). But many do have those features. One prominent example that comes to mind in the political realm is former Governor of New Jersey, James McGreevey, particularly in photos when he served as Governor.

        I then proceeded to see what kinds of information might be online about John Roberts’ sexual orientation, Googling “John Roberts” and “homosexual.” That produced little, so I substituted “gay” for “homosexual.” Voila. I found a website that lays out all the facts and circumstances about Roberts as a possible gay person. The website included an early photo of Roberts with two friends that shows Roberts actually smiling in a genuine manner. He’s happy, he’s carefree, he’s with friends, and they all appear to be in gay spirits, both literally and figuratively. Now, I don’t pretend to have the “gaydar” that those in the homosexual community have, but I’ve known enough homosexuals in my lifetime to be able to recognize those that are comfortable in that lifestyle. And there’s no question in my mind, that the photo shown of Roberts in his younger days with and his two friends shows three homosexuals. The website also offers facts and circumstances that support the inference that Roberts is a homosexual or bisexual. I won’t repeat them here, but I’ve provided a link to the website below with the information.

        Now, some might argue, “Why is Roberts sexual orientation important, and why should his private affairs be anybody’s business?” That’s a fair question, and in most jobs, I don’t think it is anybody’s business. But when we’re talking about the job of being a judge, or serving as the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS, I think that this isn’t just Roberts’ personal business. And I’m aware of the rumors about Kagan and Souter. But those cases are different than Roberts. Roberts is married and has two adopted children, and he with his wife are presenting a phony regular, all-American Ozzie & Harriet type family image (for those of you familiar with that iconic TV show). Kagan and Souter, on the other hand, were not, and are not married; and, consequently, the possibilities that Kagan was a lesbian and Souter was gay were explored to some extent, and their judicial predilections on issues was and is relatively predictible. Not so with Roberts.

        On the other hand, Roberts’ decision in the ACA case to side with the predictible liberal subset of the SCOTUS seems to have taken most legal pundits by surprise. Clearly, Roberts was not properly vetted to unearth at least the rumor of Roberts’ gayness. And I think that George W. Bush can be blamed for that. Not only for recommending him several times for leading court positions in the first place, but also because I now believe that Bush knew that Roberts was a homosexual, and, that was one of the reasons that Bush favored Roberts. After all, there are plenty of indicators that Bush, at a minimum, is bisexual. (For evidence of that, Google “Victor Ashe” and/or “Jeff Gannon” and “gay,” and you will read documented stories about Bush and those two, and you will even see phots of Bush with each of them and others in male embraces that would have excited Arafat.)

        Had the facts and circumstances of Roberts background been discussed, and the possibility of his homosexuality been a matter of public discussion, as it should have been, I believe there would have been sufficient opposition from the conservative wing of the Republican party to squelch Roberts’ nomination.

        Roberts might have ended up like Nixon’s failed SCOTUS nominee, G. Harrold Carswell. Some years after Carswell was rejected for the Court, Carswell was convicted of battery for advances he made to an undercover police officer in a Tallahassee men’s room. And in a later incident, Carswell was attacked and beaten by a man whom he had invited to his Atlanta, Georgia, hotel room in similar circumstances. Instead, we are now stuck with John Roberts for life.

        Ralph Adamo on July 8, 2012 at 5:49 am

          And here’s the link I spoke of, “Underneath Their Robes:
          News, gossip, and colorful commentary about the federal judiciary”—

          http://underneaththeirrobes.blogs.com/main/2005/08/more_grist_for_.html

          Ralph Adamo on July 8, 2012 at 5:51 am

          A couple of things… Ralph, after doing all that work to validate whatever spurious conjecture he spouts, is a homophobe. You, Debbie, are just a poisonous and vile mouthpiece for your paymasters.

          You talk about people being “so far left” or “off the scale” yet, in America, there is no real concept of a political spectrum. Talk about secular societies, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, et cetera ad infinitum. Where do you get off on thinking a state can legislate on a person’s life choices?

          Let’s say, for example, you lived in a country where women were actively oppressed and subjugated (more overt than the glass ceiling, wage gap, and rape conviction statistics suggest). Now let’s imagine that religion was banned. You’d be up in arms.

          Now, you say that if that WERE the case (and you’re smart enough to know where I’m going) you’d leave the country, so why don’t Muslims/homosexuals/pro-lifers leave the US? Don’t change the goalposts. They shouldn’t have to leave; the state shouldn’t interfere. If you base it on whatever the prevailing opinions of the political elite are, it’s a dictatorship. An oligarchy at best. But forget it. I could call you insensitive, oppressive, prejudiced, blinkered and ignorant all day. It won’t change a thing. At least something to think about:

          “One law for the lion and ox is oppression.”

          The Blakean paradox, if we’re talking about abortion, doesn’t require two laws; it demands and deserves NO laws.

          Ian on July 13, 2012 at 6:09 am

    Karen sweety your missing the point, first off Karen, DS has a a relative who’s of the “LGBT” category, so she’s NOT anti-gay or anti-LGBT. Karen, about a vast majority of us here in the US are against so-called same-sex marriage, you know why, because a woman cannot impregnate another woman and a man cannot impregnate another man. Also Karen, do you find it healthy to indoctrinate kids under 18 years old into LGBT propaganda crap? To me that’s child-abuse by brainwashing them like that.

    And also check this out Karen, majority of LGBT people here in the US DO NOT want to get married, they rather be left alone and live their lives, the only one’s who’s pushing same-sex marriage rubbish are radical and militant LGBT groups who are lobbyists.

    Now as for the bible is concern, of course cheating on you’re husband or wife is wrong, it’s written in one of the “Ten Commandments” in the bible. Then again I’m not a religious person, nor I’m not a theologists, etc. but I’m a “Secular-Christian” who’s a non-church-goer but follow some doctrines in christianity, and also at the sametime I do have some issues with religion in general and also people who are devoutly religious!

    “A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

    Sean R. on July 6, 2012 at 3:19 pm

    You really need to have someone proofread what you write Karen. Also, if you had been on Debbie’s site before for any length of time, her being anti-abortion would not be a surprise to you. The same thing holds true of gay marriage. If you want a leftist site Karen, there are plenty of them out their. The Daily Kos and Move On await you. A brighter and more literate friend should do your posting for you Karen.

    Worry on July 6, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    Karen, you’re a fraud. As an Israeli you hurt the cause more than help.

    Number one. DS has the right to HER religious opinions. You can disagree with her (as you have a right to YOURS) but you would be wrong. She is absolutely CORRECT that being anti-gay marriage (as I am) is NOT anti-gay. Deal with it.

    Abortion is murder of a pure innocent. Are you an animal lover and support animal rights? If you do you’re a FRAUD if you support abortion. It is disgusting to see Liberals get weepy over animals at a drop of a hat and yet not even THINK about what happens to an innocent child at it’s most vulnerable and in need of help from another human. Could you stomach abuse of a newborn baby? Prolly not. You’re doing that to an INNOCENT child at it’s weakest state if you support legal murder (abortion). At least have the guts to say you don’t care if the innocents are butchered and abused. It’s savage but own it.

    I love gay people and I only support HEALTHY relationships…gay or straight. But two gay people making a commitment to each other is NOT marriage. Never will be. If they want they can marry someone of the opposite sex. But I would not endorse or recommend that because too many have done that and hurt their spouses and children. Be true to yourself.

    You don’t seem to get that what DS admonishes HURTS society. And it does. Open your eyes and wake the hell up. Sure some of these truths may not be fair and seem difficult for some to adhere to but what one CAN say is that if you do those things to the best of one’s ability and to edify the other person in the relationship, one’s life will be easier and better and more enjoyable for all. Even freedom is NOT free. It shouldn’t be selfish either.

    Wake up and smell the coffee. In life some of the best things we can do are the hardest things we have to do! We are edified by the struggle and doing the right thing.

    Skunky on July 6, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    Hey Karen
    Your Muslim friends still practice slavery and always will. Before you even begin to pick on the United States, look at all of the Muslim States and you will see real hypocrisy in action.

    Confederate South on July 7, 2012 at 12:49 am

    Karen, I’m Israeli-born, don’t know what it has to do with pro-abortion or legalizing gay marriage, but ok. As a woman, who has 3 children, I’m telling you that I’m against abortion, off course women have the right to choose what to do with their body, but that’s BEFORE going to bed with whoever it is and then decide that, now we’re killing the baby. THAT’S KILLING, no other word, you don’t have to raise the kid, you should because you’re his mother, but it’s not a must, but, again, abortion means killing, you can deny it as much as you want, but this is the simple truth. I heard my baby’s heart beat when I was 6-7 weeks pregnant, so to me, and to many like me, it meant killing if I was to abort my child. It’s time to take responsibility for your actions, as a woman, it’s not a convenient time in your life to have a child, don’t have sex, as simple as that. If more women thought like this, and not acted in a promiscious way, none of this would have happened.

    Talia on July 7, 2012 at 11:02 am

      Amen Talia. You get it 100%!

      NOTHING in life is without consequence. It may be a bummer to not be able to do some things (I am talking about the pre-martial sex and NOT the infanticide (Abortion) but that’s life in the big city and everywhere else.

      Skunky on July 7, 2012 at 11:12 am

If someone says something anti-semitic AND THEN APOLOGIZES, is that PERSON still anti-semitic? Was Truman an anti-semite? He referred to Jews in a crude way, yet he recognized the state of Israel.

Hudson has since apologized for what he calls “hurtful and ugly language.” In a statement posed on the ADL website, Hudson said, “I used images about Jews rooted in the worst anti-Semitism in the past, images that at times led to the persecution and murder of Jews. I can’t tell you where I picked up phrases and descriptions that became part of my vocabulary. I used them without ever considering what they meant.”

Human prefection does not exist despite what the Counselor would have you believe. And, one more thing Counselor, if you’re gonna edit this post, at least have the honesty to admit it.

FrenchKiss on July 6, 2012 at 2:02 pm

Where is Jolie’s concern for gay rights in the muslim countries she embraces?

Too bad she totally lacks the moral clarity of her father.

Laura on July 6, 2012 at 2:06 pm

I have met them both on a couple of occasions. Both were very nice to my kids and were very gracious by signing autographs and posing for photos. They are not political scholars, they are famous movie stars with a butt-load of money. Who cares what the hell they think about anything?

Tasso on July 6, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    Tasso (rhymes with asshole) you’re the type of wimpy vermin I detest even MORE than the Jolie-Pitts because you’re one of those idiots who do NOT judge others on their deeds but how nice they are to YOU. Selfish and weak much?

    I love to see sad sorts like you get their comeuppance by the wicked types of the Jolie-Pitt ilk. It is so satisfying when the poison tail comes and whips you into a stupor…shocking your sensibilities when after all you were cavorting with scorpions all along.

    I am very patient now so I just wait for the time (and it will arrive) when idiots like you are poisoned by the poisonous you openly embrace. Even if I have no popcorn and a frosty soda I will enjoy the show. Anyone who knows you should take a second look at you and exit stage right! You’re not righteous. At all.

    Skunky on July 6, 2012 at 8:53 pm

      You make me warm and tingly in that special place when you talk mean to me. In my job I have to deal with these types. In the case of these two, my wife had dropped off my lunch when they were in my office. My teenage boys were impressed to say the least. If you want to extrapolate that into the next dimension, go for it dear.

      Tasso on July 7, 2012 at 9:03 am

        Tasso (Rhymes with asshole) no one wants to hear you wax poetic on how measly a person you are when you and your stupid family get ga-ga over stupid celebrities. Especially ones setting a poor example for America.

        You and your stupid family sell out in a tawdry and cheap way. That’s nice but I would not brag about it. You’re below the bargain basement.

        Skunky on July 7, 2012 at 10:26 am

According to a report in the Daily Rash, dozens of onlookers watched in horror as Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie threw several of their children over a bridge in Uzbekistan. Apparently the couple has been discarding their children when they reach a certain age. http://www.thedailyrash.com/witnesses-watch-in-horror-as-brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-toss-children-off-bridge

Holly on July 6, 2012 at 3:44 pm

Debbie I think momma Pitt was trying to throw a grenade into camp Jolie-Pitt with that steaming dogpile of a letter. I bet AJ doesn’t even pick up when she calls to check on her biological grandchildren. Meanwhile BP is probably calling Team Holmes to see how to get out of his current hostage situation.

A1 on July 6, 2012 at 7:03 pm

Never forget this narcissist and *maybe* sociopath is good friends with Asma Assad and her horrible husband Bashir al-Assad.

This skanky wench gets away with being soooooo “humanitarian” but the DUMB female fawning freaks can’t see the forest for the trees. If one is gonna give the viperous Skankalina Jolie credit give her credit for knowing that her so-called “humanitarian” acts are NOT for the people she supposedly helps but to make her look good. Sorry, I don’t care what you do…I never give those sorts credit when I know they are narcissistic …but I do give her credit for being so sly and cunning and using those deeds as a “beard”. After all she could be like Paris Hilton and never care to cover up that she doesn’t give a f**k about anyone but herself. Canny Skankelina at least knows to make it look like she is so good (so she can get away with taking some vapid fool’s husband away) so she won’t be judged on her bad.

You’re not thinkin’ if you are taken by her preternatural good looks (although I didn’t realize she had her nose done…) and can’t see her clever sleight of hand. And you’re shallow to boot.

The Jolie-Pitts make me sick and I LOVED this column! Said it all and with no apologies!

Skunky on July 6, 2012 at 8:45 pm

“It’s no mistake that the man’s name goes first in the hyphenated Jolie-Pitt name”

The woman’s last name in all hyphen names goes first. It’s just the way it’s always been done.

dee on July 6, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    Dee, why didn’t you see that DS is calling Skankalina Jolie-Pitt the MAN in the relationship?

    Skankalina is the MAN in that relationship and Brad Pitt(iful) is the FEMALE.

    Skunky on July 6, 2012 at 9:47 pm

@A1 on July 6, 2012 at 7:03 pm
judging from the first picture I’d say you were right.

Fist bump, high five and a kiss on the cheek to the senior Mrs. P (not J-P)
Seems like a very classy lady. A rare treasure these days.

theShadow on July 6, 2012 at 10:21 pm

That picture of Skankelina & Queen Whore Noor grosses me out every time. That should be classified on-line porn. Could you imagine anyone, male or female, kissing that mouth (Noor’s) knowing whose schlong has been in it?

CornCoLeo on July 6, 2012 at 11:26 pm

As CJ noted, Mrs Pitt has just joined Mr Voight in disapproval of their kids’ lifestyle. I do pity the grandkids, though!

Infidel on July 6, 2012 at 11:48 pm

One picture is worth a thousand words and it is very obvious Mrs. Pitt and Angelina are ready for a fight.
By the way Mrs. Pitt, send that boy Brad of yours to either a good Conservative Christian Church or an Orthodox Jewish Synagogue. He might just meet a decent woman in one of these places who can put up with all of the Marxist crap that needs to be flushed out of his system.

Confederate South on July 7, 2012 at 12:57 am

Pitt’s mom has a lot of guts!! She’s great!

Dave on July 7, 2012 at 10:56 am

@Laura – “Where is Jolie’s concern for gay rights in the muslim countries she embraces?”

Excellent point. Or the gay activists’ who are now bashing Pitt’s mother, for that matter.

DS_ROCKS! on July 7, 2012 at 11:37 am

The one thing I cannot stand about the whole abortion issue is the fact that no one ever recognizes or states that there are certain situations where abortion is a necessary evil. If a woman or a young girl is raped or in cases of incest and they choose to have an abortion, are you going to step to their faces and call them murderers? Why should they be ostracized for choosing to have an abortion after those types of situations? First they go through a seriously traumatic situation and then find out they are pregnant and then have to go through the decision process of choosing abortion on top of that. All the while have people “who think they know best” telling them not to, trying to convince them to give it up for adoption, in essence forcing them to re-live that traumatic experience over and over for 9 long months. Then if they do decide to carry and do the adoption thing, what seems to be the norm nowadays? 18/20/30 years in the future, after finally getting over this situation, they get a knock on the door say “hi I’m your kid”. And now they get to relive it all over again and then have to try and explain what happened and their “reason” for choosing adoption. How is that in any way fair to the woman in these situations?
Then in my case, my wife had to have a medically necessary abortion. The pregnancy for all intents and purposes was perfect but it was tubal. My wife had to lose the baby and her tube. What about these kinds of cases? I dare any internet muscled moron to put down the Mountain Dew, change their underwear and step out of their mommy’s basement (my experience with a lot of bloggers) and step up to mine or my wife’s face in person and call her a murderer. I dare ya. Do that you will come close to finding out what murder is.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not for abortion. I do not believe in abortion as a form of birth control because people are to stupid or just brain dead to be responsible and take responsibility. But there ARE instances where this necessary evil has to happen. I wouldn’t have my son or my wife anymore without doing what we had to do. Knowing that it had to happen still did not make it an easy decision.
Sorry, but sometimes I get a little bent on this issue when people do not use their brains (thank the education system and most of, but not all, society for that. Does anyone out there under the age of 30 even know what critical thinking is?)

B: Very few abortions are done because of rape, incest, or medical necessity. It’s a fraction of a fraction. Most abortions are just abortions of what would be healthy babies or babies that the parent selfishly doesn’t want to raise because of health problems or defects. So, when you talk about the lack of critical thinking, tell it to your mirror, if this is the best you can do in arguing in favor of abortion. DS

Biminy on July 7, 2012 at 10:23 pm

    Less than 1% you moron. Wish you knew about paragraphs as much as you do 1% anecdotes.

    Why don’t you take it as a “it goes without saying” that when people like me who are against kindermurder/infanticide/baby killing that we know that there is a 1% a mother’s life or complications means saving the Mum? Because that is the TRUTH.

    Ask any good Mum out there if she would give HER life for her child’s. Most will say YES. And I am speaking of those whose children have been born. Many women get very upset over miscarriages alone let alone electing to suck an innocent baby down a sink. Cut the crap.

    Grow up and see it for what it is. You can be pro-abortion(infanticide) but just have the balls to own it.

    Skunky on July 7, 2012 at 11:21 pm

I’ve been sitting here thinking about what to write in response to being told that I am for abortion and some trollop called Skumky (is your name a reference to you personal hygiene and how you smell?) I guess you think-you-know-it-all regulars who post on here really know everything. I guess I’m supposed to be impressed. I’m not seeing it but maybe I’m too much of a moron or not thinking critically enough.

Ok Skumky, I have the balls to stand by everything I posted. I am NOT for abortion as a form of birth control for people who are careless (weird but I think I posted that already, maybe you should reread my post). I stand by everything else I posted (even the part about idiot bloggers like you in mommy’s basement) because I WILL NOT “take it as it goes without saying” because us “less than 1% or fraction of a fraction” of people who have had to live through both scenarios that I posted (my sister was raped 20 years ago when she was 14 and my wife’s situation happened last year) and not once, NOT ONCE, did any of you 99% pro-life zealots ever accept our situations. Not once did I ever hear anyone in 20 years on this subject ever say “I can understand your position”. No, my sister and my parents were labeled and attacked as murderers because my parents chose not to force my 14 year old sister to go through 9 months of reliving a brutal attack. Not to mention constantly having people call the house with death threats and follow them home or approach them at the doctor’s office trying to convince them to do adoption. They did think about adoption as my parents are not for abortion either but they chose not to because they didn’t want her to have to deal with any aftermath later in life, like that knock on the door and having to relive the whole thing over again. There has not been a day since then that this has not affected my family in some way.

As for my wife and I, we even lost a couple of so called friends over our situation regardless of the fact that a tubal pregnancy is deadly for both the “MUM” and the baby. It was the fact that we had to choose to terminate the pregnancy that mattered the most. Have you ever had to deal with that situation, you pretentious know-it-all twit? The fact that you have to terminate for what is otherwise a healthy pregnancy or you DIE? Not to mention the fact that you have to knowingly kill your baby on top of it? That’s right, I forgot. We are only less than 1% and we don’t matter. We are just a fraction of a fraction. But yet we get lumped in under the pro-abortion umbrella. We always seemed to get kicked to the side and don’t seem to matter and I’m f’n sick of it. Hence why I made the post I made. And yet DS, for all intents, calls me stupid and you, Skumky (yes I have been spelling your name wrong on purpose. I did choose to stoop to your name-calling level) label me a moron. Sorry, I guess the best I can do are 1% anecdotes. But I did try to improve the paragraph thing. I hope that counts for something because I really need your approval because my life won’t mean anything until you, Skumky, can say “huh, maybe he’s not such a moron. He did fix the paragraph thingy I posted about”. :)

Ultimately, F.U. Until either of you have or someone you love has lived through this crap, and has felt the so called “love” from the pro-life crowd and has been lumped in with pro-abortionists and labeled as a murderer, a baby killer and every other pro-life tag out there, STFU.

But I digress, I am just a non-thinking, stupid moron.

Biminy on July 8, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    You’re not only a moron but a boring one. How long did it take you to think of the smell and skunk quip? All day? So original. Never heard that before. *YAWN*

    I read you’re first paragraph and nothing else. You’re a crashing bore. Who cares what you think?

    DS schooled you. If you don’t wanna take what I said to heart (and you should) everyone can see DS told ya in her own words. Boring moron.

    I’m gonna go look at a cement wall and eat some saltines. That’s a party and not at bland, lame and boring as YOU. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

    Skunky on July 8, 2012 at 9:47 pm

Actually it took about a half a second to come up with that one as I was pretty sure you had already heard it before. If you had half a brain you could figured that one out.

All you really are is a sad DS wanna be. How do you breathe with your head so far up DS’s cyber ass? If you are so important and know everything, why don’t you have a blog? Why are you trying to ride on DS’s coat tails? Who knows, maybe you are really DS herself posting as you to say what she really wants to say because she knows she’d get hammered if she posted it as DS. Hmmm…that’s an interesting concept. I’ll have to look deeper into that one. Whatever.

BTW, which Skunky are you? skunky.net or skunky.org (Personally I would lean towards the skunky.org. That seems to fit better but you never know)

Enjoy the saltines. But watch the carbs though the weight is starting to get up there. Really should get out of your Mum’s basement more often. And oh, don’t forget to feed the cats too.

Biminy on July 9, 2012 at 1:33 am

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

    You big bore. Get lost, dummy. Go play with your feces like you usually do.

    Skunky on July 9, 2012 at 1:36 am

Wow you are classy bitch!! Whatever you fucking skank. I normally wouldn’t wish what happened to us on anybody but in your case, I really hope it does.

Biminy on July 9, 2012 at 2:51 pm

Then maybe you might know what compassion and having a heart is really all about. You are one sad individual. Tell your Mum I said hi!! And don’t forget to feed the cats!

Biminy on July 9, 2012 at 2:55 pm

I used to be gay, but over 6? years ago Jesus set me FREE! That’s the? name of my husband’s video? on you tube. We have been married for over 18? months and now I am pregnant? with our first child!? GOD CAN DO ANYTHING! My husband is no longer a slave to the sin of homosexuality, HALLELUJAH! Lord? save President? Obama! Xgay Greg’s Wife, Dede? Haislip

xgaygreg on July 9, 2012 at 6:05 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field