September 23, 2005, - 11:40 am

Affirmative Action Needed for MEN on Campus

By
The absurd gender and race preference policies practiced by our universities have now resulted in the predictable:
THERE ARE FEWER & FEWER MEN IN COLLEGE–and even less male college graduates.
Today’s USA Today Editorial, “Big (Lack of) Men on Campus,” has a graphic with astounding figures. In 2003 57% of bachelor’s degrees were attained by women, only 43% by men. (Same numbers for doctorate degrees.) By 2014, the Department of Education predicts the numbers will be 60% women, 40% men. I think that’s optimistic, and the numbers will likely be even more out of kilter in favor of women.
Where are all those liberal voices–the ones we always hear screaming about “equality”? Deafeningly silent.
Do we really want women taking over the job market from men? Do we want a nation of stay-at-home, Oprah-watching Dads? I don’t think so. I also don’t think we want women dominating college education as professors (which their percentage of doctorates indicates they will). The few men remaining on campus will be educated by feminists who want a matriarchal society and hierarchy.
When phony versions of merit, based on accidents of birth, replace blind standards (like test scores and grades)–everything gets out of whack.
No surprise that, in an “opposing view,” Kim Gandy, President of NOW–the National Organization of Militant Feminist Butch Lesbians Who Want to Rule the World–thinks these numbers are a great thing.
Is it a great thing for men to be in the decline? If you think so, you should probably be reading MoveOn.org or this month’s “O” Magazine.
A nation of men restricted to working-class jobs, prison cells, and diaper changes while cooking dinner–while women run the show–is no paradise. But that’s in the future, if these figures continue. Is it right that men–who make up the majority of the armed services–are passed over by women with less stellar grades and test scores, who get gender preferences in admissions?
Time to get rid of preferences for women–and give men a boost, for a change.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , ,

September 23, 2005, - 6:42 am

Jewish Republicans Host Islamic Terror Supporter

By
Why is a prominent Jewish Republican group hosting a supporter of Islamic terrorism and enemy of Israel?
That’s a good question. And one that has been asked before of the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) and its Los Angeles branch. The RJC is the Jewish arm of the Republican Party and was a prominent part of the Bush re-election campaign.
On Monday, September 26, the RJC will be proudly hosting California Director of Finance Tom Campbell.
While the RJC shirked its responsibility of objecting when Campbell was appointed to this position by Governor Schwarzenegger in November, it is more outrageous that the Jewish group is now hosting this man.
Why?
Because Tom Campbell has been and remains an unapologetic opponent of Israel, and–worse–an unapologetic supporter of Islamic Jihad’s front-man in America. As a U.S. Congressman, Campbell also employed anti-Semitic, Islamic terror supporters (with connections to Al-Qaeda) in key positions and accepted campaign contributions from those tied to terror.


Islamic Jihad-enabling Tom Campbell

Read the rest of this entry »

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 22, 2005, - 2:15 pm

Jihad Barbie is Big Mid-East Seller (Esp. in Terrorist Syria); But Forbidden under Strict Islam

By
Jihad . . . er, Hijab Barbie is a big seller in the Mid-East, according to The New York Times. Especially, in terrorist-dominated Damascus, Syria.
Syria is on the State Dept. Terrorist list and is home to assorted Islamic terrorist groups’ headquarters and officials. For instance, it is home to the only surviving Munich Olympic terrorist, Jamil Al-Gashey.
The thing that strikes me about this Islamic Barbie–named “Fulla”–is that nowhere in the list of “Muslim values” mentioned by her creator is there a love of peace, an acceptance of other religions, or an appreciation for the right of non-Muslims to live and worship wherever they want without the fear of being blown up when they go out for pizza (Sbarro), coffee, or beer (Mike’s Bar).
Another reason it’s interesting that Fulla’s creator claims the doll has “Muslim values” is that dolls that are complete like Barbie aren’t allowed. The article says Fulla shares Barbie’s proportions. Religious Muslims know that a complete doll–as Fulla appears to be–is haram (Arabic for “forbidden”) under strict Islamic sharia law. Unless, a part of the human body is missing on the doll, the doll is not halal (permitted). Otherwise, it is considered idol worship.


The article mentions that Fulla is based in Syria and all over the place in Egypt, Jordan, and Qatar. But all four of these nations are ruled by more secular Islamic leaders. A complete doll would NOT be allowed in, say, fundamentalist Saudi Arabia–where the Muttawa (religious police) run the show.
Syria’s rulers, the Assads, are al-Alaween (Alawis; also “Alawite”). They are a very small and odd minority in Islam (and in Syria, where they rule with an iron fist over the majority) which celebrates some Christian holidays. Maybe that is why they allow Fulla to be produced and sold there.
There’s probably no Corvette for Hijab Barbie, since she’s probably not allowed to drive in some countries ruled by her religion, and Osama Bin Ken is too busy building a homicide belt to drive her. No Presidential Barbie, either, since Hijab Barbie is not allowed to vote in many Islamic countries.
Here are a few Barbie’s that would be likely be halal and even bigger sellers with our friends in the Islamic Middle East:
* Evil Zionist Barbie (Oops, I forgot, Saudi Arabia already said that all Barbies fit this description and are proscribed, because Barbie was invented by a Jewish American woman a/k/a evil Zionist.)
* Jihad Ken
* Dead American Infidel Barbie w/her companion Beheaded American Ken (video not included; watch Al-Jazeera for details)
* Cindy Sheehan Barbie (no explanation necessary)
Tip from: Drudge

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 22, 2005, - 6:42 am

Bad “Flight Plan”: Jodie Foster Film Defames Air Marshals, Flight Attendants

By
It’s been four years of bad news for flight attendants.
First, 9/11 happened. Then, they were laid off. With airline bankruptcies like Northwest’s, they are being laid off again.
Now, in another blow, the movie, “Flight Plan,” is hitting theaters, tomorrow. Starring Jodie Foster, it’s an outrageous piece of propaganda and incredible display of the irresponsible.
I’m embarrassed to say that a very distant cousin of mine–Charles J.D. Schlissel–is executive producer of this outrage. The J.D. must stand for “Just Despicable.” If you’re a freedom-loving American like me, the rotten tricks of this movie will disgust you.
If you want to sicken yourself and see “Flight Plan,” stop reading here. But if you want to save ten bucks, keep going.
SPOILER ALERT
Throughout “Flight Plan,” we are given hints–very strong hints–that four Muslim Arabs are the terrorists on the plane. But in the end–breaking a cardinal rule of thrillers–the hints have no pay-off.
Instead, the terrorists are the flight’s air marshal and a flight attendant.
That is an outrage for a number of reasons. Two of those reasons are Betty Ong and . Both were among the many flight attendants who gave their lives on 9/11.
They weren’t terrorists. They were American heroes. Instead of calling their families to say good-bye, they contacted ground crews and identified the hijackers. It was because of them that authorities were able to identify Mohammad Atta and his 18 thugs as Al Qaeda.
Other flight attendants were brutally murdered by the hijackers, who slit their throats.
And now Jodie Foster and Charles J. D. Schlissel have the chutzpah to portray these low-paid workers as terrorists?!
Sickening.


Jodie Foster: Hears (and Sees) No Evil with Muslim Terrorists;

Defames Federal Air Marshals, Flight Attendants

When I described the plot of this “film” to Lori Bassani–spokeswoman for the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, and a flight attendant, herself–she said, “That is so irresponsible.”
“The portrayal of flight attendants in this movie demonstrates an
insensitive and flagrant disregard for the very real challenges facing
the front line of defense (the flight attendants) on any aircraft in an emergency situation,” Bassani added. “Should there be another 9/11, it would be critical for the cabin crew to have the support of their passengers, not the distrust that this movie may engender. Our fellow crewmembers who perished in the line of duty deserve more respect.”
Yes, they do.
The flight attendant terrorist in this film is a conspirator in the murder of a passenger’s (Jodie Foster’s) husband; tries to murder the passenger and beats her with a large flashlight; helps kidnap the passenger’s daughter and lace the plane with explosives; commits fraud with the passenger manifest; and steals the passenger’s daughter’s boarding pass.
Flight attendants who are not terrorists are also portrayed harshly in this film. They are arrogant, cold and uncaring, and lazy. When Foster’s daughter disappears, they are rude, don’t seem to care, and resent having to look for the daughter. Two of them, who are supposed to be in a frantic search for the daughter in the plane’s hull, are making out there, instead.
Then, there are the Federal Air Marshals. This movie is a huge blow to their image, especially.
Is it more likely that a dedicated, patriotic American–who goes through a lot of federal training to serve his/her country and get security to carry a gun on board–would be a terrorist hijacker . . . or four suspicious-looking, strange-acting Arab Muslims?
“Flight Plan” wants you to think the former.
It is bad enough that, until recently, Federal Air Marshals were forced to dress in suits and engage in other behavior that made their identities very obtrusive to the flying public and easy marks for potential terrorists.
Being a Federal Air Marshal is tough work. It involves a lot of flying–until recently, with little recuperation time–to nowhere for no reason–certainly not the salary. Federal Air Marshals got no respect from Homeland Security and their DHS sub-agency, ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement).
Now, there is “Flight Plan.”
The Federal Air Marshal in this movie (played by Peter Sarsgaard) kills a passenger’s (Jodie Foster) husband in Germany so he can smuggle explosives onto the flight in the dead man’s coffin; laces the plane with explosives; kidnaps the passenger’s daughter; hides her in the nose of the plane; steals the daughter’s boarding pass and commits fraud with the plane’s passenger manifest (with the flight attendant); demands $50 million; and tries to kill the passenger and her daughter.
Does this sound like a plot that will command respect for Federal Air Marshals on board your next flight? Didn’t think so.
Then there are “Flight Plan’s” suspicious Arab Muslim passengers. Schlissel and his production crew want you to question your suspicions of Arab Muslims, to think you are unfair and prejudiced.
That is the real message of this movie.
Schlissel picks four of the most fearsome looking actors (one of them is, in real life, Assaf Cohen, a Sephardic Jew–you know, the Jews who were kicked out of the Arab and Muslim countries they once called home). We know they are Muslim because when they depart the plane, the women accompanying them are wearing hijabs (head-scarves).
Each one of these Arab Muslim passengers looks more like Mohammed Atta than the next. And they were cast that way on purpose. Ditto for the knowing looks between them that imply they are about the hijack the plane–all done to that “evil villain” music scored in the background.
In the end, when they are innocent, and we–the evil viewers, for suspecting them–must feel guilty for wrongfully indicting them in our minds. In fact, the main Muslim Arab is so nice he even hands Jodie Foster her purse after the whole ordeal–in which she falsely accused him of being a terrorist–is over. Whatta guy. How touching.
This is the latest in a series of Hollywood releases where the terrorists are neither Muslim nor Arab. We can’t have that–because it might actually resemble reality.
Easy prediction: “Flight Plan” will score accolades and image awards from Islamist groups like CAIR and MPAC.
It’s bad enough that FBI Director Robert Mueller tried to dishonor Madeleine Amy Sweeney–one of the heroic, murdered flight attendants from 9/11–by (since revoked) along with Sweeney.
But Mueller tried to imply that the flight attendants were morally equivalent to Islamic terrorists.
This movie says they are worse.
Send Hollywood, Jodie Foster, and my cousin a different message. Boycott “Flight Plan.”
***UPDATE: In the same vein, Ms. Foster is set to play Nazi film propagandist in an upcoming movie glorifying that nauseating Nazi conspirator to genocide. Foster says Riefenstahl–who used concentration camp inmates as movie extras–was a good person, who was “libeled.” Right. Nazis and Extremist Muslims, Good; Air Marshals and Flight Attendants, Bad. We get it.
And John Hinckley tried to murder a President to impress THIS woman?!

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 21, 2005, - 5:23 pm

Buh-Bye: Kudos to Designers for Dumping Cokehead Model

By
Finally, fashion companies are taking a stand against illegal drugs. First H&M, and now Chanel and Burberry, are saying Buh-Bye! to admitted cokehead model, Kate Moss.


Kate Moss: Buh-Bye, she snorted.

Now, if we could only get fashion companies to take the same stand when their spokesmodels endorse Palestinian terrorism, like . . .

Latest SpokesSkank for St. John & Palestinian Terrorists

Read the full Post


Tags: , ,

September 21, 2005, - 4:32 pm

Welcome to America: Harvard Law Discovers 1st Amendment

By
You know those pronouncements we always hear emanating from the mouths of university deans and college presidents? The ones about how universities are the bastions of free speech, the open range of ideas.
Don’t believe it . . . until they give unfettered free access to military recruiters and their free speech.
Harvard Law School apparently just discovered the First Amendment and will allow the military to recruit there.
But it’s not out of the goodness of the elitist Crimson ivy-heads’ cold hearts. It’s because the school might lose federal grants and funds–an issue soon to be decided by the Supreme Court.
Remember, John LeBoutillier got it right with the title of his book. Harvard Hates America. And so do the other universities that have yet to follow Harvard Law’s current lead.
(Full, proud disclosure: My father is an Army veteran, and my great-uncle was a career Army man. My cousin, an Air Force Academy grad, recently returned from serving in Iraq.)

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , ,

September 21, 2005, - 6:45 am

Desperate ICE-Wives: Who is Julie Myers?

By
Remember President Bush’s Saturday speech at the White House, after Katrina struck?
Behind him to his left was failed Homeland Security chief and lawyer Michael Chertoff. But to his right was Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
I remember thinking: If only Bush had appointed a military or law enforcement type like Gen. Myers, to head up Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)–the most important law enforcement agency in the War on Terror–instead of his niece, Julie L. Myers. Julie Myers is another lawyer like Chertoff, inept and inexperienced when it comes to law enforcement.
The White House claims that Ms. Myers is “well-known and respected throughout the law enforcement community.”
Wrong. As one ICE agent wrote me, “What a joke of a nomination!”
Chuck Showalter, President of the National Homeland Security Council, the union for 22,000 DHS (and 7,800 ICE) employees, told me, “I haven’t seen anything to show that she is qualified. . . . My members are worried about whether they will have someone on top that can support them.” He said DHS employees are tired of “program managers with no experience” and want someone with a law enforcement or military background. Myers has none.
I’ve been hearing , since April, when it was apparent ICE chief Michael Garcia would leave, and Julie Myers would get the job.
They wondered what this 36-year-old’s credentials were–besides being General Myers’ niece and the bed partner of Chertoff’s Chief of Staff (to whom she was then engaged and is now married). The clueless Myers needed days and days of tutoring from ICE executive management for her .


Julie L. Myers, ICE Sachem Wannabe

Read the rest of this entry »

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 20, 2005, - 1:49 pm

HOprah Watch: Oprah, the Store Was CLOSED!

By
Yes, I did see the Oprah “Hermes Kowtow/Look at Me, I’m Giving $10 Mill” show, yesterday. And I wasn’t going to write about it, because I figured everyone else would be.
But, due to popular demand, I’ve changed my mind. Basically four things happened on the show (besides Jennifer Aniston, about whom we DON’T care):
1) Oprah announced that Hermes wasn’t closed, but “they were in the process of being closed.” Hello, HOprah . . . that means the store was CLOOOOOSED!
2) Oprah announced that it is now okay to buy an Hermes Birkin Bag (an $8,000 purse–Thanks for the tip, Oprah, that this average-priced item is now off the HOprah prohibited purchase list) because Hermes USA’s president came on the show to personally apologize to the Almighty, Her Excellency, Queen HOprah, and because everyone who now works for the company must undergo “sensitivity training.” That means: If you work for Hermes and you are “in the process of closing,” you must stop everything for a haughty celebrity who is a minority; for all Whites and average people, the store is still closed.


HOprah with Friend

Kanye “George Bush Doesn’t Care About Black People” West

3) Billionaire Oprah announced that she is donating “$10 million of my own money” to Hurricane Katrina relief. Why did she have to announce it? Would she have donated this relative drop in the bucket without the publicity? Don’t count on it.
4) Billionaire Oprah asked the average stay-at-home Oprah viewer to help her. “But I need your help” in buying stuff for the homes of the victims, she announced. She needs out help? Why can’t she donate a little more out of her billions and take care of it herself? And why did this take three weeks, while doing her “Look at ME on the Watery Dead Bodies with My Celeb Buddies” shows from New Orleans and Houston, took only a week?
Oprah announced that corporations can donate through her modestly-named “Angel Network,” too. No, corporations don’t want to get the recognition, themselves. They’d rather donate to Oprah and let her get the credit for their money, right?

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

September 20, 2005, - 12:05 pm

Mid-East Darwin Award Winner of the Day

By
Well, no-one accused our Jihadist friends of always being smart.
A Lebanese security guard in Kuwait’s “information” (I call it propaganda; they call it “information”) office–part of Kuwaiti Embassy operations in Beirut–died while playing with a hand grenade.
It’s kind of the literal enactment of the “You play with matches, you get burned” saying. The grenade exploded, and two other Lebanese employees of the Kuwaiti government were injured.
What was a hand grenade doing in the Kuwaiti “information” offices in Lebanon? Kuwaiti officials claim they kept the grenade in the office as a “souvenir” from Lebanon’s civil war. Right.
As one of my favorite sources of news regarding Lebanon, Ya Libnan, suggests, maybe the explosion had something to do with a Kuwaiti newspaper report on how Syrian intelligence chief (and Syrian President Assad’s Brother-in-Law) is trying to work a deal with French President Chirac to avoid any questioning of (and blame upon) Syrian officials in the assassination of Lebanon’s Rafiq Hariri.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 20, 2005, - 9:53 am

Peaceful Muslim E-mail of the Day: From A Follower of U.S. Muslim Leader Muzammil Siddiqi

By
I got this one in response to my and on Muzammil Siddiqi, American Muslim leader, former long-time head of the Islamic Society of North America, and Islamic terror supporter–and Siddiqi’s former student, Adam Gadahn, now Al Qaeda’s new “Death to America” video spokesman. So, Islam is the Religion of Peace, huh? Read this, and see if you agree. . . .
— Belal Simjee BaseballFiend82@hotmail.com wrote:


Belal Simjee:

Hate-Mail Writer, Liar & Reporter for Cal State-Fullerton’s Daily Titan

> From: “Belal Simjee” BaseballFiend82@hotmail.com
> To: dschlussel@yahoo.com
> Subject: RE: Your misiterpretations of Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:48:11 -0700
>
> You must be the most god damn, stupidest, ignorant
> bitch around. Dr. Siddiqi teaches what Islam
> teaches, what is basically echoed in every faith,
> the globalization of each person’s individual faith.
> Christianity rules America, Judaism rules Israel
> you fucking moron. And in each case, both faiths
> want to become global andf rule the world, just like
> Islam and every other religion around. And the fact
> that you claim Siddiqi preached Jihad…he was
> talking about anything…if it’s standing up for
> justice, it’s worth dying for. That was the
> principal behind the American revolution, so does
> that mean our country was founded on terrorism on
> England? Absolutely not! You are a fucking moron,
> and I will be damned to allow you to smear the name
> of a good man. I will bring this website and its
> content up to Siddiqi and ask him his views on how
> he protrays your skank ass. And who knows, with
> being a journalism major, I will see if I can’t find
> anything libelous in what you’ve written.
>
> Hope you get some fucking sense in yer head some
> day…
***UPDATE: See Comments section. Thanks to “NJBeachbum” and “Yiddish Steel,” we discovered Belal Simjee is a student at Cal-State Fullerton and a “reporter” for its Daily Titan. E-mails to his editor, Nicole M. Smith, were met with her gullible (and phony) response that a friend wrote Simjee’s letter from Simjee’s e-mail address. Right. Deny. Deny. Deny. Belal. Simjee.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , ,